Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1585544
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-02-08more like thismore than 2023-02-08
answering body
The Senior Deputy Speaker more like this
answering dept id 204 remove filter
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name Senior Deputy Speaker (HoL) more like this
hansard heading House of Lords: Security more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask the Senior Deputy Speaker whether £7 million is to be spent on the security works project at Peers' Entrance; why such expenditure is necessary; and who authorised it. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Pearson of Rannoch more like this
uin HL5563 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-02-16more like thismore than 2023-02-16
answer text <p>For security reasons, the Houses do not publish capital expenditure on security mitigating projects as providing this level of detail could enable an individual to infer the extent and nature of the works, and thus the vulnerabilities which they were intended to mitigate.</p><p>The necessity and cost of the works at Peers’ Entrance have been the subject of rigorous internal assessment through the usual business case process. The plans have also been validated by external experts. Members are always welcome to contact the Director of Security to discuss any security-related concerns privately.  <br></p><p>The Clerk of the Parliaments and Clerk of the House, as Accounting and Corporate Officers, have responsibility for approving final business cases for security projects across the Parliamentary Estate, subject to advice from the Finance Directors and other relevant officials. The Clerk of the Parliaments’ decisions on security projects are informed by consultation with the House of Lords Commission, which ensures that the impact on Members is taken into account, and by the Finance Committee which receives regular reports regarding security expenditure. The Clerk of the House is informed by the equivalent groups and individuals in the House of Commons. Ultimately it is not the House that makes the final decision because security is a bicameral issue, and legal responsibility for safety sits with the Clerk of the Parliaments and Clerk of the House.<br></p>
answering member printed Lord Gardiner of Kimble more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-02-16T14:01:31.05Zmore like thismore than 2023-02-16T14:01:31.05Z
answering member
4161
label Biography information for Lord Gardiner of Kimble more like this
tabling member
3153
label Biography information for Lord Pearson of Rannoch remove filter
1344918
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-07-07more like thismore than 2021-07-07
answering body
The Senior Deputy Speaker more like this
answering dept id 204 remove filter
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name Senior Deputy Speaker (HoL) more like this
hansard heading Parliament: Internet more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask the Senior Deputy Speaker, further to the Written Answers by Lord McFall of Alcluith on 1 and 24 February 2017 (HL4961 and HL5612), why the Religion of Peace website is no longer accessible from computers attached to the parliamentary network, having previously been available. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Pearson of Rannoch more like this
uin HL1820 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-07-21more like thismore than 2021-07-21
answer text <p>The Senior Deputy Speaker has asked me, as Chair of the Services Committee, to respond on his behalf. The Parliamentary Digital Service uses an industry standard service to categorise and block websites that are deemed offensive, the “Religion of Peace” website is blocked as part of this automated service as it is classified as a religion-based hate website by the service. There are no indications that the website has been available to access on the parliamentary network.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Touhig more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-07-21T14:01:18.737Zmore like thismore than 2021-07-21T14:01:18.737Z
answering member
542
label Biography information for Lord Touhig more like this
tabling member
3153
label Biography information for Lord Pearson of Rannoch remove filter
1316955
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-05-20more like thismore than 2021-05-20
answering body
The Senior Deputy Speaker more like this
answering dept id 204 remove filter
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name Senior Deputy Speaker (HoL) more like this
hansard heading House of Lords Chamber: Coronavirus more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask the Senior Deputy Speaker what plans there are for members to return to normal rules of debate for those who are physically present in the Chamber. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Pearson of Rannoch more like this
uin HL448 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-05-27more like thismore than 2021-05-27
answer text <p>The House of Lords Commission, which has responsibility for setting the strategic direction in this area, met on 25 May and had a preliminary discussion of these matters. The Commission discussion was informed by the debate on hybrid proceedings held in the Chamber on 20 May and was followed by a meeting of the Procedure and Privileges Committee, on 26 May, at which an initial consideration of procedural implications was undertaken. Proposals and options will be developed ahead of further anticipated deliberation at June meetings of the House of Lords Commission and Procedure and Privileges Committee. Decisions will continue to be informed by the latest Government guidance and advice from Public Health England. Finally, and most importantly, the House will be invited to consider motions in due course to agree procedures, including those relating to the rules of debate, moving forwards.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Gardiner of Kimble more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-05-27T15:14:36.183Zmore like thismore than 2021-05-27T15:14:36.183Z
answering member
4161
label Biography information for Lord Gardiner of Kimble more like this
tabling member
3153
label Biography information for Lord Pearson of Rannoch remove filter
1314725
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2021-05-13more like thisremove minimum value filter
answering body
The Senior Deputy Speaker more like this
answering dept id 204 remove filter
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name Senior Deputy Speaker (HoL) more like this
hansard heading Parliamentary Estate: Visits more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask the Senior Deputy Speaker whether the Parliamentary Estate will remain closed to visiting members of the public until September; if so, (1) for what reasons, and (2) what consideration he has given to the loosening of COVID-19 restrictions in England on 17 May in respect of the accessibility of the Estate; and what plans there are to resume normal catering services in the House. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Pearson of Rannoch more like this
uin HL231 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2021-05-27more like thismore than 2021-05-27
answer text <p>The Senior Deputy Speaker has asked me, as Chair of the Services Committee, to respond on his behalf.</p><p>Changes affecting the operation of Parliament as a whole, such as non-passholder access to the estate are decided jointly with the House of Commons Commission. Both Commissions agreed that business-related non-passholder access should resume from 17 May to reflect changes in government guidance. This is limited to one person, where the meeting cannot take place virtually. Access for the public will remain limited due to the need to control the overall number of people on the Parliamentary Estate to prevent crowding and control the risk and spread of the virus on the estate. Further changes to access may occur after step 4 following further consideration by the House of Lords Commission.</p><p>Changes to House of Lords catering services were made on 17 May, including the re-configuration of outlets in line with the ‘rule of six’. The following Lords catering venues are now open: River Restaurant and Terrace, Peers’ Dining and Guest Room, Long Room Bar, and the Millbank House ‘Coffee pod’. All outlets are operating within government guidance. Catering services in the House will be kept under review in the light of demand and the number of passholders on the estate.</p>
answering member printed Lord Touhig more like this
question first answered
less than 2021-05-27T14:28:00.263Zmore like thismore than 2021-05-27T14:28:00.263Z
answering member
542
label Biography information for Lord Touhig more like this
tabling member
3153
label Biography information for Lord Pearson of Rannoch remove filter