Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1010186
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-11-19more like thismore than 2018-11-19
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Fees and Charges more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to his Department’s consultation entitled NICE recommendations: charging and appeal panels which closed on 14 September 2018, what assessment his Department has made of the potential effect on the sustainability of the smallest businesses of (a) charging for NICE appraisals and (b) charging for NICE appraisals at a discounted rate. more like this
tabling member constituency Sefton Central remove filter
tabling member printed
Bill Esterson more like this
uin 192827 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The Government recently consulted on draft amendments to regulations that would enable the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) to charge companies for the cost of developing technology appraisal and highly specialised technology evaluation recommendations relating to their products and to allow NICE to recruit appeal panel members representing the National Health Service from the devolved administrations.</p><p> </p><p>The consultation included a draft Impact Assessment and sought views on allowing NICE to charge small companies less and permit small companies to pay in instalments. The charging model in the consultation document proposed a 25% discount for small companies. The Government is currently analysing the responses and will publish its response in due course.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Winchester more like this
answering member printed Steve Brine more like this
grouped question UIN 192828 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-11-22T15:08:39.663Zmore like thismore than 2018-11-22T15:08:39.663Z
answering member
4067
label Biography information for Steve Brine more like this
tabling member
4061
label Biography information for Bill Esterson more like this
1010187
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-11-19more like thismore than 2018-11-19
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Fees and Charges more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to his Department’s consultation entitled NICE recommendations: charging and appeal panels which closed on 14 September 2018, what discussions his Department has had with NICE on exempting the smallest companies from the proposed appraisal charges. more like this
tabling member constituency Sefton Central remove filter
tabling member printed
Bill Esterson more like this
uin 192828 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The Government recently consulted on draft amendments to regulations that would enable the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) to charge companies for the cost of developing technology appraisal and highly specialised technology evaluation recommendations relating to their products and to allow NICE to recruit appeal panel members representing the National Health Service from the devolved administrations.</p><p> </p><p>The consultation included a draft Impact Assessment and sought views on allowing NICE to charge small companies less and permit small companies to pay in instalments. The charging model in the consultation document proposed a 25% discount for small companies. The Government is currently analysing the responses and will publish its response in due course.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Winchester more like this
answering member printed Steve Brine more like this
grouped question UIN 192827 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-11-22T15:08:39.71Zmore like thismore than 2018-11-22T15:08:39.71Z
answering member
4067
label Biography information for Steve Brine more like this
tabling member
4061
label Biography information for Bill Esterson more like this
1010188
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-11-19more like thismore than 2018-11-19
answering body
Department of Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health and Social Care more like this
answering dept sort name Health and Social Care more like this
hansard heading SecurMed: Fees and Charges more like this
house id 1 remove filter
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, with reference to the European Medicines Verification Organisation’s report, NMVO’s Fee Models Status, published on 21 August 2018, what discussions his Department has had with the UK's National Medicines Verification Organisation on reducing the entrance fees for small companies in line with those of other European countries. more like this
tabling member constituency Sefton Central remove filter
tabling member printed
Bill Esterson more like this
uin 192829 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>SecurMed, the not-for-profit company set up by stakeholders in the United Kingdom medicines supply chain, is responsible for setting the fee model and level of fees as the UK’s National Medicines Verification Organisation (NMVO). In their supervisory capacity, the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) and the Department’s aim is to ensure that SecurMed is complying with the regulation in a fair and proportionate way. As part of that role, the MHRA and the Department have been involved in discussions with SecurMed to challenge and seek to influence the pricing model to ensure that the UK’s fee structure is fair and proportionate.</p><p> </p><p>The European Commission has confirmed that the fee model being used by SecurMed is in line with the majority of other member states NMVO’s across the European Union. It is based on the number of users and cost per connection where larger organisations, which are more likely to have multiple marketing authorisations, pay more. An annual fee waiver scheme exists for micro Marketing Authorisation Holders which is designed to support start-ups and help ensure there is not a barrier to market entry.</p>
answering member constituency Thurrock more like this
answering member printed Jackie Doyle-Price more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-11-22T17:48:40.693Zmore like thismore than 2018-11-22T17:48:40.693Z
answering member
4065
label Biography information for Dame Jackie Doyle-Price more like this
tabling member
4061
label Biography information for Bill Esterson more like this