Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1698269
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-03-25more like thismore than 2024-03-25
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading Bridleways and Public Footpaths: Motor Vehicles more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made, if any, of the scale of damage to public footpaths and bridleways caused by four-wheel drive vehicles and scrambler bikes. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Birt more like this
uin HL3573 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false remove filter
date of answer less than 2024-04-05more like thismore than 2024-04-05
answer text <p>The recreational use of motor vehicles on footpaths, bridleways and restricted byways is not permitted, therefore no such assessment has been undertaken. Any damage caused by illegal activity is a matter for the appropriate authorities.</p><p> </p><p>The Government is aware of damage and disturbance caused by excessive use of off-road motor vehicles on highways where such activities are legal, such as byways open to all traffic and on other unsealed roads which carry motor vehicle rights, often referred to as ‘green lanes’. This issue was included in the consultation on the recent Landscapes Review. The results of the consultation concluded that the current Traffic Regulation Order process is legally robust enough to protect green lanes with targeted local action in sensitive areas, while allowing vehicle users to responsibly enjoy the countryside.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Benyon more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-04-05T10:57:11.853Zmore like thismore than 2024-04-05T10:57:11.853Z
answering member
1547
label Biography information for Lord Benyon more like this
tabling member
2533
label Biography information for Lord Birt more like this
1698018
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-03-21more like thismore than 2024-03-21
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading Bread and Flour Regulations 1998 more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask His Majesty's Government which specific legal obligations require them to notify the EU about planned legislative changes to the Bread and Flour Regulations 1998. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Dodds of Duncairn more like this
uin HL3512 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false remove filter
date of answer less than 2024-04-02more like thismore than 2024-04-02
answer text <p>HM Government is required to allow the EU to provide comments on notified proposed technical regulations in accordance with Article 94 of the Trade and Co-operation Agreement between the UK and the EU.</p><p> </p><p>In discharging this obligation, the notification of planned legislative changes to the Bread and Flour Regulations 1998 was circulated to the World Trade Organisation Technical Barriers to Trade Committee on 9<sup>th</sup> February 2024.</p><p> </p><p>In accordance with arrangements provided in the Windsor Framework notification of the European Commission is also required under Assimilated Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006 Article 11 and Directive (EU) 2015/1535 Article 5(1) in respect of planned amendments to the Bread and Flour Regulations (Northern Ireland) 1998.</p><p> </p><p>The EU commission were notified under the Windsor Framework of the planned amendments to the Bread and Flour Regulations (Northern Ireland) on the 8<sup>th of </sup>February 2024.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Douglas-Miller more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-04-02T15:10:16.277Zmore like thismore than 2024-04-02T15:10:16.277Z
answering member
5006
label Biography information for Lord Douglas-Miller more like this
tabling member
1388
label Biography information for Lord Dodds of Duncairn more like this
1698028
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-03-21more like thismore than 2024-03-21
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading Rivers: Environment Protection more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask His Majesty's Government how many river habitats in England have good ecological status; how many are polluted by chemical waste, including raw sewage and agricultural waste; and what steps they are taking to ensure the existing regulatory framework for managing the water environment in the UK is more effectively applied. more like this
tabling member printed
The Marquess of Lothian more like this
uin HL3522 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false remove filter
date of answer less than 2024-05-14more like thismore than 2024-05-14
answer text <p>The last Water Framework Directive (WFD) full water body classification results in 2019 showed 16% of all surface water bodies (14% for river water bodies), in England achieved good ecological status (GES) (or good ecological potential for artificial and heavily modified water bodies), and 64% of surface water bodies achieved moderate ecological status (or potential).</p><p> </p><p>The next full results will be published by the Environment Agency (EA) in 2025. The headline reporting for WFD creates a simplified picture and is just one way of understanding the water environment. For example, the last classification results for England showed the 79% of elements the EA test for GES were classed at Good.</p><p> </p><p>Most water bodies failing to reach GES are subject to multiple pressures. The top three pressures are physical modification of water bodies, diffuse agricultural pollution and waste water management. More detailed information on water body reasons for not achieving good are publicly available on the EA’s Catchment Data Explorer.</p><p> </p><p>The EA has developed a Prioritisation and Early Warning System (PEWS) for chemicals of emerging concern to assess their presence and quantities in our rivers. This allows the Agency to prioritise suitable management. Additionally, EA has developed a list of priority chemicals of concern which are regularly monitored alongside appropriate measures to protect aquatic wildlife and human health.</p><p> </p><p>The government is committed to achieving the goals of the Environment Improvement Plan to bring 75% of our water to as close to its natural state as soon as practicable. Our Plan for Water, published last year will go further and faster towards that goal and deliver a safe, reliable, resilient supply of clean and plentiful water underpinned by increased investment in infrastructure, increased regulation and stronger enforcement.</p>
answering member printed Lord Douglas-Miller more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-05-14T11:47:03.69Zmore like thismore than 2024-05-14T11:47:03.69Z
answering member
5006
label Biography information for Lord Douglas-Miller more like this
tabling member
259
label Biography information for The Marquess of Lothian more like this
1697674
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-03-20more like thismore than 2024-03-20
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading UK Internal Trade: Labelling more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask His Majesty's Government what representations they have received on 'not for EU' labelling provisions; and what steps they will take to reduce the regulatory burden and costs of introducing them on small and medium-sized companies. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering more like this
uin HL3466 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false remove filter
date of answer less than 2024-04-04more like thismore than 2024-04-04
answer text <p>We have, and will continue to, engage with businesses extensively on NIRMS and GB-wide labelling requirements. A six-week public consultation on the GB wide labelling proposals closed on 15 March. As set out during that consultation, we are considering steps to reduce burdens which might be appropriate, such as for small and medium sized businesses. The responses are now being analysed and we expect to publish a response to the consultation in due course.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Douglas-Miller more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-04-04T12:58:13.89Zmore like thismore than 2024-04-04T12:58:13.89Z
answering member
5006
label Biography information for Lord Douglas-Miller more like this
tabling member
384
label Biography information for Baroness McIntosh of Pickering more like this
1697268
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-03-19more like thismore than 2024-03-19
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading Fisheries: Sustainable Development more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask His Majesty's Government what steps they are taking to support the UK fishing industry to ensure sustainable management of UK fishing waters and the livelihoods of British fishermen. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Hay of Ballyore more like this
uin HL3390 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false remove filter
date of answer less than 2024-04-03more like thismore than 2024-04-03
answer text <p>We are ensuring the sustainable management of UK fishing waters and livelihoods of British fishers by developing Fisheries Management Plans and through the £100m UK Seafood Fund, which has provided £3.9m in grant funding to projects in Northern Ireland. This includes a £2.8m project at Portavogie Harbour that will replace and enhance the existing boat cradle and winch.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Douglas-Miller more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-04-03T12:58:36.837Zmore like thismore than 2024-04-03T12:58:36.837Z
answering member
5006
label Biography information for Lord Douglas-Miller more like this
tabling member
4352
label Biography information for Lord Hay of Ballyore more like this
1697269
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-03-19more like thismore than 2024-03-19
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading Import Controls more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to dismantle the border control posts at UK ports, following the publication of Safeguarding the Union in January (CP 1021). more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Hay of Ballyore more like this
uin HL3391 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false remove filter
date of answer less than 2024-04-08more like thismore than 2024-04-08
answer text <p>SPS facilities have always been necessary under all scenarios, as the Government has made clear, in order to administer red lane checks on goods moving on into the EU. This is reflected in the fact that the plans were brought forward, and the business case for the facilities was being prepared, during the passage of the Northern Ireland Protocol Bill.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Douglas-Miller more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-04-08T10:32:13.01Zmore like thismore than 2024-04-08T10:32:13.01Z
answering member
5006
label Biography information for Lord Douglas-Miller more like this
tabling member
4352
label Biography information for Lord Hay of Ballyore more like this
1697270
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-03-19more like thismore than 2024-03-19
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading Plants: Northern Ireland more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask His Majesty's Government which plants, trees and seeds are not allowed to be sent to Northern Ireland from Great Britain as a result of the Windsor Framework. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Hoey more like this
uin HL3399 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false remove filter
date of answer less than 2024-04-22more like thismore than 2024-04-22
answer text <p>The Windsor Framework provides for simplified arrangements for the movement of plants and plant products between Great Britain and Northern Ireland, meaning a phytosanitary certificate is not required and that a wider variety of plants can move.</p><p> </p><p>We have secured the lifting of a ban on the movement of twelve plant species - apple, Japanese / delavay privet, European crab apple, common hawthorn, Norway maple, Japanese maple, sycamore maple, field maple, English oak, sessile oak, European beech and, most recently, hazel. We are in active dialogue with the EU Commission on a number of other species which industry has proposed as priorities. We will continue to engage with industry to ensure the smooth movement of additional plant species. Further details can be found on Defra’s online Plant Health Portal.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Douglas-Miller more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-04-22T13:14:33.62Zmore like thismore than 2024-04-22T13:14:33.62Z
answering member
5006
label Biography information for Lord Douglas-Miller more like this
tabling member
210
label Biography information for Baroness Hoey more like this
1697284
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-03-19more like thismore than 2024-03-19
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading Dogs: Imports more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have (1) to introduce a complete ban on the commercial movement of pregnant dogs, and (2) to increase the age at which puppies can be imported to six months. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Redfern more like this
uin HL3414 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false remove filter
date of answer less than 2024-03-27more like thismore than 2024-03-27
answer text <p>The Government supports the Private Members’ Bill, Animal Welfare (Import of Dogs, Cats and Ferrets) Bill, introduced by Selaine Saxby MP on restricting the importation and non-commercial movement of pets. The Bill contains powers that will enable future regulations for commercial and non-commercial movements of pets into the United Kingdom, including prohibiting the import of heavily pregnant dogs over 42 days gestation and puppies under six months old.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Douglas-Miller more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-03-27T15:25:56.973Zmore like thismore than 2024-03-27T15:25:56.973Z
answering member
5006
label Biography information for Lord Douglas-Miller more like this
tabling member
4551
label Biography information for Baroness Redfern more like this
1697285
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-03-19more like thismore than 2024-03-19
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading Dogs: Imports and Sales more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask His Majesty's Government what plans they have to introduce a complete ban on the (1) importation, and (2) sale, of dogs which have had (a) their ears cropped, or (b) their tails docked, for cosmetic reasons. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Redfern more like this
uin HL3415 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false remove filter
date of answer less than 2024-03-27more like thismore than 2024-03-27
answer text <p>Under the Animal Welfare Act 2006, it is already an offence in England and Wales to carry out a non-exempted mutilation, including the cropping of a dog’s ears or the docking of their tails. The Animal Welfare (Sentencing) Act 2021 creates tougher penalties for anyone convicted of such an offence face, either being sent to prison for up to five years, or receiving an unlimited fine, or both.</p><p> </p><p>The Government supports the Private Members’ Bill, Animal Welfare (Import of Dogs, Cats and Ferrets) Bill, introduced by Selaine Saxby MP on restricting the importation and non-commercial movement of pets. The Bill contains powers that will enable future regulations for commercial and non-commercial movements of pets into the United Kingdom including prohibiting the import of dogs with cropped ears and docked tails. This will prevent the import of non-exempted mutilated dogs for onward sale in the United Kingdom.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Douglas-Miller more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-03-27T15:27:13.28Zmore like thismore than 2024-03-27T15:27:13.28Z
answering member
5006
label Biography information for Lord Douglas-Miller more like this
tabling member
4551
label Biography information for Baroness Redfern more like this
1697321
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2024-03-19more like thismore than 2024-03-19
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading Hares: Conservation more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Benyon on 12 July 2023 (HL9069), which stated that “Introducing a close season for brown hares remains an option”, what indicators they are using to assess the necessity of this option, and how frequently they review it. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Helic more like this
uin HL3392 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false remove filter
date of answer less than 2024-04-04more like thismore than 2024-04-04
answer text <p>The proposal to introduce a close season for the brown hare, referred to in HL9069, was set out in the Government’s Action Plan for Animal Welfare. In terms of the necessity of a close season from a wildlife conservation perspective, the brown hare is one of the indicator species for our legally binding targets in England to halt the decline in species abundance by 2030 and then reverse declines by 2042. We know that in order to meet these targets we will need large-scale habitat creation and restoration and improved connectivity but this will be supplemented where appropriate by intelligence on individual species. While there are no immediate plans to undertake a national mammal population review as was conducted in 2018, we should get an idea of trends in our brown hare population from published surveys, for example from the British Trust for Ornithology’s mammal recording, which it has been conducting since 1995 with a view to helping improve our knowledge of the distribution and population trends of some of our commoner mammals.</p>
answering member printed Lord Benyon more like this
question first answered
less than 2024-04-04T12:57:33.957Zmore like thismore than 2024-04-04T12:57:33.957Z
answering member
1547
label Biography information for Lord Benyon more like this
tabling member
4331
label Biography information for Baroness Helic more like this