Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

1129618

registered interest
date	04/06/2019
answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	Environmental Health and Trading Standards
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what plans he has to increase the number of (a) environmental health officers and (b) trading standards officers after the UK leaves the EU.
tabling member constituency	Stroud
tabling member printed	Dr David Drew
uin	259844
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 10/06/2019 answer text <p>The local staffing for the delivery of regulatory services is a matter for those local authorities that have the statutory responsibility. Government has provided resources and support for councils for Brexit preparations. The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government has made £58 million available to help councils prepare for and manage EU exit. The FSA has already made £4 million available in total so far (£2 million in 18/19, and £2 million in 19/20) for ensuring that food safety obligations are met in the event of a no deal Exit. DEFRA made 200 free training places available to help with the signing of Environmental Health Certificates.</p><p> </p> answering member constituency Richmond (Yorks) answering member printed Rishi Sunak question first answered 10/06/2019 11:40:42 answering member 4483 label Biography information for Rishi Sunak
tabling member	252 label Biography information for Dr David Drew

1129683

registered interest
date	04/06/2019
answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	Empty Property: Shops
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what recent estimate he has made of the number of empty shops on high streets in (a) Coventry and (b) the UK.
tabling member constituency	Coventry South
tabling member printed	Mr Jim Cunningham
uin	259854
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 10/06/2019 answer text <p>The Ministry for Housing, Communities and Local Government receives information relating to the vacancy rates in the UK from the Local Data Company. As of June 2019 the vacancy rate for Coventry was 15.2 per cent and in Great Britain was 11.7 per cent according to the Local Data Company. This information is not currently reported centrally and is not publicly available. For this reason, in Autumn Budget 2018, as part of Our Plan for the High Street, we committed to piloting a publicly available register of empty commercial properties in selected local authorities, to help improve transparency and make it easier to bring vacant properties back into use. We are currently working on the detail of the pilot and will make a further announcement in due course.</p> answering member constituency Rossendale and Darwen answering member printed Jake Berry question first answered 10/06/2019 14:36:21 answering member 4060 label Biography information for Sir Jake Berry
tabling member	308 label Biography information for Mr Jim Cunningham

1129723

registered interest
date	04/06/2019
answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	Building Regulations and Fire Safety Independent Review
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, with reference to annex A of his Department's Building a safer future implementation plan published in December 2018, whether the final proposals of the competence steering group were delivered in April 2019; and if he will publish those proposals.
tabling member constituency	Croydon Central
tabling member printed	Sarah Jones
uin	260098
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 10/06/2019 answer text <p>The Competence Steering Group has submitted to Government its initial proposals for an overarching system to oversee competence requirements for buildings in scope, as part of its work to improve competence, for inclusion in our consultation ‘Building a Safer Future: a consultation’ (<a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/news/residents-encouraged-to-have-their-say-to-improve-building-safety" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/news/residents-encouraged-to-have-their-say-to-improve-building-safety</a>), published on 6 June 2019. The report can be found at Annex E. The Group expects to publish its full report covering all recommendations from its working groups in June for an industry-led consultation.</p> answering member constituency North West Hampshire answering member printed Kit Malthouse question first answered 10/06/2019 14:37:29 answering member 4495 label Biography information for Kit Malthouse
tabling member	4631 label Biography information for Sarah Jones

1129724

registered interest
date	04/06/2019
answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	Building Regulations and Fire Safety Independent Review
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, if he will provide an updated list of activity on his Department's Building a safer future implementation plan since 29 November 2018.
tabling member constituency	Croydon Central
tabling member printed	Sarah Jones
uin	260099
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 10/06/2019 answer text <p>I refer the Hon. Member to the letter I sent on 11 April to Clive Betts MP in his capacity as chair of the Housing, Communities and Local Government Select Committee, a copy of which has been placed in the House Library.</p> answering member constituency North West Hampshire answering member printed Kit Malthouse question first answered 10/06/2019 14:33:24 answering member 4495 label Biography information for Kit Malthouse
tabling member	4631 label Biography information for Sarah Jones

1129725

registered interest
date	04/06/2019
answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	Building Regulations and Fire Safety Independent Review
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, with reference to his Department's Building Safety Programme: Monthly Data Release published on 30 April 2019, if he will publish local authority data in the format of Table 3 in that document, for (a) all social sector buildings identified with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet building regulations, (b) social sector buildings identified with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet building regulations yet to be remediated, (c) all private sector buildings identified with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet building regulations, and (d) all private sector buildings identified with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet building regulations yet to be remediated.
tabling member constituency	Croydon Central
tabling member printed	Sarah Jones
uin	260100
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 10/06/2019 answer text <p>Tables A and B set out local authority areas with high-rise social sector residential buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet building regulations identified, and those yet to be remediated, respectively. These areas are grouped into bands. The bands used are: one to five buildings, six to ten buildings, 11 to 20 buildings, and over 20 buildings.</p><p> </p><p>As at 30 April, there are 37 local authorities in England where such social sector buildings were identified, of which 31 local authorities have at least one such building yet to be remediated within their boundaries.</p><p> </p><p>We exclude local authorities with fewer than ten high-rise social sector buildings (regardless of whether they have cladding) from the tables below, as their inclusion could lead to the identification of one or more buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations in these areas – hence we only list 32 local authorities in Table A and 26 in Table B.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>Table A: Number of social sector buildings identified with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet building regulations, by local authority</strong> <strong>England, 30 April 2019</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>(a) Local authorities with 1 to 5 social sector buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations identified</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Barking and Dagenham</p></td><td><p>Havering</p></td><td><p>Reading</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Barnet</p></td><td><p>Hillingdon</p></td><td><p>Sandwell</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Calderdale</p></td><td><p>Hounslow</p></td><td><p>Sefton</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cambridge</p></td><td><p>Islington</p></td><td><p>Sheffield</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Camden</p></td><td><p>Lambeth</p></td><td><p>Stockton-on-Tees</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Croydon</p></td><td><p>Lewisham</p></td><td><p>Sunderland</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Doncaster</p></td><td><p>Newham</p></td><td><p>Wandsworth</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hackney</p></td><td><p>Plymouth</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hammersmith and Fulham</p></td><td><p>Portsmouth</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>(b) Local authorities with 6 to 10 social sector buildings</strong> <strong>with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations identified</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Brent</p></td><td><p>Haringey</p></td><td><p>Southwark</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Westminster</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>(c) Local authorities with 11 to 20 social sector buildings</strong> <strong>with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations identified</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Manchester</p></td><td><p>Tower Hamlets</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>(d) Local authorities with over 20 social sector buildings</strong> <strong>with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations identified</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Salford</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>Table B: Number of social sector buildings identified with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet building regulations yet to be remediated, by local authority</strong> <strong>England, 30 April 2019</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>(a) Local authorities with 1 to 5 social sector buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations yet to be remediated</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Barking and Dagenham</p></td><td><p>Hillingdon</p></td><td><p>Portsmouth</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Barnet</p></td><td><p>Islington</p></td><td><p>Reading</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cambridge</p></td><td><p>Lambeth</p></td><td><p>Sefton</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Camden</p></td><td><p>Lewisham</p></td><td><p>Sheffield</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Croydon</p></td><td><p>Manchester</p></td><td><p>Southwark</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hackney</p></td><td><p>Newham</p></td><td><p>Stockton-on-Tees</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hammersmith and Fulham</p></td><td><p>Plymouth</p></td><td><p>Wandsworth</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>(b) Local authorities with 6 to 10 social sector buildings</strong> <strong>with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations yet to be remediated</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Brent</p></td><td><p>Haringey</p></td><td><p>Tower Hamlets</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Westminster</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>(c) Local authorities with 11 to 20 social sector buildings</strong> <strong>with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations yet to be remediated</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Salford</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Tables C and D set out the information for private sector residential buildings. Please note that this does not include hotels or student accommodation.</p><p> </p><p>As at 30 April, there are 40 local authorities in England where such private sector residential buildings were identified, of which 38 local authorities have at least one such building yet to be remediated within their boundaries.</p><p> </p><p>We exclude local authorities with fewer than ten high-rise private sector residential buildings – hence only 35 local authorities are listed in Table C and 34 in Table D.</p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="3"><p><br> <strong>Table C: Number of private sector residential buildings identified with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet building regulations, by local authority</strong> <strong>England, 30 April 2019</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>(a) Local authorities with 1 to 5 private residential buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations identified</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Barnet</p></td><td><p>Hammersmith and Fulham</p></td><td><p>Nottingham</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole</p></td><td><p>Harrow</p></td><td><p>Reading</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bradford</p></td><td><p>Hounslow</p></td><td><p>Salford</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Brent</p></td><td><p>Islington</p></td><td><p>Sheffield</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bristol</p></td><td><p>Kensington and Chelsea</p></td><td><p>Slough</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bromley</p></td><td><p>Lambeth</p></td><td><p>Southwark</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cambridge</p></td><td><p>Liverpool</p></td><td><p>Sutton</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Croydon</p></td><td><p>Medway</p></td><td><p>Waltham Forest</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ealing</p></td><td><p>Merton</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hackney</p></td><td><p>Norwich</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>(b) Local authorities with 6 to 10 private residential buildings</strong> <strong>with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations identified</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Leeds</p></td><td><p>Manchester</p></td><td><p>Newham</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>(c) Local authorities with 11 to 20 private residential buildings</strong> <strong>with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations identified</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wandsworth</p></td><td><p>Westminster</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>(d) Local authorities with over 20 private residential buildings</strong> <strong>with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations identified</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Greenwich</p></td><td><p>Tower Hamlets</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>Table D: Number of private sector residential buildings identified with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet building regulations yet to be remediated, by local authority</strong> <strong>England, 30 April 2019</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>(a) Local authorities with 1 to 5 private residential buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations yet to be remediated</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Barnet</p></td><td><p>Hammersmith and Fulham</p></td><td><p>Nottingham</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole</p></td><td><p>Harrow</p></td><td><p>Reading</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bradford</p></td><td><p>Hounslow</p></td><td><p>Salford</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Brent</p></td><td><p>Islington</p></td><td><p>Sheffield</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bristol</p></td><td><p>Kensington and Chelsea</p></td><td><p>Slough</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bromley</p></td><td><p>Lambeth</p></td><td><p>Southwark</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cambridge</p></td><td><p>Liverpool</p></td><td><p>Sutton</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Croydon</p></td><td><p>Medway</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ealing</p></td><td><p>Merton</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hackney</p></td><td><p>Norwich</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>(b) Local authorities with 6 to 10 private residential buildings</strong> <strong>with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations yet to be remediated</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Leeds</p></td><td><p>Manchester</p></td><td><p>Newham</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>(c) Local authorities with 11 to 20 private residential buildings</strong> <strong>with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations yet to be remediated</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wandsworth</p></td><td><p>Westminster</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>(d) Local authorities with over 20 private residential buildings</strong> <strong>with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations yet to be remediated</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Greenwich</p></td><td><p>Tower Hamlets</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p> answering member constituency North West Hampshire answering member printed Kit Malthouse question first answered 10/06/2019 14:32:58 answering member 4495 label Biography information for Kit Malthouse
tabling member	4631 label Biography information for Sarah Jones

1129727

registered interest
date	04/06/2019
answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	High Rise Flats: Fire Prevention
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant to the Written Statement of 11 December 2018, HCWS1169 on Contingent Liability for the Joint Inspection Team, when the Joint Inspection Taskforce was originally due to be operational; and whether that taskforce is now fully operational.
tabling member constituency	Croydon Central
tabling member printed	Sarah Jones
uin	260101
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 10/06/2019 answer text <p>The Local Government Association (LGA) who host the Joint Inspection Team has recruited all key members of the Team. They are engaging with local authorities who have sought their support in dealing with the remediation of private sector high rise residential building with unsafe Aluminium Composite Material (ACM) cladding.</p> answering member constituency North West Hampshire answering member printed Kit Malthouse question first answered 10/06/2019 14:34:08 answering member 4495 label Biography information for Kit Malthouse
tabling member	4631 label Biography information for Sarah Jones

1128821

registered interest
date	03/06/2019
answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	High Rise Flats: Insulation
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant to the Answer of 9 May 2019 to Question 249217 on High Rise Flats: Insulation, how much of that £259 million has been allocated to (a) housing associations and (b) other registered providers; and whether he holds information on the amount allocated to registered providers by the local authority where their blocks are located.
tabling member constituency	Croydon Central
tabling member printed	Sarah Jones
uin	259401
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 06/06/2019 answer text <p>Of the £259 million that has been allocated, £123 million has been allocated to housing associations and £136.4 million has been allocated to local authorities.</p><p>The table below shows total approved costs by building location. Due to public safety considerations, five local authority areas have not been specifically named as this could lead to the disclosure of individual buildings.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Local authority area</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Approved Funding</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Barking and Dagenham</p></td><td><p>£0.6m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Barnet</p></td><td><p>£6m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Brent</p></td><td><p>£21.7m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Calderdale</p></td><td><p>£1.7m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cambridge</p></td><td><p>£0.1m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Camden</p></td><td><p>£80.6m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Croydon</p></td><td><p>£1m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hackney</p></td><td><p>£2.1m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hammersmith and Fulham</p></td><td><p>£0.4m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Haringey</p></td><td><p>£10m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Havering</p></td><td><p>£0.8m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hillingdon</p></td><td><p>£0.4m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Islington</p></td><td><p>£5.6m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lambeth</p></td><td><p>£20.2m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Manchester</p></td><td><p>£7.2m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Newham</p></td><td><p>£3.6m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Norwich</p></td><td><p>£1.9m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Plymouth</p></td><td><p>£11.8m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Portsmouth</p></td><td><p>£1.2m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Reading</p></td><td><p>£2.1m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Salford</p></td><td><p>£10.2m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sandwell</p></td><td><p>£1m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sefton</p></td><td><p>£2.5m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sheffield</p></td><td><p>£3.9m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Southwark</p></td><td><p>£8.2m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Stockton on Tees</p></td><td><p>£2.4m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sunderland</p></td><td><p>£0.4m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tower Hamlets</p></td><td><p>£12.1m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Trafford</p></td><td><p>£4.8m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wandsworth</p></td><td><p>£16.5m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Westminster</p></td><td><p>£6.7m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other (5 Local Authority Areas)</p></td><td><p>£11.4m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>£259.4m</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table> answering member constituency North West Hampshire answering member printed Kit Malthouse question first answered 06/06/2019 15:30:35 answering member 4495 label Biography information for Kit Malthouse
tabling member	4631 label Biography information for Sarah Jones

1128825

registered interest
date	03/06/2019
answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	High Rise Flats: Insulation
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what estimate he made of the (a) number of blocks, (b) cost per block and 9c) cost per dwelling when calculating the £200 million private sector cladding remediation fund.
tabling member constituency	Croydon Central
tabling member printed	Sarah Jones
uin	259402
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 06/06/2019 answer text <p>The Government has announced its commitment to fully fund the remediation of private sector high-rise residential blocks with unsafe Aluminium Composite Material (ACM) cladding, except where a warranty claim is accepted. The fund will cover reasonable costs associated with the removal and replacement of unsafe ACM cladding systems on all eligible buildings and the estimated cost is £200 million. A number of building owners and developers including Taylor Wimpey, Legal &amp; General, Mace Group, Lendlease, Barratt Developments and Aberdeen Standard Investments have agreed to maintain their commitment to fund remediation and will not draw on the fund.</p> answering member constituency North West Hampshire answering member printed Kit Malthouse question first answered 06/06/2019 07:44:45 answering member 4495 label Biography information for Kit Malthouse
tabling member	4631 label Biography information for Sarah Jones

1128826

registered interest
date	03/06/2019
answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	High Rise Flats: Insulation
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, which housing associations have been allocated funding as part of the £400 million cladding remediation fund for social sector blocks; and how much each such association has been allocated.
tabling member constituency	Croydon Central
tabling member printed	Sarah Jones
uin	259403
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 06/06/2019 answer text <p>To date, MHCLG has approved £123 million of funding to 33 housing association building owners.</p><p>The table below shows total approved costs to housing associations. Due to public safety considerations, 14 housing associations have not been specifically named as this could lead to the disclosure of individual buildings.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Housing Association</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Approved Funding</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Clarion Housing Group</p></td><td><p>£0.8m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hyde Housing Association</p></td><td><p>£3.8m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Origin Housing</p></td><td><p>£1m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Poplar HARCA</p></td><td><p>£0.3m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tower Hamlets Community Housing</p></td><td><p>£2.4m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Catalyst Housing Limited</p></td><td><p>£8.8m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Islington and Shoreditch Housing Association</p></td><td><p>£2.1m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Network Homes</p></td><td><p>£17.8m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>One Housing Group</p></td><td><p>£2.6m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>One Vision Housing</p></td><td><p>£2.5m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Optivo</p></td><td><p>£0.3m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Thirteen Group</p></td><td><p>£2.4m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Together Housing</p></td><td><p>£1.7m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Gentoo Group</p></td><td><p>£0.4m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London and Quadrant Housing Trust</p></td><td><p>£1.8m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Newlon Housing Trust</p></td><td><p>£7.7m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Notting Hill Genesis</p></td><td><p>£4.2m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Peabody</p></td><td><p>£1.6m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Salix Homes</p></td><td><p>£8m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other (14 HAs)</p></td><td><p>£45.6m</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>£123m</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table> answering member constituency North West Hampshire answering member printed Kit Malthouse question first answered 06/06/2019 15:31:11 answering member 4495 label Biography information for Kit Malthouse
tabling member	4631 label Biography information for Sarah Jones

1128842

registered interest
date	03/06/2019
answering body	Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept id	7
answering dept short name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
answering dept sort name	Housing, Communities and Local Government
hansard heading	Parking: Fees and Charges
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, what measures are available to landowners and leaseholders with rights over land to enforce reasonable parking charges when a vehicle is left on their land contrary to the terms displayed.
tabling member constituency	Chelmsford
tabling member printed	Vicky Ford
uin	259459
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 10/06/2019 answer text <p>The Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 grants keeper liability for vehicles, allowing landowners and parking operators to pursue the registered keeper of a vehicle for breaches of contract related to parking. Private parking companies must be a member of a trade association if they wish to access DVLA data in order to issue parking charges to vehicle owners. The two parking trade associations, the British Parking Association (BPA) and the International Parking Community (IPC), have their own codes of practice and appeal procedures to which they expect their members to adhere. If a private parking company does not follow these codes responsibly, they risk being banned from accessing DVLA data and will be unable to issue parking charges.</p> answering member constituency Richmond (Yorks) answering member printed Rishi Sunak question first answered 10/06/2019 11:38:08 answering member 4483 label Biography information for Rishi Sunak
tabling member	4674 label Biography information for Vicky Ford