Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

100848
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-10-24more like thismore than 2014-10-24
answering body
Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
hansard heading Electronic Government more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether he has received representations on a public sector provider of identity assurance during the Gov.uk Verify programme. more like this
tabling member constituency Newcastle upon Tyne Central more like this
tabling member printed
Chi Onwurah more like this
uin 211904 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Information on Verify is published at:</p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/introducing-govuk-verify" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/introducing-govuk-verify</a><br> <br>GOV.UK Verify provides the first opportunity for people to verify their identity entirely digitally. <br> The service has not yet been launched and is still in public beta. Performance data will be published in due course.</p><p>Government Digital Service has not received representations from public sector providers of identity assurance</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Horsham more like this
answering member printed Mr Francis Maude more like this
grouped question UIN
211873 more like this
211881 more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-10-29T17:49:36.8412924Zmore like thismore than 2014-10-29T17:49:36.8412924Z
answering member
115
label Biography information for Lord Maude of Horsham more like this
tabling member
4124
label Biography information for Chi Onwurah more like this
100850
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-10-24more like thismore than 2014-10-24
answering body
Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
hansard heading Electronic Government more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what progress his Department has made in introducing the Government identity assurance programme, Gov.uk Verify; and if he will make a statement. more like this
tabling member constituency Newcastle upon Tyne Central more like this
tabling member printed
Chi Onwurah more like this
uin 211881 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Information on Verify is published at:</p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/introducing-govuk-verify" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/introducing-govuk-verify</a><br> <br>GOV.UK Verify provides the first opportunity for people to verify their identity entirely digitally. <br> The service has not yet been launched and is still in public beta. Performance data will be published in due course.</p><p>Government Digital Service has not received representations from public sector providers of identity assurance</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Horsham more like this
answering member printed Mr Francis Maude more like this
grouped question UIN
211873 more like this
211904 more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-10-29T17:49:36.7631208Zmore like thismore than 2014-10-29T17:49:36.7631208Z
answering member
115
label Biography information for Lord Maude of Horsham more like this
tabling member
4124
label Biography information for Chi Onwurah more like this
100852
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-10-24more like thismore than 2014-10-24
answering body
Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept id 53 more like this
answering dept short name Cabinet Office more like this
answering dept sort name Cabinet Office more like this
hansard heading Electronic Government more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, how many (a) successful and (b) unsuccessful registrations of identity there have been through the Gov.uk Verify programme. more like this
tabling member constituency Newcastle upon Tyne Central more like this
tabling member printed
Chi Onwurah more like this
uin 211873 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Information on Verify is published at:</p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/introducing-govuk-verify" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/introducing-govuk-verify</a><br> <br>GOV.UK Verify provides the first opportunity for people to verify their identity entirely digitally. <br> The service has not yet been launched and is still in public beta. Performance data will be published in due course.</p><p>Government Digital Service has not received representations from public sector providers of identity assurance</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Horsham more like this
answering member printed Mr Francis Maude more like this
grouped question UIN
211881 more like this
211904 more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-10-29T17:49:36.5057614Zmore like thismore than 2014-10-29T17:49:36.5057614Z
answering member
115
label Biography information for Lord Maude of Horsham more like this
tabling member
4124
label Biography information for Chi Onwurah more like this
100866
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-10-24more like thismore than 2014-10-24
answering body
Department for Education more like this
answering dept id 60 more like this
answering dept short name Education more like this
answering dept sort name Education more like this
hansard heading Academies more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Education, how many new school applications have been processed by regional school commissioners; how many such applications were (a) approved and (b) refused; and what the reasons for such approval or refusal were in each case. more like this
tabling member constituency Gateshead more like this
tabling member printed
Ian Mearns more like this
uin 211862 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The regional schools commissioners (RSCs) have been involved in nine applications for new academies under the academy presumption (section 6A of the Education and Inspections Act 2006). RSCs do not make the decision about whether a new school is needed or not. This decision lies with the relevant local authority, and arises from the basic need for more pupil places. The RSCs’ role is limited to deciding who would be the best proposer to establish the new school.</p><p>In six cases the RSC approved the proposer recommended by the local authority. In three cases a different proposer was approved. In each case this decision was taken based on an assessment of the capacity, capability and performance of all proposers.</p><p>RSCs do not currently make decisions about free school applications.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Crewe and Nantwich more like this
answering member printed Mr Edward Timpson more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-10-29T17:54:54.9421321Zmore like thismore than 2014-10-29T17:54:54.9421321Z
answering member
1605
label Biography information for Edward Timpson more like this
tabling member
4000
label Biography information for Ian Mearns more like this
100869
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-10-24more like thismore than 2014-10-24
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading Badgers more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, what account her Department's calculations of badgers per sett as a means of estimating badger populations took of (a) the movement by badgers between setts and (b) the effect of peturbation. more like this
tabling member constituency Garston and Halewood more like this
tabling member printed
Maria Eagle more like this
uin 211906 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The Paragraph 19d of the document <em>“Setting the minimum and maximum numbers for year 2 of the badger culls”</em> explains our assumption about numbers of badgers per sett. This approach was approved by the Department’s Chief Veterinary Officer and Chief Scientific Adviser.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Camborne and Redruth more like this
answering member printed George Eustice more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-10-29T19:59:37.904354Zmore like thismore than 2014-10-29T19:59:37.904354Z
answering member
3934
label Biography information for George Eustice more like this
previous answer version
24994
answering member constituency Camborne and Redruth more like this
answering member printed George Eustice more like this
answering member
3934
label Biography information for George Eustice more like this
tabling member
483
label Biography information for Maria Eagle more like this
100870
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-10-24more like thismore than 2014-10-24
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading Bovine Tuberculosis: South West more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, with reference to her Department's publication Setting the minimum and maximum numbers for year 2 of the badger culls, published in August 2014, for what reason different methods of estimating badger population were used in Gloucestershire and Somerset for determining the numbers of badgers to be removed in year 2 of the pilot culls in those areas. more like this
tabling member constituency Garston and Halewood more like this
tabling member printed
Maria Eagle more like this
uin 211907 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>As the licensing authority, it is for Natural England to set minimum and maximum numbers of badgers to be removed in each area. Defra’s advice on this particular issue is set out in paragraphs 19 to 29 of the document “<em>Setting the minimum and maximum numbers for Year 2 of the badger culls</em>”.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Camborne and Redruth more like this
answering member printed George Eustice more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-10-29T20:04:11.6121834Zmore like thismore than 2014-10-29T20:04:11.6121834Z
answering member
3934
label Biography information for George Eustice more like this
previous answer version
24631
answering member constituency Camborne and Redruth more like this
answering member printed George Eustice more like this
answering member
3934
label Biography information for George Eustice more like this
tabling member
483
label Biography information for Maria Eagle more like this
100871
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-10-24more like thismore than 2014-10-24
answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept id 13 more like this
answering dept short name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
answering dept sort name Environment, Food and Rural Affairs more like this
hansard heading Bovine Tuberculosis more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, with reference to her Department's publication Setting the minimum and maximum numbers for year 2 of the badger culls, published in August 2014, for what reason the methodology used to calculate the number of badgers to be culled changed from year 1 to year 2. more like this
tabling member constituency Garston and Halewood more like this
tabling member printed
Maria Eagle more like this
uin 211908 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The approach used to calculate the number of badgers to be culled was approved by the Department’s Chief Veterinary Officer and Chief Scientific Adviser.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Camborne and Redruth more like this
answering member printed George Eustice more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-10-29T20:05:24.1166807Zmore like thismore than 2014-10-29T20:05:24.1166807Z
answering member
3934
label Biography information for George Eustice more like this
previous answer version
25168
answering member constituency Camborne and Redruth more like this
answering member printed George Eustice more like this
answering member
3934
label Biography information for George Eustice more like this
tabling member
483
label Biography information for Maria Eagle more like this
100876
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-10-24more like thismore than 2014-10-24
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Asthma: Drugs more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how much has been spent on the prescription of asthma drugs in the NHS in each of the last five years. more like this
tabling member constituency Leicester West more like this
tabling member printed
Liz Kendall more like this
uin 211846 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Information on National Health Service expenditure on drugs for the treatment of asthma in primary and secondary care is in the table.</p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p>Drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis have been defined as those included in the following British National Formulary sections:</p><p> </p><p>3.1.1 Adrenoceptor agonists</p><p> </p><p>3.1.2 Antimuscarinic bronchodilators</p><p> </p><p>3.1.3 Theophylline</p><p> </p><p>3.2 Corticosteroids</p><p> </p><p>3.3.1 Cromoglicate and related therapy</p><p> </p><p>3.3.2 Leukotriene receptor antagonists</p><p> </p><p>3.4.2 Allergen immunotherapy (omalizumab only)</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="11"><p>Cost of drugs for the treatment of asthma, England<sup>1</sup></p></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2"><p>Drug name</p></td><td colspan="5"><p>Primary Care (£ millions)</p></td><td colspan="5"><p>Secondary Care (£ millions)</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2009</p></td><td><p>2010</p></td><td><p>2011</p></td><td><p>2012</p></td><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>2009</p></td><td><p>2010</p></td><td><p>2011</p></td><td><p>2012</p></td><td><p>2013</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Aclidinium Bromide</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>0.02</p></td><td><p>1.62</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>0.00</p></td><td><p>0.03</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Aminophylline</p></td><td><p>1.25</p></td><td><p>1.18</p></td><td><p>1.12</p></td><td><p>1.08</p></td><td><p>1.05</p></td><td><p>0.30</p></td><td><p>0.29</p></td><td><p>0.21</p></td><td><p>0.23</p></td><td><p>0.22</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Beclometasone Dipropionate</p></td><td><p>84.26</p></td><td><p>87.72</p></td><td><p>90.30</p></td><td><p>97.56</p></td><td><p>102.39</p></td><td><p>1.62</p></td><td><p>1.53</p></td><td><p>1.41</p></td><td><p>1.49</p></td><td><p>1.42</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Budesonide</p></td><td><p>140.35</p></td><td><p>149.03</p></td><td><p>158.82</p></td><td><p>169.14</p></td><td><p>177.00</p></td><td><p>1.29</p></td><td><p>1.14</p></td><td><p>1.14</p></td><td><p>1.27</p></td><td><p>1.41</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Budesonide/ Formoterol</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>2.75</p></td><td><p>2.94</p></td><td><p>2.89</p></td><td><p>3.10</p></td><td><p>3.29</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ciclesonide</p></td><td><p>0.84</p></td><td><p>0.95</p></td><td><p>1.03</p></td><td><p>1.12</p></td><td><p>1.25</p></td><td><p>0.01</p></td><td><p>0.02</p></td><td><p>0.02</p></td><td><p>0.02</p></td><td><p>0.03</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Fluticasone</p></td><td><p>366.24</p></td><td><p>380.56</p></td><td><p>387.89</p></td><td><p>392.95</p></td><td><p>396.10</p></td><td><p>1.00</p></td><td><p>0.93</p></td><td><p>0.91</p></td><td><p>1.00</p></td><td><p>0.99</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Fluticasone/ Salmeterol</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>11.46</p></td><td><p>11.56</p></td><td><p>10.69</p></td><td><p>10.82</p></td><td><p>10.48</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Formoterol Fumarate</p></td><td><p>5.18</p></td><td><p>4.87</p></td><td><p>4.68</p></td><td><p>4.85</p></td><td><p>4.93</p></td><td><p>0.10</p></td><td><p>0.08</p></td><td><p>0.07</p></td><td><p>0.06</p></td><td><p>0.06</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Glycopyrronium Bromide</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>0.01</p></td><td><p>2.30</p></td><td><p>0.58</p></td><td><p>0.62</p></td><td><p>0.70</p></td><td><p>0.79</p></td><td><p>1.00</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Indacaterol Maleate</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>0.04</p></td><td><p>0.30</p></td><td><p>0.92</p></td><td><p>1.47</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>0.00</p></td><td><p>0.00</p></td><td><p>0.02</p></td><td><p>0.04</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ipratropium Bromide</p></td><td><p>16.15</p></td><td><p>15.02</p></td><td><p>13.74</p></td><td><p>10.32</p></td><td><p>8.61</p></td><td><p>2.74</p></td><td><p>2.84</p></td><td><p>2.59</p></td><td><p>2.65</p></td><td><p>2.70</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Mometasone Furoate</p></td><td><p>0.36</p></td><td><p>0.31</p></td><td><p>0.26</p></td><td><p>0.23</p></td><td><p>0.21</p></td><td><p>0.76</p></td><td><p>0.71</p></td><td><p>0.61</p></td><td><p>0.63</p></td><td><p>0.67</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Montelukast</p></td><td><p>38.91</p></td><td><p>43.01</p></td><td><p>46.96</p></td><td><p>51.71</p></td><td><p>31.31</p></td><td><p>0.98</p></td><td><p>1.02</p></td><td><p>1.03</p></td><td><p>1.16</p></td><td><p>0.81</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Omalizumab</p></td><td><p>0.00</p></td><td><p>0.01</p></td><td><p>0.03</p></td><td><p>0.15</p></td><td><p>0.12</p></td><td><p>5.97</p></td><td><p>9.22</p></td><td><p>12.16</p></td><td><p>14.65</p></td><td><p>17.86</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Salbutamol</p></td><td><p>83.15</p></td><td><p>82.64</p></td><td><p>60.58</p></td><td><p>60.37</p></td><td><p>59.95</p></td><td><p>3.78</p></td><td><p>3.77</p></td><td><p>3.36</p></td><td><p>3.38</p></td><td><p>3.29</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Salmeterol</p></td><td><p>48.80</p></td><td><p>45.16</p></td><td><p>41.87</p></td><td><p>36.72</p></td><td><p>34.04</p></td><td><p>0.87</p></td><td><p>0.74</p></td><td><p>0.59</p></td><td><p>0.53</p></td><td><p>0.47</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Terbutaline Sulphate</p></td><td><p>8.61</p></td><td><p>8.20</p></td><td><p>7.61</p></td><td><p>7.43</p></td><td><p>7.18</p></td><td><p>0.18</p></td><td><p>0.16</p></td><td><p>0.14</p></td><td><p>0.14</p></td><td><p>0.15</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Theophylline</p></td><td><p>2.18</p></td><td><p>2.17</p></td><td><p>2.15</p></td><td><p>2.22</p></td><td><p>2.26</p></td><td><p>0.12</p></td><td><p>0.11</p></td><td><p>0.11</p></td><td><p>0.11</p></td><td><p>0.11</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Tiotropium</p></td><td><p>113.61</p></td><td><p>129.98</p></td><td><p>149.81</p></td><td><p>169.35</p></td><td><p>185.24</p></td><td><p>5.69</p></td><td><p>6.03</p></td><td><p>6.22</p></td><td><p>6.64</p></td><td><p>6.87</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Zafirlukast</p></td><td><p>0.79</p></td><td><p>0.71</p></td><td><p>0.71</p></td><td><p>0.70</p></td><td><p>0.69</p></td><td><p>0.01</p></td><td><p>0.01</p></td><td><p>0.01</p></td><td><p>0.01</p></td><td><p>0.01</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Other drugs<sup>2</sup></p></td><td><p>0.90</p></td><td><p>0.79</p></td><td><p>0.66</p></td><td><p>0.62</p></td><td><p>0.60</p></td><td><p>0.04</p></td><td><p>0.07</p></td><td><p>0.15</p></td><td><p>0.26</p></td><td><p>0.46</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Total</p></td><td><p>911.6</p></td><td><p>952.3</p></td><td><p>968.5</p></td><td><p>1,007.5</p></td><td><p>1,018.3</p></td><td><p>40.3</p></td><td><p>43.8</p></td><td><p>45.0</p></td><td><p>49.0</p></td><td><p>52.4</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p><sup>1 </sup>Cost of drugs at NHS list price not taking account of discounts, dispensing costs, fees or prescription charges income. Totals may not add up due to rounding.</p><p> </p><p><sup>2</sup> Other drugs include Azelastine/Fluticasone, Bambuterol Hydrochloride, Beclometasone/ Formoterol, Cromoglicic Acid, Fenoterol Hydrobromide, Fenoterol/Ipratropium Bromide, Fluticasone/ Formoterol, Nedocromil Sodium, Orciprenaline Sulfate and Sodium Cromoglicate.</p><p> </p><p>Source:</p><p> </p><p>Prescription Cost Analysis (PCA) provided by the Health and Social Care Information Centre (primary care)</p><p> </p><p>Hospital Pharmacy Audit Index (HPAI) provided by IMS Health (secondary care)</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Since some drugs are prescribed to treat more than one condition and as the condition for which a drug is prescribed is not collected, it is not possible to separate the different conditions for which a drug may have been prescribed. The information provided may therefore include costs from the prescribing of these drugs for conditions other than for asthma.</p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Mid Norfolk more like this
answering member printed George Freeman more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-10-29T17:13:01.0657405Zmore like thismore than 2014-10-29T17:13:01.0657405Z
answering member
4020
label Biography information for George Freeman more like this
tabling member
4026
label Biography information for Liz Kendall more like this
100880
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-10-24more like thismore than 2014-10-24
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Public Health: Business more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health, with reference to the emphasis placed on tackling and preventing lifestyle-related diseases in the NHS Five Year Forward View, published in October 2014, whether he has any plans to review and reform the voluntary responsibility deal. more like this
tabling member constituency Liverpool, Wavertree more like this
tabling member printed
Luciana Berger more like this
uin 211871 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The emphasis placed on tackling and preventing lifestyle-related diseases in the NHS Five Year Forward View underlines the importance of the Public Health Responsibility Deal and the part it plays in supporting people to make healthier choices and tackle the behaviours which lead to chronic health conditions. Over 700 community, voluntary, public sector (National Health Service as well as national and local Government), public health and commercial organisations have signed up to play their part in improving public health.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Deal is already focussed on tackling many of the key causes of lifestyle-related ill health outlined in the NHS Five Year Forward View, including obesity, smoking and harmful drinking. The Deal’s pledges tackle a wide range of issues, including: healthier diets (e.g. reformulation for reduced salt levels, elimination of trans-fats and calorie reduction); fostering a culture of responsible drinking (e.g. lower alcohol by volume products, alcohol labelling, increasing awareness of alcohol units); increasing physical activity levels (e.g. physical activity in the workplace and active travel) and improving the health of their staff (e.g. accreditation of occupational health services, supporting employees with mental health conditions in the workplace, smoking cessation and healthier staff restaurants). The Deal will continue to play an important part in delivering these ambitions.</p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Battersea more like this
answering member printed Jane Ellison more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-10-29T17:09:23.2443948Zmore like thismore than 2014-10-29T17:09:23.2443948Z
answering member
3918
label Biography information for Jane Ellison more like this
tabling member
4036
label Biography information for Luciana Berger more like this
100881
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-10-24more like thismore than 2014-10-24
answering body
Department of Health more like this
answering dept id 17 more like this
answering dept short name Health more like this
answering dept sort name Health more like this
hansard heading Ebola more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Health, pursuant to his contribution of 13 October 2014, Official Report, column 30, on bed capacity for dealing with potential Ebola patients, how many additional beds will be made available; and at which hospitals they will be made available. more like this
tabling member constituency Liverpool, Wavertree more like this
tabling member printed
Luciana Berger more like this
uin 211872 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The National Health Service has two ‘Trexler’ beds on stand-by 24 hours a day at the Royal Free Hospital in London, available for use within six hours maximum to allow staff to be mobilised. If needed further beds at the Royal Free Hospital, Newcastle Royal Victoria Infirmary, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospital and Sheffield Teaching Hospital would be made available, totalling 12 beds.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Department believes this will be sufficient even in the event of an increase in the numbers of cases of Ebola in this country. If there is a significant upscale in numbers further beds could be made available. This would amount to at least 26 beds referenced in the Secretary of State for Health’s statement on 13 October, <em>Official Report, </em>Column 30.</p><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Battersea more like this
answering member printed Jane Ellison more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-10-29T17:30:23.639361Zmore like thismore than 2014-10-29T17:30:23.639361Z
answering member
3918
label Biography information for Jane Ellison more like this
tabling member
4036
label Biography information for Luciana Berger more like this