Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1060007
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-02-13more like thismore than 2019-02-13
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Female Genital Mutilation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many cases of alleged female genital mutilation have been investigated in each of the last five years. more like this
tabling member constituency Cardiff Central more like this
tabling member printed
Jo Stevens more like this
uin 220275 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) is a crime and it is child abuse. The Government is clear that we will not tolerate a practice that can cause extreme and lifelong suffering to women and girls.</p><p>The Home Office does not collate information on investigations, arrests and prosecutions centrally. Information on FGM referrals from the police to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) from 2010-18 is available in the CPS’s Violence Against Women and Girls Report, available at <a href="https://www.cps.gov.uk/publication/violence-against-women-and-girls" target="_blank">https://www.cps.gov.uk/publication/violence-against-women-and-girls</a></p><p>The Serious Crime Act 2015 introduced a number of measures to help overcome the barriers to prosecution, including: a new mandatory reporting duty for known cases of FGM in under-18s; extension of extra-territorial jurisdiction over FGM offences committed abroad; lifelong anonymity for victims; FGM Protection Orders (FGMPOs); and a new offence of failure to protect a girl from the risk of FGM. Between their introduction and 30 September 2018, 296 FGMPOs were made to protect victims and those at risk.</p>
answering member constituency Louth and Horncastle more like this
answering member printed Victoria Atkins more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-02-18T16:00:53.4Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-18T16:00:53.4Z
answering member
4399
label Biography information for Victoria Atkins more like this
tabling member
4425
label Biography information for Jo Stevens more like this
1060566
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-02-13more like thismore than 2019-02-13
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Actors: EU Countries more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, for what reasons UK actors auditioning to work in EU countries are being asked by theatre companies and arts organisations to provide current EU passports; and if he will make a statement. more like this
tabling member constituency Hove more like this
tabling member printed
Peter Kyle more like this
uin 220981 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Pre-employment checks by theatre companies and organisations employing UK nationals to work in other EU countries are a matter for those organisations. Until the UK leaves the EU, UK nationals continue to have the same rights to live and work in other EU member states as they do now.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Romsey and Southampton North more like this
answering member printed Caroline Nokes more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-02-18T15:39:32.133Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-18T15:39:32.133Z
answering member
4048
label Biography information for Caroline Nokes more like this
tabling member
4505
label Biography information for Peter Kyle more like this
1060567
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-02-13more like thismore than 2019-02-13
answering body
Department for Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept id 29 more like this
answering dept short name Work and Pensions more like this
answering dept sort name Work and Pensions more like this
hansard heading Personal Independence Payment: Blackpool more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment she has made of the effect of waiting times for personal independence payment appeals on the wellbeing of claimants in Blackpool. more like this
tabling member constituency Blackpool South more like this
tabling member printed
Gordon Marsden more like this
uin 220795 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) and DWP are very sensitive to the needs of people who may be affected by waiting times for tribunal hearings. Tribunal staff and judicial office-holders are trained accordingly, with HMCTS’ reasonable adjustments policy and practice applied where appropriate. Guidance on the policy is published on GOV.UK. If an expedited hearing is sought, or where the tribunal identifies a case which might benefit from an expedited hearing, a judge or caseworker will make a decision on the issue, taking all the circumstances of the case into account.</p><p> </p><p>HMCTS is appointing additional judges and panel members and generally taking forward initiatives with the potential to increase the capacity and performance of the tribunal, including listing more Personal Independence Payment appeals into each session. In the North West specifically, closer case management of cases ready to list has allowed many cases to be dealt with in advance of a hearing.</p><p> </p><p>Furthermore, DWP is reviewing its decision making and Mandatory Reconsideration processes with a view to reducing the number of appeals that need to be made. It is also working closely with HMCTS as it develops a new digital system which will enable speedier processing of appeals.</p><p> </p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth more like this
answering member printed Sarah Newton more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-02-18T15:59:27.847Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-18T15:59:27.847Z
answering member
4071
label Biography information for Sarah Newton more like this
tabling member
465
label Biography information for Gordon Marsden more like this
1060570
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-02-13more like thismore than 2019-02-13
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Armed Forces Compensation Scheme: Age more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, for what reasons the age limit for priority cases for access to the Veterans UK Armed Forces Compensation Scheme has been set at 90 years of age. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow North more like this
tabling member printed
Patrick Grady more like this
uin 220940 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>There is no age-based priority afforded to claimants under the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme. This is because the rules of the Scheme normally require a claim to be submitted within seven years of an illness or injury attributable to Service occurring.</p><p>As there are no time limitations attached to when a claim can be made under the War Pension Scheme, priority is afforded to claimants aged 90 or over in recognition of their advanced age, thereby allowing compensation claims to be completed as quickly as possible.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
answering member printed Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
grouped question UIN 220941 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-02-18T16:57:09.337Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-18T16:57:09.337Z
answering member
1487
label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
tabling member
4432
label Biography information for Patrick Grady more like this
1060571
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-02-13more like thismore than 2019-02-13
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Armed Forces Compensation Scheme: Age more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of lowering the age limit for priority cases for the Veterans UK Armed Forces Compensation Scheme from 90 years of age. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow North more like this
tabling member printed
Patrick Grady more like this
uin 220941 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>There is no age-based priority afforded to claimants under the Armed Forces Compensation Scheme. This is because the rules of the Scheme normally require a claim to be submitted within seven years of an illness or injury attributable to Service occurring.</p><p>As there are no time limitations attached to when a claim can be made under the War Pension Scheme, priority is afforded to claimants aged 90 or over in recognition of their advanced age, thereby allowing compensation claims to be completed as quickly as possible.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
answering member printed Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
grouped question UIN 220940 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-02-18T16:57:09.367Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-18T16:57:09.367Z
answering member
1487
label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
tabling member
4432
label Biography information for Patrick Grady more like this
1060576
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-02-13more like thismore than 2019-02-13
answering body
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government more like this
answering dept id 7 more like this
answering dept short name Housing, Communities and Local Government more like this
answering dept sort name Housing, Communities and Local Government more like this
hansard heading Buildings: Insulation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Housing, Communities and Local Government, pursuant the Answer of 11 February 2019 to Question 217589 on Buildings: Insulation, if he could clarify the legal effect of the Building Research Establishment's methodology in relation to the use of cladding materials on existing buildings. more like this
tabling member constituency Croydon North more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Steve Reed more like this
uin 220911 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The methodology establishes the focus and the methods of the research. The Department will consider in the light of the findings of the research, and with the advice of the Independent Expert Panel, whether any further action is necessary.</p> more like this
answering member constituency North West Hampshire more like this
answering member printed Kit Malthouse more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-02-18T17:28:54.167Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-18T17:28:54.167Z
answering member
4495
label Biography information for Kit Malthouse more like this
tabling member
4268
label Biography information for Steve Reed more like this
1060577
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-02-13more like thismore than 2019-02-13
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Revenue and Customs: ICT more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many citizens have registered a voice recognition password to access HMRC services; and what legal provisions apply to the collation of that voice recognition data by HMRC. more like this
tabling member constituency Bristol North West more like this
tabling member printed
Darren Jones more like this
uin 221004 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>7,227,106 customers have registered a voice recognition password to access HMRC services.</p><p> </p><p>HMRC currently relies on the legal basis of consent to collect and process voice data from individuals under Article 6(1)(a) of the GDPR. The legal basis for most processing of personal data in HMRC is Article 6(1)(e) and section 8 DPA 2018, namely “public task”. However, HMRC does not rely on the “public task” legal basis for Voice ID at present as HMRC allows the customer to decide whether they want to use Voice ID for convenience and it is only one of 3 methods HMRC uses to verify the identity of customers on the phone.</p><p> </p><p>As biometric data is special category data, one of the additional conditions in Article 9 of GDPR also needs to be met in order for HMRC to process this data. Given consent is the legal basis for processing, HMRC relies on the Article 9 (2)(a) condition of explicit consent for the processing. HMRC allows the customer to choose to opt in to use the service for convenience and verification by other means remains possible.</p><p> </p><p>HMRC obtains explicit consent from customers and clearly informs them about how they can withdraw their consent.</p>
answering member constituency Central Devon more like this
answering member printed Mel Stride more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-02-18T17:17:04.19Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-18T17:17:04.19Z
answering member
3935
label Biography information for Mel Stride more like this
tabling member
4621
label Biography information for Darren Jones more like this
1060579
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-02-13more like thismore than 2019-02-13
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Offences against Children: Compensation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what estimate his Department has made of the number of successful child sexual abuse prosecutions that resulted in a criminal compensation order in (a) 2017 and (b) 2018. more like this
tabling member constituency Burton more like this
tabling member printed
Andrew Griffiths more like this
uin 220844 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The number of prosecutions, convictions, sentences, compensation orders and average compensation amount for child sex abuse offences in 2017 can be viewed in the table attached.</p><p> </p><p>Court statistics on prosecutions and convictions for 2018 will be published in May 2019.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
grouped question UIN 220845 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-02-18T17:20:45.377Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-18T17:20:45.377Z
answering member
4517
label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
attachment
1
file name Copy of Copy of PQ220844 220845 table1.xlsx more like this
title Table more like this
tabling member
3936
label Biography information for Andrew Griffiths more like this
1060580
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-02-13more like thismore than 2019-02-13
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Offences against Children: Compensation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the average compensation award was for successful child sexual abuse prosecutions which resulted in a criminal compensation order in (a) 2017 and (b) 2018. more like this
tabling member constituency Burton more like this
tabling member printed
Andrew Griffiths more like this
uin 220845 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The number of prosecutions, convictions, sentences, compensation orders and average compensation amount for child sex abuse offences in 2017 can be viewed in the table attached.</p><p> </p><p>Court statistics on prosecutions and convictions for 2018 will be published in May 2019.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency South East Cambridgeshire more like this
answering member printed Lucy Frazer more like this
grouped question UIN 220844 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-02-18T17:20:45.423Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-18T17:20:45.423Z
answering member
4517
label Biography information for Lucy Frazer more like this
attachment
1
file name Copy of Copy of PQ220844 220845 table1.xlsx more like this
title Table more like this
tabling member
3936
label Biography information for Andrew Griffiths more like this
1060592
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-02-13more like thismore than 2019-02-13
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading NHS: Drugs more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many weeks’ worth of medicines the Government has asked pharmaceutical companies to stockpile as part of preparations for the UK leaving the EU without a deal; and how his Department decided on that period of duration. more like this
tabling member constituency Enfield, Southgate more like this
tabling member printed
Bambos Charalambous more like this
uin 220998 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>We understand that breast cancer drugs are vitally important to many people in this country. Our ‘no deal’ European Union exit contingency plans include sensible mitigations for medicines that come to the United Kingdom from or via the EU/European Economic Area (EEA), to ensure that the supply of breast cancer drugs and other essential medicines to patients is not disrupted.</p><p> </p><p>In August 2018, the Department wrote to all pharmaceutical companies that supply prescription-only and pharmacy medicines to the UK that come from or via the EU/EEA asking them to ensure a minimum of six weeks additional supply in the UK, over and above existing business-as-usual buffer stocks, by 29 March 2019 in a ‘no deal’ scenario. The duration of the stockpiling requirement was based on the Government’s reasonable worst-case scenario border disruption planning assumptions.</p><p> </p><p>We also recognise that certain medicines with short shelf lives, including medical radioisotopes, cannot be reasonably stockpiled. Where these medicines are imported from the EU or EEA, we have asked that suppliers ensure in advance plans to air freight these medicines from the EU in the event of the no deal exit.</p><p> </p><p>The Department is unable to discuss specific medicines because to we have committed to treating all information received confidentially, securely and to using it only for the purposes of the Department’s programme, in order to reassure participating companies. This means not introducing information about a specific company, medicine, or a supply route into the public domain or to a third party.</p>
answering member constituency Wimbledon more like this
answering member printed Stephen Hammond more like this
grouped question UIN 221000 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-02-18T15:19:26.903Zmore like thismore than 2019-02-18T15:19:26.903Z
answering member
1585
label Biography information for Stephen Hammond more like this
tabling member
4610
label Biography information for Bambos Charalambous more like this