Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

746215
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-06-28more like thismore than 2017-06-28
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 remove filter
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority: Complaints more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how quickly the complaints received by the Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority in 2015-16 were dealt with; and what the 10 most common complaints were. more like this
tabling member constituency Stretford and Urmston more like this
tabling member printed
Kate Green more like this
uin 1917 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-06more like thismore than 2017-07-06
answer text <p>The Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA) received 533 complaints about their service in the financial year 2015-16. This represents 1.3% of CICA’s live caseload. 49% of complaints were closed within 10 days.</p><p> </p><p>Where complaints took longer to close this was due to the number of enquiries required to fully investigate the complaint. In other cases, CICA were asked by the complainer not to close the complaint until a final decision was issued on the claim. The average time CICA took to deal with those complaints was 23.75 days.</p><p> </p><p>The most common complaint received by CICA related to delays in finalising claims. CICA aims to make compensation payments as quickly as possible, however, they have a duty to the taxpayer to fully investigate claims to make sure that the applicant gets the level of compensation they deserve.</p><p> </p><p>The 10 most common reasons for complaining about CICA’s service in 2015/16 were:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Reason given for complaint</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Percentage of overall complaints</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Delays</p></td><td><p>68.95%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lack of updates on case progression</p></td><td><p>11.33%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Claim handling</p></td><td><p>9.77%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Failure to respond to letters</p></td><td><p>4.10%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Applicant provided with conflicting information</p></td><td><p>2.93%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Failure to provide timescales</p></td><td><p>1.76%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Failure to return phone calls</p></td><td><p>0.59%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Errors when recording telephone application information</p></td><td><p>0.20%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Impolite staff member</p></td><td><p>0.20%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Poor customer service</p></td><td><p>0.20%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>The total number of complaints the CICA received in each of the last five years, including those cases (a) escalated to stage 2 and (b) progressed to stage 3, are as follows:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Complaints received</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Escalated to Stage 2</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Escalated to Stage 3</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016-17</p></td><td><p>1122</p></td><td><p>120</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015-16</p></td><td><p>533</p></td><td><p>39</p></td><td><p>6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014-15</p></td><td><p>491</p></td><td><p>26</p></td><td><p>9</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-14</p></td><td><p>204</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012-13</p></td><td><p>284</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Over half of complaints received in 2016/17 were from paid representatives. A significant portion of these were from firms of solicitors who lodged block complaints for their CICA caseload with a view to influencing the speed of the decision making process.</p><p> </p><p>During the course of 2016/17 the CICA revised their operating model and increased staff numbers following an extensive recruitment exercise. They have also recently introduced measures that develop and streamline digital processes, which have reduced the claim processing time by 30 days. The new online service, which will be introduced later this financial year, will allow applicants and their representatives to view the progress of their case online. It is expected that these measures will reduce the time taken to finalise claims and lead to a reduction in complaints.</p>
answering member constituency Bracknell more like this
answering member printed Dr Phillip Lee more like this
grouped question UIN 1962 more like this
question first answered
remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2017-07-06T10:43:33.493Z
answering member
3921
label Biography information for Dr Phillip Lee more like this
tabling member
4120
label Biography information for Kate Green more like this
746244
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-06-28more like thismore than 2017-06-28
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 remove filter
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Appeals more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how much on average it costs HM Courts and Tribunal Service to administer a First-tier Tribunal (Social Security and Child Support Appeal) in respect of personal independence payments. more like this
tabling member constituency Coventry North East more like this
tabling member printed
Colleen Fletcher more like this
uin 1679 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-04more like thismore than 2017-07-04
answer text <p>The information requested is not held.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Esher and Walton more like this
answering member printed Dominic Raab more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-07-04T12:11:21.99Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-04T12:11:21.99Z
answering member
4007
label Biography information for Dominic Raab more like this
tabling member
4378
label Biography information for Colleen Fletcher more like this
746258
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-06-28more like thismore than 2017-06-28
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 remove filter
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Coroners more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the timetable is for the implementation of the Coroner Reform programme. more like this
tabling member constituency Hendon more like this
tabling member printed
Dr Matthew Offord more like this
uin 1728 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-05more like thismore than 2017-07-05
answer text <p>In March 2013 we published a consultation on the implementation of the coroner reforms in Part 1 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009. We implemented those reforms along with supporting rules and regulations, in July 2013. We published guidance on reformed coroner services in February 2014.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Bracknell more like this
answering member printed Dr Phillip Lee more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-07-05T15:49:20.893Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-05T15:49:20.893Z
answering member
3921
label Biography information for Dr Phillip Lee more like this
tabling member
4006
label Biography information for Dr Matthew Offord more like this
746259
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-06-28more like thismore than 2017-06-28
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 remove filter
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Post-mortems more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what guidance his Department has published to ensure the minimal use of invasive autopsies. more like this
tabling member constituency Hendon more like this
tabling member printed
Dr Matthew Offord more like this
uin 1729 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-07-05more like thismore than 2017-07-05
answer text <p>The Ministry of Justice has responsibility for coronial law and policy only. The decision to commission a post mortem examination as part of a coronial investigation, and what form it takes, is for the coroner as an independent judicial office holder. The Chief Coroner has issued guidance to coroners on post mortem imaging.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Bracknell more like this
answering member printed Dr Phillip Lee more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-07-05T15:52:39.233Zmore like thismore than 2017-07-05T15:52:39.233Z
answering member
3921
label Biography information for Dr Phillip Lee more like this
tabling member
4006
label Biography information for Dr Matthew Offord more like this