Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1137666
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-07-09more like thismore than 2019-07-09
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Reoffenders: Sentencing more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text If he will review sentencing policy for prolific offenders. more like this
tabling member constituency Harborough remove filter
tabling member printed
Neil O'Brien more like this
uin 911814 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false remove filter
date of answer less than 2019-07-09more like thismore than 2019-07-09
answer text <p>We are looking to take forward reform of short custodial sentences. We know that offenders serving short sentences often have long offending histories, as well as multiple and complex needs. In cases of the most persistent offenders, the evidence shows they are 36% more likely to re-offend where they have received a short custodial sentence rather than a court order. Community penalties can address underlying behaviour, answer mental health and alcohol or drug misuse needs and provide reparation for the benefit of the wider community.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South Swindon more like this
answering member printed Robert Buckland more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-07-09T16:03:15.583Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-09T16:03:15.583Z
answering member
4106
label Biography information for Sir Robert Buckland more like this
tabling member
4679
label Biography information for Neil O'Brien more like this
1137768
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-07-09more like thismore than 2019-07-09
answering body
Department for Education more like this
answering dept id 60 more like this
answering dept short name Education more like this
answering dept sort name Education more like this
hansard heading Schools more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education, for each local authority (a) how many pupils studied in state schools in that local authority who lived in another local authority, (b) how many pupils who lived in that local authority went to a state school in a different local authority, (c) and what the average level of per pupil funding per pupil was in each local authority in real terms in (i) the most recent year for which data are available and (ii) in 2010. more like this
tabling member constituency Harborough remove filter
tabling member printed
Neil O'Brien more like this
uin 275249 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false remove filter
date of answer less than 2019-07-15more like thismore than 2019-07-15
answer text <p>The information required for parts (a) and (b) are published in the local authority cross border movement tables of the annual “School, Pupils and their characteristics” statistical release. The latest data, relating to January 2018, can be found at the following link:</p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/schools-pupils-and-their-characteristics-january-2018" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/schools-pupils-and-their-characteristics-january-2018</a>.</p><p>The revenue funding allocated for schools for financial years 2010-2011 and 2018-2019 for each local authority (LA) are shown in the attached table.</p><p>The government publishes gross domestic product deflators that can be used to understand the impact of inflation over time. These are available at: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/gdp-deflators-at-market-prices-and-money-gdp-june-2019-quarterly-national-accounts" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/gdp-deflators-at-market-prices-and-money-gdp-june-2019-quarterly-national-accounts</a>.</p>
answering member constituency Bognor Regis and Littlehampton more like this
answering member printed Nick Gibb more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-07-15T15:19:01.063Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-15T15:19:01.063Z
answering member
111
label Biography information for Nick Gibb more like this
attachment
1
file name 275249_Revenue_amounts_primary_and_secondary_education.xlsx more like this
title 275249_table more like this
tabling member
4679
label Biography information for Neil O'Brien more like this
1137567
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-07-08more like thismore than 2019-07-08
answering body
Department for Exiting the European Union more like this
answering dept id 203 more like this
answering dept short name Exiting the European Union more like this
answering dept sort name Exiting the European Union more like this
hansard heading Brexit more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, with reference to the oral evidence from the Permanent Secretary of the Department for Exiting the European Union to the Committee on Exiting the European Union of 4 September 2018, if he will publish the 300 cross-government workstreams on no deal; and what the (a) red, (b) amber and (c) green status is for each of those workstreams. more like this
tabling member constituency Harborough remove filter
tabling member printed
Neil O'Brien more like this
uin 274642 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false remove filter
date of answer less than 2019-07-11more like thismore than 2019-07-11
answer text <p>The Government has over 300 work streams looking at specific no deal plans across a range of sectors and these are well advanced. There is still some work to be done but departments are making sensible decisions about prioritisation.</p><p>The underlying detail for each workstream, including any assessment of those programmes, is exceptionally sensitive. If workstreams - or the underlying data - were made public, both our negotiating position and our ability to manage delivery across the programme would be significantly damaged.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Spelthorne more like this
answering member printed Kwasi Kwarteng more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-07-11T16:23:59.917Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-11T16:23:59.917Z
answering member
4134
label Biography information for Kwasi Kwarteng more like this
tabling member
4679
label Biography information for Neil O'Brien more like this
1137574
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-07-08more like thismore than 2019-07-08
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Security more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, which security tools and data systems the UK will no longer have access to in the event that the UK leaves the EU without a deal. more like this
tabling member constituency Harborough remove filter
tabling member printed
Neil O'Brien more like this
uin 274647 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false remove filter
date of answer less than 2019-07-15more like thismore than 2019-07-15
answer text <p>The Government’s position remains that leaving with a deal, which includes ambitious internal security arrangements, is in the UK’s and EU’s best interests. If the UK leaves the EU without a deal, then we would cease to cooperate through the EU’s internal security tools and data systems upon exit.</p><p>The Home Office continues to work closely with operational partners to ensure readiness for a range of possible exit scenarios in October, including no deal. We have been working intensively with these partners for some time to transition cooperation with EU Member States to alternative, non-EU mechanisms, should that be needed in a no deal scenario. In the security and law enforcement space, this would include making more use of Interpol, Council of Europe Conventions and other forms of cooperation, such as bilateral channels.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Ruislip, Northwood and Pinner more like this
answering member printed Mr Nick Hurd more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-07-15T10:47:19.61Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-15T10:47:19.61Z
answering member
1561
label Biography information for Mr Nick Hurd more like this
tabling member
4679
label Biography information for Neil O'Brien more like this
1137587
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-07-08more like thismore than 2019-07-08
answering body
Department for Exiting the European Union more like this
answering dept id 203 more like this
answering dept short name Exiting the European Union more like this
answering dept sort name Exiting the European Union more like this
hansard heading Brexit more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union, with reference to paragraph 8 of the February 2019 report Implications for Business and Trade of a No Deal Exit on 29 March 2019, what proportion of (a) all and (b) the most critical no deal projects are on track. more like this
tabling member constituency Harborough remove filter
tabling member printed
Neil O'Brien more like this
uin 274652 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false remove filter
date of answer less than 2019-07-11more like thismore than 2019-07-11
answer text <p>The Government has over 300 work streams looking at specific no deal plans across a range of sectors and these are well advanced. There is still some work to be done but departments are making sensible decisions about prioritisation.</p><p>The underlying detail for each workstream, including any assessment of progress, is exceptionally sensitive. If workstreams - or the underlying data - were made public, both our negotiating position and our ability to manage delivery across the programme would be significantly damaged.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Spelthorne more like this
answering member printed Kwasi Kwarteng more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-07-11T16:20:30.75Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-11T16:20:30.75Z
answering member
4134
label Biography information for Kwasi Kwarteng more like this
tabling member
4679
label Biography information for Neil O'Brien more like this
1137588
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-07-08more like thismore than 2019-07-08
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading UK Trade with EU more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many UK businesses have obtained an EORI number in each month of 2019; and what estimate he has made of the number of businesses with an EORI number (a) currently, (b) one year ago, (c) three years ago and (b) five years ago. more like this
tabling member constituency Harborough remove filter
tabling member printed
Neil O'Brien more like this
uin 274653 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false remove filter
date of answer less than 2019-07-11more like thismore than 2019-07-11
answer text <p>Since December 2018 HM Revenue &amp; Customs have issued approximately 74,000 new UK Economic Operator Registration and Identification (EORI) numbers, up to 23 June. The reporting for UK EORI numbers is not done on a monthly basis so a monthly breakdown for EORI numbers issued is not available. The historical information on EORI numbers is not readily accessible.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire more like this
answering member printed Jesse Norman more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-07-11T08:40:07.827Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-11T08:40:07.827Z
answering member
3991
label Biography information for Jesse Norman more like this
tabling member
4679
label Biography information for Neil O'Brien more like this
1137067
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-07-04more like thismore than 2019-07-04
answering body
Department for Education more like this
answering dept id 60 more like this
answering dept short name Education more like this
answering dept sort name Education more like this
hansard heading Schools: Finance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how many and what proportion of (a) primary and (b) secondary schools (i) are eligible for and (ii) receive the full amount of funding under the sparsity element of the national funding formula; and what the average amount was that each eligible school received in the latest period for which data is available. more like this
tabling member constituency Harborough remove filter
tabling member printed
Neil O'Brien more like this
uin 273496 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false remove filter
date of answer less than 2019-07-09more like thismore than 2019-07-09
answer text <p>The table below shows the number and proportion of mainstream schools in England that received sparsity funding in 2018-19.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>Primary</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Secondary</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of schools</p></td><td><p>16,758</p></td><td><p>3,109</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number eligible for sparsity funding<sup>1</sup></p></td><td><p>992</p></td><td><p>112</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Proportion eligible for sparsity funding<sup>1</sup></p></td><td><p>5.90%</p></td><td><p>3.60%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number eligible for maximum sparsity funding<sup>1</sup></p></td><td><p>234</p></td><td><p>18</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Proportion eligible for maximum sparsity funding<sup>1</sup></p></td><td><p>1.40%</p></td><td><p>0.60%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Average sparsity funding for eligible schools (£)<sup>2</sup></p></td><td><p>14,766</p></td><td><p>34,625</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>[1] Schools are only counted as eligible for sparsity funding if the local authority has included the factor in their funding formula. The maximum amount of sparsity funding under the national funding formula is £25,000 for primary schools and £65,000 for secondary schools.</p><p>[2] This is the mean value for schools receiving sparsity funding where the local authority has included the factor in their funding formula.</p>
answering member constituency Bognor Regis and Littlehampton more like this
answering member printed Nick Gibb more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-07-09T14:15:14.36Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-09T14:15:14.36Z
answering member
111
label Biography information for Nick Gibb more like this
tabling member
4679
label Biography information for Neil O'Brien more like this
1137068
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-07-04more like thismore than 2019-07-04
answering body
Department for Education more like this
answering dept id 60 more like this
answering dept short name Education more like this
answering dept sort name Education more like this
hansard heading Schools: Finance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how many mainstream (a) primary and (b) secondary schools received a lump sum payment, and for how many schools that lump sum represented (i) less than one per cent, (ii) 2 to five per cent; (iii) five to 10 per cent, (iv) 10 to 20 per cent, (v) 20 to 30 per cent, (vi) 30 to 40 per cent, and (vii) over 50 per cent of their total income. more like this
tabling member constituency Harborough remove filter
tabling member printed
Neil O'Brien more like this
uin 273497 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false remove filter
date of answer less than 2019-07-09more like thismore than 2019-07-09
answer text <p>The table below shows the number of mainstream schools in England that received a lump sum payment in 2018-19 and the proportion of their total income (from the schools block allocation) this represented.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>Primary</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Secondary</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Number of schools</p></td><td><p>16,756[1]</p></td><td><p>3,109</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lump Sum</p></td><td><p>16,756</p></td><td><p>3,098</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Less than 1%</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1% to 5%</p></td><td><p>601</p></td><td><p>2,788</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>5% to 10%</p></td><td><p>5,332</p></td><td><p>230</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>10% to 20%</p></td><td><p>7,482</p></td><td><p>55</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>20% to 30%</p></td><td><p>2,060</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>30% to 40%</p></td><td><p>808</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>40% to 50%</p></td><td><p>326</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Over 50%</p></td><td><p>147</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>[1] In line with the published data the figures exclude two primary schools whose data has been suppressed.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Bognor Regis and Littlehampton more like this
answering member printed Nick Gibb more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-07-09T14:41:59.11Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-09T14:41:59.11Z
answering member
111
label Biography information for Nick Gibb more like this
tabling member
4679
label Biography information for Neil O'Brien more like this
1136642
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-07-03more like thismore than 2019-07-03
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Reoffenders more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many offenders in each Police Force Area were convicted but not sentenced to immediate custody who had (a) 26 to 50 previous convictions, (b) 51 to 75 previous convictions, (c) 76 to 100 previous convictions and (d) over 100 previous convictions in each year since 2007. more like this
tabling member constituency Harborough remove filter
tabling member printed
Neil O'Brien more like this
uin 272944 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false remove filter
date of answer less than 2019-07-11more like thismore than 2019-07-11
answer text <p>The information requested is provided in the tables attached with this answer. These tables include data, covering the period 2007 – 2018, on:</p><ul><li>The number of offenders in each Police Force Area with a specified number of previous convictions who were convicted but not sentenced to immediate custody.</li><li>The number of offenders in each Police Force area with a specified number of previous convictions and cautions who were convicted but not sentenced to immediate custody.</li></ul><p> </p><p>We know that some prolific offending can be driven by a variety of factors, including drug addiction and poor mental health. The Ministry of Justice has also published experimental statistics at <a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/756282/prolific-offenders-experimental-statistics.pdf" target="_blank">https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/756282/prolific-offenders-experimental-statistics.pdf</a> which show that theft and summary non-motoring offences are the offences most likely to have been committed by prolific offenders.</p>
answering member constituency South Swindon more like this
answering member printed Robert Buckland more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-07-11T16:03:09.327Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-11T16:03:09.327Z
answering member
4106
label Biography information for Sir Robert Buckland more like this
attachment
1
file name PQs 272944 and 272945 response tables.xlsx more like this
title Table for PQ 272944 more like this
tabling member
4679
label Biography information for Neil O'Brien more like this
1136643
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-07-03more like thismore than 2019-07-03
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Reoffenders more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many offenders in each Police Force area who were convicted but not sentenced to immediate custody had (a) 26 to 50 previous convictions or cautions, (b) 51 to 75 previous convictions or cautions, (c) 76 to 100 previous convictions or cautions and (d) over 100 previous convictions or cautions, in each year since 2007. more like this
tabling member constituency Harborough remove filter
tabling member printed
Neil O'Brien more like this
uin 272945 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false remove filter
date of answer less than 2019-07-11more like thismore than 2019-07-11
answer text <p>The information requested is provided in the tables attached with this answer. These tables include data, covering the period 2007 – 2018, on:</p><ul><li>The number of offenders in each Police Force Area with a specified number of previous convictions who were convicted but not sentenced to immediate custody.</li><li>The number of offenders in each Police Force area with a specified number of previous convictions and cautions who were convicted but not sentenced to immediate custody.</li></ul><p> </p><p>We know that some prolific offending can be driven by a variety of factors, including drug addiction and poor mental health. The Ministry of Justice has also published experimental statistics at <a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/756282/prolific-offenders-experimental-statistics.pdf" target="_blank">https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/756282/prolific-offenders-experimental-statistics.pdf</a> which show that theft and summary non-motoring offences are the offences most likely to have been committed by prolific offenders.</p>
answering member constituency South Swindon more like this
answering member printed Robert Buckland more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-07-11T16:03:09.273Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-11T16:03:09.273Z
answering member
4106
label Biography information for Sir Robert Buckland more like this
attachment
1
file name PQs 272944 and 272945 response tables.xlsx more like this
title Table for 272945 more like this
tabling member
4679
label Biography information for Neil O'Brien more like this