Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1453447
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-03-22more like thismore than 2022-03-22
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice remove filter
hansard heading Parole more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many prisoners subject to Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences have had two or more post tariff parole reviews with no progression to (1) open conditions, or (2) release, in each year since 2017. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Moylan more like this
uin HL7216 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The IPP Action Plan is regularly reviewed to ensure that it is responsive to the needs of those serving IPP sentences, whether in prison or in the community. During the COVID-19 pandemic, and in accordance with measures mandated in the interests of public health, HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) implemented exceptional delivery models which inevitably had some impact on all operational work. A large number of IPP prisoners have been released each year since the IPP Action Plan was first introduced in 2016, and the Plan will be refreshed, reviewed and republished after careful consideration of the forthcoming Justice Select Committee’s Report and recommendations.</p><p>HL7157 &amp; HL7158:</p><p>HMPPS operate four Progression Regimes in closed, adult male category C prisons which provide opportunities for parole-eligible prisoners who are not making anticipated progress, and particularly prioritise places for those serving an IPP sentence. The first Progression Regime opened at HMP Warren Hill in December 2014. Following the success of the Regime at HMP Warren Hill, a further three Progression Regimes were opened in 2018 at HMP The Humber, Erlestoke and Buckley Hall.</p><p>The following table shows the number of prisoners in England and Wales subject to Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences that have been (1) received into, and (2) released from, Progression Regimes in each year since 2017.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Received onto a Progression Regimes</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Release from a Progression Regime</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>47</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018*</p></td><td><p>124</p></td><td><p>30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>119</p></td><td><p>43</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>92</p></td><td><p>43</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>44</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>* Progression Regimes opened at HMPs Erlestoke, Humber and Buckley Hall.</p><p> </p><p>These data have been drawn from local spreadsheets and databases held by the Progression Regimes, as national data systems can only capture movement for a whole prison, rather than individual units within a prison. As with any large scale recording systems, the figures are subject to possible errors with data migration and processing.</p><p>The total capacity of the Progression Regimes was 202 in 2017, with only the Progression Regime at HMP Warren Hill operational at that time. This number rose to 350 spaces (202 in HMP Warren Hill, 40 in HMP Erlestoke, 48 in HMP Humber and 60 in HMP Buckley Hall) with the opening of the three additional Progression Regime sites by the end of 2018. In 2019 a further 40 places were opened in HMP Erlestoke, however last year one of their Progression Regime units closed, affecting their number of places. This unit is being replaced with a new one later this year.</p><p>HL7160:</p><p>Psychology reviews for IPP prisoners commenced in 2016 and targeted those serving IPP sentences where no progress had been made to either open conditions or release despite 2 or more post tariff parole reviews. In 2019, the cohort was widened to incorporate IPP prisoners with tariffs of fewerless than 2 years. In 2021, the cohort was again expanded to include all those 5 or more years post tariff irrespective of whether they had been to open prison previously, those serving IPP sentences for non-sexual and non-violent offences, and those serving IPP sentences for robbery.</p><p>The following table shows the number of IPP psychology reviews completed for eligible IPP prisoners, as described above, each year since 2016. The high figure in 2016 reflects the fact that a large proportion of those eligible had their reviews in the first year the central reviews were introduced:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews completed </strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>873</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>209</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>225</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>159</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>107</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>212</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>HL7161:</p><p>HMPPS Women’s Estate Psychology Services have implemented an indeterminate sentence prisoners strategy which includes the IPP cohort. The overarching goal of the strategy is to ensure that all are supported to progress through their prison sentences as quickly as possible. Psychologists regularly review cases and work with prison and probation colleagues to remove barriers to progression and expedite completion of interventions and services.</p><p>HL7216:</p><p>The following table shows the number of prisoners subject to IPP sentences that have had two or more post-tariff parole reviews with no progression to (1) open conditions, or (2) release, in each year since 2017:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Snapshot Date</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total number of IPP prisoners with two or more “no release” decisions in their latest two reviews (up to the snapshot date)*</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>31-Dec-17</p></td><td><p>1,173</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>31-Dec-18</p></td><td><p>1,028</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>31-Dec-19</p></td><td><p>943</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>31-Dec-20</p></td><td><p>887</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>31-Dec-21</p></td><td><p>874</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>*Caveats:</p><p>1. The figures in these tables have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</p><p>2. These figures include both the recalled and unreleased IPP populations.</p><p> </p><p>HL7217 &amp; HL7218:</p><p>The following data are produced from service provider returns and, whilst quality assured, are subject to reporter error. As of 31 December 2021 there were 4,869 people with IPP sentences who had been identified as meeting the screening criteria for the Offender Personality Disorder Pathway. OPD pathway screening is an administrative activity which does not necessarily mean someone needs a specific intervention to address a personality disorder. Such a need would be identified when the prisoner’s probation officer reviews the prisoner’s sentence plan to take account of the OPD pathway screening.</p><p>Of those identified as meeting the screening criteria, 2,780 are currently in custody (with 1,200 of these in custody on recall).</p><p>From 1st January 2017 to 31st December 2021, a total of 1,892 offenders serving IPP sentences have been referred to OPD Services as follows:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year of referral</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>No of IPP Referrals</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>177</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>221</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>358</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>517</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>619</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total (2017-2021)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1892</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>To note: in the breakdown of protected characteristics below, some categories have been merged where necessary to avoid the risk of identifying individual offenders.</p><p>By Age:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year of referral</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>18-29</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>30-39</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>40-49</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>50-59</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>60+</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>72</p></td><td><p>53</p></td><td><p>33</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>177</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>94</p></td><td><p>66</p></td><td><p>44</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>221</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>159</p></td><td><p>99</p></td><td><p>61</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>358</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>238</p></td><td><p>150</p></td><td><p>86</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>517</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>276</p></td><td><p>184</p></td><td><p>101</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>619</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>76</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>839</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>552</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>325</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>100</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1892</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>By Ethnicity:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year of referral</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Asian: Asian British</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Black: Black British</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Mixed/</strong> <strong>Multiple Ethnic Groups</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Other /</strong> <strong>Not Stated</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>White</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>144</p></td><td><p>177</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>182</p></td><td><p>221</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>295</p></td><td><p>358</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>422</p></td><td><p>517</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>63</p></td><td><p>32</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>505</p></td><td><p>619</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>53</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>197</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>86</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>8</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1548</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1892</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>By Sex:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year of referral</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Female</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Male</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Unspecified</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total </strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>174</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>177</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>214</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>221</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>347</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>358</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>490</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>517</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>39</p></td><td><p>577</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>619</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>87</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1802</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>3</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1892</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
grouped question UIN
HL7157 more like this
HL7158 more like this
HL7160 more like this
HL7161 more like this
HL7217 more like this
HL7218 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-04-04T16:39:50.22Zmore like thismore than 2022-04-04T16:39:50.22Z
answering member
4901
label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
tabling member
4883
label Biography information for Lord Moylan more like this
1453448
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-03-22more like thismore than 2022-03-22
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice remove filter
hansard heading Prisoners: Personality Disorders more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many prisoners subject to Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences have been referred into the offender personality disorder pathway in each year since 2017. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Moylan more like this
uin HL7217 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The IPP Action Plan is regularly reviewed to ensure that it is responsive to the needs of those serving IPP sentences, whether in prison or in the community. During the COVID-19 pandemic, and in accordance with measures mandated in the interests of public health, HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) implemented exceptional delivery models which inevitably had some impact on all operational work. A large number of IPP prisoners have been released each year since the IPP Action Plan was first introduced in 2016, and the Plan will be refreshed, reviewed and republished after careful consideration of the forthcoming Justice Select Committee’s Report and recommendations.</p><p>HL7157 &amp; HL7158:</p><p>HMPPS operate four Progression Regimes in closed, adult male category C prisons which provide opportunities for parole-eligible prisoners who are not making anticipated progress, and particularly prioritise places for those serving an IPP sentence. The first Progression Regime opened at HMP Warren Hill in December 2014. Following the success of the Regime at HMP Warren Hill, a further three Progression Regimes were opened in 2018 at HMP The Humber, Erlestoke and Buckley Hall.</p><p>The following table shows the number of prisoners in England and Wales subject to Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences that have been (1) received into, and (2) released from, Progression Regimes in each year since 2017.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Received onto a Progression Regimes</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Release from a Progression Regime</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>47</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018*</p></td><td><p>124</p></td><td><p>30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>119</p></td><td><p>43</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>92</p></td><td><p>43</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>44</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>* Progression Regimes opened at HMPs Erlestoke, Humber and Buckley Hall.</p><p> </p><p>These data have been drawn from local spreadsheets and databases held by the Progression Regimes, as national data systems can only capture movement for a whole prison, rather than individual units within a prison. As with any large scale recording systems, the figures are subject to possible errors with data migration and processing.</p><p>The total capacity of the Progression Regimes was 202 in 2017, with only the Progression Regime at HMP Warren Hill operational at that time. This number rose to 350 spaces (202 in HMP Warren Hill, 40 in HMP Erlestoke, 48 in HMP Humber and 60 in HMP Buckley Hall) with the opening of the three additional Progression Regime sites by the end of 2018. In 2019 a further 40 places were opened in HMP Erlestoke, however last year one of their Progression Regime units closed, affecting their number of places. This unit is being replaced with a new one later this year.</p><p>HL7160:</p><p>Psychology reviews for IPP prisoners commenced in 2016 and targeted those serving IPP sentences where no progress had been made to either open conditions or release despite 2 or more post tariff parole reviews. In 2019, the cohort was widened to incorporate IPP prisoners with tariffs of fewerless than 2 years. In 2021, the cohort was again expanded to include all those 5 or more years post tariff irrespective of whether they had been to open prison previously, those serving IPP sentences for non-sexual and non-violent offences, and those serving IPP sentences for robbery.</p><p>The following table shows the number of IPP psychology reviews completed for eligible IPP prisoners, as described above, each year since 2016. The high figure in 2016 reflects the fact that a large proportion of those eligible had their reviews in the first year the central reviews were introduced:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews completed </strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>873</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>209</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>225</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>159</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>107</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>212</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>HL7161:</p><p>HMPPS Women’s Estate Psychology Services have implemented an indeterminate sentence prisoners strategy which includes the IPP cohort. The overarching goal of the strategy is to ensure that all are supported to progress through their prison sentences as quickly as possible. Psychologists regularly review cases and work with prison and probation colleagues to remove barriers to progression and expedite completion of interventions and services.</p><p>HL7216:</p><p>The following table shows the number of prisoners subject to IPP sentences that have had two or more post-tariff parole reviews with no progression to (1) open conditions, or (2) release, in each year since 2017:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Snapshot Date</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total number of IPP prisoners with two or more “no release” decisions in their latest two reviews (up to the snapshot date)*</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>31-Dec-17</p></td><td><p>1,173</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>31-Dec-18</p></td><td><p>1,028</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>31-Dec-19</p></td><td><p>943</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>31-Dec-20</p></td><td><p>887</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>31-Dec-21</p></td><td><p>874</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>*Caveats:</p><p>1. The figures in these tables have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</p><p>2. These figures include both the recalled and unreleased IPP populations.</p><p> </p><p>HL7217 &amp; HL7218:</p><p>The following data are produced from service provider returns and, whilst quality assured, are subject to reporter error. As of 31 December 2021 there were 4,869 people with IPP sentences who had been identified as meeting the screening criteria for the Offender Personality Disorder Pathway. OPD pathway screening is an administrative activity which does not necessarily mean someone needs a specific intervention to address a personality disorder. Such a need would be identified when the prisoner’s probation officer reviews the prisoner’s sentence plan to take account of the OPD pathway screening.</p><p>Of those identified as meeting the screening criteria, 2,780 are currently in custody (with 1,200 of these in custody on recall).</p><p>From 1st January 2017 to 31st December 2021, a total of 1,892 offenders serving IPP sentences have been referred to OPD Services as follows:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year of referral</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>No of IPP Referrals</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>177</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>221</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>358</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>517</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>619</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total (2017-2021)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1892</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>To note: in the breakdown of protected characteristics below, some categories have been merged where necessary to avoid the risk of identifying individual offenders.</p><p>By Age:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year of referral</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>18-29</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>30-39</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>40-49</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>50-59</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>60+</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>72</p></td><td><p>53</p></td><td><p>33</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>177</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>94</p></td><td><p>66</p></td><td><p>44</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>221</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>159</p></td><td><p>99</p></td><td><p>61</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>358</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>238</p></td><td><p>150</p></td><td><p>86</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>517</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>276</p></td><td><p>184</p></td><td><p>101</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>619</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>76</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>839</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>552</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>325</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>100</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1892</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>By Ethnicity:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year of referral</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Asian: Asian British</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Black: Black British</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Mixed/</strong> <strong>Multiple Ethnic Groups</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Other /</strong> <strong>Not Stated</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>White</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>144</p></td><td><p>177</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>182</p></td><td><p>221</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>295</p></td><td><p>358</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>422</p></td><td><p>517</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>63</p></td><td><p>32</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>505</p></td><td><p>619</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>53</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>197</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>86</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>8</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1548</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1892</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>By Sex:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year of referral</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Female</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Male</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Unspecified</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total </strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>174</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>177</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>214</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>221</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>347</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>358</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>490</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>517</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>39</p></td><td><p>577</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>619</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>87</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1802</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>3</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1892</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
grouped question UIN
HL7157 more like this
HL7158 more like this
HL7160 more like this
HL7161 more like this
HL7216 more like this
HL7218 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-04-04T16:39:50.283Zmore like thismore than 2022-04-04T16:39:50.283Z
answering member
4901
label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
tabling member
4883
label Biography information for Lord Moylan more like this
1453449
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-03-22more like thismore than 2022-03-22
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice remove filter
hansard heading Prisoners: Personality Disorders more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government how many prisoners subject to Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences have been referred into the offender personality disorder pathway broken down by protected characteristics in each year since 2017. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Moylan more like this
uin HL7218 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The IPP Action Plan is regularly reviewed to ensure that it is responsive to the needs of those serving IPP sentences, whether in prison or in the community. During the COVID-19 pandemic, and in accordance with measures mandated in the interests of public health, HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) implemented exceptional delivery models which inevitably had some impact on all operational work. A large number of IPP prisoners have been released each year since the IPP Action Plan was first introduced in 2016, and the Plan will be refreshed, reviewed and republished after careful consideration of the forthcoming Justice Select Committee’s Report and recommendations.</p><p>HL7157 &amp; HL7158:</p><p>HMPPS operate four Progression Regimes in closed, adult male category C prisons which provide opportunities for parole-eligible prisoners who are not making anticipated progress, and particularly prioritise places for those serving an IPP sentence. The first Progression Regime opened at HMP Warren Hill in December 2014. Following the success of the Regime at HMP Warren Hill, a further three Progression Regimes were opened in 2018 at HMP The Humber, Erlestoke and Buckley Hall.</p><p>The following table shows the number of prisoners in England and Wales subject to Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences that have been (1) received into, and (2) released from, Progression Regimes in each year since 2017.</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Received onto a Progression Regimes</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Release from a Progression Regime</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>47</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018*</p></td><td><p>124</p></td><td><p>30</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>119</p></td><td><p>43</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>92</p></td><td><p>43</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>44</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>* Progression Regimes opened at HMPs Erlestoke, Humber and Buckley Hall.</p><p> </p><p>These data have been drawn from local spreadsheets and databases held by the Progression Regimes, as national data systems can only capture movement for a whole prison, rather than individual units within a prison. As with any large scale recording systems, the figures are subject to possible errors with data migration and processing.</p><p>The total capacity of the Progression Regimes was 202 in 2017, with only the Progression Regime at HMP Warren Hill operational at that time. This number rose to 350 spaces (202 in HMP Warren Hill, 40 in HMP Erlestoke, 48 in HMP Humber and 60 in HMP Buckley Hall) with the opening of the three additional Progression Regime sites by the end of 2018. In 2019 a further 40 places were opened in HMP Erlestoke, however last year one of their Progression Regime units closed, affecting their number of places. This unit is being replaced with a new one later this year.</p><p>HL7160:</p><p>Psychology reviews for IPP prisoners commenced in 2016 and targeted those serving IPP sentences where no progress had been made to either open conditions or release despite 2 or more post tariff parole reviews. In 2019, the cohort was widened to incorporate IPP prisoners with tariffs of fewerless than 2 years. In 2021, the cohort was again expanded to include all those 5 or more years post tariff irrespective of whether they had been to open prison previously, those serving IPP sentences for non-sexual and non-violent offences, and those serving IPP sentences for robbery.</p><p>The following table shows the number of IPP psychology reviews completed for eligible IPP prisoners, as described above, each year since 2016. The high figure in 2016 reflects the fact that a large proportion of those eligible had their reviews in the first year the central reviews were introduced:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Reviews completed </strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>873</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>209</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>225</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>159</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>107</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>212</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>HL7161:</p><p>HMPPS Women’s Estate Psychology Services have implemented an indeterminate sentence prisoners strategy which includes the IPP cohort. The overarching goal of the strategy is to ensure that all are supported to progress through their prison sentences as quickly as possible. Psychologists regularly review cases and work with prison and probation colleagues to remove barriers to progression and expedite completion of interventions and services.</p><p>HL7216:</p><p>The following table shows the number of prisoners subject to IPP sentences that have had two or more post-tariff parole reviews with no progression to (1) open conditions, or (2) release, in each year since 2017:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Snapshot Date</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total number of IPP prisoners with two or more “no release” decisions in their latest two reviews (up to the snapshot date)*</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>31-Dec-17</p></td><td><p>1,173</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>31-Dec-18</p></td><td><p>1,028</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>31-Dec-19</p></td><td><p>943</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>31-Dec-20</p></td><td><p>887</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>31-Dec-21</p></td><td><p>874</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>*Caveats:</p><p>1. The figures in these tables have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</p><p>2. These figures include both the recalled and unreleased IPP populations.</p><p> </p><p>HL7217 &amp; HL7218:</p><p>The following data are produced from service provider returns and, whilst quality assured, are subject to reporter error. As of 31 December 2021 there were 4,869 people with IPP sentences who had been identified as meeting the screening criteria for the Offender Personality Disorder Pathway. OPD pathway screening is an administrative activity which does not necessarily mean someone needs a specific intervention to address a personality disorder. Such a need would be identified when the prisoner’s probation officer reviews the prisoner’s sentence plan to take account of the OPD pathway screening.</p><p>Of those identified as meeting the screening criteria, 2,780 are currently in custody (with 1,200 of these in custody on recall).</p><p>From 1st January 2017 to 31st December 2021, a total of 1,892 offenders serving IPP sentences have been referred to OPD Services as follows:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year of referral</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>No of IPP Referrals</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>177</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>221</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>358</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>517</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>619</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total (2017-2021)</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1892</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>To note: in the breakdown of protected characteristics below, some categories have been merged where necessary to avoid the risk of identifying individual offenders.</p><p>By Age:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year of referral</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>18-29</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>30-39</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>40-49</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>50-59</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>60+</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>72</p></td><td><p>53</p></td><td><p>33</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>177</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>94</p></td><td><p>66</p></td><td><p>44</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>221</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>159</p></td><td><p>99</p></td><td><p>61</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>358</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>19</p></td><td><p>238</p></td><td><p>150</p></td><td><p>86</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>517</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>276</p></td><td><p>184</p></td><td><p>101</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>619</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>76</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>839</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>552</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>325</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>100</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1892</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>By Ethnicity:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year of referral</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Asian: Asian British</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Black: Black British</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Mixed/</strong> <strong>Multiple Ethnic Groups</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Other /</strong> <strong>Not Stated</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>White</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>144</p></td><td><p>177</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>17</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>182</p></td><td><p>221</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>295</p></td><td><p>358</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>14</p></td><td><p>57</p></td><td><p>24</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>422</p></td><td><p>517</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>63</p></td><td><p>32</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>505</p></td><td><p>619</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>53</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>197</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>86</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>8</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1548</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1892</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>By Sex:</p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year of referral</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Female</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Male</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Unspecified</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total </strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>174</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>177</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>214</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>221</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019</p></td><td><p>11</p></td><td><p>347</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>358</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020</p></td><td><p>27</p></td><td><p>490</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>517</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2021</p></td><td><p>39</p></td><td><p>577</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>619</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>87</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1802</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>3</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>1892</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table>
answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
grouped question UIN
HL7157 more like this
HL7158 more like this
HL7160 more like this
HL7161 more like this
HL7216 more like this
HL7217 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-04-04T16:39:50.343Zmore like thismore than 2022-04-04T16:39:50.343Z
answering member
4901
label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
tabling member
4883
label Biography information for Lord Moylan more like this
1452638
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-03-21more like thismore than 2022-03-21
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice remove filter
hansard heading Prison Sentences more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what progress the National Probation Service has made towards developing a package of learning for newly qualified officers on managing Imprisonment for Public Protection offenders since the publication of the Joint IPP Action Plan, published by Her Majesty's Prison and Probation Service and the Parole Board in June 2019. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Blunkett more like this
uin HL7111 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The IPP Action Plan is regularly reviewed to ensure that it is responsive to the needs of those serving IPP sentences, whether in prison andor in the community. During the COVID-19 pandemic, and in accordance with measures mandated in the interests of public health, HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) implemented exceptional delivery models which inevitably had some impact on all operational work. A large number of IPP prisoners have been released each year since the IPP Action Plan first introduced in 2016, and the Plan will be refreshed, reviewed and republished after careful consideration of the forthcoming Justice Select Committee’s Report and recommendations.</p><p> </p><p>There have been four new E-learning modules introduced for the use of probation practitioners which cover different aspects of supporting offenders serving indeterminate sentences; three of the modules cover work with those serving IPP sentences specifically, whilst the fourth is about actions at the point of sentencing for life sentences.</p><p>The three packages cover progression through the sentence, taking into account individual need, the processes during the pre-release phase, and how to manage indeterminate sentenced offenders once they are released into the community.</p><p>These packages, available now, will also form part of the Continuous Professional Development packs currently being created by the Probation Service for operational staff.</p><p> </p><p>We take mental health very seriously and recognise that providing the right interventions at the right time is vital to improve outcomes for people with mental health needs, including IPP offenders.</p><p>HMPPS is mindful that IPP prisoners do not have a definite release date and, on that account, provides each IPP prisoner with a key worker, as well as a qualified probation officer, to explain what they need to do to reduce their risk and to help them access the support services they need.</p><p>Health and justice partners have committed to providing a standard of health care in prisons equivalent to that available in the community. Through the National Partnership Agreement, health and justice partners are working closely to improve support and continuity of care when someone leaves prison. HMPPS continues to work with National Health Service England (NSHE) to develop RECONNECT, a care after custody service which supports vulnerable prison leavers in their transition to community-based health services.</p><p>The power to recall an offender to custody is a vital public protection measure when it comes to supervising any offender on licence. We have no evidence that probation officers are recalling IPP offenders to custody where they do not have compelling reason to do so. The HM Inspectorate of Probation Report – ‘A thematic review of probation recall culture and practice’ – published in 2020, found that the Probation Service is using recall appropriately, to prevent further serious offending and protect the public.</p><p>Probation officers explore other risk management steps to secure compliance and manage risk before requesting a recall. What might appear to be a relatively minor breach of a licence condition might, where the associated behaviour is similar to the behaviour when the offender committed the offence which attracted the IPP sentence, indicate that the offender needs to be recalled to protect the public.</p>
answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
grouped question UIN
HL7112 more like this
HL7116 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-04-04T14:01:57.82Zmore like thismore than 2022-04-04T14:01:57.82Z
answering member
4901
label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
tabling member
395
label Biography information for Lord Blunkett more like this
1452639
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-03-21more like thismore than 2022-03-21
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice remove filter
hansard heading Prison Sentences more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what progress the National Probation Service has made towards delivering a strategy to develop skills of all (1) practitioners, and (2) operational line managers, to manage Imprisonment for Public Protection cases since the publication of the Joint IPP Action Plan, published by Her Majesty's Prison and Probation Service and the Parole Board in June 2019. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Blunkett more like this
uin HL7112 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The IPP Action Plan is regularly reviewed to ensure that it is responsive to the needs of those serving IPP sentences, whether in prison andor in the community. During the COVID-19 pandemic, and in accordance with measures mandated in the interests of public health, HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) implemented exceptional delivery models which inevitably had some impact on all operational work. A large number of IPP prisoners have been released each year since the IPP Action Plan first introduced in 2016, and the Plan will be refreshed, reviewed and republished after careful consideration of the forthcoming Justice Select Committee’s Report and recommendations.</p><p> </p><p>There have been four new E-learning modules introduced for the use of probation practitioners which cover different aspects of supporting offenders serving indeterminate sentences; three of the modules cover work with those serving IPP sentences specifically, whilst the fourth is about actions at the point of sentencing for life sentences.</p><p>The three packages cover progression through the sentence, taking into account individual need, the processes during the pre-release phase, and how to manage indeterminate sentenced offenders once they are released into the community.</p><p>These packages, available now, will also form part of the Continuous Professional Development packs currently being created by the Probation Service for operational staff.</p><p> </p><p>We take mental health very seriously and recognise that providing the right interventions at the right time is vital to improve outcomes for people with mental health needs, including IPP offenders.</p><p>HMPPS is mindful that IPP prisoners do not have a definite release date and, on that account, provides each IPP prisoner with a key worker, as well as a qualified probation officer, to explain what they need to do to reduce their risk and to help them access the support services they need.</p><p>Health and justice partners have committed to providing a standard of health care in prisons equivalent to that available in the community. Through the National Partnership Agreement, health and justice partners are working closely to improve support and continuity of care when someone leaves prison. HMPPS continues to work with National Health Service England (NSHE) to develop RECONNECT, a care after custody service which supports vulnerable prison leavers in their transition to community-based health services.</p><p>The power to recall an offender to custody is a vital public protection measure when it comes to supervising any offender on licence. We have no evidence that probation officers are recalling IPP offenders to custody where they do not have compelling reason to do so. The HM Inspectorate of Probation Report – ‘A thematic review of probation recall culture and practice’ – published in 2020, found that the Probation Service is using recall appropriately, to prevent further serious offending and protect the public.</p><p>Probation officers explore other risk management steps to secure compliance and manage risk before requesting a recall. What might appear to be a relatively minor breach of a licence condition might, where the associated behaviour is similar to the behaviour when the offender committed the offence which attracted the IPP sentence, indicate that the offender needs to be recalled to protect the public.</p>
answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
grouped question UIN
HL7111 more like this
HL7116 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-04-04T14:01:57.88Zmore like thismore than 2022-04-04T14:01:57.88Z
answering member
4901
label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
tabling member
395
label Biography information for Lord Blunkett more like this
1452640
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-03-21more like thismore than 2022-03-21
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice remove filter
hansard heading Prison Sentences more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what progress the National Probation Service has made towards freeing capacity to hear more Imprisonment for Public Protection release decision cases since the publication of the Joint IPP Action Plan, published by Her Majesty's Prison and Probation Service and the Parole Board in June 2019. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Blunkett more like this
uin HL7113 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Over the last two years, the Parole Board has adapted its operating model to increase its hearing capacity through the use of technology and via intensive paper reviews which led to a record 9202 oral hearings conducted in 2020/21, 938 more than in 2019/20. In 2020/21 the Parole Board completed a total 1566 oral hearings (reviews and recalls) for prisoners serving IPP sentences. This was a 3% increase from 2019/20.</p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-04-04T10:21:07.087Zmore like thismore than 2022-04-04T10:21:07.087Z
answering member
4901
label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
tabling member
395
label Biography information for Lord Blunkett more like this
1452641
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-03-21more like thismore than 2022-03-21
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice remove filter
hansard heading Parole more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what was the rate of (1) deferral, and (2) adjournments, of cases by the Parole Board broken down by local region in each year since 2017. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Blunkett more like this
uin HL7114 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The Parole Board has confirmed the breakdown of Deferral and Adjournment rates for oral hearings since 2017 in the table below. The Parole Board will publish data for 2021/22 in their 2021/22 Annual Report. The Parole Board reports on national rates and does not produce this data by regions.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Conducted Hearings</p></td><td><p>Completed Oral Hearings</p></td><td><p>Deferred &amp; Adjourned Hearings</p></td><td><p>Deferred Split</p></td><td><p>Adjourned Split</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017-18</p></td><td><p>8137</p></td><td><p>5638</p></td><td><p>2499<br>(*31%)</p></td><td><p>744<br>(*9.1%)</p></td><td><p>1755<br>(*21.5%)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018-19</p></td><td><p>7903</p></td><td><p>5380</p></td><td><p>2523<br>(*32%)</p></td><td><p>488<br>(*6.1%)</p></td><td><p>2035<br>(*25.7%)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2019-20</p></td><td><p>8264</p></td><td><p>5294</p></td><td><p>2970<br>(*36%)</p></td><td><p>271<br>(*3.3%)</p></td><td><p>2699<br>(*32.7%)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2020-21</p></td><td><p>9202</p></td><td><p>6421</p></td><td><p><br>2781<br>(*30%)</p></td><td><p>167<br>(*1.8%)</p></td><td><p>2614<br>(*28.4%)</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>*Percentage of conducted oral hearings</p><p> </p>
answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-04-04T13:43:50.647Zmore like thismore than 2022-04-04T13:43:50.647Z
answering member
4901
label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
tabling member
395
label Biography information for Lord Blunkett more like this
1452642
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-03-21more like thismore than 2022-03-21
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice remove filter
hansard heading Parole more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what plans they have to publish advice given by the Parole Board to Parole Board members to increase their confidence in taking Imprisonment for Public Protection release decisions since June 2019. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Blunkett more like this
uin HL7115 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Since June 2019, the Parole Board issued the following guidance to support their members in making decisions in all type of cases, including Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP):</p><ul><li><a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/843522/Decision_Making_Framework_Public_Document.pdf" target="_blank">The parole board decision making framework (Oct 2019); </a></li><li><a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1013857/Types_of_Cases_Guidance_August_2021_v1.2.pdf" target="_blank">The types of cases guidance (Aug 2021)</a>;</li><li><a href="https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1013141/Member_Case_Assessment__MCA__Guidance_June_2021.pdf" target="_blank">The guidance on member case assessment (Aug 2021); </a>and,</li><li><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/guidance-on-oral-hearings--2" target="_blank">Guidance on oral hearings (Jan 2022)</a>.</li></ul><p> </p><p>These guidelines explain the different types of sentence and cases which Parole Board members may come across. They provide details of the possible Parole Board decision outcomes. Member guidelines are available on the Parole Board’s website: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/parole-board" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/parole-board</a>.</p>
answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-04-04T15:18:45.793Zmore like thismore than 2022-04-04T15:18:45.793Z
answering member
4901
label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
tabling member
395
label Biography information for Lord Blunkett more like this
1452643
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-03-21more like thismore than 2022-03-21
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice remove filter
hansard heading Prison Sentences: Mental Health more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what support is available to (1) Imprisonment for Public Protection prisoners to address the mental health impact of their sentence, and (2) individuals serving an Imprisonment for Public Protection on licence in the community to prevent unnecessary recalls. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Blunkett more like this
uin HL7116 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The IPP Action Plan is regularly reviewed to ensure that it is responsive to the needs of those serving IPP sentences, whether in prison andor in the community. During the COVID-19 pandemic, and in accordance with measures mandated in the interests of public health, HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) implemented exceptional delivery models which inevitably had some impact on all operational work. A large number of IPP prisoners have been released each year since the IPP Action Plan first introduced in 2016, and the Plan will be refreshed, reviewed and republished after careful consideration of the forthcoming Justice Select Committee’s Report and recommendations.</p><p> </p><p>There have been four new E-learning modules introduced for the use of probation practitioners which cover different aspects of supporting offenders serving indeterminate sentences; three of the modules cover work with those serving IPP sentences specifically, whilst the fourth is about actions at the point of sentencing for life sentences.</p><p>The three packages cover progression through the sentence, taking into account individual need, the processes during the pre-release phase, and how to manage indeterminate sentenced offenders once they are released into the community.</p><p>These packages, available now, will also form part of the Continuous Professional Development packs currently being created by the Probation Service for operational staff.</p><p> </p><p>We take mental health very seriously and recognise that providing the right interventions at the right time is vital to improve outcomes for people with mental health needs, including IPP offenders.</p><p>HMPPS is mindful that IPP prisoners do not have a definite release date and, on that account, provides each IPP prisoner with a key worker, as well as a qualified probation officer, to explain what they need to do to reduce their risk and to help them access the support services they need.</p><p>Health and justice partners have committed to providing a standard of health care in prisons equivalent to that available in the community. Through the National Partnership Agreement, health and justice partners are working closely to improve support and continuity of care when someone leaves prison. HMPPS continues to work with National Health Service England (NSHE) to develop RECONNECT, a care after custody service which supports vulnerable prison leavers in their transition to community-based health services.</p><p>The power to recall an offender to custody is a vital public protection measure when it comes to supervising any offender on licence. We have no evidence that probation officers are recalling IPP offenders to custody where they do not have compelling reason to do so. The HM Inspectorate of Probation Report – ‘A thematic review of probation recall culture and practice’ – published in 2020, found that the Probation Service is using recall appropriately, to prevent further serious offending and protect the public.</p><p>Probation officers explore other risk management steps to secure compliance and manage risk before requesting a recall. What might appear to be a relatively minor breach of a licence condition might, where the associated behaviour is similar to the behaviour when the offender committed the offence which attracted the IPP sentence, indicate that the offender needs to be recalled to protect the public.</p>
answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
grouped question UIN
HL7111 more like this
HL7112 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-04-04T14:01:57.96Zmore like thismore than 2022-04-04T14:01:57.96Z
answering member
4901
label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
tabling member
395
label Biography information for Lord Blunkett more like this
1452644
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-03-21more like thismore than 2022-03-21
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice remove filter
hansard heading Prison Sentences more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty's Government what progress they have made in establishing an active case management approach in public protection casework, further to the Joint IPP Action Plan published by Her Majesty's Prison and Probation Service and the Parole Board in June 2019. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Burt of Solihull more like this
uin HL7119 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction true more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The IPP Action Plan is regularly reviewed to ensure that it is responsive to the needs of those serving IPP sentences, whether in prison or in the community. A large number of IPP prisoners have been released each year since the IPP Action Plan was first introduced in 2016, and the Plan will be refreshed, reviewed and republished after careful consideration of the forthcoming Justice Select Committee’s Report and recommendations.</p><p> </p><p>The Public Protection Casework Section in HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) HQ has implemented active case management, which is directed towards ensuring that probation and prison staff comply with directions from Parole Board Panels in a timely fashion.</p><p> </p><p>Best practice ideals, based on an initiative that started in prisons in the East of England Region, were developed and rolled out for use in a number of prisons prior to the pandemic. The roll out was then unavoidably disrupted by the exceptional delivery models which had to be implemented on the grounds of public health. Progress of the best practice ideals will be reviewed as part of the wider action plan following consideration of the Justice Select Committee’s report and recommendations.</p><p> </p><p>Offenders subject to IPP sentences are eligible for electronic monitoring following release on licence, where considered necessary and proportionate by the Parole Board. The additional investment of £183m in the expansion of electronic monitoring will also increase the availability of electronic monitoring for IPP offenders. Those whose risk is linked to alcohol are eligible for alcohol monitoring on licence, which was introduced in Wales in November and will be rolled out to England this summer. IPP releases will also be eligible for a project targeting high-risk domestic abuse perpetrators, where they will have their whereabouts monitored using GPS tags to protect victims, and potential future victims, from further trauma. The project will begin in 2023 and we expect to tag around 3,500 offenders.</p><p> </p><p>HM Prison and Probation Service has developed a dataset and data dashboard, which is shared on a quarterly basis with Probation Regions and Prison Groups to support them in their efforts to monitor and manage their IPP populations, both in prisons and the community. The dashboard is still evolving and kept under review, as we identify new ways to capture additional key management information and present it in such a way as to be the most helpful to the operational line.</p><p> </p><p>The following table shows the number of <del class="ministerial">IPP</del> progression panels <ins class="ministerial">(lifers and IPPs)</ins> that have taken place in each Probation region by year since June 2019*: During the COVID-19 pandemic, and in accordance with measures mandated in the interests of public health, HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) implemented exceptional delivery models which inevitably had some impact on all operational work.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td rowspan="2"><p><strong>Probation Region</strong></p></td><td colspan="5"><p><strong>The number of <del class="ministerial">IPP</del> progression panels held <del class="ministerial">by year</del> <ins class="ministerial">(Lifers and IPPs)</ins><br /></strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>01/06/2019 to 31/12/2019</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2020</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2021</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>01/01/2022 to 22/03/2022</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>East Midlands Region</p></td><td><p>114</p></td><td><p>466</p></td><td><p>241</p></td><td><p>23</p></td><td><p>844</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>East of England</p></td><td><p>224</p></td><td><p>715</p></td><td><p>554</p></td><td><p>107</p></td><td><p>1,600</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Greater Manchester</p></td><td><p>294</p></td><td><p>472</p></td><td><p>291</p></td><td><p>36</p></td><td><p>1,093</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Kent Surrey Sussex Region</p></td><td><p>129</p></td><td><p>529</p></td><td><p>426</p></td><td><p>79</p></td><td><p>1,163</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>London</p></td><td><p>236</p></td><td><p>551</p></td><td><p>629</p></td><td><p>134</p></td><td><p>1,550</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>National Security Division</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">#</del> <ins class="ministerial">*</ins></p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">#</del> <ins class="ministerial">*</ins></p></td><td><p>9</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>North East Region</p></td><td><p>117</p></td><td><p>423</p></td><td><p>196</p></td><td><p>33</p></td><td><p>769</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>North West Region</p></td><td><p>298</p></td><td><p>710</p></td><td><p>447</p></td><td><p>85</p></td><td><p>1,540</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South Central</p></td><td><p>156</p></td><td><p>271</p></td><td><p>328</p></td><td><p>79</p></td><td><p>834</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>South West</p></td><td><p>111</p></td><td><p>469</p></td><td><p>197</p></td><td><p>137</p></td><td><p>914</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wales</p></td><td><p>174</p></td><td><p>197</p></td><td><p>150</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td><p>537</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>West Midlands Region</p></td><td><p>304</p></td><td><p>868</p></td><td><p>522</p></td><td><p>126</p></td><td><p>1,820</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Yorkshire and The Humber</p></td><td><p>170</p></td><td><p>635</p></td><td><p>422</p></td><td><p>72</p></td><td><p>1,299</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Unknown Region</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">#</del> <ins class="ministerial">*</ins></p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p><del class="ministerial">#</del> <ins class="ministerial">*</ins></p></td><td><p>16</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total</strong></p></td><td><p>2,330</p></td><td><p>6,322</p></td><td><p>4,407</p></td><td><p>929</p></td><td><p>13,988</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>*<del class="ministerial">Caveats</del><ins class="ministerial">Notes</ins>:</p><p><ins class="ministerial">1. Panels without a recorded outcome (from the point that an outcome was required to be recorded) were assumed to not have taken place.</ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial">2. Due to probation restructures in 2020 and 2021, a small number of panels could not be assigned to a region. These are recorded as 'Unknown Region'.</ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial">3. <strong>Disclosure control</strong>. An asterisk (*) has been used to suppress values of one or two. This is to prevent the disclosure of individual information. Further disclosure control may be completed where this alone is not sufficient.</ins></p><p><ins class="ministerial">4. <strong>Data sources and quality</strong>. The figures in these tables have been drawn from the Probation Case Management System, National Delius administrative, which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</ins></p><p> </p><p><del class="ministerial">1. # - A value less than 3, or a value suppressed to prevent the disclosure of a value less than 3.</del></p><p><del class="ministerial">2. This data is from the Probation Case Management System, National Delius. While data accuracy has been assured as far as practical, as with any large administrative data source the likelihood of some errors cannot be eliminated.</del></p><p><del class="ministerial">3. Panels without a recorded outcome (from the point that an outcome was required to be recorded) were assumed to not have taken place.</del></p><p><del class="ministerial">4. Due to probation restructures in 2020 and 2021, a small number of panels could not be assigned to a region. These are recorded as 'Unknown Region'.</del></p>
answering member printed Baroness Scott of Bybrook more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-04-04T14:05:40.653Zmore like thismore than 2022-04-04T14:05:40.653Z
question first ministerially corrected
less than 2022-04-27T09:24:17.897Zmore like thismore than 2022-04-27T09:24:17.897Z
answering member
4553
label Biography information for Baroness Scott of Bybrook more like this
previous answer version
62382
answering member printed Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
answering member
4901
label Biography information for Lord Wolfson of Tredegar more like this
tabling member
1567
label Biography information for Baroness Burt of Solihull more like this