Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1545849
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-11-28more like thismore than 2022-11-28
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence remove filter
hansard heading Royal Navy: Pitcairn Islands more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, when a Royal Navy ship last visited Pitcairn Island (a) to patrol UK waters and (b) in any other capacity. more like this
tabling member constituency Romford more like this
tabling member printed
Andrew Rosindell more like this
uin 97462 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-12-01more like thismore than 2022-12-01
answer text <p>HMS Spey visited Pitcairn in February 2022 delivering COVID vaccines and dental care as part of its duties as one of the two Royal Navy Offshore Patrol Vessels deployed in the Indo-Pacific. In addition, Spey conducted patrols in the waters around the islands in the Pitcairn chain to deter and defend against illegal fishing and to carry out environmental monitoring.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Wells more like this
answering member printed James Heappey more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-12-01T10:57:15.13Zmore like thismore than 2022-12-01T10:57:15.13Z
answering member
4528
label Biography information for James Heappey more like this
tabling member
1447
label Biography information for Andrew Rosindell more like this
1545858
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-11-28more like thismore than 2022-11-28
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence remove filter
hansard heading Robert Swara Seurei more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 23 November to Question 90887 on Robert Swara Seurei, what live munitions the British Army used in the Lolldaiga training area of Kenya before 2010; and what quantity of those munitions ere used. more like this
tabling member constituency East Lothian more like this
tabling member printed
Kenny MacAskill more like this
uin 97651 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-12-01more like thismore than 2022-12-01
answer text <p>I refer the hon. Member to the answer provided to him on 16 May 2022 in answer to Question 968. Since before 2010, the British Army Training Unit Kenya (BATUK) has not conducted live firing exercises on Lolldaiga Training Area (LTA). BATUK only use the LTA to conduct blank firing and dry exercises. There are however explosives used, for example to simulate battle noise.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Wells more like this
answering member printed James Heappey more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-12-01T10:56:27.38Zmore like thismore than 2022-12-01T10:56:27.38Z
answering member
4528
label Biography information for James Heappey more like this
attachment
1
file name UIN 968.docx more like this
title Kenya Army more like this
tabling member
4772
label Biography information for Kenny MacAskill more like this
1545888
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-11-28more like thismore than 2022-11-28
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence remove filter
hansard heading Challenger Tanks more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether it remains his Department's policy to upgrade 148 of the 227 Challenger 2 MBTs to Challenger 3 tanks; what his Department plans to do with any tanks that are not upgraded; and if he will make a statement. more like this
tabling member constituency Ealing, Southall more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Virendra Sharma more like this
uin 97545 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-12-01more like thismore than 2022-12-01
answer text <p>It remains the Department's policy to upgrade 148 of the Army's existing Challenger 2 Main Battle Tanks to the Challenger 3 standard. Initial Operating Capability is expected to be achieved in 2027, with Full Operating Capability expected in 2030. A decision on what will happen to the remaining platforms is currently under review</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Cheltenham more like this
answering member printed Alex Chalk more like this
question first answered
remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2022-12-01T13:57:01.763Z
answering member
4481
label Biography information for Alex Chalk more like this
tabling member
1604
label Biography information for Mr Virendra Sharma more like this
1545889
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-11-28more like thismore than 2022-11-28
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence remove filter
hansard heading Explosives: Civilians more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what steps the Government will take to use its diplomatic influence to promote the strengthening of protections for civilians from the use of explosive weapons in populated areas. more like this
tabling member constituency Putney more like this
tabling member printed
Fleur Anderson more like this
uin 97669 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-12-01more like thismore than 2022-12-01
answer text <p>On 18 November 2022, the UK joined 83 nations in adopting the Political Declaration on 'Strengthening the Protection of Civilians from the Humanitarian Consequences Arising from the Use of Explosive Weapons in Populated Areas (EWIPA).</p><p>The UK will work with allies, partners, and civil society to promote the aims of the Political Declaration. We will continue to use our knowledge and expertise to share good practice, strengthen cooperation with and support the work of international and civil society organisations, and encourage states to have appropriate procedures in place.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Wells more like this
answering member printed James Heappey more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-12-01T10:55:06.453Zmore like thismore than 2022-12-01T10:55:06.453Z
answering member
4528
label Biography information for James Heappey more like this
tabling member
4788
label Biography information for Fleur Anderson more like this
1545599
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-11-25more like thismore than 2022-11-25
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence remove filter
hansard heading Ministry of Defence: Electronic Purchasing Card Solution more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to his Department’s government procurement card spending over £500 on travel and stationery for the month of April 2021, published on 14 July 2021, for what reason there is a difference between the total spending of £674,470.73 for all items in the spreadsheet named Stationery and the total of £507,000.67 included in the spreadsheets named Stationery Pivot and epcData Travel-Stationery. more like this
tabling member constituency Islington South and Finsbury more like this
tabling member printed
Emily Thornberry more like this
uin 96585 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-11-30more like thismore than 2022-11-30
answer text <p>Following an internal review, the Ministry of Defence can confirm that an administrative error occurred which resulted in a reporting discrepancy within the April 2021 MOD travel and stationery Government Procurement Card (GPC) transparency report.</p><p> </p><p>The raw data contained within the tab titled &quot;Stationery&quot; contains all throughput against the Stationery Lodged Card for the month of April 2021. The tabs titled &quot;sheet 1&quot;, &quot;ePCDataTravelStationery&quot; and &quot;stationery pivot&quot; contain incorrect values with regards to Stationery spend and will be updated as a matter of priority. It has also been identified as part of this investigation that multiple MOD GPC transparency reports contain transactions under the value of £500.</p><p> </p><p>The Stationery breakdown below provides confirmed transactional throughput for this spend category during the April 2021 billing period.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Supplier</p></td><td><p>Spend</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Banner</p></td><td><p>£389,910.44</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>XMA</p></td><td><p>£284,650.29</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total Spend</p></td><td><p>£674,470.73 (1942 transactions)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total Spend (Over £500)</p></td><td><p>£509,861.75 (309 transactions)</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Cheltenham more like this
answering member printed Alex Chalk more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-11-30T17:28:00.597Zmore like thismore than 2022-11-30T17:28:00.597Z
answering member
4481
label Biography information for Alex Chalk more like this
tabling member
1536
label Biography information for Emily Thornberry more like this
1545600
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-11-25more like thismore than 2022-11-25
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence remove filter
hansard heading Ministry of Defence: Electronic Purchasing Card Solution more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to his Department’s government procurement card spending over £500 on travel and stationery for the month of May 2021, published on 9 September 2021, for what reason there is a difference between the total spending of £704,378.62 for all items in the spreadsheet named Stationery and the total of £623,865 included in the spreadsheets named Stationery Pivot and epcData Travel-Stationery. more like this
tabling member constituency Islington South and Finsbury more like this
tabling member printed
Emily Thornberry more like this
uin 96586 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-11-30more like thismore than 2022-11-30
answer text <p>Following an internal review, the Ministry of Defence can confirm that an administrative error occurred which resulted in a reporting discrepancy within the May 2021 MOD travel and stationery Government Procurement Card (GPC) transparency report.</p><p> </p><p>The raw data contained within the tab titled &quot;Stationery&quot; contains all throughput against the Stationery Lodged Card for the month of May 2021. The tabs titled &quot;ePCDataTravel-Stationery&quot; and &quot;stationery pivot&quot; contain incorrect values with regards to stationery spend and will be updated as a matter of priority.</p><p> </p><p>The Stationery breakdown below provides confirmed transactional throughput for this spend category during the May 2021 billing period.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Supplier</p></td><td><p>Spend</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Banner</p></td><td><p>£464,188.78</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>XMA</p></td><td><p>£240,189.84</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total Spend</p></td><td><p>£704,378.62 (2064 transactions)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total Spend (Over £500)</p></td><td><p>£519,192.45 (299 transactions)</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p>
answering member constituency Cheltenham more like this
answering member printed Alex Chalk more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-11-30T17:28:43.38Zmore like thismore than 2022-11-30T17:28:43.38Z
answering member
4481
label Biography information for Alex Chalk more like this
tabling member
1536
label Biography information for Emily Thornberry more like this
1545601
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-11-25more like thismore than 2022-11-25
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence remove filter
hansard heading Ministry of Defence: Electronic Purchasing Card Solution more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to his Department's monthly publications of government procurement card spending over £500 on stationery, for what reason there is a difference between the total costs of £3,885.04 incurred in the month of November 2021 and the average costs of £637,282.92 incurred in the other 11 months of that year. more like this
tabling member constituency Islington South and Finsbury more like this
tabling member printed
Emily Thornberry more like this
uin 96587 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-11-30more like thismore than 2022-11-30
answer text <p>Following an internal review, the Ministry of Defence can confirm that a reporting error occurred impacting the November 2021 MOD travel and stationery Government Procurement Card (GPC) transparency report. This was most likely due to the file becoming corrupt on upload. The specific date and reason for this file corruption is unknown at this time, but will be investigated.</p><p> </p><p>The correct data has been arranged to be uploaded as a matter of priority. The Department can confirm the correct figure for November 2021 Stationery spend <strong>(over £500)</strong> was £540,383.74 (301 transactions).</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Cheltenham more like this
answering member printed Alex Chalk more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-11-30T17:29:40.76Zmore like thismore than 2022-11-30T17:29:40.76Z
answering member
4481
label Biography information for Alex Chalk more like this
tabling member
1536
label Biography information for Emily Thornberry more like this
1545667
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-11-25more like thismore than 2022-11-25
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence remove filter
hansard heading Fleet Solid Support Ships: Contracts more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 22 November 2022 to Question 89735 on Fleet Solid Support Ships: Supply Chains, whether all social value commitments associated with the Fleet Solid Support Ships contract will be undertaken in the UK. more like this
tabling member constituency Wentworth and Dearne more like this
tabling member printed
John Healey more like this
uin 96562 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-11-30more like thismore than 2022-11-30
answer text <p>The social value commitments will greatly benefit the UK.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Cheltenham more like this
answering member printed Alex Chalk more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-11-30T15:43:56.083Zmore like thismore than 2022-11-30T15:43:56.083Z
answering member
4481
label Biography information for Alex Chalk more like this
tabling member
400
label Biography information for John Healey more like this
1545668
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-11-25more like thismore than 2022-11-25
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence remove filter
hansard heading Armed Forces: Housing more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, pursuant to the Answer of 8 November 2022 to Question 75786 on Armed Forces: Housing, how many service personnel were living in grade four single living accommodation in each region of the UK as of 25 November 2022. more like this
tabling member constituency Wentworth and Dearne more like this
tabling member printed
John Healey more like this
uin 96563 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-11-30more like thismore than 2022-11-30
answer text <p>The attached table shows a count of Service personnel who occupied Permanent Single Living Accommodation Grade four on 25 Nov 22. The table has been broken down by region as recorded on the Joint Personnel Administration System.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Cheltenham more like this
answering member printed Alex Chalk more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-11-30T17:07:11.793Zmore like thismore than 2022-11-30T17:07:11.793Z
answering member
4481
label Biography information for Alex Chalk more like this
attachment
1
file name Copy of Copy of 20221129- PQN_22-23_2022_14071 (96563)- Healey- Table of data.xlsx more like this
title Service Personnel - Permanent Single Living Accomm more like this
tabling member
400
label Biography information for John Healey more like this
1545669
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-11-25more like thismore than 2022-11-25
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence remove filter
hansard heading Ministry of Defence: Health and Social Care Levy more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether the funding provided to his Department to cover the Health and Social Care Levy has been returned to the Treasury. more like this
tabling member constituency Wentworth and Dearne more like this
tabling member printed
John Healey more like this
uin 96564 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-11-30more like thismore than 2022-11-30
answer text <p>The Department will retain the funding provided to cover the Health and Social Care Levy for this financial year but will return future years' funding to HMT.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South West Wiltshire more like this
answering member printed Dr Andrew Murrison more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-11-30T15:00:39.003Zmore like thismore than 2022-11-30T15:00:39.003Z
answering member
1466
label Biography information for Dr Andrew Murrison more like this
tabling member
400
label Biography information for John Healey more like this