Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1181836
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-03-02more like thismore than 2020-03-02
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office remove filter
hansard heading Police: Biometrics more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government, what assessment they have made of the finding by the Scottish Parliament that there was "no justification" for Police Scotland to use facial recognition technology; and why police in London and South Wales continue to use live facial recognition surveillance. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Strasburger more like this
uin HL2098 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-03-16more like thismore than 2020-03-16
answer text <ol><li>The Written Answer (HL1336) is not inconsistent with the press release from the Metropolitan Police. It referred to the results from the trials, which finished last year, and not the recent deployments of live facial recognition technology.</li><li>Those are matters for the Scottish Parliament, the Metropolitan Police Service and South Wales Police, which are all independent of the Government. The Government supports the police using new technologies like facial recognition to protect the public in accordance with the law.</li></ol> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Williams of Trafford more like this
grouped question UIN HL2097 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-03-16T16:55:06.53Zmore like thismore than 2020-03-16T16:55:06.53Z
answering member
4311
label Biography information for Baroness Williams of Trafford more like this
tabling member
4204
label Biography information for Lord Strasburger more like this