Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1200963
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-06-08more like thismore than 2020-06-08
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Home Office: Coronavirus more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text What recent assessment she has made of the implications of the covid-19 outbreak for her Department's priorities. more like this
tabling member constituency Motherwell and Wishaw remove filter
tabling member printed
Marion Fellows more like this
uin 903021 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>My Department continues to deliver on our core priorities of;</p><p>o protecting the public,</p><p>o securing our borders,</p><p>o and reforming our immigration system.</p><p> </p><p>Current rates of staff absence due to Covid-19 do not present immediate risks to delivery of these.</p><p>The Home Office is also an integral part of the cross-Government Covid-19 response. To ensure the department is equipped to respond effectively some staff have been deployed to specific covid related activities.</p><p>We have also provided additional support for victims of domestic abuse who may feel particularly vulnerable at this time and implemented public health measures at the border to prevent a second wave of Coronavirus from imported cases.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Witham more like this
answering member printed Priti Patel more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-08T15:30:50.11Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-08T15:30:50.11Z
answering member
4066
label Biography information for Priti Patel more like this
tabling member
4440
label Biography information for Marion Fellows more like this
1200023
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-06-03more like thismore than 2020-06-03
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Audiobooks: VAT more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, for what reasons audiobooks were not included in the zero-rating VAT on e-publications announced in the Budget 2020; and if he will make a statement. more like this
tabling member constituency Motherwell and Wishaw remove filter
tabling member printed
Marion Fellows more like this
uin 54133 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The extension of the zero rate of VAT has been introduced to provide consistency in approach between certain physical and digital publications in order to support reading and literacy in all its forms. Audiobooks are already taxed consistently at the standard rate in both physical and digital format.</p><p> </p><p>In UK law, a book is deemed to be something that is read or looked at, a definition that does not include audio content in both digital and physical form.</p><p> </p><p>The Government keeps all taxes under review, including VAT.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire more like this
answering member printed Jesse Norman more like this
grouped question UIN 54134 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-08T14:46:16.647Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-08T14:46:16.647Z
answering member
3991
label Biography information for Jesse Norman more like this
tabling member
4440
label Biography information for Marion Fellows more like this
1200024
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-06-03more like thismore than 2020-06-03
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Audiobooks: VAT more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what recent estimate he has made of the potential cost to the Exchequer of removing VAT from audiobooks; and if he will make a statement. more like this
tabling member constituency Motherwell and Wishaw remove filter
tabling member printed
Marion Fellows more like this
uin 54134 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The extension of the zero rate of VAT has been introduced to provide consistency in approach between certain physical and digital publications in order to support reading and literacy in all its forms. Audiobooks are already taxed consistently at the standard rate in both physical and digital format.</p><p> </p><p>In UK law, a book is deemed to be something that is read or looked at, a definition that does not include audio content in both digital and physical form.</p><p> </p><p>The Government keeps all taxes under review, including VAT.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire more like this
answering member printed Jesse Norman more like this
grouped question UIN 54133 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-08T14:46:16.693Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-08T14:46:16.693Z
answering member
3991
label Biography information for Jesse Norman more like this
tabling member
4440
label Biography information for Marion Fellows more like this
1199746
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-06-02more like thismore than 2020-06-02
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Employment and Support Allowance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what recent assessment she has made of the potential merits of increasing the rate of employment support allowance in line with universal credit. more like this
tabling member constituency Motherwell and Wishaw remove filter
tabling member printed
Marion Fellows more like this
uin 53477 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Employment and Support Allowance, Jobseeker’s Allowance or Income Support were increased by 1.7% in April 2020following the Government’s announcement to end the benefit freeze. .</p><p> </p><p>It has always been the case that claimants on legacy benefits can make a claim for UC if they believe that they will be better off. There are special arrangements for those in receipt of the Severe Disability Premium, who will be able to make a new claim to Universal Credit from January 2021.</p><p> </p><p>Claimants should check their eligibility before applying to Universal Credit as legacy benefits will end when they submit their claim and they will not be able to return to them in the future. For this reason, prospective claimants are signposted to independent benefits calculators on GOV.UK. Neither DWP nor HMRC can advise individual claimants whether they would be better off moving to UC or remaining on legacy benefits.</p><p> </p><p>From 22 July 2020, a two-week run on of Income Support, Employment and Support Allowance (IR) and Jobseeker’s Allowance (IB) will be available for all claimants whose claim to UC ends entitlement to these benefits to provide additional support for claimants moving to UC.</p>
answering member constituency North Swindon more like this
answering member printed Justin Tomlinson more like this
grouped question UIN 54163 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-08T15:38:55.963Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-08T15:38:55.963Z
answering member
4105
label Biography information for Justin Tomlinson more like this
tabling member
4440
label Biography information for Marion Fellows more like this
1199747
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-06-02more like thismore than 2020-06-02
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Social Security Benefits: Disability more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of removing conditionality and sanctioning for disabled claimants. more like this
tabling member constituency Motherwell and Wishaw remove filter
tabling member printed
Marion Fellows more like this
uin 53478 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>We continually evaluate the evidence and the feedback from our claimants and make improvements to guidance and policy, no specific assessment has been made on the potential merits of removing conditionality and sanctioning for disabled claimants.</p><p> </p><p>We engage at a personal and individual level with all of our claimants and are committed to tailoring support for specific individual needs, including agreeing realistic and structured steps to encourage claimants into or towards the labour market. These conditionality requirements are regularly reviewed to ensure that they remain appropriate for the claimant.</p><p> </p><p>When considering whether a sanction is appropriate, a Decision Maker will take all the claimant’s individual circumstances, including any health conditions or disabilities and any evidence of good reason, into account before deciding whether a sanction is warranted, which is always a last resort.</p> more like this
answering member constituency North Swindon more like this
answering member printed Justin Tomlinson more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-08T16:08:19.22Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-08T16:08:19.22Z
answering member
4105
label Biography information for Justin Tomlinson more like this
tabling member
4440
label Biography information for Marion Fellows more like this
1199748
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-06-02more like thismore than 2020-06-02
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Statutory Sick Pay more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment she has made of the potential merits of permanently removing waiting days for statutory sick pay for all illnesses and impairments. more like this
tabling member constituency Motherwell and Wishaw remove filter
tabling member printed
Marion Fellows more like this
uin 53479 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>As part of the Government’s strategy to support people affected by coronavirus (COVID 19), my department has made a number of limited changes to the operation of Statutory Sick Pay (SSP). In doing so, we have balanced the need to provide additional support for employees who are sick, self-isolating or shielding due to coronavirus and are unable to work as a result, with considerations about the burden on employers.</p><p> </p><p>Temporarily suspending waiting days ensures SSP is payable from day one of a period of absence, rather than day four, to encourage people to follow government advice to prevent the spread of coronavirus.</p><p> </p><p>We consulted last year on a range of measures, including reform of SSP, designed to reduce ill-health related job loss. We will bring forward proposals on next steps later this year.</p><p> </p><p>SSP is just one part of the government’s safety net. Where an employee’s income is reduced while off sick and they require further financial support they may be able to claim Universal Credit and new style Employment and Support Allowance, depending on individual circumstances.</p>
answering member constituency North Swindon more like this
answering member printed Justin Tomlinson more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-08T12:33:23.267Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-08T12:33:23.267Z
answering member
4105
label Biography information for Justin Tomlinson more like this
tabling member
4440
label Biography information for Marion Fellows more like this
1197438
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-05-20more like thismore than 2020-05-20
answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office more like this
answering dept id 16 more like this
answering dept short name Foreign and Commonwealth Office more like this
answering dept sort name Foreign and Commonwealth Office more like this
hansard heading Foreign and Commonwealth Office: Correspondence more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, what the average length of time was for Ministers of his Department to respond to correspondence from hon. Members in each month in the last two years. more like this
tabling member constituency Motherwell and Wishaw remove filter
tabling member printed
Marion Fellows more like this
uin 49731 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>In line with Cabinet Office guidance, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office has a target of responding within 20 working days where a response is required.</p><p>As you will understand, Foreign and Commonwealth Office is currently dealing with unprecedented volumes of correspondence due to COVID-19. The Foreign and Commonwealth Office ensures that urgent cases raised by hon. Members are prioritised, and is taking steps to provide substantive responses in as short a time as possible.</p><p>All correspondence received from hon. Members is being reviewed and will be responded to as soon as possible.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Selby and Ainsty more like this
answering member printed Nigel Adams more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-08T16:36:06.603Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-08T16:36:06.603Z
answering member
4057
label Biography information for Nigel Adams more like this
tabling member
4440
label Biography information for Marion Fellows more like this
1197442
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-05-20more like thismore than 2020-05-20
answering body
Department for Education more like this
answering dept id 60 more like this
answering dept short name Education more like this
answering dept sort name Education more like this
hansard heading Department for Education: Correspondence more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what the average length of time was for Ministers of his Department to respond to correspondence from hon. Members in each month in the last two years. more like this
tabling member constituency Motherwell and Wishaw remove filter
tabling member printed
Marion Fellows more like this
uin 49734 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The Department has a target of responding within 18 working days where a response is required. In 2019 the Department responded to 94% of correspondence from hon. Members within 18 working days, and 89% in 2018. A breakdown of the data by month is available in the attached table.</p><p>As you will understand, the Department is currently dealing with unprecedented volumes of correspondence due to COVID-19. The Department ensures that urgent cases raised by hon. Members are prioritised wherever possible, and is taking steps to provide substantive responses in as short a time as possible.</p><p>All correspondence received from hon. Members is being reviewed and will be responded to as soon as possible.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Bognor Regis and Littlehampton more like this
answering member printed Nick Gibb more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-08T11:09:30.663Zmore like thisremove minimum value filter
answering member
111
label Biography information for Nick Gibb more like this
attachment
1
file name 49734_Correspondence_timeliness_statistics.xls more like this
title 49734 Table more like this
tabling member
4440
label Biography information for Marion Fellows more like this
1197444
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-05-20more like thismore than 2020-05-20
answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
answering dept id 201 more like this
answering dept short name Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
answering dept sort name Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy more like this
hansard heading Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy: Correspondence more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what the average length of time was for Ministers of his Department to respond to correspondence from hon. Members in each month in the last two years. more like this
tabling member constituency Motherwell and Wishaw remove filter
tabling member printed
Marion Fellows more like this
uin 49736 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>In line with Cabinet Office guidance, the Department aims to respond to all correspondence within 15 working days, where a response is required.</p><p> </p><p>The average response times for each month in the last two years is set out below. The data is correct as of 27 May and relates to correspondence for which a reply has been issued.</p><p> </p><table><thead><tr><td><p><strong>Month Due</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Days to Complete </strong></p></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><p>Apr-18</p></td><td><p>14</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>May-18</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jun-18</p></td><td><p>11</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jul-18</p></td><td><p>14</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Aug-18</p></td><td><p>17</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sep-18</p></td><td><p>16</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Oct-18</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Nov-18</p></td><td><p>21</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dec-18</p></td><td><p>17</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan-19</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Feb-19</p></td><td><p>11</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mar-19</p></td><td><p>12</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Apr-19</p></td><td><p>11</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>May-19</p></td><td><p>13</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jun-19</p></td><td><p>14</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jul-19</p></td><td><p>13</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Aug-19</p></td><td><p>15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sep-19</p></td><td><p>11</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Oct-19</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Nov-19</p></td><td><p>9</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dec-19</p></td><td><p>16</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan-20</p></td><td><p>9</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Feb-20</p></td><td><p>11</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mar-20</p></td><td><p>13</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Apr-20</p></td><td><p>11</p></td></tr></tbody></table>
answering member constituency Stratford-on-Avon more like this
answering member printed Nadhim Zahawi more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-08T13:29:18.013Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-08T13:29:18.013Z
answering member
4113
label Biography information for Nadhim Zahawi more like this
tabling member
4440
label Biography information for Marion Fellows more like this
1197450
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-05-20more like thismore than 2020-05-20
answering body
Department for Transport more like this
answering dept id 27 more like this
answering dept short name Transport more like this
answering dept sort name Transport more like this
hansard heading Department for Transport: Correspondence more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what the average length of time was for Ministers of his Department to respond to correspondence from hon. Members in each month in the last two years. more like this
tabling member constituency Motherwell and Wishaw remove filter
tabling member printed
Marion Fellows more like this
uin 49741 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>In line with Cabinet Office guidance, the Department for Transport has a target of responding within 20 working days where a response is required. In September 2019 the Department adopted its own internal target of 7 Working days.</p><p> </p><p>As you will understand, the Department for Transport is currently dealing with unprecedented volumes of correspondence due to COVID-19. The Department ensures that urgent cases raised by hon. Members are prioritised, and is taking steps to provide substantive responses in as short a time as possible.</p><p>All correspondence received from hon. Members is being reviewed and will be responded to as soon as possible.</p><p> </p><p>A table showing the average number of days taken to respond to correspondence from Hon. Members is below. Please note, in some cases Ministers had not been appointed to the Department at the time the correspondence was received, however they signed the final reply, leading to some delay due to the handover from previous ministers.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="8"><p><strong><em>Average Number of Days to Respond - All Ministers by Month</em></strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jan-18</p></td><td><p>17.32</p></td><td><p>Jan-19</p></td><td><p>32.06</p></td><td><p>Jan-20</p></td><td><p>10.33</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Feb-18</p></td><td><p>17.50</p></td><td><p>Feb-19</p></td><td><p>14.66</p></td><td><p>Feb-20</p></td><td><p>8.77</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mar-18</p></td><td><p>15.66</p></td><td><p>Mar-19</p></td><td><p>31.23</p></td><td><p>Mar-20</p></td><td><p>13.15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Apr-18</p></td><td><p>18.99</p></td><td><p>Apr-19</p></td><td><p>31.70</p></td><td><p>Apr-20</p></td><td><p>8.42</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>May-18</p></td><td><p>20.31</p></td><td><p>May-19</p></td><td><p>30.27</p></td><td><p>May-20</p></td><td><p>4.20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jun-18</p></td><td><p>20.48</p></td><td><p>Jun-19</p></td><td><p>24.80</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Jul-18</p></td><td><p>21.55</p></td><td><p>Jul-19</p></td><td><p>15.22</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Aug-18</p></td><td><p>30.81</p></td><td><p>Aug-19</p></td><td><p>13.07</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Sep-18</p></td><td><p>52.62</p></td><td><p>Sep-19</p></td><td><p>7.27</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Oct-18</p></td><td><p>49.76</p></td><td><p>Oct-19</p></td><td><p>6.63</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Nov-18</p></td><td><p>38.60</p></td><td><p>Nov-19</p></td><td><p>6.53</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dec-18</p></td><td><p>36.34</p></td><td><p>Dec-19</p></td><td><p>10.10</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Daventry more like this
answering member printed Chris Heaton-Harris more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-08T15:35:50.99Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-08T15:35:50.99Z
answering member
3977
label Biography information for Chris Heaton-Harris more like this
tabling member
4440
label Biography information for Marion Fellows more like this