 |
answer text |
<p>Public procurement for London 2012 was conducted by the Olympic Delivery Authority
(ODA, an arm's length body of the Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
until its dissolution in 2014).</p><p> </p><p>ODA procurement processes were subject
to the assurance processes laid out in their Assurance Framework (available online
via the archived "Learning Legacy" website at <a href="http://learninglegacy.independent.gov.uk/"
target="_blank">http://learninglegacy.independent.gov.uk</a>) and included reviews
by the National Audit Office and Commission for a Sustainable London 2012.</p><p>
</p><p>Procurement outcomes (such as size and quality management of contractors) were
assessed as part of the Meta-Evaluation of London 2012, conducted by an independent
consortium lead by Grant Thornton for the government (available on the GOV.UK website
at <a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/224145/Report_5_Economy_Evidence_Base_FINAL.pdf"
target="_blank">https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/224145/Report_5_Economy_Evidence_Base_FINAL.pdf</a>)
and the Olympic Games Impact Study (Post-Games Report), conducted by the University
of East London for the International Olympic Committee (available on the UEL website
at <a href="https://www.uel.ac.uk/research/centre-for-geoinformation-studies/researchareasprojects/ogispostgameslondon2012"
target="_blank">https://www.uel.ac.uk/research/centre-for-geoinformation-studies/researchareasprojects/ogispostgameslondon2012</a>).</p>
|
|
