Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1696852
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-03-18more like thismore than 2024-03-18
answering body
Department for Business and Trade more like this
answering dept id 214 more like this
answering dept short name Business and Trade more like this
answering dept sort name Business and Trade remove filter
hansard heading Import Controls: Occupied Territories more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what assessment her Department has made of the legality of imports from illegal Israeli settlements. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow East more like this
tabling member printed
David Linden more like this
uin 19153 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction true more like this
date of answer less than 2024-03-26more like thismore than 2024-03-26
answer text <p>The UK’s position on settlements is clear: they are illegal under international law and undermine the prospect of a two-state solution.</p><p>Under the existing UK-Israel trade agreement, goods originating from illegal Israeli settlements are not entitled to tariff and trade preferences under either the agreement between the UK and Israel, <ins class="ministerial">n</ins>or the agreement between the UK and the Palestinian <ins class="ministerial">Authority</ins><del class="ministerial"> Liberation Organization</del>.</p><p><del class="ministerial">I can confirm that t</del><ins class="ministerial">T</ins>his will not change in the upgraded FTA with Israel. The UK will not compromise on any of our longstanding positions on the Middle East Peace Process throughout this negotiation, including with respect to settlements.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Chelsea and Fulham more like this
answering member printed Greg Hands more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-03-26T17:59:34.637Zmore like thismore than 2024-03-26T17:59:34.637Z
question first ministerially corrected
less than 2024-03-27T10:35:16.817Zmore like thismore than 2024-03-27T10:35:16.817Z
answering member
1526
label Biography information for Greg Hands more like this
previous answer version
26249
answering member constituency Chelsea and Fulham more like this
answering member printed Greg Hands more like this
answering member
1526
label Biography information for Greg Hands more like this
tabling member
4640
label Biography information for David Linden remove filter
1696854
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-03-18more like thismore than 2024-03-18
answering body
Department for Business and Trade more like this
answering dept id 214 more like this
answering dept short name Business and Trade more like this
answering dept sort name Business and Trade remove filter
hansard heading Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership: Intellectual Property more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what assessment her Department has made of the potential impact on smallholder farmers of the measures in the Intellectual Property Chapter of the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership relating to the requirement for signatory countries to ratify the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants 1991. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow East more like this
tabling member printed
David Linden more like this
uin 19155 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2024-03-26more like thismore than 2024-03-26
answer text <p>The UK’s accession to CPTPP will not change the UK’s existing commitments under the International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants (UPOV).</p><p>The Government does not foresee any impacts on UK small farmers due to the UK’s legal obligations under CPTPP Article 18.7.2 because there will be no changes to the UK’s existing legislative framework in this area.</p><p>UPOV provides for plant breeders’ rights, aiming to encourage the development of new varieties of plants, with benefits such as food security and mitigating climate change.</p><p>Mechanisms are available within CPTPP to discuss issues raised by signatory countries.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Chelsea and Fulham more like this
answering member printed Greg Hands more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-03-26T11:36:06.287Zmore like thismore than 2024-03-26T11:36:06.287Z
answering member
1526
label Biography information for Greg Hands more like this
tabling member
4640
label Biography information for David Linden remove filter
1696855
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-03-18more like thismore than 2024-03-18
answering body
Department for Business and Trade more like this
answering dept id 214 more like this
answering dept short name Business and Trade more like this
answering dept sort name Business and Trade remove filter
hansard heading Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, if she will have discussions with the Leader of the House on allocating time for debate on a substantive motion relating to the UK's accession to the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership ahead of the conclusion of the statutory 21 sitting day period for which the treaty is laid before Parliament. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow East more like this
tabling member printed
David Linden more like this
uin 19156 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2024-03-21more like thismore than 2024-03-21
answer text <p>The Government is committed to effective scrutiny of its trade agenda and has put in place a comprehensive framework for scrutiny of free trade agreements (FTAs). This includes a commitment to seek to hold a general debate on a new FTA where one is requested by the relevant Select Committee, subject to parliamentary time being available.</p><p> </p><p>The scheduling of parliamentary business is not a matter for the Department for Business and Trade.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Chelsea and Fulham more like this
answering member printed Greg Hands more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-03-21T15:38:17.957Zmore like thismore than 2024-03-21T15:38:17.957Z
answering member
1526
label Biography information for Greg Hands more like this
tabling member
4640
label Biography information for David Linden remove filter
1674178
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-11-29more like thismore than 2023-11-29
answering body
Department for Business and Trade more like this
answering dept id 214 more like this
answering dept short name Business and Trade more like this
answering dept sort name Business and Trade remove filter
hansard heading Unpaid Work more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what data her Department holds on the number of people who have undertaken unpaid trial shifts in (a) England and Wales and (b) Scotland in each of the last five years. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow East more like this
tabling member printed
David Linden more like this
uin 4509 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-12-04more like thismore than 2023-12-04
answer text <p>Minimum wage legislation prohibits unpaid work trials that are excessive and not part of a genuine recruitment process. An unpaid trial work period lasting a few hours may be reasonable and legal. This is because the main purpose would be to test the individual, and what is done would probably have little or no other value to the employer. However, an unpaid trial lasting more than one day is probably illegal in all but exceptional circumstances.</p><p> </p><p>DBT does not hold information about the number of people who have undertaken unpaid trial shifts in England, Wales and Scotland in each of the last five years.</p><p> </p><p>If someone has undertaken an unpaid work trial and thinks they should have been paid NMW, they can call the ACAS helpline or make a complaint to HMRC.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Thirsk and Malton more like this
answering member printed Kevin Hollinrake more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-12-04T17:12:31.443Zmore like thismore than 2023-12-04T17:12:31.443Z
answering member
4474
label Biography information for Kevin Hollinrake more like this
tabling member
4640
label Biography information for David Linden remove filter