Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

388032
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2015-07-07
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 remove filter
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Social Services: Apprentices more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government how they plan to encourage young people to take up social care apprenticeships. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Taylor of Warwick more like this
uin HL1158 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-07-20more like thismore than 2015-07-20
answer text <p>The Department is committed to supporting the social care apprenticeships programme. A recruitment and retention strategy launched by the Department in September 2014 focuses on apprenticeships and other innovative programmes to attract younger people into careers in adult social care. A copy is attached.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>These include: the care ambassadors service supporting frontline care staff, to visit schools, colleges and job centres and inspire others; Sector Route-Way and Work Academy which provide experience of working in care, and develops skills; and the Traineeship initiative which is a training programme to provide young people with skills and work experience to find employment or progress onto an apprenticeship.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Department’s delivery partner, Skills for Care, has also produced guidance for social care employers on the employment of 16 – 18 year olds and is developing projects with local authorities to encourage recruitment of young people into apprenticeships in social care.</p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-07-20T10:44:07.62Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-20T10:44:07.62Z
answering member
127
label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
attachment
1
file name recruitment-and-retention-strategy-2014---2017.pdf more like this
title Recruitment and Retention Strategy more like this
tabling member
1796
label Biography information for Lord Taylor of Warwick more like this
388033
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2015-07-07
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 remove filter
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Medicine: Research more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the case for a global fund to support research into antibiotics, Ebola and other neglected diseases. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Taylor of Warwick more like this
uin HL1159 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-07-20more like thismore than 2015-07-20
answer text <p>The global funding of research and development of new antibiotics is part of the Independent review announced by the Prime Minister in June 2014 and chaired by Lord O’Neill of Gatley. The review is analysing the economics underlying all stages of the research and development of new antimicrobials and will propose concrete actions to tackle these internationally. The final recommendations from the review will be published in summer 2016.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>There are now 15 vaccines under development for Ebola across the world. The Department for International Development, in partnership with the Wellcome Trust and the Medical Research Council, has supported the Phase 1 clinical trial of a vaccine candidate, and funded a number of other areas of Ebola research, through the Research for Health in Humanitarian Crises programme.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The United Kingdom is also providing over £10 million annually for research into neglected tropical diseases. This is through a range of initiatives, including development of new treatment and diagnostic products, as well as implementation research. Examples of products resulting from the research in recent years include the first ever rapid diagnostic test and the first new, improved treatment option for sleeping sickness.</p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-07-20T15:39:50.013Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-20T15:39:50.013Z
answering member
127
label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
tabling member
1796
label Biography information for Lord Taylor of Warwick more like this
388036
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2015-07-07
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 remove filter
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Human Papillomavirus: Vaccination more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether post-marketing surveillance has been conducted on the administration of (1) Gardasil, and (2) Cervarix; if so, by whom, over what period, and with what results; and if not, why not. more like this
tabling member printed
The Countess of Mar more like this
uin HL1162 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-07-20more like thismore than 2015-07-20
answer text <p>All licensed medicines and vaccines, including Gardasil and Cervarix, are subject to post-marketing surveillance (also known as pharmacovigilance). Gardasil and Cervarix are authorised via the centralised procedure with the European Commission as Licensing Authority. The post-marketing surveillance for centrally authorised products is underpinned by European Legislation (Regulation (EU) No 1027/2012) which puts requirements on national competent authorities in member states, the European Medicines Agency and marketing authorisation holders to collect data on safety of medicines and vaccines, assess any new issues, take action to minimise risks and monitor the effectiveness of any action taken.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Gardasil and Cervarix have been subject to post-marketing surveillance since the time of marketing. Gardasil and Cervarix have a very good safety record, and surveillance shows they have contributed to a significant decrease in rates of infection with the two main cancer-causing human papillomaviruses. The United Kingdom programme is eventually expected to prevent hundreds of deaths from cervical cancer every year.</p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-07-20T10:31:31.987Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-20T10:31:31.987Z
answering member
127
label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
tabling member
1861
label Biography information for The Countess of Mar more like this
388037
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2015-07-07
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 remove filter
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Human Papillomavirus: Vaccination more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government why the outcome of 75 per cent of reported serious adverse events arising from taking Cervarix is unknown, in the light of the fact that the vaccine has a black triangle warning on its packaging indicating that increased pharmacovigilance is required. more like this
tabling member printed
The Countess of Mar more like this
uin HL1163 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-07-20more like thismore than 2015-07-20
answer text <p>As of 7 July 2015, adverse events with an unknown outcome make up 22% of the total number of serious suspected adverse events reported in association with Cervarix.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Black Triangle Scheme for intensive monitoring of medicines ran for many years in the United Kingdom but was replaced by the European equivalent in 2012.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Cervarix was first authorised in September 2007. For the first two years of the Cervarix immunisation programme in the UK, to complement the Black Triangle Scheme, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) put in place an ‘enhanced’ safety monitoring strategy involving a multi-disciplinary team of scientists. Cumulative safety summaries were published on the MHRA website each week for the public to see.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Black Triangle Scheme, when it was in place, intensively monitored new medicines to ensure that any new safety hazards were identified promptly. The Commission on Human Medicines and the MHRA encouraged the reporting of all suspected reactions to newer drugs and vaccines, which were denoted by an inverted black triangle symbol.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Every reporter to the Yellow Card scheme receives an acknowledgement which asks that any new information relating to the case be reported. Follow up procedures for Yellow Card reports are in place and are designed to ensure that relevant information is sought if this is missing from reports of serious reactions which could potentially be new signals. While in an ideal world full details would be obtained for every report, given there are over 750,000 reports on the database with around 30,000 new reports each year, it will never be possible to ensure all reports on the database are complete. There are a number of difficulties with achieving satisfactory follow up. Time pressure on potential reporters has been identified as one of the reasons for under-reporting adverse reactions through the Yellow Card Scheme. This issue also applies to requests for follow up information and therefore there is a need to be selective and focussed about the reports for which follow up information is requested.</p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-07-20T10:29:57.397Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-20T10:29:57.397Z
answering member
127
label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
tabling member
1861
label Biography information for The Countess of Mar more like this
388038
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2015-07-07
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 remove filter
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Human Papillomavirus: Vaccination more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government why only 16.8 per cent of reports of serious adverse events relating to human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines under the Yellow Card Scheme have been followed up, according to the response by the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency to a freedom of information request on 25 June; how this compares to the percentage of yellow-card reports followed up for all vaccines; and whether they now plan to follow up all reported serious adverse events relating to HPV vaccines in order to ascertain recovery rates. more like this
tabling member printed
The Countess of Mar more like this
uin HL1164 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-07-20more like thismore than 2015-07-20
answer text <p>A total of 2,624 spontaneous suspected serious adverse reaction reports (ADRs) with human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines have been reported to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) via the Yellow Card Scheme up to 7 July 2015.</p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p>To date more than eight million doses of HPV vaccine have been given in the United Kingdom since 2008, with close to 90% eligible teenagers vaccinated. The vast majority of suspected side effects reported so far relate to those we would expect with most types of vaccine; these are most commonly dizziness, headache, nausea, sore arms, vomiting, general malaise, tiredness, fever, and rashes. These tend to be mild and transient. Many serious reports relate to immediate fainting, which is not necessarily a side effect of the vaccine but a response that any type of needle insertion can provoke in some people.</p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p>The following table provides a breakdown of UK suspected spontaneous ADRs received via the Yellow card Scheme in association with all vaccines on the immunisation schedule. The table provides the total number of reports, the total number of serious reports and the number of serious reports followed up.</p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p>UK suspected spontaneous ADRs received via the Yellow card Scheme in association with all vaccines on the immunisation schedule.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p>Vaccine Brand</p></td><td><p>Total number of reports</p></td><td><p>Number of serious reports</p></td><td><p>Number of serious reports followed up</p></td><td><p>% of serious reports followed up*</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)</p></td><td><p>8,276</p></td><td><p>2,624</p></td><td><p>441</p></td><td><p>17%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Diphtheria,tetanus, pertussis, polio and <em>Haemophilus influenza </em>type b (DTaP/IPV/Hib)</p></td><td><p>1,382</p></td><td><p>713</p></td><td><p>103</p></td><td><p>14%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tetanus, diphtheria and polio (Td/IPV)</p></td><td><p>1,152</p></td><td><p>671</p></td><td><p>95</p></td><td><p>14%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Diphtheria,tetanus, pertussis and polio (DTaP/IPV)</p></td><td><p>1,326</p></td><td><p>509</p></td><td><p>65</p></td><td><p>12%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Rotavirus (Rotarix)</p></td><td><p>452</p></td><td><p>283</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>25%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Pneumococcal disease (PCV)</p></td><td><p>1,611</p></td><td><p>882</p></td><td><p>85</p></td><td><p>10%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Meningococcal group C disease (Men C)</p></td><td><p>14,671</p></td><td><p>4,241</p></td><td><p>81</p></td><td><p>2%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hib/Men C</p></td><td><p>285</p></td><td><p>155</p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>15%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Measles, mumps and rubella (MMR)</p></td><td><p>5,492</p></td><td><p>2,804</p></td><td><p>88</p></td><td><p>3%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Pneumococcal disease (PPV)</p></td><td><p>1,726</p></td><td><p>985</p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>3%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Fluenz/ Fluenz Tetra</p></td><td><p>877</p></td><td><p>381</p></td><td><p>74</p></td><td><p>19%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Zostavax</p></td><td><p>646</p></td><td><p>408</p></td><td><p>105</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Influenza virus</p></td><td><p>5,745</p></td><td><p>3807</p></td><td><p>483</p></td><td><p>13%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>* Percentage provided to the nearest whole number</p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p>It should be noted that a Yellow Card report is not proof of a side effect occurring, but a suspicion by the reporter that the vaccine may have been the cause. Yellow Card data cannot be used as a reliable indicator of the frequency of suspected ADRs to vaccines or medicines. The level of ADR reporting may fluctuate between given years due to a variety of reasons such as a medicine being new (reporting rates are generally higher when a product is first introduced), stimulated interest/publicity and variations in exposure to the medicine. Comparisons of ADR reporting rates would be an invalid estimate of relative vaccine safety.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Every reporter to the Yellow Card scheme receives an acknowledgement which asks that any new information relating to the case be reported. Follow up procedures for Yellow Card reports are in place and are designed to ensure that relevant information is sought if this is missing from reports of serious reactions which could potentially be new signals. While in an ideal world full details would be obtained for every report, given there are over 750,000 reports on the database with around 30,000 new reports each year, it will never be possible to ensure all reports on the database are complete. There are a number of difficulties with achieving satisfactory follow up. Time pressure on potential reporters has been identified as one of the reasons for under-reporting adverse reactions through the Yellow Card Scheme. This issue also applies to requests for follow up information and therefore there is a need to be selective and focussed about the reports for which follow up information is requested.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The HPV vaccine has a very good safety record, and surveillance shows it has contributed to a significant decrease in rates of infection with the two main cancer-causing human papillomaviruses. The UK programme is eventually expected to prevent hundreds of deaths from cervical cancer every year.</p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-07-20T10:35:53.857Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-20T10:35:53.857Z
answering member
127
label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
tabling member
1861
label Biography information for The Countess of Mar more like this
388039
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2015-07-07
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 remove filter
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Human Papillomavirus: Vaccination more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Prior of Brampton on 16 June (HL229), which indicated that 2,589 serious suspected adverse drug reactions to human papilloma virus vaccines had been reported to the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) as at 3 June, and the response by the MHRA to a freedom of information request on 25 June that 2,617 such reactions had been reported as at 24 June, what assessment they have made of the increase in reports over the course of one month. more like this
tabling member printed
The Countess of Mar more like this
uin HL1165 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-07-20more like thismore than 2015-07-20
answer text <p>My Answer of 16 June (<a href="http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/written-questions-answers-statements/written-questions-answers/?page=1&amp;max=20&amp;questiontype=AllQuestions&amp;house=commons%2clords&amp;uin=HL299" target="_blank">HL229</a>) confirmed a total of 2,598 serious suspected adverse reaction reports with human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccines had been reported via the Yellow Card Scheme up to 3 June 2015.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>In relation to the additional serious suspected adverse reaction reports received since 3 June 2015, this number is in line with the average number of such reports received per month since the start of the United Kingdom HPV vaccination program.</p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p>The safety of all vaccines, including HPV, remains under continual review and appropriate action will be taken if any important new risks are confirmed.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-07-20T15:41:02.213Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-20T15:41:02.213Z
answering member
127
label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
tabling member
1861
label Biography information for The Countess of Mar more like this
388049
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2015-07-07
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 remove filter
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Pregnancy more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what percentage of pregnancies are unplanned; and what assessment they have made of the relationship between unplanned pregnancies and the high-risk period for folate levels and the closure of the neural tube at 27 days. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Rooker more like this
uin HL1175 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-07-21more like thismore than 2015-07-21
answer text <p>There is no data routinely collected on whether a pregnancy is planned or unplanned. However, the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles estimated that 16.2% of pregnancies are unplanned with a further 29% categorised as ambivalent i.e. where the woman was neither actively planning or seeking to avoid a pregnancy.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>No assessment has been made of the relationship between unplanned pregnancies and the high risk period for folate levels and the closure of the neural tube at 27 days gestation. In line with NICE guidance, women intending to become pregnant should be informed that dietary supplementation with folic acid, before conception and throughout the first 12 weeks, reduces the risk of having a baby with a neural tube defect.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The International Classification of Disease (10<sup>th</sup> edition) includes Anencephaly, Encephalocele and Spina Bifida as Neural Tube Defects. In 2014, 442 abortions were performed because of Neural Tube defects; 152 (34%) of these were performed at 20 weeks gestation or over.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Information on the socio-economic group for women having abortions is not collected centrally.</p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
grouped question UIN
HL1176 more like this
HL1177 more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-07-21T12:21:01.05Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-21T12:21:01.05Z
answering member
127
label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
tabling member
302
label Biography information for Lord Rooker more like this
388050
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2015-07-07
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 remove filter
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Abortion: Neural Tube Defects more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is the average number of terminations of pregnancies affected by neural tube defects at the 20-week scan. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Rooker more like this
uin HL1176 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-07-21more like thismore than 2015-07-21
answer text <p>There is no data routinely collected on whether a pregnancy is planned or unplanned. However, the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles estimated that 16.2% of pregnancies are unplanned with a further 29% categorised as ambivalent i.e. where the woman was neither actively planning or seeking to avoid a pregnancy.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>No assessment has been made of the relationship between unplanned pregnancies and the high risk period for folate levels and the closure of the neural tube at 27 days gestation. In line with NICE guidance, women intending to become pregnant should be informed that dietary supplementation with folic acid, before conception and throughout the first 12 weeks, reduces the risk of having a baby with a neural tube defect.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The International Classification of Disease (10<sup>th</sup> edition) includes Anencephaly, Encephalocele and Spina Bifida as Neural Tube Defects. In 2014, 442 abortions were performed because of Neural Tube defects; 152 (34%) of these were performed at 20 weeks gestation or over.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Information on the socio-economic group for women having abortions is not collected centrally.</p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
grouped question UIN
HL1175 more like this
HL1177 more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-07-21T12:21:01.163Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-21T12:21:01.163Z
answering member
127
label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
tabling member
302
label Biography information for Lord Rooker more like this
388051
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2015-07-07
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 remove filter
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Abortion: Neural Tube Defects more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what information they have regarding the socio-economic groups to which those deciding to terminate a neural tube defect-affected pregnancy after the 20-week scan belong. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Rooker more like this
uin HL1177 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-07-21more like thismore than 2015-07-21
answer text <p>There is no data routinely collected on whether a pregnancy is planned or unplanned. However, the third National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles estimated that 16.2% of pregnancies are unplanned with a further 29% categorised as ambivalent i.e. where the woman was neither actively planning or seeking to avoid a pregnancy.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>No assessment has been made of the relationship between unplanned pregnancies and the high risk period for folate levels and the closure of the neural tube at 27 days gestation. In line with NICE guidance, women intending to become pregnant should be informed that dietary supplementation with folic acid, before conception and throughout the first 12 weeks, reduces the risk of having a baby with a neural tube defect.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The International Classification of Disease (10<sup>th</sup> edition) includes Anencephaly, Encephalocele and Spina Bifida as Neural Tube Defects. In 2014, 442 abortions were performed because of Neural Tube defects; 152 (34%) of these were performed at 20 weeks gestation or over.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Information on the socio-economic group for women having abortions is not collected centrally.</p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
grouped question UIN
HL1175 more like this
HL1176 more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-07-21T12:21:01.21Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-21T12:21:01.21Z
answering member
127
label Biography information for Lord Prior of Brampton more like this
tabling member
302
label Biography information for Lord Rooker more like this
388238
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2015-07-07
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 remove filter
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Autism: Health Services more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health, what representations he has received from (a) specialist bodies and (b) charities on treatment options for autism spectrum disorder on the NHS; and if he will make a statement. more like this
tabling member constituency Coventry South more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Jim Cunningham more like this
uin 5992 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2015-07-13more like thismore than 2015-07-13
answer text <p>We do not hold this information centrally.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Revised statutory guidance on autism for local authorities and the National Health Service was issued on 26 March this year and continued to include the importance of having access locally to a diagnostic pathway and improving the quality of services for adults with autism.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) provides national guidance and advice to improve health and social care. NICE has published three clinical guidelines on autism and a quality standard. It has also produced an implementation pack on developing multi-agency local autism teams and support for commissioning autism services, which outlines key actions that commissioners should take. Although arrangements for referrals for autism diagnosis are a matter for local determination, NHS England has a role in assuring the process is adopted. Representations on clinical approaches concerning autism are normally forwarded by the Department to NHS organisations or other relevant authorities.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Public Health England oversees an annual autism self-assessment exercise amongst local authority areas and their partners. In 2013/14, it reported that 4,677 people had received a diagnosis of an autistic spectrum condition in the year to the end of March 2014, based on data submitted from 102 of a possible 152 local authority areas. In the same exercise, the average waiting time between referral and assessment as reported by 110 local authority areas was 29.6 weeks. This was the first time these questions had been asked in this form. The results of the 2014/15 exercise will be published in the autumn.</p><p> </p>
answering member constituency North East Bedfordshire more like this
answering member printed Alistair Burt more like this
grouped question UIN
5990 more like this
5991 more like this
5993 more like this
5994 more like this
question first answered
less than 2015-07-13T14:57:20.8Zmore like thismore than 2015-07-13T14:57:20.8Z
answering member
1201
label Biography information for Alistair Burt more like this
tabling member
308
label Biography information for Mr Jim Cunningham more like this