Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

64621
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-06-30more like thismore than 2014-06-30
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 remove filter
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Protection of Freedoms Act 2012 more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many applications there have been to date, and in the last three months, for the Secretary of State to disregard a conviction under the terms of section 92 of the Protection of Freedoms Act 2012; how many of those applications have been successful; how many are still pending resolution; how many have been refused; and of those refused what were the most common reasons for refusal. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Sharkey more like this
uin HL704 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2014-07-17more like thismore than 2014-07-17
answer text <p> </p><p> </p><p>Since the Government commenced sections 92-101, Protection of Freedoms Act on 1 October 2012, the Home Office has received applications for 185 offences from 147 individuals seeking to have their historical convictions or cautions for certain offences disregarded under these provisions.</p><p> </p><p>For the last three months, from 1 April 2014, the Home Office has received applications for 23 offences from 13 individuals seeking to have their <br>historical convictions or cautions for certain offences disregarded under these provisions.</p><p> </p><p><br>The Home Secretary has determined that 45 offences were eligible for disregard under sections 92; 130 offences were not eligible for disregard under sections 92; there are 10 applications pending decision to date.</p><p> </p><p>The most common reasons for a decision of ineligibility were either a failure to fully meet the criteria required under section 92, or that that the conviction was out of scope, as prescribed at sections 92 and 101 of the Act</p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Taylor of Holbeach more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-07-17T14:56:47.9852494Zmore like thismore than 2014-07-17T14:56:47.9852494Z
answering member
3787
label Biography information for Lord Taylor of Holbeach more like this
tabling member
4196
label Biography information for Lord Sharkey more like this