Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

44810
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-03-24more like thismore than 2014-03-24
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, in which instances Probation Trust staff have been co-located with other public or private organisations in (a) Probation Trust premises and (b) other organisation premises; and what the annual cost to the Probation Trust is of sub-letting space shared with another organisation for the purpose of staff co-location. more like this
tabling member constituency Tooting more like this
tabling member printed
Sadiq Khan more like this
uin 193387 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-03-31more like thismore than 2014-03-31
answer text <p>This information is not recorded centrally and could only be provided at disproportionate cost.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Kenilworth and Southam more like this
answering member printed Jeremy Wright more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-03-31T12:00:00.00Zmore like thismore than 2014-03-31T12:00:00.00Z
answering member
1560
label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Wright more like this
tabling member
1577
label Biography information for Sadiq Khan more like this
44811
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-03-24more like thismore than 2014-03-24
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many people given custodial sentences for non-payment of (a) a television licence, (b) vehicle excise duty and (c) council tax in (i) 2010, (ii) 2011, (iii) 2012 and (iv) 2013 were sentenced to (A) up to three months, (B) up to six months, (C) up to 12 months and (D) over 12 months. more like this
tabling member constituency Tooting more like this
tabling member printed
Sadiq Khan more like this
uin 193388 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-04-03more like thismore than 2014-04-03
answer text <p>The offences of using a TV receiver without a valid licence and of failure to hold a valid vehicle excise duty licence (tax disc) are not punishable by imprisonment, so offenders cannot be sentenced to custody for these offences. Failing to pay council tax is not a criminal offence.</p><p> </p><p>Offenders found guilty of TV licence or vehicle excise evasion may be sentenced to a fine. Failure to pay a fine can lead, following enforcement action and as a last resort, to committal to prison for fine default. Failure to pay council tax is pursued through the civil courts and can also lead, ultimately, to committal to prison.</p><p> </p><p>Data for receptions into prison for defaulting on the TV licence fine, in England and Wales, 2008 to 2012 can be viewed in table 1 below. Receptions for defaulting on the vehicle excise duty fine cannot be separately identified.</p><p><strong>Table 1</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="9"><p><strong>Fine defaulters received into prison for defaulting on fines imposed for using a TV without a valid licence: England and Wales, 2008-2012</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>Length to serve in respect of fine</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2008</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2009</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2010</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2011</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2012</strong></p></td><td> </td></tr><tr><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>Less than or equal to 3 months</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>34</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>30</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>30</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>48</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>50</strong></p></td><td> </td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>Greater than 3 months less than or equal to 6 months</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>0</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>0</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>0</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1</strong></p></td><td> </td></tr><tr><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><em>Data Sources and Quality:</em></p></td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td colspan="8"><p><em>These figures have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing. </em></p></td><td> </td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Data in relation to failure to pay council tax are shown in table 2 below.</p><p><strong>Table 2</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Disposal</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2010</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2011</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2012</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2013 </strong></p><p><strong>(To Sept )</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Immediate Imprisonment</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>122</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>104</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>106</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>81</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Committal Warrant Issued</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>5</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>0</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Totals</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>123</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>109</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>107</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>81</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><em>Notes:</em></p><p>· <em>This data has been extracted solely for the purposes of answering this question and has not been subject to data quality checks that would be applied for published statistics</em></p><p>· <em>The date is based on case completion date</em></p><p>· <em>The total figures include committal to prison, detention until court rises, imprisonment and imprisonment in default.</em></p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The number of defendants proceeded against in magistrates' courts, and found guilty and sentenced in all courts, for installing or using a television receiver without the appropriate licence, in England and Wales, from 2008 to 2012, can be viewed in Table 3.</p><p> </p><p>The number of defendants proceeded against in magistrates' courts, and found guilty and sentenced in all courts, for keeping a motor vehicle on the highway without a current vehicle excise licence, in England and Wales, from 2008 to 2012, can be viewed in Table 4.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Kenilworth and Southam more like this
answering member printed Jeremy Wright more like this
attachment
1
file name 193388, 193400 - Khan - Table 3.xls more like this
title Table 3 more like this
2
file name 193388, 193400 - Khan - Table 4.xls more like this
title Table 4 more like this
grouped question UIN 193400 more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-04-03T12:00:00.00Zmore like thismore than 2014-04-03T12:00:00.00Z
answering member
1560
label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Wright more like this
tabling member
1577
label Biography information for Sadiq Khan more like this
44812
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-03-24more like thismore than 2014-03-24
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 29 January 2013, Official Report, column 772W, on Judicial Review, what further assessment has been made of the reasons for the increase in the number of applications for judicial review. more like this
tabling member constituency Brent Central more like this
tabling member printed
Sarah Teather more like this
uin 193293 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-04-02more like thismore than 2014-04-02
answer text <p>The use of judicial review more than tripled between 2000 and 2013, from around 4,300 applications to around 15,700. The increase has been driven mainly by immigration and asylum cases but civil judicial reviews have increased by around 27% over the same period, from 1,745 in 2000 to 2,210 in 2013.</p><p> </p><p>In 2012 only around 1,400 of 7,600 applications considered for permission, including at an oral renewal, were granted permission to proceed to a final hearing. Between 1 October 2012 and 31 December 2013 around 30% of judicial reviews which reached the permission stage or oral renewal were found to be totally without merit.</p><p> </p><p>The governemnt is determined to improve the judicial review process. The rationale for the Government's reforms is set out in ‘Judicial review: further proposals for reform – the Government response' (<a href="https://consult.justice.gov.uk/digital-communications/judicial-review" target="_blank">https://consult.justice.gov.uk/digital-communications/judicial-review</a>). The Government is determined to improve the judicial review process so that it is not open to abuse and arguable cases can proceed quickly to final resolution.</p><p> </p><p>The Government is clear that judicial review is, and will remain, an important means to ensure the actions of Government and other bodies are lawful.</p><p> </p>
answering member constituency North West Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Mr Shailesh Vara more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-04-02T12:00:00.00Zmore like thismore than 2014-04-02T12:00:00.00Z
answering member
1496
label Biography information for Shailesh Vara more like this
tabling member
1170
label Biography information for Sarah Teather more like this
44813
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-03-24more like thismore than 2014-03-24
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, for what reasons Worksop Courthouse is planned to close. more like this
tabling member constituency Bassetlaw more like this
tabling member printed
John Mann more like this
uin 193281 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-03-31more like thismore than 2014-03-31
answer text <p>There are no plans to close the courthouse at Worksop. A consultation is currently underway on potential changes to listing arrangements at Worksop Magistrates' Court. The consultation commenced on 19 March 2014 and closes on 30 April 2014 and all responses will be taken into account before any decision is made.</p> more like this
answering member constituency North West Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Mr Shailesh Vara more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-03-31T12:00:00.00Zmore like thismore than 2014-03-31T12:00:00.00Z
answering member
1496
label Biography information for Shailesh Vara more like this
tabling member
1387
label Biography information for Lord Mann more like this