Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

436308

registered interest
date	08/12/2015
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Ministry of Justice: Redundancy
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to paragraph 2.149 of the Spending Review, where he expects job cuts in his Department; and how many such jobs he expects to be cut.
tabling member constituency	Caerphilly
tabling member printed	Wayne David
uin	19207
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/12/2015 answer text <p>The Secretary of State for Justice has set out his vision for a one nation justice system, with swift and certain justice in a reformed courts system and transformed prisons that become places of rehabilitation, not just incarceration. Those on the frontline will be empowered to make the right decisions for those who use their services.</p><br /><p>This means a smaller and smarter Whitehall department with less bureaucracy, including savings which do not impact on staff numbers, such as changes to our estate, our major contracts and better use of technology.</p><br /><p>We also expect to reduce headquarters and administrative headcount and costs over the course of the parliament. This will include reduced reliance on contractors and contingent labour and fewer staff based in expensive London premises.</p><br /><p>Final decisions on the scale of staff reductions have not yet been reached.</p> answering member constituency Esher and Walton answering member printed Dominic Raab question first answered 14/12/2015 14:12:46 answering member 4007 label Biography information for Dominic Raab
tabling member	1398 label Biography information for Wayne David

436309

registered interest
date	08/12/2015
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Personal Injury: Compensation
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to paragraph 1.143 of the Spending Review and Autumn Statement 2015, what the evidential basis is for the statement that whiplash claims cost the country £2 billion per year.
tabling member constituency	Caerphilly
tabling member printed	Wayne David
uin	19208
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/12/2015 answer text <p>The government received and analysed data from numerous sources when formulating the announcement in the Chancellor’s Autumn Statement. The quoted figures were arrived at by combining published industry estimates along with data from government and other sources.</p> answering member constituency Esher and Walton answering member printed Dominic Raab question first answered 14/12/2015 14:17:18 answering member 4007 label Biography information for Dominic Raab
tabling member	1398 label Biography information for Wayne David

436313

registered interest
date	08/12/2015
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Prisons: Construction
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 8 December 2015 to Question 18626, what estimate he has made of the average cost of (a) the five new prisons planned to be open in the current Parliament and (b) the four new prisons planned to open after the current Parliament; and what estimate he has made of the average time that will be taken from application for planning permission to completion in each such set of such prisons.
tabling member constituency	Wellingborough
tabling member printed	Mr Peter Bone
uin	19179
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/12/2015 answer text <p>I refer my hon. Friend to the answer given to PQ 18626 on 8 December 2015.</p> answering member constituency South West Bedfordshire answering member printed Andrew Selous question first answered 14/12/2015 12:42:43 answering member 1453 label Biography information for Andrew Selous
tabling member	1581 label Biography information for Mr Peter Bone

436316

registered interest
date	08/12/2015
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Criminal Proceedings: Fees and Charges
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the administrative costs was of implementing and enforcing the criminal courts charge; and what the projected cost of administering that charge is in each of the next three years.
tabling member constituency	Hampstead and Kilburn
tabling member printed	Tulip Siddiq
uin	19256
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/12/2015 answer text <p>The costs of the criminal courts charge implementation project were £534,760.</p><br /><p>The cost of enforcing the criminal courts charge cannot be separated from the total cost of enforcing all types of court ordered financial impositions. No additional resources have been allocated to the National Compliance and Enforcement Service within HMCTS specifically as a result of the criminal courts charge.</p> answering member constituency North West Cambridgeshire answering member printed Mr Shailesh Vara question first answered 14/12/2015 13:22:41 answering member 1496 label Biography information for Shailesh Vara
tabling member	4518 label Biography information for Tulip Siddiq

436321

registered interest
date	08/12/2015
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Fines: Surcharges
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the value is of victims' surcharge (a) imposed, (b) collected, (c) cancelled and (d) outstanding in each financial year since 2010.
tabling member constituency	Hammersmith
tabling member printed	Andy Slaughter
uin	19285
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/12/2015 answer text <p>The table below shows the value of victim surcharge orders imposed, collected, cancelled and outstanding since April 2011.</p><br /><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="2"><p><strong>Victim Surcharge</strong></p></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><p><br></p></td><td><p><strong>Victim surcharge imposed</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Value of victim surcharge collected in the same year of imposition</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Value of victim surcharge cancelled in the same year of imposition (administrative and legal cancellations) </strong><strong>1</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Value of victim surcharge outsanding at end of year of imposition</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total value of victim surcharge collected regardless of imposition date </strong><strong>2</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total value of victim surcharge administratively cancelled regardless of imposition date 3</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total value of victim surcharge legally cancelled regardless of imposition date 3</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total value of victim surcharge outstanding regardless of imposition date </strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010/11</p></td><td colspan="5"><p>Data is only available in this format from April 2011 onwards 4</p></td><td><p>£501,887</p></td><td><p>£473,116</p></td><td><p>£7,219,000</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011/12</p></td><td><p>£12,199,956</p></td><td><p>£6,810,532</p></td><td><p>£645,381</p></td><td><p>£4,744,043</p></td><td><p>£10,281,567</p></td><td><p>£1,355,514</p></td><td><p>£1,163,017</p></td><td><p>£10,121,000</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012/13</p></td><td><p>£15,508,307</p></td><td><p>£7,607,886</p></td><td><p>£888,027</p></td><td><p>£7,012,395</p></td><td><p>£10,517,641</p></td><td><p>£1,605,519</p></td><td><p>£1,384,779</p></td><td><p>£12,084,000</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013/14</p></td><td><p>£33,726,535</p></td><td><p>£15,343,460</p></td><td><p>£2,265,389</p></td><td><p>£16,117,686</p></td><td><p>£19,548,368</p></td><td><p>£2,395,662</p></td><td><p>£2,937,982</p></td><td><p>£21,110,000</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014/15</p></td><td><p>£38,631,424</p></td><td><p>£17,302,260</p></td><td><p>£2,350,532</p></td><td><p>£18,978,631</p></td><td><p>£24,569,735</p></td><td><p>£2,362,914</p></td><td><p>£3,711,748</p></td><td><p>£29,381,000</p></td></tr></tbody></table><br /> <br /><p>The HMCTS Trust Statement also provides financial information on fines, victim surcharge and other types of financial impositions ordered in the criminal courts for each financial year since 2010-11.</p><br /><p>It is not possible to subdivide the value of victims’ surcharge imposed, collected and cancelled into the categories of adults, youths and organisations nor report on how many times the victims’ surcharge was imposed, collected and cancelled for various sentences; to do so would incur disproportionate cost.</p><br /> <br /><p>Data notes:</p><p>1. The value of victim surcharge that was cancelled in the same year of imposition cannot be broken down into administrative and legal cancellations.</p><p>2. The ‘total value of victim surcharge collected in a year’ includes the ‘value of victim surcharge collected in the same year of imposition.</p><p>3. The figures representing the total value of victim surcharge administratively cancelled include the values of those victim surcharge impositions administratively cancelled in the same year of imposition. Impositions are only administratively cancelled in accordance with a strict criteria. Legal cancellations occur after the case has been reconsidered by a Judge or Magistrate.</p><p>4. The reporting functionality from which this data has been extracted has only been in existence since April 2011 and it is not possible to break the data for 2010 down in the same format.</p> answering member constituency Hemel Hempstead answering member printed Mike Penning grouped question UIN 19165 19286 19287 question first answered 14/12/2015 15:05:28 answering member 1528 label Biography information for Sir Mike Penning
tabling member	1516 label Biography information for Andy Slaughter

436322

registered interest
date	08/12/2015
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Fines: Surcharges
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the value is of victims' surcharge (a) imposed, (b) collected, (c) cancelled and (d) outstanding for (i) adults, (ii) youths and (iii) organisations in each financial year since 2010.
tabling member constituency	Hammersmith
tabling member printed	Andy Slaughter
uin	19286
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/12/2015 answer text <p>The table below shows the value of victim surcharge orders imposed, collected, cancelled and outstanding since April 2011.</p><br /><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="2"><p><strong>Victim Surcharge</strong></p></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><p><br></p></td><td><p><strong>Victim surcharge imposed</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Value of victim surcharge collected in the same year of imposition</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Value of victim surcharge cancelled in the same year of imposition (administrative and legal cancellations) </strong><strong>1</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Value of victim surcharge outsanding at end of year of imposition</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total value of victim surcharge collected regardless of imposition date </strong><strong>2</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total value of victim surcharge administratively cancelled regardless of imposition date 3</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total value of victim surcharge legally cancelled regardless of imposition date 3</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total value of victim surcharge outstanding regardless of imposition date </strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010/11</p></td><td colspan="5"><p>Data is only available in this format from April 2011 onwards 4</p></td><td><p>£501,887</p></td><td><p>£473,116</p></td><td><p>£7,219,000</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011/12</p></td><td><p>£12,199,956</p></td><td><p>£6,810,532</p></td><td><p>£645,381</p></td><td><p>£4,744,043</p></td><td><p>£10,281,567</p></td><td><p>£1,355,514</p></td><td><p>£1,163,017</p></td><td><p>£10,121,000</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012/13</p></td><td><p>£15,508,307</p></td><td><p>£7,607,886</p></td><td><p>£888,027</p></td><td><p>£7,012,395</p></td><td><p>£10,517,641</p></td><td><p>£1,605,519</p></td><td><p>£1,384,779</p></td><td><p>£12,084,000</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013/14</p></td><td><p>£33,726,535</p></td><td><p>£15,343,460</p></td><td><p>£2,265,389</p></td><td><p>£16,117,686</p></td><td><p>£19,548,368</p></td><td><p>£2,395,662</p></td><td><p>£2,937,982</p></td><td><p>£21,110,000</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014/15</p></td><td><p>£38,631,424</p></td><td><p>£17,302,260</p></td><td><p>£2,350,532</p></td><td><p>£18,978,631</p></td><td><p>£24,569,735</p></td><td><p>£2,362,914</p></td><td><p>£3,711,748</p></td><td><p>£29,381,000</p></td></tr></tbody></table><br /> <br /><p>The HMCTS Trust Statement also provides financial information on fines, victim surcharge and other types of financial impositions ordered in the criminal courts for each financial year since 2010-11.</p><br /><p>It is not possible to subdivide the value of victims’ surcharge imposed, collected and cancelled into the categories of adults, youths and organisations nor report on how many times the victims’ surcharge was imposed, collected and cancelled for various sentences; to do so would incur disproportionate cost.</p><br /> <br /><p>Data notes:</p><p>1. The value of victim surcharge that was cancelled in the same year of imposition cannot be broken down into administrative and legal cancellations.</p><p>2. The ‘total value of victim surcharge collected in a year’ includes the ‘value of victim surcharge collected in the same year of imposition.</p><p>3. The figures representing the total value of victim surcharge administratively cancelled include the values of those victim surcharge impositions administratively cancelled in the same year of imposition. Impositions are only administratively cancelled in accordance with a strict criteria. Legal cancellations occur after the case has been reconsidered by a Judge or Magistrate.</p><p>4. The reporting functionality from which this data has been extracted has only been in existence since April 2011 and it is not possible to break the data for 2010 down in the same format.</p> answering member constituency Hemel Hempstead answering member printed Mike Penning grouped question UIN 19165 19285 19287 question first answered 14/12/2015 15:05:29 answering member 1528 label Biography information for Sir Mike Penning
tabling member	1516 label Biography information for Andy Slaughter

436323

registered interest
date	08/12/2015
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Fines: Surcharges
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the total is of (a) uncollected and (b) cancelled victims' surcharges.
tabling member constituency	Hammersmith
tabling member printed	Andy Slaughter
uin	19287
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/12/2015 answer text <p>The table below shows the value of victim surcharge orders imposed, collected, cancelled and outstanding since April 2011.</p><br /><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="2"><p><strong>Victim Surcharge</strong></p></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td><td></td></tr><tr><td><p><br></p></td><td><p><strong>Victim surcharge imposed</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Value of victim surcharge collected in the same year of imposition</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Value of victim surcharge cancelled in the same year of imposition (administrative and legal cancellations) </strong><strong>1</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Value of victim surcharge outsanding at end of year of imposition</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total value of victim surcharge collected regardless of imposition date </strong><strong>2</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total value of victim surcharge administratively cancelled regardless of imposition date 3</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total value of victim surcharge legally cancelled regardless of imposition date 3</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total value of victim surcharge outstanding regardless of imposition date </strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010/11</p></td><td colspan="5"><p>Data is only available in this format from April 2011 onwards 4</p></td><td><p>£501,887</p></td><td><p>£473,116</p></td><td><p>£7,219,000</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011/12</p></td><td><p>£12,199,956</p></td><td><p>£6,810,532</p></td><td><p>£645,381</p></td><td><p>£4,744,043</p></td><td><p>£10,281,567</p></td><td><p>£1,355,514</p></td><td><p>£1,163,017</p></td><td><p>£10,121,000</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012/13</p></td><td><p>£15,508,307</p></td><td><p>£7,607,886</p></td><td><p>£888,027</p></td><td><p>£7,012,395</p></td><td><p>£10,517,641</p></td><td><p>£1,605,519</p></td><td><p>£1,384,779</p></td><td><p>£12,084,000</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013/14</p></td><td><p>£33,726,535</p></td><td><p>£15,343,460</p></td><td><p>£2,265,389</p></td><td><p>£16,117,686</p></td><td><p>£19,548,368</p></td><td><p>£2,395,662</p></td><td><p>£2,937,982</p></td><td><p>£21,110,000</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014/15</p></td><td><p>£38,631,424</p></td><td><p>£17,302,260</p></td><td><p>£2,350,532</p></td><td><p>£18,978,631</p></td><td><p>£24,569,735</p></td><td><p>£2,362,914</p></td><td><p>£3,711,748</p></td><td><p>£29,381,000</p></td></tr></tbody></table><br /> <br /><p>The HMCTS Trust Statement also provides financial information on fines, victim surcharge and other types of financial impositions ordered in the criminal courts for each financial year since 2010-11.</p><br /><p>It is not possible to subdivide the value of victims’ surcharge imposed, collected and cancelled into the categories of adults, youths and organisations nor report on how many times the victims’ surcharge was imposed, collected and cancelled for various sentences; to do so would incur disproportionate cost.</p><br /> <br /><p>Data notes:</p><p>1. The value of victim surcharge that was cancelled in the same year of imposition cannot be broken down into administrative and legal cancellations.</p><p>2. The ‘total value of victim surcharge collected in a year’ includes the ‘value of victim surcharge collected in the same year of imposition.</p><p>3. The figures representing the total value of victim surcharge administratively cancelled include the values of those victim surcharge impositions administratively cancelled in the same year of imposition. Impositions are only administratively cancelled in accordance with a strict criteria. Legal cancellations occur after the case has been reconsidered by a Judge or Magistrate.</p><p>4. The reporting functionality from which this data has been extracted has only been in existence since April 2011 and it is not possible to break the data for 2010 down in the same format.</p> answering member constituency Hemel Hempstead answering member printed Mike Penning grouped question UIN 19165 19285 19286 question first answered 14/12/2015 15:05:29 answering member 1528 label Biography information for Sir Mike Penning
tabling member	1516 label Biography information for Andy Slaughter

436324

registered interest
date	08/12/2015
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Personal Injury: Compensation
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many whiplash claims there have been in each of the last five years.
tabling member constituency	Caerphilly
tabling member printed	Wayne David
uin	19270
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/12/2015 answer text <p>Government data is compiled by the Compensation Recovery Unit at the Department for Work and Pensions. The figures for the number of whiplash claims are shown in the table below:</p><table><thead><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total Motor PI Claims</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total Whiplash (including claims for neck and back)</strong></p></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><p>2010/11</p></td><td><p>790,000</p></td><td><p>740,000</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011/12</p></td><td><p>830,000</p></td><td><p>760,000</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012/13</p></td><td><p>820,000</p></td><td><p>750,000</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013/14</p></td><td><p>770,000</p></td><td><p>700,000</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014/15</p></td><td><p>760,000</p></td><td><p>690,000</p></td></tr></tbody></table><br /><p>The Government remains concerned about the number of claims and the impact they have on motor insurance premiums. Despite an overall decrease since 2011/12, claims volumes are still at historically high levels, being some 50% higher than in 2006. In his Autumn Statement the Chancellor therefore announced tough new measures to control costs and reduce the number of unnecessary whiplash claims made.</p> answering member constituency Esher and Walton answering member printed Dominic Raab question first answered 14/12/2015 14:08:25 answering member 4007 label Biography information for Dominic Raab
tabling member	1398 label Biography information for Wayne David

436325

registered interest
date	08/12/2015
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
hansard heading	Prisons: Location
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment his Department has made of the effect on families of prisoners of the sale of inner-city prisons and their replacement with out of town buildings.
tabling member constituency	Caerphilly
tabling member printed	Wayne David
uin	19271
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/12/2015 answer text <p>In looking at our strategy for the future configuration of the prison estate, we will consider a range of factors including the ability of families to access visits. Beyond the closure of HMP Holloway, no decision on further closures, or where any new prisons will be sited, has been made.</p> answering member constituency South West Bedfordshire answering member printed Andrew Selous question first answered 14/12/2015 12:36:48 answering member 1453 label Biography information for Andrew Selous
tabling member	1398 label Biography information for Wayne David