Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1669331
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2023-11-13
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Pets: Fireworks more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Benyon on 10 November (HL11), how many prosecutions there have been in each year since the implementation of the Animal Welfare Act 2006 of individuals causing animals unnecessary suffering as a result of the misuse of fireworks; and how many of those resulted in a custodial sentence. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Black of Brentwood more like this
uin HL207 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-11-23more like thismore than 2023-11-23
answer text <p>The Ministry of Justice publishes information on prosecutions, convictions and sentence outcomes in the Outcome by Offence data tool including offences as set out in the Offence Group Classification. This can be found via the following link: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/criminal-justice-system-statistics-quarterly-december-2022" target="_blank">Criminal Justice System statistics quarterly: December 2022 - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)</a>. The total number of individuals prosecuted and sentence outcomes for causing, permitting, or failing to prevent unnecessary suffering of animals, under the Animal Welfare Act 2006, can be obtained by selecting HO code 09701 and 10829.</p><p>However, whether this was specifically due to the misuse of fireworks is not held centrally in the Court Proceedings Database. This information may be held on court records but to examine individual court records would be of disproportionate costs.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Bellamy more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-11-23T13:07:03.303Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-23T13:07:03.303Z
answering member
4941
label Biography information for Lord Bellamy more like this
tabling member
4171
label Biography information for Lord Black of Brentwood more like this
1669346
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2023-11-13
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Parole more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask His Majesty's Government how many people serving an imprisonment for public protection sentence were eligible for a review of their licence, in each quarter since 2021; and of those how many referrals were made to the Parole Board for review. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Moylan more like this
uin HL233 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-11-28more like thismore than 2023-11-28
answer text <p>Where 10 years have elapsed since the Parole Board first directed the release of an offender serving a sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP), the Secretary of State must by law refer that offender to the Parole Board, in order for the Board to determine whether to terminate the offender’s IPP licence. The minimum 10-year period is not paused or reset if an offender is recalled to prison or serves a subsequent sentence for further offences. Where the Board does not terminate the licence, the Secretary of State must by law re-refer the offender every 12 months. This ensures that every eligible offender is considered by the Parole Board annually and will enable the IPP licence, and the IPP sentence as a whole, to be brought to a definitive end for more offenders.</p><p>On 16 October 2023, the Lord Chancellor announced he would be looking at options to curtail the licence period to restore greater proportionality to IPP sentences in line with recommendation 8 of the report by the Justice Select Committee’ (JSC) report, published on 28 September 2022.</p><p>These changes are being taken forward in the Victims and Prisoners Bill.</p><p>The new measure will:</p><ol><li>Reduce the qualifying period which triggers the duty of the Secretary of State to refer an IPP licence to the Parole Board for termination from ten years to three years;</li><li>Include a clear statutory presumption that the IPP licence will be terminated by the Parole Board at the end of the three-year qualifying period;</li><li>Introduce a provision that will automatically terminate the IPP licence two years after the three-year qualifying period, in cases where the Parole Board has not terminated the licence; and</li><li>Introduce a power to amend the qualifying period by Statutory Instrument.</li></ol><p> </p><p>The Lord Chancellor was persuaded by the Committee’s recommendation to reduce the qualifying licence period from 10 years to 5 years and is going further: reducing the period to 3 years. These amendments will restore greater proportionality to IPP sentences and provide a clear pathway to a definitive end to the licence and, therefore, the sentence.</p><p>In addition to these changes, the actions this Government are taking are working; the number of prisoners serving the IPP sentence who have never been released now stands at 1,269 as of September 2023, down from more than 6000 in 2012.</p><p>Table 1: Shows the number of offenders serving an IPP sentence under pre- and post-release supervision who are eligible to be considered for termination of their licence, at end of period, December 2020 to June 2023, England and Wales.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Period</p></td><td><p>Eligible</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q1</p></td><td><p>187</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q2</p></td><td><p>237</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q3</p></td><td><p>299</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q4</p></td><td><p>391</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q1</p></td><td><p>477</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q2</p></td><td><p>571</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q3</p></td><td><p>662</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q4</p></td><td><p>769</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q1</p></td><td><p>842</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q2</p></td><td><p>945</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Please Note:</p><p>(1) This table includes IPP offenders who have been returned to custody following a recall.</p><p>(2) The figures in these tables have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</p><p>Table 2: Shows the number of cases referred to the Parole Board</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Period</p></td><td><p>Referrals</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q2</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q3</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q4</p></td><td><p>9</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q1</p></td><td><p>46</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q2</p></td><td><p>42</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q3</p></td><td><p>72</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q4</p></td><td><p>69</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q1</p></td><td><p>83</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q2</p></td><td><p>147</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Please Note:</p><p>(1) Figures could contain cases where the offender became eligible for licence termination in previous quarter.</p><p>(2) Figures from Table 1 are snapshot figures and are not comparable to figures in Table 2</p><p> </p><p>Table 3: Shows the outcomes of licence termination applications in each quarter since 2021.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Outcome Period</p></td><td><p>Terminated</p></td><td><p>Suspended/ Varied</p></td><td><p>Refused</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q2</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q3</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q4</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q1</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q2</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q3</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>18</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q4</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>46</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q1</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>23</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q2</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>72</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Table 4: Shows the number of people serving an IPP sentence that were transferred from prison to a secure hospital, and held in a secure hospital, in each year, since 2009</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Year</p></td><td><p>Number of transfers in the year</p></td><td><p>Population in Secure Hospital at end of year</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2009</p></td><td><p>54</p></td><td><p>472</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010</p></td><td><p>107</p></td><td><p>467</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>438</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012</p></td><td><p>86</p></td><td><p>380</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>326</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>88</p></td><td><p>264</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>72</p></td><td><p>274</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>66</p></td><td><p>274</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>59</p></td><td><p>278</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>282</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>59</p></td><td><p>276</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>55</p></td><td><p>275</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>39</p></td><td><p>287</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022</p></td><td><p>44</p></td><td><p>262</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Please Note:</p><p>(1) We do not hold figures prior to 2009 as the data entry system which holds these data was implemented in 2009 and data prior to this period are not of sufficient quality to allow for the breakdown requested.</p><p>(2) The number of transfers is not the same as number of offenders transferred as there could be more than one transfer associated with an offender in a year.</p><p>(3) These figures have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing. Consequently, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.</p><p>The information requested for HL236 and HL237 could only be obtained at disproportionate cost. The information for HL238 is not held centrally.</p>
answering member printed Lord Bellamy more like this
grouped question UIN
HL234 more like this
HL235 more like this
HL236 more like this
HL237 more like this
HL238 more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-11-28T15:57:00.023Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-28T15:57:00.023Z
answering member
4941
label Biography information for Lord Bellamy more like this
tabling member
4883
label Biography information for Lord Moylan more like this
1669347
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2023-11-13
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Parole more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask His Majesty's Government how many hearings were held by the Parole Board to review an imprisonment for public protection licence, in each quarter since 2021, and of those how many resulted in (1) termination of the licence, (2) variation of licence conditions, or (3) no change to licence conditions. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Moylan more like this
uin HL234 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-11-28more like thismore than 2023-11-28
answer text <p>Where 10 years have elapsed since the Parole Board first directed the release of an offender serving a sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP), the Secretary of State must by law refer that offender to the Parole Board, in order for the Board to determine whether to terminate the offender’s IPP licence. The minimum 10-year period is not paused or reset if an offender is recalled to prison or serves a subsequent sentence for further offences. Where the Board does not terminate the licence, the Secretary of State must by law re-refer the offender every 12 months. This ensures that every eligible offender is considered by the Parole Board annually and will enable the IPP licence, and the IPP sentence as a whole, to be brought to a definitive end for more offenders.</p><p>On 16 October 2023, the Lord Chancellor announced he would be looking at options to curtail the licence period to restore greater proportionality to IPP sentences in line with recommendation 8 of the report by the Justice Select Committee’ (JSC) report, published on 28 September 2022.</p><p>These changes are being taken forward in the Victims and Prisoners Bill.</p><p>The new measure will:</p><ol><li>Reduce the qualifying period which triggers the duty of the Secretary of State to refer an IPP licence to the Parole Board for termination from ten years to three years;</li><li>Include a clear statutory presumption that the IPP licence will be terminated by the Parole Board at the end of the three-year qualifying period;</li><li>Introduce a provision that will automatically terminate the IPP licence two years after the three-year qualifying period, in cases where the Parole Board has not terminated the licence; and</li><li>Introduce a power to amend the qualifying period by Statutory Instrument.</li></ol><p> </p><p>The Lord Chancellor was persuaded by the Committee’s recommendation to reduce the qualifying licence period from 10 years to 5 years and is going further: reducing the period to 3 years. These amendments will restore greater proportionality to IPP sentences and provide a clear pathway to a definitive end to the licence and, therefore, the sentence.</p><p>In addition to these changes, the actions this Government are taking are working; the number of prisoners serving the IPP sentence who have never been released now stands at 1,269 as of September 2023, down from more than 6000 in 2012.</p><p>Table 1: Shows the number of offenders serving an IPP sentence under pre- and post-release supervision who are eligible to be considered for termination of their licence, at end of period, December 2020 to June 2023, England and Wales.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Period</p></td><td><p>Eligible</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q1</p></td><td><p>187</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q2</p></td><td><p>237</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q3</p></td><td><p>299</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q4</p></td><td><p>391</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q1</p></td><td><p>477</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q2</p></td><td><p>571</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q3</p></td><td><p>662</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q4</p></td><td><p>769</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q1</p></td><td><p>842</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q2</p></td><td><p>945</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Please Note:</p><p>(1) This table includes IPP offenders who have been returned to custody following a recall.</p><p>(2) The figures in these tables have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</p><p>Table 2: Shows the number of cases referred to the Parole Board</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Period</p></td><td><p>Referrals</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q2</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q3</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q4</p></td><td><p>9</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q1</p></td><td><p>46</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q2</p></td><td><p>42</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q3</p></td><td><p>72</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q4</p></td><td><p>69</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q1</p></td><td><p>83</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q2</p></td><td><p>147</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Please Note:</p><p>(1) Figures could contain cases where the offender became eligible for licence termination in previous quarter.</p><p>(2) Figures from Table 1 are snapshot figures and are not comparable to figures in Table 2</p><p> </p><p>Table 3: Shows the outcomes of licence termination applications in each quarter since 2021.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Outcome Period</p></td><td><p>Terminated</p></td><td><p>Suspended/ Varied</p></td><td><p>Refused</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q2</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q3</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q4</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q1</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q2</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q3</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>18</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q4</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>46</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q1</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>23</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q2</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>72</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Table 4: Shows the number of people serving an IPP sentence that were transferred from prison to a secure hospital, and held in a secure hospital, in each year, since 2009</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Year</p></td><td><p>Number of transfers in the year</p></td><td><p>Population in Secure Hospital at end of year</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2009</p></td><td><p>54</p></td><td><p>472</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010</p></td><td><p>107</p></td><td><p>467</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>438</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012</p></td><td><p>86</p></td><td><p>380</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>326</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>88</p></td><td><p>264</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>72</p></td><td><p>274</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>66</p></td><td><p>274</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>59</p></td><td><p>278</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>282</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>59</p></td><td><p>276</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>55</p></td><td><p>275</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>39</p></td><td><p>287</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022</p></td><td><p>44</p></td><td><p>262</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Please Note:</p><p>(1) We do not hold figures prior to 2009 as the data entry system which holds these data was implemented in 2009 and data prior to this period are not of sufficient quality to allow for the breakdown requested.</p><p>(2) The number of transfers is not the same as number of offenders transferred as there could be more than one transfer associated with an offender in a year.</p><p>(3) These figures have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing. Consequently, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.</p><p>The information requested for HL236 and HL237 could only be obtained at disproportionate cost. The information for HL238 is not held centrally.</p>
answering member printed Lord Bellamy more like this
grouped question UIN
HL233 more like this
HL235 more like this
HL236 more like this
HL237 more like this
HL238 more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-11-28T15:57:00.1Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-28T15:57:00.1Z
answering member
4941
label Biography information for Lord Bellamy more like this
tabling member
4883
label Biography information for Lord Moylan more like this
1669384
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2023-11-13
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Compulsorily Detained Psychiatric Patients more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask His Majesty's Government how many people serving an imprisonment for public protection sentence were (1) transferred from prison to a secure hospital, and (2) held in a secure hospital, in each year since 2005. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Moylan more like this
uin HL235 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-11-28more like thismore than 2023-11-28
answer text <p>Where 10 years have elapsed since the Parole Board first directed the release of an offender serving a sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP), the Secretary of State must by law refer that offender to the Parole Board, in order for the Board to determine whether to terminate the offender’s IPP licence. The minimum 10-year period is not paused or reset if an offender is recalled to prison or serves a subsequent sentence for further offences. Where the Board does not terminate the licence, the Secretary of State must by law re-refer the offender every 12 months. This ensures that every eligible offender is considered by the Parole Board annually and will enable the IPP licence, and the IPP sentence as a whole, to be brought to a definitive end for more offenders.</p><p>On 16 October 2023, the Lord Chancellor announced he would be looking at options to curtail the licence period to restore greater proportionality to IPP sentences in line with recommendation 8 of the report by the Justice Select Committee’ (JSC) report, published on 28 September 2022.</p><p>These changes are being taken forward in the Victims and Prisoners Bill.</p><p>The new measure will:</p><ol><li>Reduce the qualifying period which triggers the duty of the Secretary of State to refer an IPP licence to the Parole Board for termination from ten years to three years;</li><li>Include a clear statutory presumption that the IPP licence will be terminated by the Parole Board at the end of the three-year qualifying period;</li><li>Introduce a provision that will automatically terminate the IPP licence two years after the three-year qualifying period, in cases where the Parole Board has not terminated the licence; and</li><li>Introduce a power to amend the qualifying period by Statutory Instrument.</li></ol><p> </p><p>The Lord Chancellor was persuaded by the Committee’s recommendation to reduce the qualifying licence period from 10 years to 5 years and is going further: reducing the period to 3 years. These amendments will restore greater proportionality to IPP sentences and provide a clear pathway to a definitive end to the licence and, therefore, the sentence.</p><p>In addition to these changes, the actions this Government are taking are working; the number of prisoners serving the IPP sentence who have never been released now stands at 1,269 as of September 2023, down from more than 6000 in 2012.</p><p>Table 1: Shows the number of offenders serving an IPP sentence under pre- and post-release supervision who are eligible to be considered for termination of their licence, at end of period, December 2020 to June 2023, England and Wales.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Period</p></td><td><p>Eligible</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q1</p></td><td><p>187</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q2</p></td><td><p>237</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q3</p></td><td><p>299</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q4</p></td><td><p>391</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q1</p></td><td><p>477</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q2</p></td><td><p>571</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q3</p></td><td><p>662</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q4</p></td><td><p>769</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q1</p></td><td><p>842</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q2</p></td><td><p>945</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Please Note:</p><p>(1) This table includes IPP offenders who have been returned to custody following a recall.</p><p>(2) The figures in these tables have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</p><p>Table 2: Shows the number of cases referred to the Parole Board</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Period</p></td><td><p>Referrals</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q2</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q3</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q4</p></td><td><p>9</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q1</p></td><td><p>46</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q2</p></td><td><p>42</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q3</p></td><td><p>72</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q4</p></td><td><p>69</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q1</p></td><td><p>83</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q2</p></td><td><p>147</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Please Note:</p><p>(1) Figures could contain cases where the offender became eligible for licence termination in previous quarter.</p><p>(2) Figures from Table 1 are snapshot figures and are not comparable to figures in Table 2</p><p> </p><p>Table 3: Shows the outcomes of licence termination applications in each quarter since 2021.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Outcome Period</p></td><td><p>Terminated</p></td><td><p>Suspended/ Varied</p></td><td><p>Refused</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q2</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q3</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q4</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q1</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q2</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q3</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>18</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q4</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>46</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q1</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>23</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q2</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>72</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Table 4: Shows the number of people serving an IPP sentence that were transferred from prison to a secure hospital, and held in a secure hospital, in each year, since 2009</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Year</p></td><td><p>Number of transfers in the year</p></td><td><p>Population in Secure Hospital at end of year</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2009</p></td><td><p>54</p></td><td><p>472</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010</p></td><td><p>107</p></td><td><p>467</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>438</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012</p></td><td><p>86</p></td><td><p>380</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>326</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>88</p></td><td><p>264</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>72</p></td><td><p>274</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>66</p></td><td><p>274</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>59</p></td><td><p>278</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>282</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>59</p></td><td><p>276</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>55</p></td><td><p>275</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>39</p></td><td><p>287</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022</p></td><td><p>44</p></td><td><p>262</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Please Note:</p><p>(1) We do not hold figures prior to 2009 as the data entry system which holds these data was implemented in 2009 and data prior to this period are not of sufficient quality to allow for the breakdown requested.</p><p>(2) The number of transfers is not the same as number of offenders transferred as there could be more than one transfer associated with an offender in a year.</p><p>(3) These figures have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing. Consequently, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.</p><p>The information requested for HL236 and HL237 could only be obtained at disproportionate cost. The information for HL238 is not held centrally.</p>
answering member printed Lord Bellamy more like this
grouped question UIN
HL233 more like this
HL234 more like this
HL236 more like this
HL237 more like this
HL238 more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-11-28T15:57:00.177Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-28T15:57:00.177Z
answering member
4941
label Biography information for Lord Bellamy more like this
tabling member
4883
label Biography information for Lord Moylan more like this
1669385
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2023-11-13
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Compulsorily Detained Psychiatric Patients more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask His Majesty's Government, of those currently serving an imprisonment for public protection sentence in prison, how many have been held in a secure hospital at any point during their sentence, and are (1) unreleased or (2) have been recalled. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Moylan more like this
uin HL236 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-11-28more like thismore than 2023-11-28
answer text <p>Where 10 years have elapsed since the Parole Board first directed the release of an offender serving a sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP), the Secretary of State must by law refer that offender to the Parole Board, in order for the Board to determine whether to terminate the offender’s IPP licence. The minimum 10-year period is not paused or reset if an offender is recalled to prison or serves a subsequent sentence for further offences. Where the Board does not terminate the licence, the Secretary of State must by law re-refer the offender every 12 months. This ensures that every eligible offender is considered by the Parole Board annually and will enable the IPP licence, and the IPP sentence as a whole, to be brought to a definitive end for more offenders.</p><p>On 16 October 2023, the Lord Chancellor announced he would be looking at options to curtail the licence period to restore greater proportionality to IPP sentences in line with recommendation 8 of the report by the Justice Select Committee’ (JSC) report, published on 28 September 2022.</p><p>These changes are being taken forward in the Victims and Prisoners Bill.</p><p>The new measure will:</p><ol><li>Reduce the qualifying period which triggers the duty of the Secretary of State to refer an IPP licence to the Parole Board for termination from ten years to three years;</li><li>Include a clear statutory presumption that the IPP licence will be terminated by the Parole Board at the end of the three-year qualifying period;</li><li>Introduce a provision that will automatically terminate the IPP licence two years after the three-year qualifying period, in cases where the Parole Board has not terminated the licence; and</li><li>Introduce a power to amend the qualifying period by Statutory Instrument.</li></ol><p> </p><p>The Lord Chancellor was persuaded by the Committee’s recommendation to reduce the qualifying licence period from 10 years to 5 years and is going further: reducing the period to 3 years. These amendments will restore greater proportionality to IPP sentences and provide a clear pathway to a definitive end to the licence and, therefore, the sentence.</p><p>In addition to these changes, the actions this Government are taking are working; the number of prisoners serving the IPP sentence who have never been released now stands at 1,269 as of September 2023, down from more than 6000 in 2012.</p><p>Table 1: Shows the number of offenders serving an IPP sentence under pre- and post-release supervision who are eligible to be considered for termination of their licence, at end of period, December 2020 to June 2023, England and Wales.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Period</p></td><td><p>Eligible</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q1</p></td><td><p>187</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q2</p></td><td><p>237</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q3</p></td><td><p>299</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q4</p></td><td><p>391</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q1</p></td><td><p>477</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q2</p></td><td><p>571</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q3</p></td><td><p>662</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q4</p></td><td><p>769</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q1</p></td><td><p>842</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q2</p></td><td><p>945</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Please Note:</p><p>(1) This table includes IPP offenders who have been returned to custody following a recall.</p><p>(2) The figures in these tables have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</p><p>Table 2: Shows the number of cases referred to the Parole Board</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Period</p></td><td><p>Referrals</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q2</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q3</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q4</p></td><td><p>9</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q1</p></td><td><p>46</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q2</p></td><td><p>42</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q3</p></td><td><p>72</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q4</p></td><td><p>69</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q1</p></td><td><p>83</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q2</p></td><td><p>147</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Please Note:</p><p>(1) Figures could contain cases where the offender became eligible for licence termination in previous quarter.</p><p>(2) Figures from Table 1 are snapshot figures and are not comparable to figures in Table 2</p><p> </p><p>Table 3: Shows the outcomes of licence termination applications in each quarter since 2021.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Outcome Period</p></td><td><p>Terminated</p></td><td><p>Suspended/ Varied</p></td><td><p>Refused</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q2</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q3</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q4</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q1</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q2</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q3</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>18</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q4</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>46</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q1</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>23</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q2</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>72</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Table 4: Shows the number of people serving an IPP sentence that were transferred from prison to a secure hospital, and held in a secure hospital, in each year, since 2009</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Year</p></td><td><p>Number of transfers in the year</p></td><td><p>Population in Secure Hospital at end of year</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2009</p></td><td><p>54</p></td><td><p>472</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010</p></td><td><p>107</p></td><td><p>467</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>438</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012</p></td><td><p>86</p></td><td><p>380</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>326</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>88</p></td><td><p>264</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>72</p></td><td><p>274</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>66</p></td><td><p>274</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>59</p></td><td><p>278</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>282</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>59</p></td><td><p>276</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>55</p></td><td><p>275</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>39</p></td><td><p>287</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022</p></td><td><p>44</p></td><td><p>262</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Please Note:</p><p>(1) We do not hold figures prior to 2009 as the data entry system which holds these data was implemented in 2009 and data prior to this period are not of sufficient quality to allow for the breakdown requested.</p><p>(2) The number of transfers is not the same as number of offenders transferred as there could be more than one transfer associated with an offender in a year.</p><p>(3) These figures have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing. Consequently, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.</p><p>The information requested for HL236 and HL237 could only be obtained at disproportionate cost. The information for HL238 is not held centrally.</p>
answering member printed Lord Bellamy more like this
grouped question UIN
HL233 more like this
HL234 more like this
HL235 more like this
HL237 more like this
HL238 more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-11-28T15:56:59.93Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-28T15:56:59.93Z
answering member
4941
label Biography information for Lord Bellamy more like this
tabling member
4883
label Biography information for Lord Moylan more like this
1669386
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2023-11-13
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Compulsorily Detained Psychiatric Patients more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask His Majesty's Government, of those currently serving an imprisonment for public protection sentence on licence in the community, how many have been held in a secure hospital at any point during their sentence. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Moylan more like this
uin HL237 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-11-28more like thismore than 2023-11-28
answer text <p>Where 10 years have elapsed since the Parole Board first directed the release of an offender serving a sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP), the Secretary of State must by law refer that offender to the Parole Board, in order for the Board to determine whether to terminate the offender’s IPP licence. The minimum 10-year period is not paused or reset if an offender is recalled to prison or serves a subsequent sentence for further offences. Where the Board does not terminate the licence, the Secretary of State must by law re-refer the offender every 12 months. This ensures that every eligible offender is considered by the Parole Board annually and will enable the IPP licence, and the IPP sentence as a whole, to be brought to a definitive end for more offenders.</p><p>On 16 October 2023, the Lord Chancellor announced he would be looking at options to curtail the licence period to restore greater proportionality to IPP sentences in line with recommendation 8 of the report by the Justice Select Committee’ (JSC) report, published on 28 September 2022.</p><p>These changes are being taken forward in the Victims and Prisoners Bill.</p><p>The new measure will:</p><ol><li>Reduce the qualifying period which triggers the duty of the Secretary of State to refer an IPP licence to the Parole Board for termination from ten years to three years;</li><li>Include a clear statutory presumption that the IPP licence will be terminated by the Parole Board at the end of the three-year qualifying period;</li><li>Introduce a provision that will automatically terminate the IPP licence two years after the three-year qualifying period, in cases where the Parole Board has not terminated the licence; and</li><li>Introduce a power to amend the qualifying period by Statutory Instrument.</li></ol><p> </p><p>The Lord Chancellor was persuaded by the Committee’s recommendation to reduce the qualifying licence period from 10 years to 5 years and is going further: reducing the period to 3 years. These amendments will restore greater proportionality to IPP sentences and provide a clear pathway to a definitive end to the licence and, therefore, the sentence.</p><p>In addition to these changes, the actions this Government are taking are working; the number of prisoners serving the IPP sentence who have never been released now stands at 1,269 as of September 2023, down from more than 6000 in 2012.</p><p>Table 1: Shows the number of offenders serving an IPP sentence under pre- and post-release supervision who are eligible to be considered for termination of their licence, at end of period, December 2020 to June 2023, England and Wales.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Period</p></td><td><p>Eligible</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q1</p></td><td><p>187</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q2</p></td><td><p>237</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q3</p></td><td><p>299</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q4</p></td><td><p>391</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q1</p></td><td><p>477</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q2</p></td><td><p>571</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q3</p></td><td><p>662</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q4</p></td><td><p>769</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q1</p></td><td><p>842</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q2</p></td><td><p>945</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Please Note:</p><p>(1) This table includes IPP offenders who have been returned to custody following a recall.</p><p>(2) The figures in these tables have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</p><p>Table 2: Shows the number of cases referred to the Parole Board</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Period</p></td><td><p>Referrals</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q2</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q3</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q4</p></td><td><p>9</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q1</p></td><td><p>46</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q2</p></td><td><p>42</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q3</p></td><td><p>72</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q4</p></td><td><p>69</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q1</p></td><td><p>83</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q2</p></td><td><p>147</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Please Note:</p><p>(1) Figures could contain cases where the offender became eligible for licence termination in previous quarter.</p><p>(2) Figures from Table 1 are snapshot figures and are not comparable to figures in Table 2</p><p> </p><p>Table 3: Shows the outcomes of licence termination applications in each quarter since 2021.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Outcome Period</p></td><td><p>Terminated</p></td><td><p>Suspended/ Varied</p></td><td><p>Refused</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q2</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q3</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q4</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q1</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q2</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q3</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>18</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q4</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>46</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q1</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>23</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q2</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>72</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Table 4: Shows the number of people serving an IPP sentence that were transferred from prison to a secure hospital, and held in a secure hospital, in each year, since 2009</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Year</p></td><td><p>Number of transfers in the year</p></td><td><p>Population in Secure Hospital at end of year</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2009</p></td><td><p>54</p></td><td><p>472</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010</p></td><td><p>107</p></td><td><p>467</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>438</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012</p></td><td><p>86</p></td><td><p>380</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>326</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>88</p></td><td><p>264</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>72</p></td><td><p>274</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>66</p></td><td><p>274</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>59</p></td><td><p>278</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>282</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>59</p></td><td><p>276</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>55</p></td><td><p>275</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>39</p></td><td><p>287</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022</p></td><td><p>44</p></td><td><p>262</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Please Note:</p><p>(1) We do not hold figures prior to 2009 as the data entry system which holds these data was implemented in 2009 and data prior to this period are not of sufficient quality to allow for the breakdown requested.</p><p>(2) The number of transfers is not the same as number of offenders transferred as there could be more than one transfer associated with an offender in a year.</p><p>(3) These figures have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing. Consequently, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.</p><p>The information requested for HL236 and HL237 could only be obtained at disproportionate cost. The information for HL238 is not held centrally.</p>
answering member printed Lord Bellamy more like this
grouped question UIN
HL233 more like this
HL234 more like this
HL235 more like this
HL236 more like this
HL238 more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-11-28T15:57:00.257Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-28T15:57:00.257Z
answering member
4941
label Biography information for Lord Bellamy more like this
tabling member
4883
label Biography information for Lord Moylan more like this
1669387
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2023-11-13
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Compulsorily Detained Psychiatric Patients: Mental Health Services more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask His Majesty's Government, of those currently serving an imprisonment for public protection sentence in (1) prison, or (2) the community, how many are (a) eligible for support, and (b) receiving support, under section 117 of the Mental Health Act 1983. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Moylan more like this
uin HL238 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-11-28more like thismore than 2023-11-28
answer text <p>Where 10 years have elapsed since the Parole Board first directed the release of an offender serving a sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP), the Secretary of State must by law refer that offender to the Parole Board, in order for the Board to determine whether to terminate the offender’s IPP licence. The minimum 10-year period is not paused or reset if an offender is recalled to prison or serves a subsequent sentence for further offences. Where the Board does not terminate the licence, the Secretary of State must by law re-refer the offender every 12 months. This ensures that every eligible offender is considered by the Parole Board annually and will enable the IPP licence, and the IPP sentence as a whole, to be brought to a definitive end for more offenders.</p><p>On 16 October 2023, the Lord Chancellor announced he would be looking at options to curtail the licence period to restore greater proportionality to IPP sentences in line with recommendation 8 of the report by the Justice Select Committee’ (JSC) report, published on 28 September 2022.</p><p>These changes are being taken forward in the Victims and Prisoners Bill.</p><p>The new measure will:</p><ol><li>Reduce the qualifying period which triggers the duty of the Secretary of State to refer an IPP licence to the Parole Board for termination from ten years to three years;</li><li>Include a clear statutory presumption that the IPP licence will be terminated by the Parole Board at the end of the three-year qualifying period;</li><li>Introduce a provision that will automatically terminate the IPP licence two years after the three-year qualifying period, in cases where the Parole Board has not terminated the licence; and</li><li>Introduce a power to amend the qualifying period by Statutory Instrument.</li></ol><p> </p><p>The Lord Chancellor was persuaded by the Committee’s recommendation to reduce the qualifying licence period from 10 years to 5 years and is going further: reducing the period to 3 years. These amendments will restore greater proportionality to IPP sentences and provide a clear pathway to a definitive end to the licence and, therefore, the sentence.</p><p>In addition to these changes, the actions this Government are taking are working; the number of prisoners serving the IPP sentence who have never been released now stands at 1,269 as of September 2023, down from more than 6000 in 2012.</p><p>Table 1: Shows the number of offenders serving an IPP sentence under pre- and post-release supervision who are eligible to be considered for termination of their licence, at end of period, December 2020 to June 2023, England and Wales.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Period</p></td><td><p>Eligible</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q1</p></td><td><p>187</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q2</p></td><td><p>237</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q3</p></td><td><p>299</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q4</p></td><td><p>391</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q1</p></td><td><p>477</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q2</p></td><td><p>571</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q3</p></td><td><p>662</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q4</p></td><td><p>769</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q1</p></td><td><p>842</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q2</p></td><td><p>945</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Please Note:</p><p>(1) This table includes IPP offenders who have been returned to custody following a recall.</p><p>(2) The figures in these tables have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</p><p>Table 2: Shows the number of cases referred to the Parole Board</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Period</p></td><td><p>Referrals</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q2</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q3</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q4</p></td><td><p>9</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q1</p></td><td><p>46</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q2</p></td><td><p>42</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q3</p></td><td><p>72</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q4</p></td><td><p>69</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q1</p></td><td><p>83</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q2</p></td><td><p>147</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Please Note:</p><p>(1) Figures could contain cases where the offender became eligible for licence termination in previous quarter.</p><p>(2) Figures from Table 1 are snapshot figures and are not comparable to figures in Table 2</p><p> </p><p>Table 3: Shows the outcomes of licence termination applications in each quarter since 2021.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Outcome Period</p></td><td><p>Terminated</p></td><td><p>Suspended/ Varied</p></td><td><p>Refused</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q2</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q3</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021 Q4</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q1</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q2</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q3</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>18</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022 Q4</p></td><td><p>28</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>46</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q1</p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>23</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2023 Q2</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>72</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Table 4: Shows the number of people serving an IPP sentence that were transferred from prison to a secure hospital, and held in a secure hospital, in each year, since 2009</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Year</p></td><td><p>Number of transfers in the year</p></td><td><p>Population in Secure Hospital at end of year</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2009</p></td><td><p>54</p></td><td><p>472</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010</p></td><td><p>107</p></td><td><p>467</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>438</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012</p></td><td><p>86</p></td><td><p>380</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>326</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>88</p></td><td><p>264</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>72</p></td><td><p>274</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>66</p></td><td><p>274</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>59</p></td><td><p>278</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>282</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>59</p></td><td><p>276</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>55</p></td><td><p>275</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>39</p></td><td><p>287</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2022</p></td><td><p>44</p></td><td><p>262</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Please Note:</p><p>(1) We do not hold figures prior to 2009 as the data entry system which holds these data was implemented in 2009 and data prior to this period are not of sufficient quality to allow for the breakdown requested.</p><p>(2) The number of transfers is not the same as number of offenders transferred as there could be more than one transfer associated with an offender in a year.</p><p>(3) These figures have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large-scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing. Consequently, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.</p><p>The information requested for HL236 and HL237 could only be obtained at disproportionate cost. The information for HL238 is not held centrally.</p>
answering member printed Lord Bellamy more like this
grouped question UIN
HL233 more like this
HL234 more like this
HL235 more like this
HL236 more like this
HL237 more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-11-28T15:57:00.323Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-28T15:57:00.323Z
answering member
4941
label Biography information for Lord Bellamy more like this
tabling member
4883
label Biography information for Lord Moylan more like this
1669448
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2023-11-13
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Probation Service: Recruitment more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to Annex 1.12 of the model service agreements for contracts with Red Snapper and Service Care Solutions, dated 5 May 2022, and with reference to the Answers of 25 October 2023 to Question 203245 on Probation Service: Red Snapper Recruitment and 26 October 2023 to Question 203246 on Probation Service: Service Care Solutions, for what reason there was a decline in the number of agency staff recruited to temporary probation officer roles between 1 June 2022 and 18 October 2023, compared to the number recruited in 2021-22. more like this
tabling member constituency Islington South and Finsbury more like this
tabling member printed
Emily Thornberry more like this
uin 1489 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-11-21more like thismore than 2023-11-21
answer text <p>The information requested is not readily available as it requires the validation of an inordinate amount of data which would therefore incur disproportionate cost.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Charnwood more like this
answering member printed Edward Argar more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-11-21T10:12:23.787Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-21T10:12:23.787Z
answering member
4362
label Biography information for Edward Argar more like this
tabling member
1536
label Biography information for Emily Thornberry more like this
1669449
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2023-11-13
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Probation Service: Recruitment more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to Annex 1.12 of the model service agreements for contracts with Red Snapper and Service Care Solutions, dated 5 May 2022, and with reference to the Answers of 25 October 2023 to Question 203245 on Probation Service: Red Snapper Recruitment and 26 October 2023 to Question 203246 on Probation Service: Service Care Solutions, for what reason there was an increase in the number of agency staff recruited to temporary probation service officer roles between 1 June 2022 and 18 October 2023, compared to the number recruited in 2021-22. more like this
tabling member constituency Islington South and Finsbury more like this
tabling member printed
Emily Thornberry more like this
uin 1490 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-11-21more like thismore than 2023-11-21
answer text <p>The information requested is not readily available as it requires the validation of an inordinate amount of data which would therefore incur disproportionate cost.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Charnwood more like this
answering member printed Edward Argar more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-11-21T10:12:36.69Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-21T10:12:36.69Z
answering member
4362
label Biography information for Edward Argar more like this
tabling member
1536
label Biography information for Emily Thornberry more like this
1669462
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2023-11-13
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prisoners: Wales more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will make an assessment of the reasons for which Wales has a proportionally higher prison population per 100,000 than England. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts more like this
uin 1661 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-11-16more like thismore than 2023-11-16
answer text <p>Prison capacity and population movements are managed nationally across England and Wales. There are over 5,500 prison places in Wales including a 2,000 place prison, HMP Berwyn, which opened in 2017. Geographically HMP Berwyn is near to the Northwest of England and holds a significant number of prisoners sentenced by courts in that region as well as prisoners originating in Wales.</p><p> </p><p>UK nationals have a nationality of British. While holding an individual close to their home is an important consideration in the placement of prisoners, HMPPS does not identify or record prisoners as English or Welsh. Someone with an address in England may consider themselves to be Welsh, while someone with an address in Wales may not.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Charnwood more like this
answering member printed Edward Argar more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-11-16T13:02:12.157Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-16T13:02:12.157Z
answering member
4362
label Biography information for Edward Argar more like this
tabling member
4521
label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this