Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1079383
registered interest true more like this
date less than 2019-02-28more like thismore than 2019-02-28
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Universal Credit more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment she has made of the adequacy of staffing levels in universal credit centres; and what proportion of fixed-term staff working in universal credit centres are on (a) permanent contracts and (b) zero-hour contracts. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow South West more like this
tabling member printed
Chris Stephens remove filter
uin 227130 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-03-05more like thismore than 2019-03-05
answer text <p>The Department regularly reviews both the numbers of people working in Universal Credit service centres and their performance to ensure we have the right number of people available to manage claimants Universal Credit claims. Services and staff training is assessed, both in real time to meet any short term peaks in demand and also reviewed for longer term improvements to ensure the service continues to meet customer service expectation.</p><p> </p><p>Our priority is to give all employees, including those delivering Universal Credit, the necessary resources, including manageable workloads, so that they can carry out their roles successfully.</p><p> </p><p>The size of a Case Manager’s caseload is dependent on a number of factors, including the complexity of the caseload and experience of the case manager.</p><p> </p><p>All staff on fixed-term contracts are employed on the basis of agreed full or part time hours. No staff are employed on zero-hour contracts.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Reading West more like this
answering member printed Alok Sharma more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-03-05T17:53:37.63Zmore like thismore than 2019-03-05T17:53:37.63Z
answering member
4014
label Biography information for Sir Alok Sharma more like this
tabling member
4463
label Biography information for Chris Stephens more like this
1077140
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-02-25more like thismore than 2019-02-25
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Epilepsy more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people who previously received disability living allowance and who have a primary condition of epilepsy have (a) failed their initial assessment for personal independence payments (PIP)and (b) have experienced a reduction in their payment as result of changing to PIP in (i) Scotland and (ii) the UK in each year since 2013. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow South West more like this
tabling member printed
Chris Stephens remove filter
uin 225547 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-02-28more like thismore than 2019-02-28
answer text <p>The tables attached show the comparison of the Disability Living Allowance (DLA) award before and Personal Independence Payment (PIP) award after the DLA to PIP reassessment number of people with epilepsy as their main disabling condition in both Scotland and Great Britain. The data is also split by calendar year from 2013 when PIP was introduced to October 2018.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-02-28T15:20:47.163Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-28T15:20:47.163Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
attachment
1
file name pq225547 DLA to PIP reassessment outcomes.pdf more like this
title DLA to PIP Reassessment outcomes more like this
tabling member
4463
label Biography information for Chris Stephens more like this
1077142
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-02-25more like thismore than 2019-02-25
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Universal Credit more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what the cost to the public purse is of the administration of the advance payment system. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow South West more like this
tabling member printed
Chris Stephens remove filter
uin 225548 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-03-05more like thismore than 2019-03-05
answer text <p>The information requested is not readily available and to provide it would incur disproportionate cost.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Reading West more like this
answering member printed Alok Sharma more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-03-05T17:44:23.643Zmore like thismore than 2019-03-05T17:44:23.643Z
answering member
4014
label Biography information for Sir Alok Sharma more like this
tabling member
4463
label Biography information for Chris Stephens more like this
1064925
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-02-22more like thismore than 2019-02-22
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Epilepsy more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people identifying as having a primary condition of epilepsy have been awarded personal independence payment (a) after mandatory reconsideration of their initial assessment and (b) at a tribunal in Scotland in each year since 2013. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow South West more like this
tabling member printed
Chris Stephens remove filter
uin 224814 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-02-27more like thismore than 2019-02-27
answer text <p>The information requested is shown in the tables below.</p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><p>Table 1: Personal Independence Payment (PIP) new claims and reassessments for claimants with a primary disabling condition of Epilepsy - initial decisions, Mandatory Reconsiderations (MRs) and appeals, Scotland</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Of which:</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Financial year of initial decision</p></td><td><p>Initial Decisions</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Initial decisions - disallowed due to failing the assessment</p></td><td><p>MR - new decision award changed</p></td><td><p>Appeal – decision overturned</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013/14</p></td><td><p>160</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014/15</p></td><td><p>940</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>510</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>60</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015/16</p></td><td><p>910</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>660</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>120</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016/17</p></td><td><p>1,440</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>1,030</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>230</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017/18</p></td><td><p>1,480</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>960</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>250</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>April to Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>900</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>340</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total Decisions</p></td><td><p>5,830</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>3,550</p></td><td><p>150</p></td><td><p>670</p></td></tr></tbody></table>Table 2: Personal Independence Payment (PIP) new claims - initial decisions, Mandatory Reconsiderations (MRs) and appeals, Scotland</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Of which:</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Financial year of initial decision</p></td><td><p>Initial Decisions</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Initial decisions - disallowed due to failing the assessment</p></td><td><p>MR - new decision award changed</p></td><td><p>Appeal - decision overturned</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013/14</p></td><td><p>10,470</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>2,490</p></td><td><p>140</p></td><td><p>160</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014/15</p></td><td><p>55,740</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>13,180</p></td><td><p>360</p></td><td><p>1,190</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015/16</p></td><td><p>49,020</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>12,680</p></td><td><p>370</p></td><td><p>1,180</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016/17</p></td><td><p>52,820</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>13,500</p></td><td><p>510</p></td><td><p>1,170</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017/18</p></td><td><p>57,580</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>15,910</p></td><td><p>560</p></td><td><p>1,620</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>April to Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>27,710</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>8,130</p></td><td><p>150</p></td><td><p>90</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total Decisions</p></td><td><p>253,340</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>65,890</p></td><td><p>2,090</p></td><td><p>5,410</p></td></tr></tbody></table><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><p>Table 3: Personal Independence Payment (PIP) new claims for claimants with a primary disabling condition of Epilepsy - initial decisions, Mandatory Reconsiderations (MRs) and appeals, Scotland</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Of which:</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Financial year of initial decision</p></td><td><p>Initial Decisions</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Initial decisions - disallowed due to failing the assessment</p></td><td><p>MR - new decision award changed</p></td><td><p>Appeal - decision overturned</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013/14</p></td><td><p>160</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014/15</p></td><td><p>790</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>450</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015/16</p></td><td><p>510</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>410</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016/17</p></td><td><p>550</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>440</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>50</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017/18</p></td><td><p>700</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>500</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>80</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>April to Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>400</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>200</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total Decisions</p></td><td><p>3,110</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>2,050</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>220</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p /><p>Under PIP, 27 per cent of working age claimants with epilepsy recorded as their primary disabling condition receive the highest level of support compared to 6 per cent under Disability Living Allowance when PIP was introduced.</p><p>Notes</p><p>Tables 2 and 3 are for PIP new claims only, whereas Table 1 is for both new claims and DLA reassessment claims.</p><p>In the application process, claimants’ primary disabling condition is only recorded for collation by the Department at assessment. Therefore the initial decisions in Table 2 will include claims where the disability has not been recorded due to the assessment not being completed, and are therefore not comparable to the figures in Table 3.</p><p>Data is based on primary disabling condition as recorded on the PIP computer system. Claimants may often have multiple disabling conditions upon which the decision is based but only the primary condition is shown in these statistics.</p><p>The disability subgroup of Epilepsy in the PIP Computer System includes Cataplexy, Generalised seizures (with status epilepticus in last 12 months), Generalised seizures (without status epilepticus in last 12 months), Narcolepsy, Partial seizures (with status epilepticus in last 12 months), Partial seizures (without status epilepticus in last 12 months) and Seizures - unclassified.</p><p>PIP data includes normal rules and special rules for the terminally ill claimants.</p><p>Data has been rounded to the nearest 10.</p><p>Appeals data taken from the DWP PIP computer system’s management information. Therefore this data may differ from that held by Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service for various reasons such as delays in data recording and other methodological differences in collating and preparing statistics.</p><p>Decisions overturned at appeal may include a number of appeals that have been lapsed (which is where DWP changed the decision after an appeal was lodged but before it was heard at Tribunal).</p><p>Some decisions which are changed at MR, and where the claimant continues to appeal for a higher PIP award, are then changed again at tribunal appeal. Therefore the number of people who had a decision changed at MR and the number of people who had a decision changed at tribunal appeal cannot be added together.</p><p>Claimants who have received benefit decisions more recently may not yet have had time to complete the claimant journey and progress to appeal.</p>
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
grouped question UIN 224815 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-02-27T13:36:34.597Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-27T13:36:34.597Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
tabling member
4463
label Biography information for Chris Stephens more like this
1064926
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-02-22more like thismore than 2019-02-22
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Epilepsy more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many and what proportion of (a) all new claimants of personal independence payment and (b) new claimants of that payment identifying as having a primary condition of epilepsy did not receive an award during their initial assessment but received an award at (i) mandatory reconsideration and (ii) tribunal in Scotland in each year since 2013. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow South West more like this
tabling member printed
Chris Stephens remove filter
uin 224815 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-02-27more like thismore than 2019-02-27
answer text <p>The information requested is shown in the tables below.</p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><p>Table 1: Personal Independence Payment (PIP) new claims and reassessments for claimants with a primary disabling condition of Epilepsy - initial decisions, Mandatory Reconsiderations (MRs) and appeals, Scotland</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Of which:</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Financial year of initial decision</p></td><td><p>Initial Decisions</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Initial decisions - disallowed due to failing the assessment</p></td><td><p>MR - new decision award changed</p></td><td><p>Appeal – decision overturned</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013/14</p></td><td><p>160</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014/15</p></td><td><p>940</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>510</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>60</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015/16</p></td><td><p>910</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>660</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>120</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016/17</p></td><td><p>1,440</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>1,030</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>230</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017/18</p></td><td><p>1,480</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>960</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>250</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>April to Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>900</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>340</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total Decisions</p></td><td><p>5,830</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>3,550</p></td><td><p>150</p></td><td><p>670</p></td></tr></tbody></table>Table 2: Personal Independence Payment (PIP) new claims - initial decisions, Mandatory Reconsiderations (MRs) and appeals, Scotland</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Of which:</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Financial year of initial decision</p></td><td><p>Initial Decisions</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Initial decisions - disallowed due to failing the assessment</p></td><td><p>MR - new decision award changed</p></td><td><p>Appeal - decision overturned</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013/14</p></td><td><p>10,470</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>2,490</p></td><td><p>140</p></td><td><p>160</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014/15</p></td><td><p>55,740</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>13,180</p></td><td><p>360</p></td><td><p>1,190</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015/16</p></td><td><p>49,020</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>12,680</p></td><td><p>370</p></td><td><p>1,180</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016/17</p></td><td><p>52,820</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>13,500</p></td><td><p>510</p></td><td><p>1,170</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017/18</p></td><td><p>57,580</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>15,910</p></td><td><p>560</p></td><td><p>1,620</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>April to Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>27,710</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>8,130</p></td><td><p>150</p></td><td><p>90</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total Decisions</p></td><td><p>253,340</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>65,890</p></td><td><p>2,090</p></td><td><p>5,410</p></td></tr></tbody></table><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="6"><p>Table 3: Personal Independence Payment (PIP) new claims for claimants with a primary disabling condition of Epilepsy - initial decisions, Mandatory Reconsiderations (MRs) and appeals, Scotland</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Of which:</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Financial year of initial decision</p></td><td><p>Initial Decisions</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Initial decisions - disallowed due to failing the assessment</p></td><td><p>MR - new decision award changed</p></td><td><p>Appeal - decision overturned</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013/14</p></td><td><p>160</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014/15</p></td><td><p>790</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>450</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015/16</p></td><td><p>510</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>410</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016/17</p></td><td><p>550</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>440</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>50</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017/18</p></td><td><p>700</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>500</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>80</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>April to Sep 2018</p></td><td><p>400</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>200</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total Decisions</p></td><td><p>3,110</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>2,050</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>220</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p /><p>Under PIP, 27 per cent of working age claimants with epilepsy recorded as their primary disabling condition receive the highest level of support compared to 6 per cent under Disability Living Allowance when PIP was introduced.</p><p>Notes</p><p>Tables 2 and 3 are for PIP new claims only, whereas Table 1 is for both new claims and DLA reassessment claims.</p><p>In the application process, claimants’ primary disabling condition is only recorded for collation by the Department at assessment. Therefore the initial decisions in Table 2 will include claims where the disability has not been recorded due to the assessment not being completed, and are therefore not comparable to the figures in Table 3.</p><p>Data is based on primary disabling condition as recorded on the PIP computer system. Claimants may often have multiple disabling conditions upon which the decision is based but only the primary condition is shown in these statistics.</p><p>The disability subgroup of Epilepsy in the PIP Computer System includes Cataplexy, Generalised seizures (with status epilepticus in last 12 months), Generalised seizures (without status epilepticus in last 12 months), Narcolepsy, Partial seizures (with status epilepticus in last 12 months), Partial seizures (without status epilepticus in last 12 months) and Seizures - unclassified.</p><p>PIP data includes normal rules and special rules for the terminally ill claimants.</p><p>Data has been rounded to the nearest 10.</p><p>Appeals data taken from the DWP PIP computer system’s management information. Therefore this data may differ from that held by Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service for various reasons such as delays in data recording and other methodological differences in collating and preparing statistics.</p><p>Decisions overturned at appeal may include a number of appeals that have been lapsed (which is where DWP changed the decision after an appeal was lodged but before it was heard at Tribunal).</p><p>Some decisions which are changed at MR, and where the claimant continues to appeal for a higher PIP award, are then changed again at tribunal appeal. Therefore the number of people who had a decision changed at MR and the number of people who had a decision changed at tribunal appeal cannot be added together.</p><p>Claimants who have received benefit decisions more recently may not yet have had time to complete the claimant journey and progress to appeal.</p>
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
grouped question UIN 224814 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-02-27T13:36:34.69Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-27T13:36:34.69Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
tabling member
4463
label Biography information for Chris Stephens more like this
1058637
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-02-11more like thismore than 2019-02-11
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Pensioners: Poverty more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text What recent assessment she has made of trends in the level of pensioner poverty; and if she will make a statement. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow South West more like this
tabling member printed
Chris Stephens remove filter
uin 909129 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-02-11more like thismore than 2019-02-11
answer text <p>This Government has seen the absolute poverty rate for pensioners fall to record lows, with over 200,000 fewer pensioners in absolute poverty before housing costs. Rates of material deprivation for pensioners are also at record lows.</p><p>We have reduced pensioner poverty close to historically low levels, lifting the incomes of millions of older people. Since 2009/10, material deprivation for pensioners has fallen from 10 per cent to 7 per cent in 2016/17 and since 2010 there are 200,000 fewer pensioners in absolute poverty, a record low.</p><p>The Government is committed to action that helps to alleviate levels of pensioner poverty. In 2018/19 we will spend £121.5 billion on benefits for pensioners, including £97 billion on the State Pension for this year.</p><p>The Government has also committed to up-rating the basic State Pension by the highest of the growth in earnings, prices or 2.5 per cent - the 'triple lock' guarantee. This will mean that the full basic State Pension will be around £1450 per year higher in 2018/19 than in 2010. The Government has committed to the triple lock for the remainder of this Parliament.</p>
answering member constituency Hexham more like this
answering member printed Guy Opperman more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-02-11T17:58:24.993Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-11T17:58:24.993Z
answering member
4142
label Biography information for Guy Opperman more like this
tabling member
4463
label Biography information for Chris Stephens more like this
1037054
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-07more like thismore than 2019-01-07
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Visual Impairment more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people identifying as having a primary condition of (a) sight loss and (b) a visual impairment have been awarded personal independence payment (i) after mandatory reconsideration of their initial assessment and (ii) at a tribunal in Scotland in each year since 2013. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow South West more like this
tabling member printed
Chris Stephens remove filter
uin 205970 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-10more like thismore than 2019-01-10
answer text <p>The information requested is provided in the tables below.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 1:</strong> <strong>PIP decisions, MRs and appeals – People with a primary disabling condition of visual diseases, Scotland, new claims and reassessments</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Initial decisions</p></td><td><p>Failed initial assessment</p></td><td><p>Failed initial assessment - Changed at mandatory reconsideration</p></td><td><p>Failed initial assessment - Overturned at tribunal appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014-15</p></td><td><p>420</p></td><td><p>120</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015-16</p></td><td><p>620</p></td><td><p>150</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016-17</p></td><td><p>1,250</p></td><td><p>220</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017-18</p></td><td><p>1,000</p></td><td><p>230</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>50</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Table 2: PIP decisions, MRs and appeals – Scotland, New claims</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Initial decisions</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Failed initial assessment</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Failed initial assessment - Changed at MR</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Failed initial assessment - Overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>10,460</p></td><td><p>2,480</p></td><td><p>24%</p></td><td><p>140</p></td><td><p>6%</p></td><td><p>160</p></td><td><p>6%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014-15</p></td><td><p>55,460</p></td><td><p>13,140</p></td><td><p>24%</p></td><td><p>360</p></td><td><p>3%</p></td><td><p>1,190</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015-16</p></td><td><p>48,740</p></td><td><p>12,640</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td><td><p>370</p></td><td><p>3%</p></td><td><p>1,180</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016-17</p></td><td><p>52,560</p></td><td><p>13,430</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td><td><p>510</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td><td><p>1,170</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017-18</p></td><td><p>57,290</p></td><td><p>15,830</p></td><td><p>28%</p></td><td><p>560</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td><td><p>1,620</p></td><td><p>10%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 3: PIP decisions, MRs and appeals – People with a primary disabling condition of visual diseases, Scotland, New claims</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Initial decisions</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Failed initial assessment</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Failed initial assessment - Changed at MR</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Failed initial assessment - Overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>19%</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014-15</p></td><td><p>350</p></td><td><p>120</p></td><td><p>33%</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015-16</p></td><td><p>300</p></td><td><p>120</p></td><td><p>40%</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>14%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016-17</p></td><td><p>290</p></td><td><p>110</p></td><td><p>38%</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>11%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017-18</p></td><td><p>340</p></td><td><p>140</p></td><td><p>41%</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>16%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>Since PIP was introduced 3.7m decisions have been made in Great Britain for all health conditions up to September 2018, of these 10% have been appealed and 5% have been overturned.</p><p> </p><p>The data has been rounded to the nearest 10. # Fewer than 5 in this category.</p><p> </p><p>PIP data includes normal rules and special rules for the terminally ill claimants, and covers new claims and DLA reassessment claims.</p><p> </p><p>In the application process, claimants’ main disabling condition is only recorded for collation by the Department at assessment. Therefore the figures in Table 2 will include claims where the disability has not been recorded due to the assessment not being completed, and are therefore not comparable to the figures in Table 3.</p><p> </p><p>Data is based on primary disabling condition as recorded on the PIP computer systems. Claimants may often have multiple disabling conditions upon which the decision is based but only the primary condition is shown in these statistics. It is not possible to break down the condition of “visual disease” into sight loss or visual impairment from the data.</p><p> </p><p>The appeals may include decisions which are changed at mandatory reconsideration, and where the claimant continues to appeal for a higher PIP award, are then changed again at tribunal appeal.</p><p> </p><p>Claimants who have received benefit decisions more recently may not yet have had time to complete the claimant journey and progress to appeal.</p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
grouped question UIN 205971 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-10T15:19:42.19Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-10T15:19:42.19Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
tabling member
4463
label Biography information for Chris Stephens more like this
1037057
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-07more like thismore than 2019-01-07
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Visual Impairment more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many and what proportion of (a) all new claimants of personal independence payment (PIP) and (b) new claimants of PIP identifying as having a primary condition of (i) sight loss and (ii) a visual impairment did not receive an award during their initial PIP assessment but received an award at (A) mandatory reconsideration and (B) tribunal in Scotland in each year since 2013. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow South West more like this
tabling member printed
Chris Stephens remove filter
uin 205971 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-10more like thismore than 2019-01-10
answer text <p>The information requested is provided in the tables below.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 1:</strong> <strong>PIP decisions, MRs and appeals – People with a primary disabling condition of visual diseases, Scotland, new claims and reassessments</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Initial decisions</p></td><td><p>Failed initial assessment</p></td><td><p>Failed initial assessment - Changed at mandatory reconsideration</p></td><td><p>Failed initial assessment - Overturned at tribunal appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014-15</p></td><td><p>420</p></td><td><p>120</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015-16</p></td><td><p>620</p></td><td><p>150</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016-17</p></td><td><p>1,250</p></td><td><p>220</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017-18</p></td><td><p>1,000</p></td><td><p>230</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>50</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Table 2: PIP decisions, MRs and appeals – Scotland, New claims</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Initial decisions</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Failed initial assessment</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Failed initial assessment - Changed at MR</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Failed initial assessment - Overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>10,460</p></td><td><p>2,480</p></td><td><p>24%</p></td><td><p>140</p></td><td><p>6%</p></td><td><p>160</p></td><td><p>6%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014-15</p></td><td><p>55,460</p></td><td><p>13,140</p></td><td><p>24%</p></td><td><p>360</p></td><td><p>3%</p></td><td><p>1,190</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015-16</p></td><td><p>48,740</p></td><td><p>12,640</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td><td><p>370</p></td><td><p>3%</p></td><td><p>1,180</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016-17</p></td><td><p>52,560</p></td><td><p>13,430</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td><td><p>510</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td><td><p>1,170</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017-18</p></td><td><p>57,290</p></td><td><p>15,830</p></td><td><p>28%</p></td><td><p>560</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td><td><p>1,620</p></td><td><p>10%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 3: PIP decisions, MRs and appeals – People with a primary disabling condition of visual diseases, Scotland, New claims</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Initial decisions</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Failed initial assessment</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Failed initial assessment - Changed at MR</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Failed initial assessment - Overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>19%</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014-15</p></td><td><p>350</p></td><td><p>120</p></td><td><p>33%</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015-16</p></td><td><p>300</p></td><td><p>120</p></td><td><p>40%</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>14%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016-17</p></td><td><p>290</p></td><td><p>110</p></td><td><p>38%</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>11%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017-18</p></td><td><p>340</p></td><td><p>140</p></td><td><p>41%</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>16%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>Since PIP was introduced 3.7m decisions have been made in Great Britain for all health conditions up to September 2018, of these 10% have been appealed and 5% have been overturned.</p><p> </p><p>The data has been rounded to the nearest 10. # Fewer than 5 in this category.</p><p> </p><p>PIP data includes normal rules and special rules for the terminally ill claimants, and covers new claims and DLA reassessment claims.</p><p> </p><p>In the application process, claimants’ main disabling condition is only recorded for collation by the Department at assessment. Therefore the figures in Table 2 will include claims where the disability has not been recorded due to the assessment not being completed, and are therefore not comparable to the figures in Table 3.</p><p> </p><p>Data is based on primary disabling condition as recorded on the PIP computer systems. Claimants may often have multiple disabling conditions upon which the decision is based but only the primary condition is shown in these statistics. It is not possible to break down the condition of “visual disease” into sight loss or visual impairment from the data.</p><p> </p><p>The appeals may include decisions which are changed at mandatory reconsideration, and where the claimant continues to appeal for a higher PIP award, are then changed again at tribunal appeal.</p><p> </p><p>Claimants who have received benefit decisions more recently may not yet have had time to complete the claimant journey and progress to appeal.</p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
grouped question UIN 205970 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-10T15:19:42.27Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-10T15:19:42.27Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
tabling member
4463
label Biography information for Chris Stephens more like this
1035341
registered interest true more like this
date less than 2019-01-04more like thismore than 2019-01-04
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Department for Work and Pensions: Brexit more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what estimate she has made of the additional staff required by her Department in the event that the UK leaves the EU (a) with and (b) without a deal. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow South West more like this
tabling member printed
Chris Stephens remove filter
uin 205309 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-14more like thismore than 2019-01-14
answer text <p>The Government continues undertaking planning for all EU exit scenarios, as is prudent. The Department continues to work closely with the Department for Exiting the European Union to ensure consistency of plans across government. Members of staff across the Department provide advice and analysis on EU Exit issues as required. Given the interactions between EU exit work and the Department’s other priorities, it would not be possible to give a figure for the information requested.</p><p> </p><p>The Department continually reviews workforce plans, priorities and changing needs, which includes identification and cessation of non-priority work where appropriate. We have accelerated our plans, and at the same time, the Civil Service as a whole is working to ensure that EU exit implementation is carried out to high quality without impacting public service delivery across the whole of government.</p><p> </p><p>The Department publishes its workforce management information each month. These details can be found at the following link.</p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/dwp-workforce-management-information#2010-to-march-2014-" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/dwp-workforce-management-information#2010-to-march-2014-</a></p>
answering member constituency Reading West more like this
answering member printed Alok Sharma more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-14T17:59:17.54Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-14T17:59:17.54Z
answering member
4014
label Biography information for Sir Alok Sharma more like this
tabling member
4463
label Biography information for Chris Stephens more like this
1029335
registered interest true more like this
date less than 2018-12-20more like thismore than 2018-12-20
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Department for Work and Pensions: Staff more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many staff were employed in her Department on (a) 20 December 2018 and (b) 23 June 2016. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow South West more like this
tabling member printed
Chris Stephens remove filter
uin 204533 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-10more like thismore than 2019-01-10
answer text <p>The Department collects and publishes its workforce management information each month. These details can be found at the following link.</p><p> </p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/dwp-workforce-management-information" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/dwp-workforce-management-information</a></p><p> </p><p>The Department’s headcount is collected and reported as at the last day of each month. On 30 June 2016 the Department’s headcount was 84,226 and on 30 November 2018 it was 82,827.</p> more like this
answering member constituency North Swindon more like this
answering member printed Justin Tomlinson more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-10T15:55:02.597Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-10T15:55:02.597Z
answering member
4105
label Biography information for Justin Tomlinson more like this
tabling member
4463
label Biography information for Chris Stephens more like this