Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

470363
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-03-14more like thismore than 2016-03-14
answering body
HM Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name CaTreasury more like this
hansard heading Alcoholic Drinks: Excise Duties more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what the reasons are for the difference between the duty imposed on cider with alcohol content of 7.5 per cent and beer with a similar alcohol content. more like this
tabling member constituency Enfield, Southgate more like this
tabling member printed
Mr David Burrowes more like this
uin 30978 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>There are higher duty rates on both beer and cider above 7.5 per cent alcohol by volume compared to standard strength beers and ciders. This is to encourage the production and consumption of lower strength products.</p><p> </p><p>The Chancellor keeps all duty rates under review as part of the Budget process.</p> more like this
answering member constituency East Hampshire more like this
answering member printed Damian Hinds more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-03-17T17:54:31.537Zmore like thismore than 2016-03-17T17:54:31.537Z
answering member
3969
label Biography information for Damian Hinds more like this
tabling member
1518
label Biography information for Mr David Burrowes more like this
470364
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-03-14more like thismore than 2016-03-14
answering body
HM Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name CaTreasury more like this
hansard heading Taxation: Domicil more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answer of 3 March 2016 to Question 29027, how many people currently have non-domicile tax status. more like this
tabling member constituency Leicester South more like this
tabling member printed
Jonathan Ashworth more like this
uin 30975 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>For the 2013-14 tax year (the latest tax year for which information is available), there were 118,000 non-domiciled individuals who completed a Self-Assessment return (rounded to the nearest 100).</p> more like this
answering member constituency South West Hertfordshire more like this
answering member printed Mr David Gauke more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-03-17T17:30:42.21Zmore like thismore than 2016-03-17T17:30:42.21Z
answering member
1529
label Biography information for Mr David Gauke more like this
tabling member
4244
label Biography information for Jonathan Ashworth more like this
470365
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-03-14more like thismore than 2016-03-14
answering body
HM Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name CaTreasury more like this
hansard heading Employee Ownership more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment he has made of the potential effect on employee ownership schemes of the decision by HM Revenue and Customs to withdraw its valuation check service; and if he will make a statement. more like this
tabling member constituency Harrow West more like this
tabling member printed
Gareth Thomas more like this
uin 31012 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>It is not anticipated that HM Revenue and Customs’ (HMRC) withdrawal of some valuation services will impact the take up of employee ownership schemes.</p><p> </p><p>HMRC has announced the withdrawal of income tax and PAYE post-transaction valuation checks, but has not withdrawn those valuation services that are most relevant to employee ownership schemes. These consist of:</p><p> </p><ul><li><p>Enterprise Management Incentives (EMI),</p></li><li><p>Company Share Option Plans (CSOP),</p></li><li><p>Save As You Earn share option schemes (SAYE),</p></li><li><p>Share Incentive Plans (SIP) and</p></li><li><p>Employee Shareholder Status (ESS).</p><p> </p><p>HMRC has, however, announced a review of the valuation services for those schemes and is consulting interested parties. Most people submit acceptable valuations in respect of these schemes, and HMRC is therefore considering whether the valuation service offered continues to be needed.</p><p> </p></li></ul> more like this
answering member constituency South West Hertfordshire more like this
answering member printed Mr David Gauke more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-03-17T17:28:51.393Zmore like thismore than 2016-03-17T17:28:51.393Z
answering member
1529
label Biography information for Mr David Gauke more like this
tabling member
177
label Biography information for Gareth Thomas more like this
470417
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-03-14more like thismore than 2016-03-14
answering body
Department for Education more like this
answering dept id 60 more like this
answering dept short name Education more like this
answering dept sort name Education more like this
hansard heading Special Educational Needs more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education, what plans she has to evaluate the effect of the introduction of education, health and care plans. more like this
tabling member constituency East Ham more like this
tabling member printed
Stephen Timms more like this
uin 30971 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The department will draw on evidence from a wide range of sources to determine whether the Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) provisions of the Children and Families Act have improved outcomes for children with SEND.</p><p> </p><p>The department published details in March 2015 of our intention to use a combination of local accountability measures, data and analysis and independent inspection to evaluate how the SEND system is performing, which parts are working well and whether outcomes are improving for children and young people. The publication can be found here: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/416347/Accountability_Publication.pdf" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/416347/Accountability_Publication.pdf</a></p><p> </p><p>In May, Ofsted and CQC will begin inspecting local area effectiveness in meeting their responsibilities towards children and young people who are disabled and/or have special educational needs. Inspections will include education, health and care plans.</p><p> </p><p>We will draw on a wide range of statistics on pupils with SEND, including information on educational attainment, absence and exclusions and research into families and young people’s experience of the new system. Statistics on pupils with SEND can be found here: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/statistics-special-educational-needs-sen" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/statistics-special-educational-needs-sen</a></p>
answering member constituency Crewe and Nantwich more like this
answering member printed Edward Timpson more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-03-17T17:58:06.923Zmore like thismore than 2016-03-17T17:58:06.923Z
answering member
1605
label Biography information for Edward Timpson more like this
tabling member
163
label Biography information for Sir Stephen Timms more like this
470504
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-03-14more like thismore than 2016-03-14
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Counter-terrorism more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many referrals were received by the Counter-Terrorism Internet Referral Unit in each of the last five years; how many of those referrals were investigated by that unit in full; how many of those investigations led to a recommendation being made for web content to be removed; and on how many occasions web content was removed following such a recommendation. more like this
tabling member constituency Islington South and Finsbury more like this
tabling member printed
Emily Thornberry more like this
uin 30893 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The Counter-Terrorism Internet Referral Unit (CTIRU) receive referrals from a number of sources including the public and law enforcement partners. The unit also self-generates referrals.</p><p>All referrals are assessed by CTIRU against UK terrorism legislation (Terrorism Act 2000 and 2006). Those that breach this legislation are referred to industry for removal. If industry agrees that it breaches their terms and conditions, they remove it voluntarily.</p><p>Referrals made to industry by CTIRU have led to over 150,000 pieces of terrorist-related material being removed to date from various online platforms. Overall, removals at the request of CTIRU have increased from around 60 items a month in 2010, when CTIRU was first established, to over 4000 a month in 2015.</p><p>For reasons of national security we do not publically disclose the detailed allocation of funding for counter terrorism by capability.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South Holland and The Deepings more like this
answering member printed Mr John Hayes more like this
grouped question UIN 30894 more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-03-17T17:56:43.26Zmore like thismore than 2016-03-17T17:56:43.26Z
answering member
350
label Biography information for Sir John Hayes more like this
previous answer version
51921
answering member constituency South Holland and The Deepings more like this
answering member printed Mr John Hayes more like this
answering member
350
label Biography information for Sir John Hayes more like this
tabling member
1536
label Biography information for Emily Thornberry more like this
470506
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-03-14more like thismore than 2016-03-14
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Counter-terrorism more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what the total (a) budget and (b) full-time equivalent workforce was of the Counter-Terrorism Internet Referral Unit in each of the last five years. more like this
tabling member constituency Islington South and Finsbury more like this
tabling member printed
Emily Thornberry more like this
uin 30894 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The Counter-Terrorism Internet Referral Unit (CTIRU) receive referrals from a number of sources including the public and law enforcement partners. The unit also self-generates referrals.</p><p>All referrals are assessed by CTIRU against UK terrorism legislation (Terrorism Act 2000 and 2006). Those that breach this legislation are referred to industry for removal. If industry agrees that it breaches their terms and conditions, they remove it voluntarily.</p><p>Referrals made to industry by CTIRU have led to over 150,000 pieces of terrorist-related material being removed to date from various online platforms. Overall, removals at the request of CTIRU have increased from around 60 items a month in 2010, when CTIRU was first established, to over 4000 a month in 2015.</p><p>For reasons of national security we do not publically disclose the detailed allocation of funding for counter terrorism by capability.</p> more like this
answering member constituency South Holland and The Deepings more like this
answering member printed Mr John Hayes more like this
grouped question UIN 30893 more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-03-17T17:56:43.323Zmore like thismore than 2016-03-17T17:56:43.323Z
answering member
350
label Biography information for Sir John Hayes more like this
previous answer version
51922
answering member constituency South Holland and The Deepings more like this
answering member printed Mr John Hayes more like this
answering member
350
label Biography information for Sir John Hayes more like this
tabling member
1536
label Biography information for Emily Thornberry more like this
470523
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-03-14more like thismore than 2016-03-14
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Ministry of Justice: Sick Leave more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many and what proportion of officials of his Department took sick leave for reasons relating to stress in each of the last five years; and what proportion of total sick leave that leave was in each such year. more like this
tabling member constituency Leicester South more like this
tabling member printed
Jonathan Ashworth more like this
uin 30864 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The tables below set out the information you have requested on sickness absence taken by officials in the Ministry of Justice relating to stress for each year in which figures are currently available. Data prior to 2011 is not available as this information is not held centrally.</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p>Total Number of staff Sick with Stress</p></td><td><p>Proportion of staff off with Stress</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014-2015</p></td><td><p>2,593</p></td><td><p>3%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-2014</p></td><td><p>2,344</p></td><td><p>3%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012-2013</p></td><td><p>2,043</p></td><td><p>3%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011-2012</p></td><td><p>2,221</p></td><td><p>3%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Proportion of Sick Days due to Stress</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014-2015</p></td><td><p>15%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013-2014</p></td><td><p>13%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012-2013</p></td><td><p>11%</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011-2012</p></td><td><p>10%</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>The information includes staff within Ministry of Justice Headquarters, National Offender Management Service, Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunal Service, Office of the Public Guardian and Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority for all four years. Staff within Legal Aid Agency are included from 2013 and UK Supreme Court is in scope for 2011-2012.</p><p> </p><p>As a department we are actively managing attendance in order to reduce the number of days lost due to sickness. A large proportion of staff absence is within the Prison Service and the challenges they face do not bear a direct comparison with the working conditions of most civil servants. They perform a difficult, physical and sometimes dangerous job.</p>
answering member constituency Hemel Hempstead more like this
answering member printed Mike Penning more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-03-17T17:44:44.61Zmore like thismore than 2016-03-17T17:44:44.61Z
answering member
1528
label Biography information for Sir Mike Penning more like this
tabling member
4244
label Biography information for Jonathan Ashworth more like this
470637
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-03-14more like thismore than 2016-03-14
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Warships more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether the National Security Council has been involved in establishing the national requirement of 19 destroyers and frigates, and whether close allies were also consulted. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord West of Spithead more like this
uin HL6980 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The National Security Council was consulted at each stage of the Strategic Defence and Security Review (SDSR). It gave direction on the full strategic approach required from Defence, rather than individual capability planning decisions. This Review also featured unprecedented levels of consultation with our closest allies.</p> more like this
answering member printed Earl Howe more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-03-17T17:17:20.707Zmore like thisremove minimum value filter
answering member
2000
label Biography information for Earl Howe more like this
tabling member
3834
label Biography information for Lord West of Spithead more like this
458819
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-03-09more like thismore than 2016-03-09
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Armed Forces: Housing more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether the Ministry of Defence takes into account (1) a spouse’s employment, (2) children’s education requirements, and (3) children’s health and disability requirements, when considering whether to relocate or retain military quarters for a couple or family in the context of a change of posting within 50 miles. more like this
tabling member printed
Baroness Hodgson of Abinger more like this
uin HL6853 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Entitlement to Service accommodation at a duty station normally ends when the next assignment begins, whether or not the new duty station is within 50 miles of the previous location. However, Service personnel may apply to retain their Service accommodation at their previous duty station. The Ministry of Defence will consider each case in light of the policy criteria, taking account of all the factors specified within the application. Such factors may include a spouse's employment, children's education requirements and children's health and disability requirements.</p><p>More information on the policy, how to apply, and the factors included within MOD's consideration, can be found at paragraph 0725 of Volume 1, Part 1 of the Tri-Service Accommodation Regulations (Joint Service Publication 464) which is available at the following link:</p><p>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/jsp-464-tri-service-accommodation-regulations-tsars</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Earl Howe more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-03-17T17:31:05.867Zmore like thismore than 2016-03-17T17:31:05.867Z
answering member
2000
label Biography information for Earl Howe more like this
attachment
1
file name 20130114JSP464Part1_Amend14.pdf more like this
title JSP464 - Tri Service Accommodation Regulations more like this
tabling member
4301
label Biography information for Baroness Hodgson of Abinger more like this
458853
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-03-09more like thismore than 2016-03-09
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading F-35 Aircraft more like this
house id 2 more like this
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government what testing has been done on software systems for UK F-35 Lightning II fighters for resistance to hacking. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Moonie more like this
uin HL6887 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The F-35B Lightning II aircraft and its Autonomic Logistics Information System (ALIS) have both been designed to be resilient against cyber attack and will be the subject of testing throughout the life of the programme.</p><p>Risk assessments of the aircraft and ALIS vulnerability to cyber attacks are conducted continuously. In addition, all classified data transmission to and from the F-35B Lightning II aircraft is fully encrypted.</p> more like this
answering member printed Earl Howe more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-03-17T17:18:16.967Zmore like thismore than 2016-03-17T17:18:16.967Z
answering member
2000
label Biography information for Earl Howe more like this
tabling member
621
label Biography information for Lord Moonie more like this