Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

76659
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2014-07-09more like thismore than 2014-07-09
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Terminal Illnesses more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many employment tribunals in which the appellant had a terminal condition and was contesting a dismissal that occurred because of their diagnosis took place in each of the last five years. more like this
tabling member constituency Leicester West more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Kendall more like this
uin 204907 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-07-16more like thismore than 2014-07-16
answer text <p>Data on the number of claims made by appellants with a terminal condition on the grounds of unfair dismissal is not collated centrally by HM Courts &amp; Tribunals Service (HMCTS). This information could only be provided at a disproportionate cost by manually checking hard copy tribunal files or judgments.</p> more like this
answering member constituency North West Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Mr Shailesh Vara more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-07-16T10:41:59.326546Zmore like thismore than 2014-07-16T10:41:59.326546Z
answering member
1496
label Biography information for Shailesh Vara more like this
tabling member
4026
label Biography information for Liz Kendall more like this
76667
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2014-07-09more like thismore than 2014-07-09
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Cybercrime more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will bring forward legislative proposals to ensure that online theft is punishable in line with traditional theft of items of the same monetary value. more like this
tabling member constituency Hove more like this
tabling member printed
Mike Weatherley more like this
uin 204684 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-07-22more like thismore than 2014-07-22
answer text <p>I refer my honourable friend to the answer I gave to his written question (205872) on 21 July 2014 (Hansard reference: 21 July 2014 Column 854W).</p> more like this
answering member constituency Hemel Hempstead more like this
answering member printed Mike Penning more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-07-22T16:36:21.5194198Zmore like thismore than 2014-07-22T16:36:21.5194198Z
answering member
1528
label Biography information for Sir Mike Penning more like this
tabling member
3984
label Biography information for Mike Weatherley more like this
76680
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2014-07-09more like thismore than 2014-07-09
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Government Departments: Freedom of Information more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, if he will place in the Library (a) the number of Freedom of Information requests received by each Government Department in each of the last four years, (b) the number and proportion of such requests that received a full answer from each Department and (c) the number and proportion of such requests which did not receive a full answer in each category of reason for refusal in each Department. more like this
tabling member constituency Bristol North West more like this
tabling member printed
Charlotte Leslie more like this
uin 204955 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-07-16more like thismore than 2014-07-16
answer text <p>The Government publishes detailed statistics on freedom of information requests received by central government departments quarterly and annually. These include the number of requests received by government departments, the number of requests which received a full answer and the number which did not receive a full answer. The statistics for the last four years can be found on the following web addresses:</p><p> </p><ul><li><a title="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/freedom-of-information-statistics-October-December-2013-and-annual" href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/freedom-of-information-statistics-October-December-2013-and-annual" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/freedom-of-information-statistics-October-December-2013-and-annual</a> (for 2013 Annual);</li></ul><p> </p><ul><li><a title="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/freedom-of-information-statistics-October-December-2012-and-annual" href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/freedom-of-information-statistics-October-December-2012-and-annual" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/freedom-of-information-statistics-October-December-2012-and-annual</a> (for 2012 Annual);</li></ul><p> </p><ul><li><a title="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/earlier-editions-statistics-on-implementation-in-central-government-earlier-editions-in-the-series" href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/earlier-editions-statistics-on-implementation-in-central-government-earlier-editions-in-the-series" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/earlier-editions-statistics-on-implementation-in-central-government-earlier-editions-in-the-series</a> (for 2011 Annual and 2010 Annual)</li></ul><p> </p>
answering member constituency Bermondsey and Old Southwark more like this
answering member printed Simon Hughes more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-07-16T16:28:40.9649319Zmore like thismore than 2014-07-16T16:28:40.9649319Z
answering member
194
label Biography information for Simon Hughes more like this
tabling member
3933
label Biography information for Charlotte Leslie more like this
76874
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2014-07-09more like thismore than 2014-07-09
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Procurement more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what estimate he has made of the potential effect of the privatisation of Ministry of Justice shared services on jobs in Bootle constituency. more like this
tabling member constituency Bootle more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Joe Benton more like this
uin 204927 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-07-16more like thismore than 2014-07-16
answer text <p>The Ministry of Justice is entering into detailed discussions with Shared Services Connected Limited (SSCL) regarding the future delivery of their back office services with the intention of awarding a contract in August 2014. We expect this to bring increased savings and efficiency in back-office functions, provide further benefits across wider Government and offer better value for money to the tax payer.</p><p> </p><p>SSCL have stated their intention of providing 12 months job protection for all transferring staff from the point of transfer in October 2014. This means that there will be no compulsory redundancies during this period. No decisions have been made to close buildings and we expect all sites to remain open during this period.</p><p> </p><p>Following the transfer of staff, services and IT, there will be a stabilisation stage during which SSCL will look at how the service is currently delivered. No decisions will be made until SSCL has had the opportunity to fully understand the operation.</p><p> </p><p>We will continue to work with staff, trade unions and other stakeholders to assess any impacts on staff.</p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Bermondsey and Old Southwark more like this
answering member printed Simon Hughes more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-07-16T16:07:28.1081124Zmore like thismore than 2014-07-16T16:07:28.1081124Z
answering member
194
label Biography information for Simon Hughes more like this
tabling member
479
label Biography information for Mr Joe Benton more like this
76875
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2014-07-09more like thismore than 2014-07-09
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Procurement more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what steps he is taking to protect personal data held by Ministry of Justice Shared Services when that data is off-shored to countries with less robust data protection than the UK. more like this
tabling member constituency Bootle more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Joe Benton more like this
uin 204929 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-07-16more like thismore than 2014-07-16
answer text <p>The Ministry of Justice is entering into detailed discussions with Shared Services Connected Limited (SSCL) regarding the future delivery of their back office services with the intention of awarding a contract in August 2014. We expect this to bring increased savings and efficiency in back-office functions, provide further benefits across wider Government and offer better value for money to the tax payer.</p><p> </p><p>It is a part of Shared Services Connected Limited's business strategy to move some of its work offshore. However, no decision has been taken to move any of the work of MoJ Shared Services offshore. Should there be any proposals to offshore MoJ work in the future, specific agreement would be needed from the MoJ. This would also include the need to make sure that the right level of data security was in place.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Bermondsey and Old Southwark more like this
answering member printed Simon Hughes more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-07-16T16:26:17.4035568Zmore like thismore than 2014-07-16T16:26:17.4035568Z
answering member
194
label Biography information for Simon Hughes more like this
tabling member
479
label Biography information for Mr Joe Benton more like this
76876
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2014-07-09more like thismore than 2014-07-09
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Procurement more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what discussions took place between officials in his Department, the Home Office and STERIA before the decision to privatise Ministry of Justice shared services was taken. more like this
tabling member constituency Bootle more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Joe Benton more like this
uin 204926 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-07-16more like thismore than 2014-07-16
answer text <p>Prior to entering these detailed discussions with Shared Services Connected Limited (a joint venture between STERIA and the Cabinet Office) all options were fully evaluated. A business case was developed to evaluate the two Independent Shared Service Centre (ISSC) options, alongside the option to remain a standalone organisation.</p><p>The business case was informed by proposals from both ISSC framework providers, which included SSCL. In order to complete these proposals, both providers learned about the existing MoJ Shared Services organisation through visits to our sites and through the information that was provided to them about:</p><p> </p><p>· How Shared Services fitted in to the MoJ organisation.</p><p>· What services they provided and who their customers were.</p><p>· How many transactions were processed in a typical day.</p><p>· Who their partners were and what systems they used.</p><p>· The projects that were currently underway.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The evaluation criteria in the business case included people impact, services delivery, cost and IT. Overall the SSCL proposal was the strongest, in part due to the investment that they were already making in a new IT platform and the fact that the costs of this could be shared across multiple government departments.</p><p> </p><p>The Ministry of Justice is now entering into detailed discussions with Shared Services Connected Limited (SSCL) regarding the future delivery of their back office services, with the intention of awarding a contract in August 2014.</p><p><em>The Home Office have also been considering their options at the same time as the Ministry of Justice but the two departments have completed their evaluations as separate and independent exercises. The Home Office </em>have reached the same conclusion and assessed SSCL to be its preferred option. <em>The two departments have started contract negotiations at the same time but each will have a separate contract with SSCL. </em>It's intended that MoJ and Home Office follow the same process going forward and will make changes within the same timescales.</p><p><em>Both of these evaluations followed the publication of the Government's Next Generation Shared Services Strategy in December 2012 and a rigorous procurement exercise completed by Cabinet Office to select the providers of the two Independent Shared Service Centres.</em></p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Bermondsey and Old Southwark more like this
answering member printed Simon Hughes more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-07-16T16:42:41.1402871Zmore like thismore than 2014-07-16T16:42:41.1402871Z
answering member
194
label Biography information for Simon Hughes more like this
tabling member
479
label Biography information for Mr Joe Benton more like this
76878
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2014-07-09more like thismore than 2014-07-09
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Procurement more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, for what reason his Department did not consult the Public and Commercial Services Union on an in-house bid for the Ministry of Justice shared services contract. more like this
tabling member constituency Bootle more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Joe Benton more like this
uin 204928 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-07-16more like thismore than 2014-07-16
answer text <p>The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) is entering into detailed discussions with Shared Services Connected Limited (SSCL) regarding the future delivery of their back office serviceswith the intention of awarding a contract in August 2014.</p><p> </p><p>Prior to entering these detailed discussions with SSCL, all options were fully evaluated. A business case was developed to evaluate both Independent Shared Service Centre (ISSC) options as well as the option for back office to remain a standalone organisation.</p><p> </p><p>Detailed information was put together on the in-house option, which reflected our existing organisation and also any known plans for the coming years, including those for growth in our customer numbers. This information was prepared in parallel with the proposals from the two ISSC framework providers. The costs and benefits of all three options between now and 2021/22 were assessed and this informed the business case, which was approved by the MoJ Departmental Board.</p><p> </p><p>The MoJ has been meeting regularly with trade union representatives since we started considering the options in December 2013 prior to any decisions being made and also prior to taking the outcome of the evaluation to the MoJ Departmental Board. Trade Union representation includes representatives from Public and Commercial Services (PCS).</p><p> </p><p>Once we knew the decision had been taken to enter into detailed discussions with Shared Services Connected Limited (SSCL). We informed trade union representatives. Formal consultation is now taking place about the transfer of MoJ staff to SSCL under TUPE. We have been working with these staff and keeping them informed of developments. This will continue throughout the transition process.</p><p> </p><p>SSCL recognise our existing unions, including PCS, and will continue to consult with them after the staff transfer has taken place. <strong> </strong></p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Bermondsey and Old Southwark more like this
answering member printed Simon Hughes more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-07-16T16:16:01.5955254Zmore like thismore than 2014-07-16T16:16:01.5955254Z
answering member
194
label Biography information for Simon Hughes more like this
tabling member
479
label Biography information for Mr Joe Benton more like this
76880
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2014-07-09more like thismore than 2014-07-09
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, for what reason the new electronic tagging system was not subject to a pilot before the decision to implement it was taken. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Elfyn Llwyd more like this
uin 204991 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-07-17more like thismore than 2014-07-17
answer text <p>The contracts have not yet been awarded. An announcement was made on 15<sup>th</sup> July.</p><p> </p><p>Yes we comply with the OJEU / EU procurement rules as well as cabinet office processes.</p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>The new electronic monitoring service has not been subject to a pilot as in the first instance we need to ensure continuity of service. However, there will be a significant period of testing and validation for the new system before introduction. There is also a robust programme of testing for the new tags themselves, and we will have to be satisfied that they meet our standards before they are introduced on the new platform. </strong></p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Electronic monitoring using GPS was piloted in three probation areas in 2004 to 2005 and the evaluation found qualitative evidence to show that it:</p><p>o acted as a deterrent because offenders thought they would be caught if they were to reoffend;</p><p>o was a constant reminder which prompted offenders to ‘think twice' when a criminal opportunity presented itself and gave them the spur they needed to walk away;</p><p>o provided offenders with renewed determination to get their lives back together after a period of incarceration; and</p><p>o was perceived by offenders to help stop wrongful identification for crimes they hadn't done.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member constituency North West Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Mr Shailesh Vara more like this
grouped question UIN
204814 more like this
204815 more like this
204816 more like this
204992 more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-07-17T13:21:18.5467436Zmore like thismore than 2014-07-17T13:21:18.5467436Z
answering member
1496
label Biography information for Shailesh Vara more like this
tabling member
549
label Biography information for Mr Elfyn Llwyd more like this
76881
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2014-07-09more like thismore than 2014-07-09
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Ministers: Official Cars more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many journeys Ministers of his Department have made using the Government Car Service; and how many such journeys were for the transportation of a red box. more like this
tabling member constituency West Ham more like this
tabling member printed
Lyn Brown more like this
uin 204942 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-07-22more like thismore than 2014-07-22
answer text <p>For the Period of 01/04/2013 - 31/03/2014 inclusive there was:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>On demand Journeys - Ministers</p></td><td><p>331</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Red Box Movements</p></td><td><p>22</p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total</p></td><td><p>353</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>The total spend for the use of Government Car Service has reduced from £310,600 in 2008/9 to £28,739 in 2013/14, a reduction of 91%.</p><p> </p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency North West Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Mr Shailesh Vara more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-07-22T16:33:54.4658706Zmore like thismore than 2014-07-22T16:33:54.4658706Z
answering member
1496
label Biography information for Shailesh Vara more like this
tabling member
1583
label Biography information for Ms Lyn Brown more like this
76882
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2014-07-09more like thismore than 2014-07-09
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice remove filter
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Electronic Tagging more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the purpose is of the new electronic tagging system; and what evidence his Department analysed or collected on the potential effect of that system on crime and reconviction rates. more like this
tabling member constituency Dwyfor Meirionnydd more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Elfyn Llwyd more like this
uin 204992 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-07-17more like thismore than 2014-07-17
answer text <p>The contracts have not yet been awarded. An announcement was made on 15<sup>th</sup> July.</p><p> </p><p>Yes we comply with the OJEU / EU procurement rules as well as cabinet office processes.</p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>The new electronic monitoring service has not been subject to a pilot as in the first instance we need to ensure continuity of service. However, there will be a significant period of testing and validation for the new system before introduction. There is also a robust programme of testing for the new tags themselves, and we will have to be satisfied that they meet our standards before they are introduced on the new platform. </strong></p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Electronic monitoring using GPS was piloted in three probation areas in 2004 to 2005 and the evaluation found qualitative evidence to show that it:</p><p>o acted as a deterrent because offenders thought they would be caught if they were to reoffend;</p><p>o was a constant reminder which prompted offenders to ‘think twice' when a criminal opportunity presented itself and gave them the spur they needed to walk away;</p><p>o provided offenders with renewed determination to get their lives back together after a period of incarceration; and</p><p>o was perceived by offenders to help stop wrongful identification for crimes they hadn't done.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member constituency North West Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Mr Shailesh Vara more like this
grouped question UIN
204814 more like this
204815 more like this
204816 more like this
204991 more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-07-17T13:21:18.6405043Zmore like thismore than 2014-07-17T13:21:18.6405043Z
answering member
1496
label Biography information for Shailesh Vara more like this
tabling member
549
label Biography information for Mr Elfyn Llwyd more like this