Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1036455
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-07more like thismore than 2019-01-07
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Universal Credit more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text What assessment her Department has made of the effect of explicit consent restrictions placed on advice agencies on the ability of people to make a claim for universal credit. more like this
tabling member constituency Dewsbury more like this
tabling member printed
Paula Sherriff more like this
uin 908386 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-07more like thismore than 2019-01-07
answer text <p>Explicit consent is not required to make a new claim. If claimants cannot make or manage their claim on-line, they can receive face to face support through their local jobcentre or assistance through our Freephone telephone number. Once the claim is made, claimants who require agencies to act on their behalf can provide explicit consent.</p><p>In our response to the Social Security Advisory Committee in November 2018 in respect of the managed migration regulations, we have agreed to explore options for improving the process of explicit consent in collaboration with the committee.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Reading West more like this
answering member printed Alok Sharma more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-07T18:01:25.76Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-07T18:01:25.76Z
answering member
4014
label Biography information for Sir Alok Sharma more like this
tabling member
4426
label Biography information for Paula Sherriff more like this
1036896
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-07more like thismore than 2019-01-07
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Universal Credit more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what is the (1) percentage, and (2) number of Universal Credit claims that have not been paid in full within five weeks. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord McNicol of West Kilbride more like this
uin HL12538 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-21more like thismore than 2019-01-21
answer text <p>The information requested for the percentage of Universal Credit claims not paid in full on time is in the table below and was taken from statistics we published on payment timeliness in November 2018.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>-</p></td><td><p><strong>August 2018</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2"><p><strong> </strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Proportion of paid Universal Credit claims that were not paid in full on time (all claims)</strong><strong>*</strong></p></td><td><p>6 per cent</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="2"><p><strong> </strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Proportion of paid Universal Credit claims that were not paid in full on time (new claims)</strong><strong>*</strong></p></td><td><p>16 per cent</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>*</strong> Universal Credit entitlement is calculated over monthly Assessment Periods. Claims which are paid on time will receive payment by the payment due date, which is 7 days after an Assessment Period ends.</p><p> </p><p>In many cases where full payment is not made on time, it is due to unresolved issues such as: claimants not accepting their Claimant Commitment or passing identity checks, satisfying the Habitual Residency Test, or having outstanding verification issues, such as housing costs and self-employed earnings.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>We plan to publish updated official statistics on the number of Universal Credit claims that have been paid on time. This data is currently going through quality assurance clearance procedures in line with the Official Statistics publication standard.</p><p> </p>
answering member printed Baroness Buscombe more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-21T16:49:00.07Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-21T16:49:00.07Z
answering member
3349
label Biography information for Baroness Buscombe more like this
tabling member
4702
label Biography information for Lord McNicol of West Kilbride more like this
1036897
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-07more like thismore than 2019-01-07
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Universal Credit more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many, and what percentage of, Universal Credit claimants are on alternative payments arrangements. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord McNicol of West Kilbride more like this
uin HL12539 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-21more like thismore than 2019-01-21
answer text <p>Alternative Payment Arrangements for Universal Credit are only available at Household level and can be found in the tables below.</p><p> </p><p>UC households claiming Housing Entitlement split by those receiving Managed Payment to Landlord by Month</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>August 2018 (p)</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Percentage of relevant claims</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of Households receiving Managed Payments to Landlords</p></td><td><p>106,538</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>18%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total UC households claiming Housing Entitlement</p></td><td><p>582,859</p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>UC households in payment split by those receiving More Frequent Payments by Month</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p>August 2018 (p)</p></td><td><p>Percentage of relevant claims</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of Households receiving More Frequent Payments</p></td><td><p>8,235</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>1%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total UC Households in payment</p></td><td><p>850,172</p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>UC Couple Households split by those receiving Split Payments by Month</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td colspan="2"><p>August 2018 (p)</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Percentage of relevant claims</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of Households receiving split payments</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>20</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>less than 1%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total UC Couple Households</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>126,889</p></td><td colspan="2"><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Source: Stat-Xplore, Department for Work and Pensions</p><p> </p><ol><li>Figures marked &quot;p&quot; are provisional. These figures will be subject to revision in subsequent releases. It is expected that overall provisional figures will be within two per cent of their revised figure in future releases.</li><li>Percentages may not add up due to rounding.</li><li>Statistical disclosure control has been applied to this table to avoid the release of confidential data. As such totals may not sum.</li><li>The figures for More Frequent Payments and Managed Payments to Landlords exclude those under Scottish Choices.</li></ol>
answering member printed Baroness Buscombe more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-21T17:07:25.857Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-21T17:07:25.857Z
answering member
3349
label Biography information for Baroness Buscombe more like this
tabling member
4702
label Biography information for Lord McNicol of West Kilbride more like this
1036898
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-07more like thismore than 2019-01-07
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Universal Credit more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how are the salaries of employees on Universal Credit who are paid twice within a month, in particular over the Christmas period, being treated for the purposes of benefits payments; and what steps are being taken to prevent such employees being disadvantaged. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord McNicol of West Kilbride more like this
uin HL12540 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-21more like thismore than 2019-01-21
answer text <p>Universal Credit payments reflect, as closely as possible, the actual circumstances of a household during each monthly assessment period. Assessment periods allow for Universal Credit awards to be adjusted on a monthly basis, ensuring that if a claimant’s income falls, they do not have to wait several months for a rise in their Universal Credit award.</p><p> </p><p>Some claimants receive earnings from work multiple times within an assessment period if they are paid via four-weekly, fortnightly, or weekly patterns. This in turn may reduce, or in some cases, nil the Universal Credit award the claimant receives that month. Claimants can always discuss the implications of this with their case managers and work coaches and can be referred to Personal Budgeting Support to help them manage their budgeting.</p><p> </p><p>If a claimant’s Universal Credit claim is closed due to this, claimants can re-claim the following month via a more simplified process than for an initial claim. We have produced guidance to help ensure claimants, staff and representatives are aware of the importance of reporting accurate dates and the impact on payment cycles, which is attached with this reply.</p><p> </p><p>The Government is working with employers to ensure that they use the most appropriate payment practices and comply with RTI guidelines in order to minimise the incidence of erroneous or late reporting by employers. HMRC have recently updated guidance to reiterate to employers the importance of reporting accurate dates and the impact on payment cycles; the Financial Secretary to the Treasury is working closely with HMRC and employers to do this.</p>
answering member printed Baroness Buscombe more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-21T15:36:52.127Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-21T15:36:52.127Z
answering member
3349
label Biography information for Baroness Buscombe more like this
attachment
1
file name gov.uk UC earnings patterns.pdf more like this
title UC Earning Patterns more like this
tabling member
4702
label Biography information for Lord McNicol of West Kilbride more like this
1036899
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-07more like thismore than 2019-01-07
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Universal Credit more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of whether advance payments for Universal Credit are working. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord McNicol of West Kilbride more like this
uin HL12541 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-21more like thismore than 2019-01-21
answer text <p>Advances are available to all new claimants of Universal Credit. Our latest internal data shows around 60 percent of eligible new claims to Universal Credit received an advance in October 2018. Subject to some fluctuation, this rate of advance take up has been broadly consistent. This shows that claimants are being made aware of advances and that our advance system is being utilised so people get help when they need it.</p><p /><p /> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Buscombe more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-21T15:28:58.97Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-21T15:28:58.97Z
answering member
3349
label Biography information for Baroness Buscombe more like this
tabling member
4702
label Biography information for Lord McNicol of West Kilbride more like this
1036996
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-07more like thismore than 2019-01-07
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Social Security Benefits: Domestic Abuse more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Buscombe on 18 December 2018 (HL12153, HL12154, HL12155) and the Written Answer by the Minister of State for Employment on 10 February 2015 (HC223651), whether they have stopped recording information on domestic violence easements since 2015; and, if not, whether they are now able to answer the question originally put. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Lister of Burtersett more like this
uin HL12638 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-14more like thismore than 2019-01-14
answer text <p>The Department does not centrally record information on specific easements applied to individual claimants.</p><p><strong> </strong></p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Buscombe more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-14T13:41:41.03Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-14T13:41:41.03Z
answering member
3349
label Biography information for Baroness Buscombe more like this
tabling member
4234
label Biography information for Baroness Lister of Burtersett more like this
1037002
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-07more like thismore than 2019-01-07
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Children: Maintenance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what the average deduction of wages was for (a) one child, (b) two children and (c) three children by (i) the Child Support Agency and (ii) the Child Maintenance Service in each of the last three years for which figures are available. more like this
tabling member constituency Hemel Hempstead more like this
tabling member printed
Sir Mike Penning more like this
uin 205857 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-15more like thismore than 2019-01-15
answer text <p><strong> </strong></p><p>The following table provides the average quarterly amounts paid through a deduction from earning order/request for each available quarter in the years 2016, 2017 and 2018.</p><p> </p><p>Figures are up to the quarter ending September 2018. This is consistent with the latest Official Statistics on the Child Maintenance Service and the Child Support Agency (CSA).</p><p> </p><p>Data relating to the Child Maintenance Service is not readily available before July 2017.</p><p> </p><p>For the Child Support Agency, in the quarter ending September 2018, there were no liabilities for cases with 3 or more children.</p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>Average quarterly amount deducted</strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong> -</strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td colspan="3"><p><strong>Child Support Agency</strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td colspan="3"><p><strong>Child Maintenance Service</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Number of Children</strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>3 or more</strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>3 or more</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Quarter ending</strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Mar-16</strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p>£523</p></td><td><p>£735</p></td><td><p>£792</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Jun-16</strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p>£532</p></td><td><p>£745</p></td><td><p>£804</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Sep-16</strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p>£539</p></td><td><p>£750</p></td><td><p>£814</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Dec-16</strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p>£529</p></td><td><p>£733</p></td><td><p>£799</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Mar-17</strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p>£517</p></td><td><p>£716</p></td><td><p>£783</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Jun-17</strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p>£514</p></td><td><p>£710</p></td><td><p>£774</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Sep-17</strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p>£520</p></td><td><p>£724</p></td><td><p>£893</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>£567</p></td><td><p>£686</p></td><td><p>£778</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Dec-17</strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p>£537</p></td><td><p>£749</p></td><td><p>£920</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>£559</p></td><td><p>£691</p></td><td><p>£791</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Mar-18</strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p>£539</p></td><td><p>£745</p></td><td><p>£948</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>£575</p></td><td><p>£706</p></td><td><p>£786</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Jun-18<sup>1</sup></strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><em>£475</em></p></td><td><p><em>£585</em></p></td><td><p><em>£1,063</em></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>£591</p></td><td><p>£725</p></td><td><p>£815</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Sep-18<sup>1</sup></strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><em>£455</em></p></td><td><p><em>£1,187</em></p></td><td><p><em>-</em></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>£600</p></td><td><p>£738</p></td><td><p>£840</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p>Figures are rounded to the nearest £.</p><p> </p><p>Figures for three or more children are presented together as the rate at which a non-resident/paying parent is liable to pay does not change after three children.</p><p> </p><p>The caseload on CSA is falling at a faster rate as we are approaching the end of the Case Closure programme. We have now ended liabilities on the majority of CSA cases and will be taking steps to conclude the remaining cases before the end of 2018.</p><p> </p><ol><li>Figures for CSA in June 2018 and September 2018 are based on less than 200 cases. The small number of cases in this period helps to explain the greater variation in average amounts in these quarters.</li></ol><p> </p>
answering member constituency North Swindon more like this
answering member printed Justin Tomlinson more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-15T11:23:26.29Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-15T11:23:26.29Z
answering member
4105
label Biography information for Justin Tomlinson more like this
tabling member
1528
label Biography information for Sir Mike Penning more like this
1037011
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-07more like thismore than 2019-01-07
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Universal Credit: West Lancashire more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to the West Lancashire constituent, Ronald Hillier, on his migration to universal credit, if she will write to (a) Mr Hillier and (b) the hon. Member for West Lancashire to provide a detailed legal explanation of the deductions made to his benefits as requested in previous correspondence between her Department and the hon. Member for West Lancashire. more like this
tabling member constituency West Lancashire more like this
tabling member printed
Rosie Cooper more like this
uin 205859 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-02-21more like thismore than 2019-02-21
answer text <p>A reply from the Department was sent to the Hon. Member on 10 January and I followed this up with a letter to the Hon. Member on 20 February.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Reading West more like this
answering member printed Alok Sharma more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-02-21T14:31:02.777Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-21T14:31:02.777Z
answering member
4014
label Biography information for Sir Alok Sharma more like this
tabling member
1538
label Biography information for Rosie Cooper more like this
1037054
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-07more like thismore than 2019-01-07
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Visual Impairment more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people identifying as having a primary condition of (a) sight loss and (b) a visual impairment have been awarded personal independence payment (i) after mandatory reconsideration of their initial assessment and (ii) at a tribunal in Scotland in each year since 2013. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow South West more like this
tabling member printed
Chris Stephens more like this
uin 205970 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-10more like thismore than 2019-01-10
answer text <p>The information requested is provided in the tables below.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 1:</strong> <strong>PIP decisions, MRs and appeals – People with a primary disabling condition of visual diseases, Scotland, new claims and reassessments</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Initial decisions</p></td><td><p>Failed initial assessment</p></td><td><p>Failed initial assessment - Changed at mandatory reconsideration</p></td><td><p>Failed initial assessment - Overturned at tribunal appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014-15</p></td><td><p>420</p></td><td><p>120</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015-16</p></td><td><p>620</p></td><td><p>150</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016-17</p></td><td><p>1,250</p></td><td><p>220</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017-18</p></td><td><p>1,000</p></td><td><p>230</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>50</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Table 2: PIP decisions, MRs and appeals – Scotland, New claims</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Initial decisions</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Failed initial assessment</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Failed initial assessment - Changed at MR</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Failed initial assessment - Overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>10,460</p></td><td><p>2,480</p></td><td><p>24%</p></td><td><p>140</p></td><td><p>6%</p></td><td><p>160</p></td><td><p>6%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014-15</p></td><td><p>55,460</p></td><td><p>13,140</p></td><td><p>24%</p></td><td><p>360</p></td><td><p>3%</p></td><td><p>1,190</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015-16</p></td><td><p>48,740</p></td><td><p>12,640</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td><td><p>370</p></td><td><p>3%</p></td><td><p>1,180</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016-17</p></td><td><p>52,560</p></td><td><p>13,430</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td><td><p>510</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td><td><p>1,170</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017-18</p></td><td><p>57,290</p></td><td><p>15,830</p></td><td><p>28%</p></td><td><p>560</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td><td><p>1,620</p></td><td><p>10%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 3: PIP decisions, MRs and appeals – People with a primary disabling condition of visual diseases, Scotland, New claims</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Initial decisions</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Failed initial assessment</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Failed initial assessment - Changed at MR</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Failed initial assessment - Overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>19%</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014-15</p></td><td><p>350</p></td><td><p>120</p></td><td><p>33%</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015-16</p></td><td><p>300</p></td><td><p>120</p></td><td><p>40%</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>14%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016-17</p></td><td><p>290</p></td><td><p>110</p></td><td><p>38%</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>11%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017-18</p></td><td><p>340</p></td><td><p>140</p></td><td><p>41%</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>16%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>Since PIP was introduced 3.7m decisions have been made in Great Britain for all health conditions up to September 2018, of these 10% have been appealed and 5% have been overturned.</p><p> </p><p>The data has been rounded to the nearest 10. # Fewer than 5 in this category.</p><p> </p><p>PIP data includes normal rules and special rules for the terminally ill claimants, and covers new claims and DLA reassessment claims.</p><p> </p><p>In the application process, claimants’ main disabling condition is only recorded for collation by the Department at assessment. Therefore the figures in Table 2 will include claims where the disability has not been recorded due to the assessment not being completed, and are therefore not comparable to the figures in Table 3.</p><p> </p><p>Data is based on primary disabling condition as recorded on the PIP computer systems. Claimants may often have multiple disabling conditions upon which the decision is based but only the primary condition is shown in these statistics. It is not possible to break down the condition of “visual disease” into sight loss or visual impairment from the data.</p><p> </p><p>The appeals may include decisions which are changed at mandatory reconsideration, and where the claimant continues to appeal for a higher PIP award, are then changed again at tribunal appeal.</p><p> </p><p>Claimants who have received benefit decisions more recently may not yet have had time to complete the claimant journey and progress to appeal.</p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
grouped question UIN 205971 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-10T15:19:42.19Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-10T15:19:42.19Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
tabling member
4463
label Biography information for Chris Stephens more like this
1037057
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-01-07more like thismore than 2019-01-07
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions remove filter
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Visual Impairment more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many and what proportion of (a) all new claimants of personal independence payment (PIP) and (b) new claimants of PIP identifying as having a primary condition of (i) sight loss and (ii) a visual impairment did not receive an award during their initial PIP assessment but received an award at (A) mandatory reconsideration and (B) tribunal in Scotland in each year since 2013. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow South West more like this
tabling member printed
Chris Stephens more like this
uin 205971 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-01-10more like thismore than 2019-01-10
answer text <p>The information requested is provided in the tables below.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 1:</strong> <strong>PIP decisions, MRs and appeals – People with a primary disabling condition of visual diseases, Scotland, new claims and reassessments</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Initial decisions</p></td><td><p>Failed initial assessment</p></td><td><p>Failed initial assessment - Changed at mandatory reconsideration</p></td><td><p>Failed initial assessment - Overturned at tribunal appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014-15</p></td><td><p>420</p></td><td><p>120</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015-16</p></td><td><p>620</p></td><td><p>150</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016-17</p></td><td><p>1,250</p></td><td><p>220</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>40</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017-18</p></td><td><p>1,000</p></td><td><p>230</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>50</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Table 2: PIP decisions, MRs and appeals – Scotland, New claims</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Initial decisions</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Failed initial assessment</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Failed initial assessment - Changed at MR</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Failed initial assessment - Overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>10,460</p></td><td><p>2,480</p></td><td><p>24%</p></td><td><p>140</p></td><td><p>6%</p></td><td><p>160</p></td><td><p>6%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014-15</p></td><td><p>55,460</p></td><td><p>13,140</p></td><td><p>24%</p></td><td><p>360</p></td><td><p>3%</p></td><td><p>1,190</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015-16</p></td><td><p>48,740</p></td><td><p>12,640</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td><td><p>370</p></td><td><p>3%</p></td><td><p>1,180</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016-17</p></td><td><p>52,560</p></td><td><p>13,430</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td><td><p>510</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td><td><p>1,170</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017-18</p></td><td><p>57,290</p></td><td><p>15,830</p></td><td><p>28%</p></td><td><p>560</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td><td><p>1,620</p></td><td><p>10%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 3: PIP decisions, MRs and appeals – People with a primary disabling condition of visual diseases, Scotland, New claims</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Initial decisions</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Failed initial assessment</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Failed initial assessment - Changed at MR</p></td><td colspan="2"><p>Failed initial assessment - Overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>%</p></td><td><p>Number</p></td><td><p>%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>19%</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014-15</p></td><td><p>350</p></td><td><p>120</p></td><td><p>33%</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015-16</p></td><td><p>300</p></td><td><p>120</p></td><td><p>40%</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>14%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016-17</p></td><td><p>290</p></td><td><p>110</p></td><td><p>38%</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>11%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017-18</p></td><td><p>340</p></td><td><p>140</p></td><td><p>41%</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>16%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>Since PIP was introduced 3.7m decisions have been made in Great Britain for all health conditions up to September 2018, of these 10% have been appealed and 5% have been overturned.</p><p> </p><p>The data has been rounded to the nearest 10. # Fewer than 5 in this category.</p><p> </p><p>PIP data includes normal rules and special rules for the terminally ill claimants, and covers new claims and DLA reassessment claims.</p><p> </p><p>In the application process, claimants’ main disabling condition is only recorded for collation by the Department at assessment. Therefore the figures in Table 2 will include claims where the disability has not been recorded due to the assessment not being completed, and are therefore not comparable to the figures in Table 3.</p><p> </p><p>Data is based on primary disabling condition as recorded on the PIP computer systems. Claimants may often have multiple disabling conditions upon which the decision is based but only the primary condition is shown in these statistics. It is not possible to break down the condition of “visual disease” into sight loss or visual impairment from the data.</p><p> </p><p>The appeals may include decisions which are changed at mandatory reconsideration, and where the claimant continues to appeal for a higher PIP award, are then changed again at tribunal appeal.</p><p> </p><p>Claimants who have received benefit decisions more recently may not yet have had time to complete the claimant journey and progress to appeal.</p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
grouped question UIN 205970 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-01-10T15:19:42.27Zmore like thismore than 2019-01-10T15:19:42.27Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
tabling member
4463
label Biography information for Chris Stephens more like this