Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label attachment file name title
tabling member	label

Search

681205

registered interest
date	30/01/2017
answering body	Department of Health
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health
answering dept sort name	Health
hansard heading	Hidradenitis Suppurativa
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health, if he will place in the Library a list of designated centres for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa that is difficult to diagnose or manage.
tabling member constituency	West Lancashire
tabling member printed	Rosie Cooper
uin	62194
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 02/02/2017 answer text <p>Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) can usually be managed through routine access to primary or secondary care. For those patients with the most serious forms of HS, who cannot be managed in this way, a referral to an appropriate specialised service may be appropriate.</p><p> </p><p>The list of specialised dermatology providers for both in-patient and out-patient care is attached.</p><p> </p><p>NHS England commissions specialised services for people with rare and complex skin conditions and has set out what providers must have in place in order to offer specialist dermatology care. The level of service provision nationally is based on an assessment of the likely patient population who will need to access specialised care. It is estimated that about 10% of patients requiring dermatology services (about 10,000 each year) need care from specialised dermatology centres.</p><p> </p><p>More information on the service specification for specialised dermatology can be found at the following link:</p><p><a href="http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/a12-spec-dermatology.pdf" target="_blank">www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/a12-spec-dermatology.pdf</a></p> answering member constituency Warrington South answering member printed David Mowat grouped question UIN 62255 question first answered 02/02/2017 16:27:10 answering member 4080 label Biography information for David Mowat attachment 1 file name PQ62194 attached document.XLSX title PQ62194 attached document
tabling member	1538 label Biography information for Rosie Cooper

681213

registered interest
date	30/01/2017
answering body	Department of Health
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health
answering dept sort name	Health
hansard heading	Hidradenitis Suppurativa
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health, with reference to NHS England's service specification for specialised dermatology services, if he will place in the Library a list of designated centres for the treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa that is difficult to diagnose or manage.
tabling member constituency	West Lancashire
tabling member printed	Rosie Cooper
uin	62255
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 02/02/2017 answer text <p>Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) can usually be managed through routine access to primary or secondary care. For those patients with the most serious forms of HS, who cannot be managed in this way, a referral to an appropriate specialised service may be appropriate.</p><p> </p><p>The list of specialised dermatology providers for both in-patient and out-patient care is attached.</p><p> </p><p>NHS England commissions specialised services for people with rare and complex skin conditions and has set out what providers must have in place in order to offer specialist dermatology care. The level of service provision nationally is based on an assessment of the likely patient population who will need to access specialised care. It is estimated that about 10% of patients requiring dermatology services (about 10,000 each year) need care from specialised dermatology centres.</p><p> </p><p>More information on the service specification for specialised dermatology can be found at the following link:</p><p><a href="http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/a12-spec-dermatology.pdf" target="_blank">www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/a12-spec-dermatology.pdf</a></p> answering member constituency Warrington South answering member printed David Mowat grouped question UIN 62194 question first answered 02/02/2017 16:27:10 answering member 4080 label Biography information for David Mowat attachment 1 file name PQ62194 attached document.XLSX title PQ62194 attached document
tabling member	1538 label Biography information for Rosie Cooper

679054

registered interest
date	26/01/2017
answering body	Department of Health
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health
answering dept sort name	Health
hansard heading	NHS: Inspections
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what the (a) average, (b) shortest and (c) longest length of time has been between the Care Quality Commission's inspections of NHS Trusts and the publication of report on those inspections.
tabling member constituency	West Lancashire
tabling member printed	Rosie Cooper
uin	61844
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 31/01/2017 answer text <p>The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is the independent regulator of health and adult social care in England. The CQC has provided the following information:</p><p> </p><p>Length of time between CQC inspection of National Health Service trusts and publication of inspection reports:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Shortest length of time</p></td><td><p>18 working days</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Longest length of time</p></td><td><p>176 working days</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Average (Mean) length of time</p></td><td><p>75 working days</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>The time taken between the conclusion of an inspection and the publication of an inspection report can vary for wide number of reasons. These include variations in the size of the trust being inspected, the complexity of the services they deliver, the scale and scope of the CQC reports and also whether it is a first rating or a subsequent inspection.<strong> </strong></p> answering member constituency Ludlow answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne question first answered 31/01/2017 17:32:03 answering member 1542 label Biography information for Philip Dunne
tabling member	1538 label Biography information for Rosie Cooper

679055

registered interest
date	26/01/2017
answering body	Department of Health
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health
answering dept sort name	Health
hansard heading	Bridgewater Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how long it took between the Care Quality Commission's inspection of Bridgewater NHS Trust and the production of the report on that inspection.
tabling member constituency	West Lancashire
tabling member printed	Rosie Cooper
uin	61845
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 31/01/2017 answer text <p>The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is the independent regulator of health and adult social care. The CQC has provided the following information.</p><p> </p><p>The CQC inspected Bridgewater Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust between May and June 2016.</p><p> </p><p>The Trust is made up of particular size and complexity and as a result of this the post inspection and pre-publication processes took longer than the usual set timescale and were not completed until October 2016.</p><p> </p><p>The quality checking element of the nine separate inspection reports that were completed were presented at four separate National Quality Assurance Group (NQAG) panels rather than the usual one. Although this part of the process could have been completed in a shorter timeframe, it was considered important to maintain consistency within the NQAG panel and so additional time was added to the process.</p><p> </p><p>The draft inspection report was sent to the Trust on 2 November 2016 for factual accuracy checks and was returned to the CQC on 2 December with factual accuracy comments and a request from the Trust for CQC to consider further information. The further information was scheduled to be considered at a further NQAG panel in line with CQC pre-publication processes.</p><p> </p><p>The NQAG panel was set up for 9 December 2016 but this was cancelled due to the panel Chair being called away on urgent business. The panel was rescheduled for 21 December 2016.</p><p> </p><p>On 20 December 2016 the Trust forwarded an additional set of further information for the CQC to consider the day before the NQAG panel was due to take place. The panel Chair felt more time was needed to consider this additional further information and as a result the NQAG panel was rescheduled to 11 January 2017.</p><p> </p><p>After the NQAG panel took place the CQC prepared the inspection report for final publication and contacted the Trust on 18 January 2017 to inform them that the report would be published on 23 January 2017.</p><p> </p><p>On that same day, 18 January, the Trust contacted the CQC with a request to delay publication as their Chief Executive Officer was on leave as from 20 January 2017 and wished to be available when the inspection report was published to support his staff and team. The CQC agreed to this request.</p><p> </p><p>The report is currently scheduled to be published in February 2017.</p> answering member constituency Ludlow answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne grouped question UIN 61846 question first answered 31/01/2017 17:33:43 answering member 1542 label Biography information for Philip Dunne
tabling member	1538 label Biography information for Rosie Cooper

679056

registered interest
date	26/01/2017
answering body	Department of Health
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health
answering dept sort name	Health
hansard heading	Bridgewater Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what reasons are for the time taken in the production of the Care Quality Commission's report on its inspection of Bridgewater NHS Trust.
tabling member constituency	West Lancashire
tabling member printed	Rosie Cooper
uin	61846
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 31/01/2017 answer text <p>The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is the independent regulator of health and adult social care. The CQC has provided the following information.</p><p> </p><p>The CQC inspected Bridgewater Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust between May and June 2016.</p><p> </p><p>The Trust is made up of particular size and complexity and as a result of this the post inspection and pre-publication processes took longer than the usual set timescale and were not completed until October 2016.</p><p> </p><p>The quality checking element of the nine separate inspection reports that were completed were presented at four separate National Quality Assurance Group (NQAG) panels rather than the usual one. Although this part of the process could have been completed in a shorter timeframe, it was considered important to maintain consistency within the NQAG panel and so additional time was added to the process.</p><p> </p><p>The draft inspection report was sent to the Trust on 2 November 2016 for factual accuracy checks and was returned to the CQC on 2 December with factual accuracy comments and a request from the Trust for CQC to consider further information. The further information was scheduled to be considered at a further NQAG panel in line with CQC pre-publication processes.</p><p> </p><p>The NQAG panel was set up for 9 December 2016 but this was cancelled due to the panel Chair being called away on urgent business. The panel was rescheduled for 21 December 2016.</p><p> </p><p>On 20 December 2016 the Trust forwarded an additional set of further information for the CQC to consider the day before the NQAG panel was due to take place. The panel Chair felt more time was needed to consider this additional further information and as a result the NQAG panel was rescheduled to 11 January 2017.</p><p> </p><p>After the NQAG panel took place the CQC prepared the inspection report for final publication and contacted the Trust on 18 January 2017 to inform them that the report would be published on 23 January 2017.</p><p> </p><p>On that same day, 18 January, the Trust contacted the CQC with a request to delay publication as their Chief Executive Officer was on leave as from 20 January 2017 and wished to be available when the inspection report was published to support his staff and team. The CQC agreed to this request.</p><p> </p><p>The report is currently scheduled to be published in February 2017.</p> answering member constituency Ludlow answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne grouped question UIN 61845 question first answered 31/01/2017 17:33:44 answering member 1542 label Biography information for Philip Dunne
tabling member	1538 label Biography information for Rosie Cooper

678625

registered interest
date	25/01/2017
answering body	Department of Health
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health
answering dept sort name	Health
hansard heading	Skin Diseases
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many finished admission episodes there were in each parliamentary constituency where a patient was diagnosed as having (a) hidradenitis suppurativa and (b) a dermatological condition in each of the last five years.
tabling member constituency	West Lancashire
tabling member printed	Rosie Cooper
uin	61547
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 30/01/2017 answer text <p>The attached table gives a count of finished admissions episodes with a primary diagnosis of hidradenitis suppurativa and dermatological conditions for the years 2011-12 to 2015-16 by parliamentary constituency.</p> answering member constituency Warrington South answering member printed David Mowat question first answered 30/01/2017 16:55:40 answering member 4080 label Biography information for David Mowat attachment 1 file name PQ61547 attached document.xlsx title PQ61547 attached document
tabling member	1538 label Biography information for Rosie Cooper

670803

registered interest
date	10/01/2017
answering body	Department of Health
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health
answering dept sort name	Health
hansard heading	Community Health Services: Liverpool
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to the Answer of 9 January 2017 to Questions 58635, 58636, 58637, 58638, 58639, whether there is any non-recurrent funding in the contract let by Liverpool Clinical Commissioning Group for Liverpool community health services to be provided by Bridgewater Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust from 2017-18.
tabling member constituency	West Lancashire
tabling member printed	Rosie Cooper
uin	59411
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 13/01/2017 answer text <p>We are informed by NHS England that the contract for 'core services' which will be let by NHS Liverpool Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) on behalf of the CCG, Liverpool City Council and NHS England has not yet been let. Following a transaction process led by NHS Improvement (NHSI), Bridgewater NHS Foundation Trust (FT) has been identified as the preferred bidder, and the submission is being assured by NHSI. When let, the existing Liverpool Community Health contract will novate to Bridgewater NHS FT. As such, and as with all other major National Health Service contracts, there is no specific end point.</p><p> </p><p>The accepted bid for 2017/18 includes £4.6 million non-recurrent funding for transition and transformation, the same level as for the current year.</p> answering member constituency Ludlow answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne question first answered 13/01/2017 14:53:07 answering member 1542 label Biography information for Philip Dunne
tabling member	1538 label Biography information for Rosie Cooper

670804

registered interest
date	10/01/2017
answering body	Department of Health
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health
answering dept sort name	Health
hansard heading	Community Health Services: Liverpool
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to the Answer of 9 January 2017 to Questions 58635, 58636, 58637, 58638, 58639, what the recurrent contract value is in the contract let by Liverpool Clinical Commissioning Group for Liverpool community health services to be provided by Bridgewater Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust from 2017-18.
tabling member constituency	West Lancashire
tabling member printed	Rosie Cooper
uin	59412
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 13/01/2017 answer text <p>We are informed by NHS England that the contract for 'core services' which will be let by NHS Liverpool Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) on behalf of the CCG, Liverpool City Council and NHS England has not yet been let. Following a transaction process led by NHS Improvement (NHSI), Bridgewater NHS Foundation Trust (FT) has been identified as the preferred bidder, and the submission is being assured by NHSI. When let, the existing Liverpool Community Health NHS Trust contract will novate to Bridgewater NHS FT. As such, and as with all other major National Health Service contracts, there is no specific end point.</p><p> </p><p>The accepted bid for 2017/18 is for £77 million recurrent funding, the same level as for the current year.</p> answering member constituency Ludlow answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne question first answered 13/01/2017 14:50:04 answering member 1542 label Biography information for Philip Dunne
tabling member	1538 label Biography information for Rosie Cooper

670806

registered interest
date	10/01/2017
answering body	Department of Health
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health
answering dept sort name	Health
hansard heading	Community Health Services: Liverpool
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to the Answer of 9 January 2017 to Questions 58635, 58636, 58637, 58638, 58639, what the depreciation value is of the recurrent contract value let by Liverpool Clinical Commissioning Group for Liverpool community health services over five years in the Bridgewater Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust financial plan for community health services in Liverpool.
tabling member constituency	West Lancashire
tabling member printed	Rosie Cooper
uin	59410
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 13/01/2017 answer text <p>We are informed by NHS England that the contract for 'core services' which will be let by NHS Liverpool Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) on behalf of the CCG, Liverpool City Council and NHS England has not yet been let. Following a transaction process led by NHS Improvement (NHSI), Bridgewater NHS FT has been identified as the preferred bidder, and the submission is being assured by NHSI. When let, the existing Liverpool Community Health contract will novate to Bridgewater NHS FT. As such, and as with all other major National Health Service contracts, there is no specific end point.</p><p> </p><p>Bidders were told prior to re-submitting their bids in August 2016 for the first two years, that non-recurrent resource would reduce over a period of time.</p><p>Contract values for 2019/20, 2020/21 and 2021/22 will be negotiated and agreed in advance of those financial years. As such, no figure can be put on depreciation over a future five year period by commissioners.</p> answering member constituency Ludlow answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne question first answered 13/01/2017 15:04:39 answering member 1542 label Biography information for Philip Dunne
tabling member	1538 label Biography information for Rosie Cooper

670807

registered interest
date	10/01/2017
answering body	Department of Health
answering dept id	17
answering dept short name	Health
answering dept sort name	Health
hansard heading	Community Health Services: Liverpool
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to the Answer of 9 January 2017 to Questions 58635, 58636, 58637, 58638, 58639, whether the recurrent and non-recurrent contract value let by Liverpool Clinical Commissioning Group for Liverpool community health services includes (a) the National annual two per cent NHS Efficiency target and (b) the North Mersey Sustainability and Transformation Plan requirement for an annual 3.5 per cent increase in community health service case activity in each of the next five years.
tabling member constituency	West Lancashire
tabling member printed	Rosie Cooper
uin	59413
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 13/01/2017 answer text <p>We are informed by NHS England that the contract for 'core services' which will be let by NHS Liverpool Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) on behalf of the CCG, Liverpool City Council and NHS England has not yet been let. Following a transaction process led by NHS Improvement (NHSI), Bridgewater NHS Foundation Trust (FT) has been identified as the preferred bidder, and the submission is being assured by NHSI. When let, the existing Liverpool Community Health NHS Trust contract will novate to Bridgewater NHS FT. As such, and as with all other major National Health Service contracts, there is no specific end point.</p><p> </p><p>Efficiency targets post 2018/19 cannot be forecast for any NHS provider. For 2017/18 and 2018/19, all NHS providers are expected to deliver the nationally set target of 2% efficiencies. This would be expected of Bridgewater NHS FT across all its services.</p><p> </p><p>The Cheshire and Mersey Sustainability and Transformation Plan (STP) contained a national template which set out that community spend was anticipated to increase by approximately 3.5% per year (for all CCGs) while hospital spend was anticipated to increase by approximately 1.8% each year. The STP, along with other planning activity, is expected to manage spend to sustainable levels while also ensuring quality and service performance are secured. In North Mersey, there is a Local Delivery System Plan which describes all the work to be undertaken to address this. This includes implementation of the Healthy Liverpool Community Model.</p> answering member constituency Ludlow answering member printed Mr Philip Dunne question first answered 13/01/2017 15:00:03 answering member 1542 label Biography information for Philip Dunne
tabling member	1538 label Biography information for Rosie Cooper