Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

90896
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2014-09-08more like thismore than 2014-09-08
answering body
Department for Culture Media and Sport more like this
answering dept id 10 more like this
answering dept short name Culture, Media and Sport more like this
answering dept sort name Culture, Media and Sport more like this
hansard heading Gambling: Internet more like this
house id 2 remove filter
legislature
25277
pref label House of Lords more like this
question text To ask Her Majesty’s Government why intellectual property relating to gambling software, often owned by separate companies which in turn license that software, rather than by the direct software developers or gambling operators, remains a determinant of a gambling licence requirement. more like this
tabling member printed
Lord Mancroft more like this
uin HL1822 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false remove filter
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p> </p><p>Intellectual property relating to gambling software is only one of the factors that is relevant to understanding where control of the product sits. There are also other factors that are relevant when considering who needs a gambling software licence for example who is responsible for the design and functionality of the software and what the contract says in terms of responsibilities and liabilities. One relevant activity caught by Section 41 of the Gambling Act 2005 is adaptation, and so the person who actually undertakes that adaptation will need to be licensed.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member printed Lord Newby more like this
grouped question UIN HL1823 more like this
question first answered
less than 2014-09-22T13:55:31.9232472Zmore like thismore than 2014-09-22T13:55:31.9232472Z
answering member
1916
label Biography information for Lord Newby more like this
tabling member
1833
label Biography information for Lord Mancroft more like this