Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

940055
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-07-12more like thismore than 2018-07-12
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prison Officers more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many prison officers were in post on 1 January 2017 in (1) prisons managed by HM Prison Service, and (2) prisons managed by contractors; and how many of those in each category are still in post. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Beecham remove filter
uin HL9470 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-07-26more like thismore than 2018-07-26
answer text <p>On 31 December 2016 (the closest data point available) there were 17,687¹ prison officers in bands 3 to 5 in post in public sector prisons in England and Wales. Of these, 15,170<sup>2</sup> were still in post on 31 March 2018.</p><p>The latest Information on prison staffing levels can be found at <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/her-majestys-prison-and-probation-service-workforce-quarterly-march-2018" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/her-majestys-prison-and-probation-service-workforce-quarterly-march-2018</a>.</p><p>There are no comparable figures for privately managed prisons. The provision of management information relating to the number of officers in privately managed prisons is not a contractual requirement. Private providers continue to play an important role in the prison estate providing safe, decent and secure services, in line with HMPPS performance standards.</p><p><sup>1</sup> Excludes band 3-5 officers who are based in HQ and area services. These are band 3 to 5 officers who have not been allocated to a prison and are mainly officers who are on detached duty with no fixed location or are POELT trainers. It may also include a few staff redeploying from closing establishments who are allocated to an area office in the HR database before being reallocated to a prison in the database.</p><p><sup>2</sup> This includes staff who may have left and returned at any point after 31 December 2016 and before 31 March 2018, and therefore may not reflect continuous service.</p>
answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-07-26T12:51:18.85Zmore like thismore than 2018-07-26T12:51:18.85Z
answering member
4538
label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
tabling member
4181
label Biography information for Lord Beecham more like this
940056
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-07-12more like thismore than 2018-07-12
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prison Officers: Termination of Employment more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many prison officers have left HM Prison Service in each of the last three years for reasons other than reaching retirement age. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Beecham remove filter
uin HL9471 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-07-26more like thismore than 2018-07-26
answer text <p>The number of band 3-5 prison officers who have left HM Prison Service by reason for leaving in each of the last three years is presented in table 1 below. This information can also be found in table 11b in the latest set of HMPPS workforce statistics at the following link:</p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/her-majestys-prison-and-probation-service-workforce-quarterly-march-2018" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/her-majestys-prison-and-probation-service-workforce-quarterly-march-2018</a>.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Table 1: Band 3-5 prison officer leavers (headcount), by reason for leaving, 12 months ending 31 March 2016 to 12 months ending 31 March 2018</strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Headcount</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Reason for leaving</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>12 months ending 31 Mar 2016</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>12 months ending 31 Mar 2017</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>12 months ending 31 Mar 2018</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Resignation</p></td><td><p>596</p></td><td><p>859</p></td><td><p>1,244</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Medical retirement</p></td><td><p>150</p></td><td><p>142</p></td><td><p>109</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Death</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>23</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Voluntary Exit<sup>1</sup></p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>~</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Voluntary Redundancy</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>~</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Compulsory Redundancy</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>~</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dismissal Other</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>44</p></td><td><p>80</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dismissal - Conduct</p></td><td><p>64</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>61</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dismissal - Poor performance</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dismissal - Unsatisfactory attendance/Medical Inefficiency<sup>2</sup></p></td><td><p>324</p></td><td><p>330</p></td><td><p>151</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Transfer to other Government dept.</p></td><td><p>38</p></td><td><p>58</p></td><td><p>72</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Public sector transfer<sup>3</sup></p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>~</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other<sup>4</sup></p></td><td><p>59</p></td><td><p>39</p></td><td><p>43</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total (excl. retirements)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1,258</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1,553</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1,791</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Retirements</p></td><td><p>286</p></td><td><p>281</p></td><td><p>297</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>All band 3-5 officer leavers</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1,544</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1,834</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2,088</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><strong> </strong></p><p><sup>1</sup> This can be offered where the organisation wishes to reduce staff numbers by offering an early exit scheme or an early exit package to an individual. There is no compulsion on individuals to accept the offer.</p><p><sup>2 </sup>Since January 2017, information regarding dismissals as a result of medical inefficiencies have been recorded as unsatisfactory attendances. Therefore, these categories have been combined.</p><p><sup>3</sup> Public sector transfers include healthcare staff transferring to NHS employment. These staff continue to work within establishments but under a different employer.</p><p><sup>4</sup> The 'Other' category largely consists of fixed-term appointments coming to the end of their contract. Reductions in this category reflect the fall in recruitment since 2009, including fixed-term staff.</p><p> </p><p>~ denotes suppressed values of 2 or fewer or other values which would allow values of 2 or fewer to be derived by subtraction. Low numbers are suppressed to prevent disclosure in accordance with the Data Protection Act, 1998.</p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-07-26T13:00:41.367Zmore like thismore than 2018-07-26T13:00:41.367Z
answering member
4538
label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
tabling member
4181
label Biography information for Lord Beecham more like this
928157
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-06-20more like thismore than 2018-06-20
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading HM Courts and Tribunals Service more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Keen of Elie on 13 March 2017 (HL5691), when they intend to start the regular publication of the notes of the HM Courts and Tribunal Service Board meetings. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Beecham remove filter
uin HL8812 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-06-28more like thismore than 2018-06-28
answer text <p>The work of HMCTS is overseen by its Board, which is headed by an independent Chair, working with executive, non-executive and judicial members. Following the commitment to publish notes of HMCTS Board meetings, summaries dating back to March 2017 have started to be made available on the HMCTS pages of www.gov.uk. Summaries of all meetings to date will be available before the end of this month.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-06-28T13:53:32.847Zmore like thismore than 2018-06-28T13:53:32.847Z
answering member
4538
label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
tabling member
4181
label Biography information for Lord Beecham more like this
916539
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-06-04more like thismore than 2018-06-04
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Family Courts: Domestic Abuse more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government when they intend to introduce legislation to ban the practice of alleged domestic abusers cross-examining their alleged victims in the family courts. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Beecham remove filter
uin HL8245 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-06-19more like thismore than 2018-06-19
answer text <p>We remain fully committed to addressing the issue of abusers directly cross-examining their victims in family proceedings. We want to legislate to give family courts the power to stop this as soon as possible and are considering how best to proceed.</p><p> </p><p>Family judges already have a range of powers they can use to make sure difficult courtroom situations are handled sensitively for vulnerable witnesses, such as putting questions to the witness from the bench.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-06-19T10:45:49.297Zmore like thismore than 2018-06-19T10:45:49.297Z
answering member
4538
label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
tabling member
4181
label Biography information for Lord Beecham more like this
916540
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-06-04more like thismore than 2018-06-04
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prisoners: Veterans more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many women former members of the armed forces are currently serving custodial sentences; and for what offences. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Beecham remove filter
uin HL8246 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-06-18more like thismore than 2018-06-18
answer text <p>The Ministry began collecting data on service in the Armed Forces in 2015 and all newly received offenders into custody are asked on reception if they have served in the Armed Forces.</p><p> </p><p>Latest figures published in April 2018 show approximately 3% of prisoners on their first reception (Q4 2017) responded to the question were ex-armed service personnel. This has remained relatively stable for 18 months. Due to the very small number of female ex-armed service personnel in prisons the number is not split by gender and could only be obtained at disproportionate cost. Full details of new receptions can be found in the attached table.</p><p> </p><p>Prisoners who choose to identify as former members of the Armed Services are given access to available specialist support. This includes support for issues such as post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), that may affect them following their service. Additional support can be offered by military service charities working with prisons and rehabilitation services.</p>
answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-06-18T15:57:51.57Zmore like thismore than 2018-06-18T15:57:51.57Z
answering member
4538
label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
tabling member
4181
label Biography information for Lord Beecham more like this
897313
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-05-03more like thismore than 2018-05-03
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Offenders: Females more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what form the latest review of the decisions to set up community prisons for women and launch a scheme to support female offenders will take; and when it is likely to be completed. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Beecham remove filter
uin HL7544 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-05-17more like thismore than 2018-05-17
answer text <p>Female offenders often have complex issues and needs. This is why by 2020 we will have invested £1 million seed funding to support local areas to respond to the needs of female offenders by adopting a multi-agency, whole system approach, which aims to bring together and improve services at each stage of the criminal justice system. We will also deliver a strategy to improve outcomes for women both in the community and in custody which will be released in the coming months.</p><p> </p><p>We want to divert women from custody wherever possible, but some women do need to be held in prison. Where this is true, we want to provide the best rehabilitative regimes possible which are specifically tailored to women’s needs to break the reoffending cycle.</p><p> </p><p>We remain committed to doing all we can to address the issues around female offending, so we can better protect the public and deliver more effective rehabilitation.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-05-17T14:51:17.727Zmore like thismore than 2018-05-17T14:51:17.727Z
answering member
4538
label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
tabling member
4181
label Biography information for Lord Beecham more like this
885863
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-04-17more like thismore than 2018-04-17
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Duty Solicitors more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they plan to take in response to data published by the Law Society in April, which shows a growing shortage of criminal law solicitors. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Beecham remove filter
uin HL6965 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-05-01more like thismore than 2018-05-01
answer text <p>Last year £860 million was spent on criminal legal aid so that those who most need legal support are able to get it.</p><p> </p><p>The Government is clear that there are sufficient solicitors to undertake criminal legal aid-funded cases and will make sure this continues to be the case. The Legal Aid Agency monitors capacity across criminal legal aid contracts on a regular basis and takes action to ensure there is ongoing availability of criminal legal advice for the public.</p><p> </p><p>The engagement phase of the post-implementation review of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 has begun. We are gathering evidence from the legal professions to inform our analysis of the effects of the changes made by and under LASPO and how we can best move forward given the changes to the justice system since 2012.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-05-01T15:42:35.087Zmore like thismore than 2018-05-01T15:42:35.087Z
answering member
4538
label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
tabling member
4181
label Biography information for Lord Beecham more like this
884175
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-04-16more like thismore than 2018-04-16
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading John Worboys more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what steps they intend to take to address the failure of the Ministry of Justice to include all relevant information in the dossier it provided to the Parole Board in the Worboys case. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Beecham remove filter
uin HL6860 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-05-08more like thismore than 2018-05-08
answer text <p>Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) omitted the sentencing remarks from the criminal trial, one of the mandatory documents for each parole dossier, in accordance with the Parole Board Rules. HMPPS implemented fresh and robust checks on every dossier, before the High Court handed down its judgement, to ensure that dossiers are complete for the Parole Board to undertake its consideration of each case.</p><p> </p><p>HMPPS has issued guidance to assist report writers in cases where the offences of which an offender has been convicted may not provide to the Parole Board a comprehensive understanding of the offender’s risk.</p><p> </p><p>I can provide reassurance that her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service had implemented fresh and robust checks on every dossier, before the High Court handed down its judgement, to ensure that dossiers are complete for the Parole Board to undertake its consideration of each case.</p><p> </p><p>It is not usual to include police evidence, or information in respect of civil actions, in the dossier submitted to the Parole Board. As the High Court said, this was an exceptional case, as there were a very high number of complaints to the police, and two of Worboys’ victims brought a successful action against the Metropolitan Police for its failures to properly investigate their complaints.</p><p> </p><p>Therefore, in the light of this judgement, the Secretary of State has pledged that all relevant evidence of past offending should be included in the dossiers submitted to the Parole Board, including, possibly, police evidence, so it can be robustly tested at each Parole Board hearing. Her Majesty’s Prison and Probation Service is in the process of issuing new guidance to ensure that this is absolutely clear to those submitting evidence.</p>
answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-05-08T17:01:24.737Zmore like thismore than 2018-05-08T17:01:24.737Z
answering member
4538
label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
tabling member
4181
label Biography information for Lord Beecham more like this
884176
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-04-16more like thismore than 2018-04-16
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prisons: Discipline more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what action they have taken to reduce the number of days added to the sentences of prisoners for misconduct. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Beecham remove filter
uin HL6861 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-04-30more like thismore than 2018-04-30
answer text <p>Discipline procedures are central to the maintenance of a safe, decent and rehabilitative custodial environment. They require adjudications to be conducted lawfully, fairly and justly. Only Independent Adjudicators, who are District Judges or Deputy District Judges can, in cases deemed to be sufficiently serious, make an award of additional days. Additional days cannot extend the totality of the sentence imposed by the court but, they will have the effect of extending a person’s custodial time left to serve. The most serious offences are referred to the police.</p><p> </p><p>Information on the number of individual prisoners who were subject to punishments for disciplinary misconduct is not routinely extracted from the adjudications database as the primary purpose is to report on the volume of punishments imposed. In order to collect this specific information on prisoners, a matching exercise using prison population and adjudication databases would be required to identify each individual prisoner who was sanctioned under the Prison Rules, as a result of which the data could only be obtained at disproportionate cost. Information on the number of occasions additional days were awarded to prisoners between 2011 and 2016 is publicly available and is published as part of the Offender Management Statistics bulletin.</p><p> </p><p>Table 1 below provides an extract from the published statistics, outlining the number of occasions additional days were awarded by offence during 2011-2016.</p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><p>Table 1: Awards of additional days by offence 2011 - 2016, England and Wales</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>2011</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2012</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2013</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2014</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Offence </strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>8,690</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>9,537</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>9,125</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>10,265</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>13,000</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>16,756</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Disobedience/Disrespect</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>1,393</p></td><td><p>1,455</p></td><td><p>1,401</p></td><td><p>1,457</p></td><td><p>1,731</p></td><td><p>2,268</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Escape/Abscond</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Unauthorised transactions</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>5,111</p></td><td><p>5,668</p></td><td><p>5,284</p></td><td><p>6,186</p></td><td><p>7,738</p></td><td><p>9,594</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Violence</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>1,124</p></td><td><p>1,232</p></td><td><p>1,210</p></td><td><p>1,412</p></td><td><p>1,688</p></td><td><p>2,295</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wilful damage</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>536</p></td><td><p>611</p></td><td><p>646</p></td><td><p>471</p></td><td><p>635</p></td><td><p>740</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other offences</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>501</p></td><td><p>551</p></td><td><p>577</p></td><td><p>735</p></td><td><p>1,202</p></td><td><p>1,855</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"><p>(1) Adjudications are the procedure whereby offences against the Prison or Young Offender Institution Rules are alleged to have been committed by prisoners or young offenders (YOs). Under the Prison Rules, Governors may delegate the conduct of adjudications to any other officer of the prison or Young Offender Institution, who has passed the relevant authorised training course, has suitable operational experience and has been certified by the Governor as competent to carry out adjudication duties.</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"><p>(2) The number of offences refers to the number of adjudications for which one or more punishments may be imposed onto an offender.</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"><p>(3) The number of punishments refers to all proven adjudications and excludes all those that have been dismissed or not proceeded with.</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>The majority of punishments of added days are for unauthorised transactions, which concern illicit economies within prisons, such as possession and selling of forbidden items. We are working closely with the police and the Crown Prosecution Service to improve the response to crime in prisons and to ensure that wherever possible and appropriate those who commit serious crimes in prison are punished through the courts rather than by the internal disciplinary system. We are also reviewing and sharing best practice from prisons who have built up excellent relationships with their local police forces.</p><p> </p><p>We are also reviewing the Adjudications policy set out in Prison Service Instruction 47/2011 as part of our ongoing Prison Reform Programme. The review incorporates a study to examine the impact of disciplinary adjudication punishments on custodial misconduct and provide a better understanding of ‘what works’ in terms of behaviour change.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
grouped question UIN
HL6862 more like this
HL6863 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-04-30T16:47:52.743Zmore like thismore than 2018-04-30T16:47:52.743Z
answering member
4538
label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
tabling member
4181
label Biography information for Lord Beecham more like this
884177
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-04-16more like thismore than 2018-04-16
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prisons: Discipline more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many prisoners had their sentences extended for misconduct in each year from 2011 to 2016. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Beecham remove filter
uin HL6862 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-04-30more like thismore than 2018-04-30
answer text <p>Discipline procedures are central to the maintenance of a safe, decent and rehabilitative custodial environment. They require adjudications to be conducted lawfully, fairly and justly. Only Independent Adjudicators, who are District Judges or Deputy District Judges can, in cases deemed to be sufficiently serious, make an award of additional days. Additional days cannot extend the totality of the sentence imposed by the court but, they will have the effect of extending a person’s custodial time left to serve. The most serious offences are referred to the police.</p><p> </p><p>Information on the number of individual prisoners who were subject to punishments for disciplinary misconduct is not routinely extracted from the adjudications database as the primary purpose is to report on the volume of punishments imposed. In order to collect this specific information on prisoners, a matching exercise using prison population and adjudication databases would be required to identify each individual prisoner who was sanctioned under the Prison Rules, as a result of which the data could only be obtained at disproportionate cost. Information on the number of occasions additional days were awarded to prisoners between 2011 and 2016 is publicly available and is published as part of the Offender Management Statistics bulletin.</p><p> </p><p>Table 1 below provides an extract from the published statistics, outlining the number of occasions additional days were awarded by offence during 2011-2016.</p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="5"><p>Table 1: Awards of additional days by offence 2011 - 2016, England and Wales</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>2011</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2012</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2013</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2014</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2015</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2016</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Offence </strong></p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>8,690</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>9,537</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>9,125</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>10,265</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>13,000</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>16,756</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Disobedience/Disrespect</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>1,393</p></td><td><p>1,455</p></td><td><p>1,401</p></td><td><p>1,457</p></td><td><p>1,731</p></td><td><p>2,268</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Escape/Abscond</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>25</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Unauthorised transactions</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>5,111</p></td><td><p>5,668</p></td><td><p>5,284</p></td><td><p>6,186</p></td><td><p>7,738</p></td><td><p>9,594</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Violence</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>1,124</p></td><td><p>1,232</p></td><td><p>1,210</p></td><td><p>1,412</p></td><td><p>1,688</p></td><td><p>2,295</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wilful damage</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>536</p></td><td><p>611</p></td><td><p>646</p></td><td><p>471</p></td><td><p>635</p></td><td><p>740</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other offences</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>501</p></td><td><p>551</p></td><td><p>577</p></td><td><p>735</p></td><td><p>1,202</p></td><td><p>1,855</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"><p>(1) Adjudications are the procedure whereby offences against the Prison or Young Offender Institution Rules are alleged to have been committed by prisoners or young offenders (YOs). Under the Prison Rules, Governors may delegate the conduct of adjudications to any other officer of the prison or Young Offender Institution, who has passed the relevant authorised training course, has suitable operational experience and has been certified by the Governor as competent to carry out adjudication duties.</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"><p>(2) The number of offences refers to the number of adjudications for which one or more punishments may be imposed onto an offender.</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"><p>(3) The number of punishments refers to all proven adjudications and excludes all those that have been dismissed or not proceeded with.</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="7"><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>The majority of punishments of added days are for unauthorised transactions, which concern illicit economies within prisons, such as possession and selling of forbidden items. We are working closely with the police and the Crown Prosecution Service to improve the response to crime in prisons and to ensure that wherever possible and appropriate those who commit serious crimes in prison are punished through the courts rather than by the internal disciplinary system. We are also reviewing and sharing best practice from prisons who have built up excellent relationships with their local police forces.</p><p> </p><p>We are also reviewing the Adjudications policy set out in Prison Service Instruction 47/2011 as part of our ongoing Prison Reform Programme. The review incorporates a study to examine the impact of disciplinary adjudication punishments on custodial misconduct and provide a better understanding of ‘what works’ in terms of behaviour change.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Keen of Elie more like this
grouped question UIN
HL6861 more like this
HL6863 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-04-30T16:47:52.867Zmore like thismore than 2018-04-30T16:47:52.867Z
answering member
4538
label Biography information for Lord Keen of Elie more like this
tabling member
4181
label Biography information for Lord Beecham more like this