Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1670113
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-11-14more like thismore than 2023-11-14
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Social Security Benefits: Children more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask His Majesty's Government why, from the next release of the benefit cap statistics, information on the youngest child in capped households will be suspended; and whether they propose to resume publication of those data in later releases. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Lister of Burtersett more like this
uin HL287 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The Department advised users on GOV.UK on 7 November 2023, that information on the age of youngest child for capped Housing Benefit households will be suspended from the next release of Benefit Cap statistics (due to be published on 12 December 2023). This is due to an issue with the quality of the HM Revenue &amp; Customs (HMRC) statistical Child Benefit data, which is currently being investigated. We will reinstate the breakdown in the statistical series as soon as possible, in line with the UK Statistics Authority (UKSA) Code of Practice for Statistics.</p><p> </p><p>In May 2023, 91% of capped households were on Universal Credit (UC) and are not affected by this issue. The statistics for the age of youngest child in UC capped households will be published as normal on 12 December 2023.</p> more like this
answering member printed Viscount Younger of Leckie more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-11-21T17:21:51.237Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-21T17:21:51.237Z
answering member
4169
label Biography information for Viscount Younger of Leckie more like this
tabling member
4234
label Biography information for Baroness Lister of Burtersett more like this
1668659
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-11-08more like thismore than 2023-11-08
answering body
Department for Education more like this
answering dept id 60 more like this
answering dept short name Education more like this
answering dept sort name Education more like this
hansard heading Schools: HIV Infection more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask His Majesty's Government whether they are planning to introduce any measures to include HIV education as a part of the school curriculum in order to promote understanding about HIV and tackle stigma among children; and, if so, what are their plans. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Black of Brentwood more like this
uin HL96 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>In September 2020 the government made Relationships Education compulsory for primary school pupils, Relationships and Sex Education compulsory for secondary school pupils and Health Education compulsory for all pupils in state-funded schools.</p><p>In secondary schools, the Relationships, Sex and Health Education (RSHE) statutory guidance states that pupils should be taught factual knowledge around sex, sexual health, and sexuality, set firmly within the context of relationships. Pupils should learn about contraception, sexually transmitted infections (STIs), developing intimate relationships and resisting pressure to have sex. Further information and a link to the guidance can be found here: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/relationships-education-relationships-and-sex-education-rse-and-health-education" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/relationships-education-relationships-and-sex-education-rse-and-health-education</a>.</p><p>To support teachers to deliver these topics safely and with confidence, the department has produced RSHE Teacher Training Modules. The ‘intimate and sexual relationships, including sexual health’ topic specifies that by the end of secondary school, pupils should know how the different STIs, including HIV/AIDS, are transmitted, how risk can be reduced through safer sex and the importance of and facts about testing. Pupils are also taught about HIV/AIDS at Key Stages 3 and 4 of the science curriculum. Further information and a link to the training modules can be found here: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/guidance/teaching-about-relationships-sex-and-health" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/guidance/teaching-about-relationships-sex-and-health</a>.</p><p>From primary education onwards, age appropriate Relationships Education supports pupils to treat each other with kindness, consideration and respect, including understanding the importance of respectful relationships and the different types of loving and healthy relationships that exist.</p><p>The department will be launching a public consultation by the end of this year on a draft revised RSHE guidance, so that interested parties can contribute their comments and ideas, including on sexual health and STIs, including HIV/AIDS education. The department will carefully consider responses received and intends to publish the final guidance in 2024.</p>
answering member printed Baroness Barran more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-11-21T12:37:52.36Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-21T12:37:52.36Z
answering member
4703
label Biography information for Baroness Barran more like this
tabling member
4171
label Biography information for Lord Black of Brentwood more like this
1668691
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-11-08more like thismore than 2023-11-08
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Social Security Benefits: Fraud more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask His Majesty's Government how many staff were employed in (1) 2021, (2) 2022, and (3) 2023, in roles which target fraud, error and debt across the benefit system. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Royall of Blaisdon more like this
uin HL142 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Everyone in DWP has a role to play in stopping fraud and error.</p><p> </p><p>In recent Spending Rounds we secured additional funding enabling us to enhance our counter-fraud and error capabilities including a new Targeted Case Review (TCR) team to review millions of Universal Credit claims, as well as recruitment into our Counter Fraud &amp; Compliance Directorate (CFCD).</p><p> </p><p>We are continuing to create a culture where stopping fraud and error and minimising debt is a shared goal of everyone in DWP and those who deliver services for us. All staff will understand the part they play within DWP, and they will have the knowledge, skills and tools they need to deliver.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Oct-21</p></td><td><p>Oct-22</p></td><td><p>Oct-23</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>CFCD/TCR staffing</p></td><td><p>7,410</p></td><td><p>9,240</p></td><td><p>10,260</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p><strong> </strong></p><p>Source: Derived from the Department’s Activity Based Model (ABM).</p><p> </p><p>Notes:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><ul><li>Data is drawn at the end of each month. Data is correct as of the end of October in 2021, 2022 and 2023 and has been rounded to the nearest 10.</li><li>Figures were derived from the Department’s Activity Based Model (ABM), which provides Full Time Equivalent (FTE) figures based on point in time estimate by Line Managers. They cover only FTE of staff with paid employment. No overtime FTE is included.</li><li>The number of Fraud, Error and Debt staff is unpublished management information, collected and intended for internal department use and has not been quality assured to National Statistics or Official Statistics standard.</li></ul></p></td></tr><tr><td><p> </p></td></tr></tbody></table>
answering member printed Viscount Younger of Leckie more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-11-21T17:21:21.477Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-21T17:21:21.477Z
answering member
4169
label Biography information for Viscount Younger of Leckie more like this
tabling member
3703
label Biography information for Baroness Royall of Blaisdon more like this
1668702
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-11-08more like thismore than 2023-11-08
answering body
Department for Energy Security and Net Zero more like this
answering dept id 215 more like this
answering dept short name Energy Security and Net Zero more like this
answering dept sort name Energy Security and Net Zero more like this
hansard heading Fossil Fuels: Storage more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of the environmental impact of the planned redevelopment of Cloghan Point oil terminal into a storage and distribution hub for all forms of fossil fuels for Northern Ireland and beyond, including the impact on the UK's carbon emissions. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle more like this
uin HL94 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>This is a devolved matter. Environmental assessments of projects in Northern Ireland are carried out by the NI Environment Agency.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Callanan more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-11-21T12:30:27.147Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-21T12:30:27.147Z
answering member
4336
label Biography information for Lord Callanan more like this
tabling member
4719
label Biography information for Baroness Bennett of Manor Castle more like this
1668710
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-11-08more like thismore than 2023-11-08
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Gift Aid more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the gift aid review launched in their policy paper Summary of tax administration and maintenance: Spring 2023, published on 27 April, what progress they have made so far in that review. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock more like this
uin HL107 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The Government is undertaking a review of the administration of Gift Aid. It is considering areas for improvements suggested by representatives of charities. Since the announcement HMRC has undertaken analysis of its systems that administer Gift Aid and also undertaken research on charities use of Gift Aid. HMRC has not completed this review of existing processes and research into challenges and possible improvements.</p><p>HMRC works closely and regularly with representatives from across the charity sector reviewing Gift Aid, as well as raising awareness amongst donors. It places a high priority on this collaborative work and is always interested in ideas to improve the administration, take-up and awareness of Gift Aid.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Vere of Norbiton more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-11-21T12:38:23.17Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-21T12:38:23.17Z
answering member
4580
label Biography information for Baroness Vere of Norbiton more like this
tabling member
579
label Biography information for Lord Foulkes of Cumnock more like this
1668711
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-11-08more like thismore than 2023-11-08
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Gift Aid more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the gift aid review launched in their policy paper Summary of tax administration and maintenance: Spring 2023, published on 27 April, how many meetings they have had with charities in the past six months as part of that review. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock more like this
uin HL108 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>As part of the Government’s review of the administration of Gift Aid processes, and to fully understand the current Gift Aid Service and associated processes and challenges, HMRC has conducted in-depth research interviews with officials responsible for Gift Aid from 17 charities across the country, ranging in size from micro to large. These represented charities across a range of different sectors and included some that claim Gift Aid, don’t claim or partially claim, to help understand the reasons, challenges and needs.</p><p> </p><p>HMRC also conducted internal user research with members of its charities operations team to understand the challenges and to inform its research with charity officials.</p><p> </p><p>Prior to the announcement, HMRC met with 6 charity officials responsible for Gift Aid at their respective charities to test changes to the charities online service. This followed research conducted with 5 charities in November 2022.</p><p> </p><p>In total, there have been 28 research sessions with distinct, individual charities, and two sector meetings. 18 of these meetings have been in the past 6 months, with the remaining 12 having happened in the past 12 months.</p><p> </p><p>This review of existing processes and research into challenges and possible improvements is still ongoing.</p>
answering member printed Baroness Vere of Norbiton more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-11-21T12:39:08.327Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-21T12:39:08.327Z
answering member
4580
label Biography information for Baroness Vere of Norbiton more like this
tabling member
579
label Biography information for Lord Foulkes of Cumnock more like this
1668718
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-11-08more like thismore than 2023-11-08
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Food: Prices more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask His Majesty's Government what assessment they have made of reports that food inflation is set to reduce next year; and what assessment they have made of the impact this will have on consumers following the increased cost of living. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Taylor of Warwick more like this
uin HL147 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>His Majesty’s Government is encouraged by reports that food inflation is expected to be lower next year than this year. This will benefit consumers and help with the cost of living.</p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Vere of Norbiton more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-11-21T16:29:46.483Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-21T16:29:46.483Z
answering member
4580
label Biography information for Baroness Vere of Norbiton more like this
tabling member
1796
label Biography information for Lord Taylor of Warwick more like this
1668056
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-11-07more like thismore than 2023-11-07
answering body
Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
hansard heading Surveillance: China more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask His Majesty's Government whether the Procurement Act 2023 obliges police forces to remove Chinese-made surveillance equipment from sensitive sites. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
uin HL4 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The Procurement Act 2023 does not oblige police forces to remove Chinese-made surveillance equipment from their estate. The government has committed to remove from sensitive government sites all surveillance equipment subject to the National Intelligence Law of the People’s Republic of China. This commitment does not extend to the wider public sector. However, public sector organisations, including police forces, may choose to mirror the action and I understand some have already done so.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Baroness Neville-Rolfe more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-11-21T17:35:02.51Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-21T17:35:02.51Z
answering member
4284
label Biography information for Baroness Neville-Rolfe more like this
tabling member
738
label Biography information for Lord Alton of Liverpool more like this
1668067
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-11-07more like thismore than 2023-11-07
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Remand in Custody: Women more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask His Majesty's Government what percentage of women remanded into custody in each of the past five years were subsequently sentenced to (1) a community sentence, and (2) a prison sentence. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Bradley more like this
uin HL16 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The Ministry of Justice holds data on sentence outcomes and custodial sentence lengths after being remanded in custody. Data for the last five years is publicly available and can be viewed in remands data tool, available via the following link: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/criminal-justice-system-statistics-quarterly-december-2022" target="_blank">Criminal Justice System statistics quarterly: December 2022 - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)</a>.</p><p>To view data relating to cases completed at magistrates’ courts, navigate to the ‘Magistrates’ Courts’ tab. To view data relating to cases completed at Crown courts, navigate to the ‘Crown Courts’ tab. <br> <br>To select data for cases where the defendant is known to be female, ’01: Female’ should be selected within the Sex filter. To see data for cases where the female is aged over 18, select ‘02: Young adults’ and ’03: Adults’ in the Age group filter. To view those remanded in custody, ’03: Custody’ should be selected within the Remand status at magistrates’ court and Remand status at the Crown Court filters on the appropriate tabs.</p><p><strong>Table 1: Proportion of women issued a custodial sentence, community sentence, other sentence, or no sentence, after being remanded in custody, in cases completed at all courts in England and Wales, between 2018 and 2022 (Note 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Outcome</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2018</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2019</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2020</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2021</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2022</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Immediate custody</p></td><td><p>50%</p></td><td><p>50%</p></td><td><p>49%</p></td><td><p>47%</p></td><td><p>44%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Community sentence</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td><td><p>10%</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other</p></td><td><p>18%</p></td><td><p>17%</p></td><td><p>19%</p></td><td><p>18%</p></td><td><p>20%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>No sentence</p></td><td><p>23%</p></td><td><p>23%</p></td><td><p>24%</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td><td><p>28%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source: Court Proceedings Database</p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 2: Proportion of women issued a custodial sentence after being remanded in custody, by custodial sentence length, in cases completed at all courts in England and Wales, between 2018 and 2022. (Note 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Custodial sentence length</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2018</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2019</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2020</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2021</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2022</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1 year and over</p></td><td><p>24%</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td><td><p>28%</p></td><td><p>27%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>6 months and up to 1 year</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Over 3 months and up to 6 months</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td><td><p>6%</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Over 1 month and up to and including 3 months</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td><td><p>6%</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Up to and including 1 month</p></td><td><p>7%</p></td><td><p>6%</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td><td><p>3%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>N/A (received other sentence type or not sentenced)</p></td><td><p>50%</p></td><td><p>50%</p></td><td><p>51%</p></td><td><p>53%</p></td><td><p>56%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source: Court Proceedings Database</p><p> </p><p>Notes:</p><p>1) Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.</p><p>2) The figures given in the table relate to defendants for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences it is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.</p><p>3) Defendants are reported against their principal (i.e. most serious) remand status. Court custody includes those remanded in custody at any stage of proceedings who may also have been given bail or not remanded at some stage of those proceedings.</p><p>4) 'To obtain percentages for cases completed at both magistrates' and Crown courts, cases where a defendant has failed to appear to their hearing have been excluded from the totals. This can be replicated within the remand tool, by deselecting '01: Failure to appear' in the Outcome filter within the Magistrates' Court tab.</p><p>5) Defendants proceeded against at magistrates’ courts and subsequently committed to the Crown Court will have separate remand decisions made in both courts and will be included in both totals. To avoid duplication of figures, those committed to trial/sentence at Crown court following a hearing at magistrates' courts have been removed from the totals. This can be replicated within the remand tool, by deselecting '03: Committed to Crown Court for trial/sentencing' in the Outcome filters within the Magistrates' Court and Crown Courts tabs.</p><p>6) Please note, an issue we are currently investigating is the high proportion of unknown remand status at Crown Court – early findings suggest that these cases are split broadly proportionally (to offence breakdowns) across those remanded at custody and those granted bail. In 2022, 24% of defendants remanded at Crown Court had unknown remand status. We are working on a solution to fill in those unknown remand statuses with the actual status. Due to this, the figures presented only includes data for those where remand status is known.</p><p>7) The figures given in the table relate to those where sex is known to be female and age is known to be 18 or over.</p><p>8) An outcome of 'no sentence' includes cases where proceedings are discontinued, withdrawn, dismissed, or discharged Sec 6 at magistrates' courts, and not tried or acquitted at Crown Court.</p><p>9) The figures given in the table under outcome 'Other' relate to cases where the offender has been received a suspended sentence, absolute/conditional discharge, sentenced to pay a fine or compensation, or has been otherwise dealt with.</p>
answering member printed Lord Bellamy more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-11-21T12:33:29.817Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-21T12:33:29.817Z
answering member
4941
label Biography information for Lord Bellamy more like this
tabling member
452
label Biography information for Lord Bradley more like this
1668069
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2023-11-07more like thismore than 2023-11-07
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Remand in Custody: Women more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords remove filter
question text To ask His Majesty's Government what percentage of women remanded into custody in each of the past five years subsequently received a custodial sentence of (1) one year and over, (2) six months to one year, (3) three to six months, (4) one to three months, and (5) less than one month. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Bradley more like this
uin HL17 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The Ministry of Justice holds data on sentence outcomes and custodial sentence lengths after being remanded in custody. Data for the last five years is publicly available and can be viewed in remands data tool, available via the following link: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/criminal-justice-system-statistics-quarterly-december-2022" target="_blank">Criminal Justice System statistics quarterly: December 2022 - GOV.UK (www.gov.uk)</a>.</p><p>To view data relating to cases completed at magistrates’ courts, navigate to the ‘Magistrates’ Courts’ tab. To view data relating to cases completed at Crown courts, navigate to the ‘Crown Courts’ tab. <br> <br>To select data for cases where the defendant is known to be female, ’01: Female’ should be selected within the Sex filter. To see data for cases where the female is aged over 18, select ‘02: Young adults’ and ’03: Adults’ in the Age group filter. To view those remanded in custody, ’03: Custody’ should be selected within the Remand status at magistrates’ court and Remand status at the Crown Court filters on the appropriate tabs.</p><p><strong>Table 1: Proportion of women issued a custodial sentence, community sentence, other sentence, or no sentence, after being remanded in custody, in cases completed at all courts in England and Wales, between 2018 and 2022 (Note 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Outcome</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2018</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2019</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2020</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2021</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2022</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Immediate custody</p></td><td><p>50%</p></td><td><p>50%</p></td><td><p>49%</p></td><td><p>47%</p></td><td><p>44%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Community sentence</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td><td><p>10%</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other</p></td><td><p>18%</p></td><td><p>17%</p></td><td><p>19%</p></td><td><p>18%</p></td><td><p>20%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>No sentence</p></td><td><p>23%</p></td><td><p>23%</p></td><td><p>24%</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td><td><p>28%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source: Court Proceedings Database</p><p> </p><p><strong>Table 2: Proportion of women issued a custodial sentence after being remanded in custody, by custodial sentence length, in cases completed at all courts in England and Wales, between 2018 and 2022. (Note 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9)</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Custodial sentence length</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2018</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2019</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2020</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2021</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2022</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>1 year and over</p></td><td><p>24%</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td><td><p>26%</p></td><td><p>28%</p></td><td><p>27%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>6 months and up to 1 year</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Over 3 months and up to 6 months</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td><td><p>6%</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Over 1 month and up to and including 3 months</p></td><td><p>9%</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td><td><p>8%</p></td><td><p>6%</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Up to and including 1 month</p></td><td><p>7%</p></td><td><p>6%</p></td><td><p>5%</p></td><td><p>4%</p></td><td><p>3%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>N/A (received other sentence type or not sentenced)</p></td><td><p>50%</p></td><td><p>50%</p></td><td><p>51%</p></td><td><p>53%</p></td><td><p>56%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Source: Court Proceedings Database</p><p> </p><p>Notes:</p><p> </p><p>1) Every effort is made to ensure that the figures presented are accurate and complete. However, it is important to note that these data have been extracted from large administrative data systems generated by the courts. As a consequence, care should be taken to ensure data collection processes and their inevitable limitations are taken into account when those data are used.</p><p>2) The figures given in the table relate to defendants for whom these offences were the principal offences for which they were dealt with. When a defendant has been found guilty of two or more offences it is the offence for which the heaviest penalty is imposed. Where the same disposal is imposed for two or more offences, the offence selected is the offence for which the statutory maximum penalty is the most severe.</p><p>3) Defendants are reported against their principal (i.e. most serious) remand status. Court custody includes those remanded in custody at any stage of proceedings who may also have been given bail or not remanded at some stage of those proceedings.</p><p>4) 'To obtain percentages for cases completed at both magistrates' and Crown courts, cases where a defendant has failed to appear to their hearing have been excluded from the totals. This can be replicated within the remand tool, by deselecting '01: Failure to appear' in the Outcome filter within the Magistrates' Court tab.</p><p>5) Defendants proceeded against at magistrates’ courts and subsequently committed to the Crown Court will have separate remand decisions made in both courts and will be included in both totals. To avoid duplication of figures, those committed to trial/sentence at Crown court following a hearing at magistrates' courts have been removed from the totals. This can be replicated within the remand tool, by deselecting '03: Committed to Crown Court for trial/sentencing' in the Outcome filters within the Magistrates' Court and Crown Courts tabs.</p><p>6) Please note, an issue we are currently investigating is the high proportion of unknown remand status at Crown Court – early findings suggest that these cases are split broadly proportionally (to offence breakdowns) across those remanded at custody and those granted bail. In 2022, 24% of defendants remanded at Crown Court had unknown remand status. We are working on a solution to fill in those unknown remand statuses with the actual status. Due to this, the figures presented only includes data for those where remand status is known.</p><p>7) The figures given in the table relate to those where sex is known to be female and age is known to be 18 or over.</p><p>8) An outcome of 'no sentence' includes cases where proceedings are discontinued, withdrawn, dismissed, or discharged Sec 6 at magistrates' courts, and not tried or acquitted at Crown Court.</p><p>9) The figures given in the table under outcome 'Other' relate to cases where the offender has been received a suspended sentence, absolute/conditional discharge, sentenced to pay a fine or compensation, or has been otherwise dealt with.</p>
answering member printed Lord Bellamy more like this
question first answered
less than 2023-11-21T12:33:37.58Zmore like thismore than 2023-11-21T12:33:37.58Z
answering member
4941
label Biography information for Lord Bellamy more like this
tabling member
452
label Biography information for Lord Bradley more like this