| answer text |
<p>Tables A and B set out local authority areas with high-rise social sector residential
buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet building regulations identified,
and those yet to be remediated, respectively. These areas are grouped into bands.
The bands used are: one to five buildings, six to ten buildings, 11 to 20 buildings,
and over 20 buildings.</p><p> </p><p>As at 30 April, there are 37 local authorities
in England where such social sector buildings were identified, of which 31 local authorities
have at least one such building yet to be remediated within their boundaries.</p><p>
</p><p>We exclude local authorities with fewer than ten high-rise social sector buildings
(regardless of whether they have cladding) from the tables below, as their inclusion
could lead to the identification of one or more buildings with ACM cladding systems
unlikely to meet Building Regulations in these areas – hence we only list 32 local
authorities in Table A and 26 in Table B.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>Table
A: Number of social sector buildings identified with ACM cladding systems unlikely
to meet building regulations, by local authority</strong> <strong>England, 30 April
2019</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>(a) Local authorities with
1 to 5 social sector buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building
Regulations identified</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Barking and Dagenham</p></td><td><p>Havering</p></td><td><p>Reading</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Barnet</p></td><td><p>Hillingdon</p></td><td><p>Sandwell</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Calderdale</p></td><td><p>Hounslow</p></td><td><p>Sefton</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cambridge</p></td><td><p>Islington</p></td><td><p>Sheffield</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Camden</p></td><td><p>Lambeth</p></td><td><p>Stockton-on-Tees</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Croydon</p></td><td><p>Lewisham</p></td><td><p>Sunderland</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Doncaster</p></td><td><p>Newham</p></td><td><p>Wandsworth</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hackney</p></td><td><p>Plymouth</p></td><td><p>
</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hammersmith and Fulham</p></td><td><p>Portsmouth</p></td><td><p>
</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>(b) Local authorities with 6 to 10 social
sector buildings</strong> <strong>with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building
Regulations identified</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Brent</p></td><td><p>Haringey</p></td><td><p>Southwark</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Westminster</p></td><td><p>
</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>(c) Local authorities
with 11 to 20 social sector buildings</strong> <strong>with ACM cladding systems unlikely
to meet Building Regulations identified</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Manchester</p></td><td><p>Tower
Hamlets</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>(d) Local authorities
with over 20 social sector buildings</strong> <strong>with ACM cladding systems unlikely
to meet Building Regulations identified</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Salford</p></td><td><p>
</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>Table B: Number of social
sector buildings identified with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet building regulations
yet to be remediated, by local authority</strong> <strong>England, 30 April 2019</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td
colspan="3"><p><strong>(a) Local authorities with 1 to 5 social sector buildings with
ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations yet to be remediated</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Barking
and Dagenham</p></td><td><p>Hillingdon</p></td><td><p>Portsmouth</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Barnet</p></td><td><p>Islington</p></td><td><p>Reading</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cambridge</p></td><td><p>Lambeth</p></td><td><p>Sefton</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Camden</p></td><td><p>Lewisham</p></td><td><p>Sheffield</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Croydon</p></td><td><p>Manchester</p></td><td><p>Southwark</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hackney</p></td><td><p>Newham</p></td><td><p>Stockton-on-Tees</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hammersmith
and Fulham</p></td><td><p>Plymouth</p></td><td><p>Wandsworth</p></td></tr><tr><td
colspan="3"><p><strong>(b) Local authorities with 6 to 10 social sector buildings</strong>
<strong>with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations yet to be
remediated</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Brent</p></td><td><p>Haringey</p></td><td><p>Tower
Hamlets</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Westminster</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td
colspan="3"><p><strong>(c) Local authorities with 11 to 20 social sector buildings</strong>
<strong>with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations yet to be
remediated</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Salford</p></td><td><p> </p></td><td><p>
</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Tables C and D set out the information for
private sector residential buildings. Please note that this does not include hotels
or student accommodation.</p><p> </p><p>As at 30 April, there are 40 local authorities
in England where such private sector residential buildings were identified, of which
38 local authorities have at least one such building yet to be remediated within their
boundaries.</p><p> </p><p>We exclude local authorities with fewer than ten high-rise
private sector residential buildings – hence only 35 local authorities are listed
in Table C and 34 in Table D.</p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="3"><p><br> <strong>Table
C: Number of private sector residential buildings identified with ACM cladding systems
unlikely to meet building regulations, by local authority</strong> <strong>England,
30 April 2019</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>(a) Local authorities
with 1 to 5 private residential buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet
Building Regulations identified</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Barnet</p></td><td><p>Hammersmith
and Fulham</p></td><td><p>Nottingham</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bournemouth, Christchurch
and Poole</p></td><td><p>Harrow</p></td><td><p>Reading</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bradford</p></td><td><p>Hounslow</p></td><td><p>Salford</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Brent</p></td><td><p>Islington</p></td><td><p>Sheffield</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bristol</p></td><td><p>Kensington
and Chelsea</p></td><td><p>Slough</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bromley</p></td><td><p>Lambeth</p></td><td><p>Southwark</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cambridge</p></td><td><p>Liverpool</p></td><td><p>Sutton</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Croydon</p></td><td><p>Medway</p></td><td><p>Waltham
Forest</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ealing</p></td><td><p>Merton</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hackney</p></td><td><p>Norwich</p></td><td><p>
</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>(b) Local authorities with 6 to 10 private
residential buildings</strong> <strong>with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet
Building Regulations identified</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Leeds</p></td><td><p>Manchester</p></td><td><p>Newham</p></td></tr><tr><td
colspan="3"><p><strong>(c) Local authorities with 11 to 20 private residential buildings</strong>
<strong>with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations identified</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wandsworth</p></td><td><p>Westminster</p></td><td><p>
</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>(d) Local authorities with over 20 private
residential buildings</strong> <strong>with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet
Building Regulations identified</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Greenwich</p></td><td><p>Tower
Hamlets</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>Table D: Number
of private sector residential buildings identified with ACM cladding systems unlikely
to meet building regulations yet to be remediated, by local authority</strong> <strong>England,
30 April 2019</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>(a) Local authorities
with 1 to 5 private residential buildings with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet
Building Regulations yet to be remediated</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Barnet</p></td><td><p>Hammersmith
and Fulham</p></td><td><p>Nottingham</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bournemouth, Christchurch
and Poole</p></td><td><p>Harrow</p></td><td><p>Reading</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bradford</p></td><td><p>Hounslow</p></td><td><p>Salford</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Brent</p></td><td><p>Islington</p></td><td><p>Sheffield</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bristol</p></td><td><p>Kensington
and Chelsea</p></td><td><p>Slough</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bromley</p></td><td><p>Lambeth</p></td><td><p>Southwark</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cambridge</p></td><td><p>Liverpool</p></td><td><p>Sutton</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Croydon</p></td><td><p>Medway</p></td><td><p>
</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ealing</p></td><td><p>Merton</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hackney</p></td><td><p>Norwich</p></td><td><p>
</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>(b) Local authorities with 6 to 10 private
residential buildings</strong> <strong>with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet
Building Regulations yet to be remediated</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Leeds</p></td><td><p>Manchester</p></td><td><p>Newham</p></td></tr><tr><td
colspan="3"><p><strong>(c) Local authorities with 11 to 20 private residential buildings</strong>
<strong>with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet Building Regulations yet to be
remediated</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wandsworth</p></td><td><p>Westminster</p></td><td><p>
</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p><strong>(d) Local authorities with over 20 private
residential buildings</strong> <strong>with ACM cladding systems unlikely to meet
Building Regulations yet to be remediated</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Greenwich</p></td><td><p>Tower
Hamlets</p></td><td><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p>
|
|
