Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1651480
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-07-10more like thismore than 2023-07-10
answering body
Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office remove filter
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
hansard heading Surveillance: China more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask His Majesty's Government which locations they believe to be 'sensitive sites' where surveillance cameras with links to the People’s Republic of China should not be located; how many such sites exist; and how many cameras are involved. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
uin HL9193 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2023-07-24more like thismore than 2023-07-24
answer text <p><strong> </strong></p><p>The Cabinet Office has been working closely with government departments to implement the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster’s Written Ministerial Statement of 24 November 2022. I can confirm that departments have ceased the deployment of visual surveillance equipment produced by companies subject to the National Intelligence Law of the People's Republic of China onto sensitive sites.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>The statement also asked departments to consider whether they should remove and replace such equipment where it is deployed on sensitive sites rather than awaiting any scheduled upgrades. As the Parliamentary Secretary confirmed in the other place, the Government will set out the timeline for the removal of surveillance equipment supplied by companies subject to the national intelligence law of China from such sites within six months of the Procurement Bill receiving Royal Assent. The Cabinet Office has been working closely with Departments on this and I can confirm that good progress has already been made.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>It is a longstanding Government policy that specific security arrangements regarding the Government estate, including any lists of sensitive sites and their locations, are withheld on security grounds. Security teams within government departments are responsible for identifying which of their locations are defined as sensitive against a common set of criteria.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><p>Since the Written Ministerial Statement, we have also been working at pace to prepare for the implementation of the Procurement Bill, when it finishes its Parliamentary steps. Our efforts have focused on the setting up of the new National Security Unit for Procurement, which will administer the new national security debarment and exclusion powers that the Bill will provide.</p><p><strong><br></strong>The measures we have already taken on surveillance technology demonstrate that we will always put national security first and we will continue to keep risks such as this under close review. We will respond to the Biometrics and Surveillance Camera Commissioner’s letter on public space surveillance in due course. The Cabinet Office continues to monitor Government policy in this area, and is currently engaging with the Commissioner on this topic.</p>
answering member printed Baroness Neville-Rolfe more like this
grouped question UIN
HL9189 more like this
HL9190 more like this
HL9191 more like this
HL9192 more like this
question first answered
remove filter
answering member
4284
label Biography information for Baroness Neville-Rolfe more like this
tabling member
738
label Biography information for Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this