Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1132544
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-06-17more like thismore than 2019-06-17
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 remove filter
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Historic Buildings: Health Hazards more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to the protections introduced in Germany and Austria for workers renovating or demolishing buildings against the risk of breathing in historical man-made mineral fibres which are now considered to pose a serious risk to health, what steps she is taking to introduce similar protections for UK workers. more like this
tabling member constituency York Central more like this
tabling member printed
Rachael Maskell more like this
uin 265555 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-06-24more like thismore than 2019-06-24
answer text <p>The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) is aware of the guidelines that have been produced in Germany and Austria, advising companies on the measures they should take to protect workers against risks of breathing in historic man-made mineral fibres (MMMFs).</p><p>In Great Britain there is a statutory framework in place to protect workers who may be exposed to any hazardous substance, such as MMMFs, regardless of how that exposure occurs. This framework includes the Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 which places a general duty on employers to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the health, safety and welfare of people affected by their work activities.</p><p> </p><p>The Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 (COSHH), places specific duties on employers and implements several EU Directives on worker protection, ensuring our standards meet those required of all EU Member States. COSHH requires employers to carry out a risk assessment to establish the hazards associated with the tasks and processes they are undertaking and put in place suitable arrangements to either prevent or control those risks. Such a risk assessment would need to be carried out for workers renovating or demolishing buildings to enable suitable controls to be put in place for any hazardous substances that may be present or that may be produced, including MMMFs. HSE provides guidance, to help businesses comply with their legal duties.</p><p> </p><p>The regulatory framework, supported by guidance, is sufficient to control occupational exposure to MMMFs.</p>
answering member constituency North Swindon more like this
answering member printed Justin Tomlinson more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-06-24T14:39:07.767Zmore like thismore than 2019-06-24T14:39:07.767Z
answering member
4105
label Biography information for Justin Tomlinson more like this
tabling member
4471
label Biography information for Rachael Maskell remove filter
906316
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-05-17more like thismore than 2018-05-17
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 remove filter
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: York more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people in York have had their entitlement to personal independence payments upheld as a result of (a) mandatory reconsideration and (b) an appeal hearing. more like this
tabling member constituency York Central more like this
tabling member printed
Rachael Maskell more like this
uin 145372 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-05-29more like thismore than 2018-05-29
answer text <p>The number of Mandatory Reconsideration clearances for Personal Independence Payment in York Local Authority broken down by clearance type for each financial year since its introduction is as follows:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Financial Year</p></td><td><p>New Decision - Award Changed</p></td><td><p>New Decision - Award Unchanged</p></td><td><p>Decision Not Revised</p></td><td><p>Withdrawn/<br> Cancelled</p></td><td><p>Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>13/14</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>14/15</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>170</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>280</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>15/16</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>300</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>390</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>16/17</p></td><td><p>120</p></td><td><p>440</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>610</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Apr 17 - Jan 18</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>320</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>440</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total</p></td><td><p>320</p></td><td><p>1,230</p></td><td><p>120</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>1,740</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>The number of appeals for Personal Independence Payment in York Local Authority broken down by outcome for each financial year since its introduction is as follows:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Financial Year</p></td><td><p>Decision Overturned</p></td><td><p>Decision Upheld</p></td><td><p>Total</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>14/15</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>15/16</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>140</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>16/17</p></td><td><p>130</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>200</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Apr 17 - Dec 17</p></td><td><p>120</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>160</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total</p></td><td><p>330</p></td><td><p>180</p></td><td><p>510</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Reconsiderations data is available to January 2018. Appeals data is to December 2017.</p><p>#’ means greater than zero but fewer than 5 in this category.</p><p>Data has been rounded to the nearest 10.</p><p>PIP data includes normal rules and special rules for the terminally ill claimants, and is for both new claims and DLA reassessment claims</p><p>Some decisions which are changed at mandatory reconsideration, and where the claimant continues to appeal for a higher PIP award, are then changed again at tribunal appeal. Therefore the number of people who had a decision changed at mandatory reconsideration and the number of people who had a decision changed at tribunal appeal cannot be added together.</p><p>Award overturned at appeal may include a small number of appeals that have been lapsed (which is where DWP changed the decision after an appeal was lodged but before it was heard at Tribunal).</p><p>The Local Authority Region geography relates to the origin of the claim (i.e. derived from claimant’s postcode) rather than the location of where the tribunal was held.</p><p>Appeals data taken from the DWP PIP computer system’s management information. Therefore this appeal data may differ from that held by Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service for various reasons such as delays in data recording and other methodological differences in collating and preparing statistics.</p>
answering member constituency Hexham more like this
answering member printed Guy Opperman more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-05-29T10:48:52.34Zmore like thisremove minimum value filter
answering member
4142
label Biography information for Guy Opperman more like this
tabling member
4471
label Biography information for Rachael Maskell remove filter