Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

169736
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2014-12-11more like thismore than 2014-12-11
answering body
Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
hansard heading Electronic Government: Conferences more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what the budget was for the D5 London 2014: leading digital governments conference; and how the invitees to this conference were identified. more like this
tabling member constituency Newcastle upon Tyne Central more like this
tabling member printed
Chi Onwurah more like this
uin 218347 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The D5 London 2014: Leading Digital Governments Conference met at Idea London and Digital Catapult to discuss how to promote economic growth through open markets, teaching children to code, improving connectivity, and ideas for future collaborative projects. A trade event was hosted at Buckingham Palace by HRH the Duke of York which included the following leading British SMEs:</p><p>· Code Kingdoms</p><p>· Crowd Emotion</p><p>· Funding Circle</p><p>· Hypercat</p><p>· Kano</p><p>· Relative Insight</p><p>· Skyscape Cloud Services</p><p>· Therapy Box</p><p>· Yoyo</p><p>Founding members met criteria including on their expertise in teaching children coding, commitment to support all citizens to access digital services, and commitment to open standards, open markets and open source. Each member must also be a member of the Open Government Partnership.<br> <br> In addition representatives from the United States and Mexico attended.<br> <br> Details of costs will be published in due course.</p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Horsham more like this
answering member printed Mr Francis Maude more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-12-16T17:55:16.327Zmore like thismore than 2014-12-16T17:55:16.327Z
answering member
115
label Biography information for Lord Maude of Horsham more like this
tabling member
4124
label Biography information for Chi Onwurah remove filter
169933
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2014-12-11more like thismore than 2014-12-11
answering body
Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
hansard heading Government Departments: Internet more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what the (a) least and (b) most visited Government website was in each of the last three years; and how many times each such website was visited. more like this
tabling member constituency Newcastle upon Tyne Central more like this
tabling member printed
Chi Onwurah more like this
uin 218433 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p><a href="http://gov.uk/" target="_blank">GOV.UK</a> is designed to make dealing with government simpler, clearer and faster. Information on the performance of <a href="http://gov.uk/" target="_blank">GOV.UK</a>, including activity, is published at: <a href="https://www.gov.uk/performance" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/performance</a></p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Horsham more like this
answering member printed Mr Francis Maude more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-12-16T16:58:18.157Zmore like thismore than 2014-12-16T16:58:18.157Z
answering member
115
label Biography information for Lord Maude of Horsham more like this
tabling member
4124
label Biography information for Chi Onwurah remove filter
168851
registered interest false remove filter
date less than 2014-12-09more like thismore than 2014-12-09
answering body
HM Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Stamp Duty Land Tax more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, what progress he has made in pursuing firms which use schemes to evade stamp duty land tax. more like this
tabling member constituency Newcastle upon Tyne Central more like this
tabling member printed
Chi Onwurah more like this
uin 217846 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>In light of evidence that Stamp Duty Land Tax avoidance schemes were being widely marketed to businesses and to the public, the Government has taken clear and robust action. This can be seen in a twin approach to driving down SDLT avoidance – legislation to put beyond doubt that these schemes do not work, and wider measures which remove the advantage of delaying payment that those who seek to avoid tax gain over the great majority who pay the right amount at the right time. As a result of this Government’s intervention, SDLT avoidance schemes have largely disappeared and the number of individuals using such schemes has reduced by over 90%.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>In 2013, the Government introduced legislation which makes it clear that the SDLT schemes being sold did not work. It also passed legislation which worked retrospectively, requiring users of the most popularly sold schemes to immediately amend their tax returns. This legislation applied to those who had still chosen to enter into schemes despite the Chancellor’s warning against the continuing use of SDLT avoidance in his budget speech of March 2012.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>HMRC has consistently challenged the use of these schemes and does not believe that any of them actually achieves its aim of reducing the liability to SDLT. This view has been tested in a number of recent court hearings and HMRC has been successful in every case so far.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>To further strengthen the anti-avoidance effort, the Government has introduced additional measures which make it harder for users of tax avoidance to delay paying what is due. From 2014, anyone who has used a scheme where a similar case has already been settled in the courts will be required to accept that ruling or face additional penalties on top of the tax and interest owing. And users of disclosable schemes where there is no such court decision will be expected to pay in advance the amount of tax that they are seeking to avoid while they await a final decision.</p><p> </p>
answering member constituency South West Hertfordshire more like this
answering member printed Mr David Gauke more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-12-16T16:55:55.42Zmore like thismore than 2014-12-16T16:55:55.42Z
answering member
1529
label Biography information for Mr David Gauke more like this
tabling member
4124
label Biography information for Chi Onwurah remove filter