Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

747760
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-07-03more like thismore than 2017-07-03
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Young Offenders more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many under-18 year olds have been starred up in each prison in each of the last three years. more like this
tabling member constituency Cardiff Central more like this
tabling member printed
Jo Stevens more like this
uin 2539 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-06more like thismore than 2017-07-06
answer text <p>Starring up is the term used to define the early transition process whereby young people under the age of 18 can be moved into the young adult estate prior to their eighteenth birthday. The starring up process can be used for a range of reasons, but past usage has mainly been in relating to the management of disruptive or violent behaviour or transfers to Mother and Baby Units.</p><p> </p><p>In practice, the starring up process is rarely used and then only in exceptional circumstances.</p><p> </p><p>Data in relation to the number of young people who were starred-up into the young adult estate in each of the last three years (by the establishment they were starred-up from) is provided in the table below:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>HMPPS under 18 YOI</p></td><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>2016</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cookham</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Feltham</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Werrington</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wetherby</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>To date, the data for the current year (2017) is:</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>HMPPS under 18 YOI</p></td><td><p>2017</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cookham</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Feltham</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Werrington</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wetherby</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table>
answering member constituency Bracknell more like this
answering member printed Dr Phillip Lee more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-07-06T10:37:29.943Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-06T10:37:29.943Z
answering member
3921
label Biography information for Dr Phillip Lee more like this
tabling member
4425
label Biography information for Jo Stevens more like this
747122
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-06-30more like thismore than 2017-06-30
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Rape: Trials more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, with reference to applications granted under subsection 41(3)c(i) of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 to use rape complainants' previous sexual history as evidence, how many of those applications resulted in the defendant being (a) acquitted and (b) convicted in each of the last five years. more like this
tabling member constituency Camberwell and Peckham more like this
tabling member printed
Ms Harriet Harman more like this
uin 2351 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-05more like thismore than 2017-07-05
answer text <p>This information requested is not held centrally.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Esher and Walton more like this
answering member printed Dominic Raab more like this
grouped question UIN 2353 more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-07-05T15:56:17.237Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-05T15:56:17.237Z
answering member
4007
label Biography information for Dominic Raab more like this
tabling member
150
label Biography information for Ms Harriet Harman more like this
747123
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-06-30more like thismore than 2017-06-30
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Rape: Trials more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what plans he has to amend subsection 41(3)c(i) of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 which allows rape complainant's previous sexual history to be used as evidence in court. more like this
tabling member constituency Camberwell and Peckham more like this
tabling member printed
Ms Harriet Harman more like this
uin 2352 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-05more like thismore than 2017-07-05
answer text <p>The Attorney General and the previous Justice Secretary committed to looking at how s41 is operating in practice. MoJ keep all areas of criminal justice procedure under ongoing review.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Esher and Walton more like this
answering member printed Dominic Raab more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-07-05T17:12:39.583Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-05T17:12:39.583Z
answering member
4007
label Biography information for Dominic Raab more like this
tabling member
150
label Biography information for Ms Harriet Harman more like this
747124
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-06-30more like thismore than 2017-06-30
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Rape: Trials more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, in how many cases an application was made under subsection 41(3)c(i) of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 for a rape complainant's previous sexual history to be used as evidence in court in each of the last five years; and how many such applications were granted. more like this
tabling member constituency Camberwell and Peckham more like this
tabling member printed
Ms Harriet Harman more like this
uin 2353 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-05more like thismore than 2017-07-05
answer text <p>This information requested is not held centrally.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Esher and Walton more like this
answering member printed Dominic Raab more like this
grouped question UIN 2351 more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-07-05T15:56:17.297Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-05T15:56:17.297Z
answering member
4007
label Biography information for Dominic Raab more like this
tabling member
150
label Biography information for Ms Harriet Harman more like this
746750
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-06-29more like thismore than 2017-06-29
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Criminal Injuries Compensation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many claims have been rejected by the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority, by the reason for refusal, in each of the last five years. more like this
tabling member constituency Stretford and Urmston more like this
tabling member printed
Kate Green more like this
uin 1962 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction true more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-06more like thismore than 2017-07-06
answer text <p><del class="ministerial">The Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA) received 533 complaints about their service in the financial year 2015-16. This represents 1.3% of CICA’s live caseload. 49% of complaints were closed within 10 days.</del></p><p> </p><p><del class="ministerial">Where complaints took longer to close this was due to the number of enquiries required to fully investigate the complaint. In other cases, CICA were asked by the complainer not to close the complaint until a final decision was issued on the claim. The average time CICA took to deal with those complaints was 23.75 days.</del></p><p> </p><p><del class="ministerial">The most common complaint received by CICA related to delays in finalising claims. CICA aims to make compensation payments as quickly as possible, however, they have a duty to the taxpayer to fully investigate claims to make sure that the applicant gets the level of compensation they deserve.</del></p><p> </p><p><del class="ministerial">The 10 most common reasons for complaining about CICA’s service in 2015/16 were:</del></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>Reason given for complaint</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>Percentage of overall complaints</strong></del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial">Delays</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">68.95%</del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial">Lack of updates on case progression</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">11.33%</del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial">Claim handling</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">9.77%</del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial">Failure to respond to letters</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">4.10%</del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial">Applicant provided with conflicting information</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">2.93%</del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial">Failure to provide timescales</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">1.76%</del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial">Failure to return phone calls</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">0.59%</del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial">Errors when recording telephone application information</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">0.20%</del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial">Impolite staff member</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">0.20%</del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial">Poor customer service</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">0.20%</del></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><del class="ministerial">The total number of complaints the CICA received in each of the last five years, including those cases (a) escalated to stage 2 and (b) progressed to stage 3, are as follows:</del></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>Year</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>Complaints received</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>Escalated to Stage 2</strong></del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial"><strong>Escalated to Stage 3</strong></del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial">2016-17</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">1122</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">120</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">7</del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial">2015-16</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">533</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">39</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">6</del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial">2014-15</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">491</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">26</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">9</del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial">2013-14</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">204</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">8</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">1</del></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><del class="ministerial">2012-13</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">284</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">10</del></p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">5</del></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><del class="ministerial">Over half of complaints received in 2016/17 were from paid representatives. A significant portion of these were from firms of solicitors who lodged block complaints for their CICA caseload with a view to influencing the speed of the decision making process.</del></p><p> </p><p><del class="ministerial">During the course of 2016/17 the CICA revised their operating model and increased staff numbers following an extensive recruitment exercise. They have also recently introduced measures that develop and streamline digital processes, which have reduced the claim processing time by 30 days. The new online service, which will be introduced later this financial year, will allow applicants and their representatives to view the progress of their case online. It is expected that these measures will reduce the time taken to finalise claims and lead to a reduction in complaints.</del></p><p> </p><p><ins class="ministerial">The Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA) publishes data about the reasons claims are rejected in its annual reports at: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications?departments%5B%5D=criminal-injuries-compensation-authority&amp;publication_type=corporate-reports" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications?departments%5B%5D=criminal-injuries-compensation-authority&amp;publication_type=corporate-reports</a></ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial"> </ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial">The figures published in the annual reports show the number of times each rejection reason was used. For some applications there may have been more than one reason for rejection. This means that the total number of reasons for rejection is higher than the actual number of claims refused. The accurate total of rejected claims for the years specified is as follows:</ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial"> </ins></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">Financial year</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">Rejected cases</ins></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">2012/13</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">24,411</ins></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">2013/14</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">23,803</ins></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">2014/15</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">20,066</ins></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">2015/16</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">15,243</ins></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">2016/17</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">12,411</ins></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><ins class="ministerial"> </ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial">Information about the time CICA has taken to reach decisions on claims over the past few years can also be found in its annual reports (see link above).</ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial"> </ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial">The number of full time equivalent staff employed in CICA as at 31 March 2017 was 291.2. The table below shows the number of staff CICA has employed in managerial positions over the past 5 years:</ins></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">Date</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">Band D (first line manager) to Senior Civil Service (SCS)</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">Band B (senior manager) to SCS only</ins></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">March 2017</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">156 (plus 2 on temporary promotion)</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">24</ins></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">March 2016</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">112 (plus 7 on temporary promotion)</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">16</ins></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">March 2015</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">132 (plus 14 on temporary promotion)</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">24 (plus 1 on temporary promotion)</ins></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">March 2014</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">136 (plus 15 on temporary promotion)</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">24 (plus 5 on temporary promotion)</ins></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><ins class="ministerial">March 2013</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">145 (plus 19 on temporary promotion)</ins></p></td><td><p><ins class="ministerial">24 (plus 9 on temporary promotion)</ins></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><ins class="ministerial">Complaints in CICA are registered by two staff within the Corporate Services team and then allocated to the relevant team to deal with the complaint in line with CICA’s complaints process. CICA teams have staff members assigned to the role of complaints champion in addition to their day to day duties. The number of complaints champions fluctuates depending on demand and staff movement. Complaints champions are responsible for handling complaints and team managers oversee the complaints process in each of their respective areas. This group regularly meets to look at improvements to our complaints handling processes. CICA does not have a record of the number of complaint champions for the last five years due to the fluctuating nature of this work. </ins></p>
answering member constituency Bracknell more like this
answering member printed Dr Phillip Lee more like this
question first answered
remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2017-07-06T10:43:33.617Z
question first ministerially corrected
less than 2017-07-06T14:21:18.483Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-06T14:21:18.483Z
answering member
3921
label Biography information for Dr Phillip Lee more like this
previous answer version
2253
answering member constituency Bracknell more like this
answering member printed Dr Phillip Lee more like this
answering member
3921
label Biography information for Dr Phillip Lee more like this
tabling member
4120
label Biography information for Kate Green more like this
746779
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-06-29more like thismore than 2017-06-29
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Link Parking more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many cases brought by Link Parking Ltd against residents were heard in UK courts in each of the last three years. more like this
tabling member constituency Cardiff South and Penarth more like this
tabling member printed
Stephen Doughty more like this
uin 1970 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-04more like thismore than 2017-07-04
answer text <p>The number of County Court judgments made in relation to cases brought by Link Parking Ltd against UK residents in each of the three years last is shown below:-</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Calendar Year</p></td><td><p>Judgment</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>14</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>113</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>These data are management information and are not subject to the normal standards applying to official statistics.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Esher and Walton more like this
answering member printed Dominic Raab more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-07-04T15:34:50.217Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-04T15:34:50.217Z
answering member
4007
label Biography information for Dominic Raab more like this
tabling member
4264
label Biography information for Stephen Doughty more like this
746912
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-06-29more like thismore than 2017-06-29
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Prisons: Port Talbot more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what his Department's policy is on building a new prison in Port Talbot. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Saville Roberts more like this
uin 2008 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-04more like thismore than 2017-07-04
answer text <p>We are investing £1.3 billion to reform and modernise the prison estate to replace ageing and ineffective prisons with up to 10,000 modern prison places. On 22 March 2017, the then Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice announced plans for the building of four new prisons in England and Wales, replacing old and overcrowded establishments with new, fit for purpose buildings. This is in addition to our plans to redevelop the sites at the former HMP Wellingborough and at HMP &amp; YOI Glen Parva.</p><p> </p><p>The plans include a new prison in Port Talbot in South Wales. The Ministry of Justice intends to apply for planning permission in due course.</p> more like this
answering member constituency East Surrey more like this
answering member printed Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-07-04T14:13:07.67Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-04T14:13:07.67Z
answering member
3980
label Biography information for Mr Sam Gyimah more like this
tabling member
4521
label Biography information for Liz Saville Roberts more like this
746215
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-06-28more like thismore than 2017-06-28
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority: Complaints more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how quickly the complaints received by the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority in 2015-16 were dealt with; and what the 10 most common complaints were. more like this
tabling member constituency Stretford and Urmston more like this
tabling member printed
Kate Green more like this
uin 1917 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-06more like thismore than 2017-07-06
answer text <p>The Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA) received 533 complaints about their service in the financial year 2015-16. This represents 1.3% of CICA’s live caseload. 49% of complaints were closed within 10 days.</p><p> </p><p>Where complaints took longer to close this was due to the number of enquiries required to fully investigate the complaint. In other cases, CICA were asked by the complainer not to close the complaint until a final decision was issued on the claim. The average time CICA took to deal with those complaints was 23.75 days.</p><p> </p><p>The most common complaint received by CICA related to delays in finalising claims. CICA aims to make compensation payments as quickly as possible, however, they have a duty to the taxpayer to fully investigate claims to make sure that the applicant gets the level of compensation they deserve.</p><p> </p><p>The 10 most common reasons for complaining about CICA’s service in 2015/16 were:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Reason given for complaint</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Percentage of overall complaints</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Delays</p></td><td><p>68.95%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lack of updates on case progression</p></td><td><p>11.33%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Claim handling</p></td><td><p>9.77%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Failure to respond to letters</p></td><td><p>4.10%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Applicant provided with conflicting information</p></td><td><p>2.93%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Failure to provide timescales</p></td><td><p>1.76%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Failure to return phone calls</p></td><td><p>0.59%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Errors when recording telephone application information</p></td><td><p>0.20%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Impolite staff member</p></td><td><p>0.20%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Poor customer service</p></td><td><p>0.20%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>The total number of complaints the CICA received in each of the last five years, including those cases (a) escalated to stage 2 and (b) progressed to stage 3, are as follows:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Complaints received</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Escalated to Stage 2</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Escalated to Stage 3</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016-17</p></td><td><p>1122</p></td><td><p>120</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015-16</p></td><td><p>533</p></td><td><p>39</p></td><td><p>6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014-15</p></td><td><p>491</p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>9</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>204</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012-13</p></td><td><p>284</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Over half of complaints received in 2016/17 were from paid representatives. A significant portion of these were from firms of solicitors who lodged block complaints for their CICA caseload with a view to influencing the speed of the decision making process.</p><p> </p><p>During the course of 2016/17 the CICA revised their operating model and increased staff numbers following an extensive recruitment exercise. They have also recently introduced measures that develop and streamline digital processes, which have reduced the claim processing time by 30 days. The new online service, which will be introduced later this financial year, will allow applicants and their representatives to view the progress of their case online. It is expected that these measures will reduce the time taken to finalise claims and lead to a reduction in complaints.</p>
answering member constituency Bracknell more like this
answering member printed Dr Phillip Lee more like this
grouped question UIN 1962 more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-07-06T10:43:33.493Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-06T10:43:33.493Z
answering member
3921
label Biography information for Dr Phillip Lee more like this
tabling member
4120
label Biography information for Kate Green more like this
746244
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-06-28more like thismore than 2017-06-28
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Appeals more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how much on average it costs HM Courts and Tribunal Service to administer a First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support Appeal) in respect of personal independence payments. more like this
tabling member constituency Coventry North East more like this
tabling member printed
Colleen Fletcher more like this
uin 1679 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-04more like thismore than 2017-07-04
answer text <p>The information requested is not held.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Esher and Walton more like this
answering member printed Dominic Raab more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-07-04T12:11:21.99Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-04T12:11:21.99Z
answering member
4007
label Biography information for Dominic Raab more like this
tabling member
4378
label Biography information for Colleen Fletcher more like this
746258
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-06-28more like thismore than 2017-06-28
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Coroners more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the timetable is for the implementation of the Coroner Reform programme. more like this
tabling member constituency Hendon more like this
tabling member printed
Dr Matthew Offord more like this
uin 1728 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-05more like thismore than 2017-07-05
answer text <p>In March 2013 we published a consultation on the implementation of the coroner reforms in Part 1 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009. We implemented those reforms along with supporting rules and regulations, in July 2013. We published guidance on reformed coroner services in February 2014.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Bracknell more like this
answering member printed Dr Phillip Lee more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-07-05T15:49:20.893Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-05T15:49:20.893Z
answering member
3921
label Biography information for Dr Phillip Lee more like this
tabling member
4006
label Biography information for Dr Matthew Offord more like this