Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

1588085

registered interest
date	22/02/2023
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Arts: Tax Allowances
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to the report entitled Creative Industry Tax Reliefs Evaluation, published on 17 November 2022, whether his Department plans to commission a similar evaluation on Cultural Tax Reliefs.
tabling member constituency	Worsley and Eccles South
tabling member printed	Barbara Keeley
uin	150437
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 27/02/2023 answer text HMRC has a programme for evaluating tax reliefs and has published criteria which are used to decide which reliefs should be evaluated. Against these criteria, cultural reliefs have not been assessed as being a priority. HMRC published research on the museum and gallery exhibition tax relief in 2022. Cultural reliefs will be reconsidered for evaluation in future. answering member constituency Louth and Horncastle answering member printed Victoria Atkins question first answered 27/02/2023 15:32:05 answering member 4399 label Biography information for Victoria Atkins
tabling member	1588 label Biography information for Barbara Keeley

1588087

registered interest
date	22/02/2023
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Horizon IT System: Compensation
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to subpostmasters who have received compensation following the failure of the Post Office Horizon IT system, if he will make an estimate of the total amount of tax he expects to be due on that compensation.
tabling member constituency	Stalybridge and Hyde
tabling member printed	Jonathan Reynolds
uin	150474
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 27/02/2023 answer text <p>The Government wants to see all victims affected by the Post Office Horizon IT scandal compensated fairly and swiftly. We will continue to work across Government and with the Post Office to ensure the postmasters get the full compensation they deserve and that payments and associated taxes are fair and proportionate.</p> answering member constituency Louth and Horncastle answering member printed Victoria Atkins question first answered 27/02/2023 15:29:49 answering member 4399 label Biography information for Victoria Atkins
tabling member	4119 label Biography information for Jonathan Reynolds

1588175

registered interest
date	22/02/2023
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	High-risk Wealth Programme
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answer of 30 January 2023 to Question 131456 on High-risk Wealth Programme and the Answer of 20 February 2023 to Question 136859, how many unique cases were included in the High Risk Wealth Programme between 2017-18 and 2021-22.
tabling member constituency	Ealing North
tabling member printed	James Murray
uin	150650
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 28/02/2023 answer text <p><strong> </strong></p><p>I refer to the responses provided on 30<sup>th</sup> January 2023 to PQ UIN 131456 and on 20<sup>th</sup> February 2023 to PQ UIN 136859.</p><p> </p><p>Over 2017-18 to 2021-22, two thirds of cases considered were included in the High Risk Wealth Programme (HRWP).</p><p> </p><p>The HRWP was introduced in 2017-2018. The programme is reserved for our most complex and highest risk cases and we therefore do not expect a large number of cases to enter these programmes each year.</p><p> </p><p>HRWP is just one aspect of our compliance approach, you can find out more about HMRC’s compliance approach <a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/how-hmrc-collects-the-right-tax-from-wealthy-individuals/how-hmrc-collects-the-right-tax-from-wealthy-individuals#:~:text=We%20respond%20to%20non%2Dcompliance,tax%20system%20is%20operating%20fairly." target="_blank">here. </a></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p> answering member constituency Louth and Horncastle answering member printed Victoria Atkins question first answered 28/02/2023 17:37:52 answering member 4399 label Biography information for Victoria Atkins
tabling member	4797 label Biography information for James Murray

1588211

registered interest
date	22/02/2023
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Taxation: Fines
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answer of 2 February to Question 135480 on Taxation: Fines, how many penalties issued by HM Revenue and Customs recorded on the National Penalty Processing System for unpaid tax amounted to (a) less than £1,000, (b) £1,000 to £9,999, (c) £10,000 to £99,999, (d) £100,000 to £999,999 and (e) £1,000,000 or above in each of the last five years.
tabling member constituency	Ealing North
tabling member printed	James Murray
uin	150651
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 27/02/2023 answer text <p>I refer the Hon Member to UIN 139294.</p> answering member constituency Louth and Horncastle answering member printed Victoria Atkins question first answered 27/02/2023 18:00:12 answering member 4399 label Biography information for Victoria Atkins
tabling member	4797 label Biography information for James Murray

1588247

registered interest
date	22/02/2023
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Health: Products
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, whether he plans to (a) remove and (b) reduce VAT on essential healthcare products.
tabling member constituency	East Dunbartonshire
tabling member printed	Amy Callaghan
uin	150637
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 27/02/2023 answer text <p>VAT rules do not distinguish between supplies on the basis of whether they might be considered essential. VAT is a broad-based tax on consumption, and the twenty per cent standard rate applies across a very broad range of goods and services. While there are exceptions to the standard rate, these are strictly limited by legal and fiscal considerations. One such exception is that medicines on the NHS prescription list are zero-rated for VAT when dispensed by a pharmacist.</p><p> </p><p>Removing or reducing VAT on a broad range of healthcare products would likely come at a significant cost to the Exchequer, and with no guarantee that it would reduce the cost to consumers of the products themselves. While all taxes are kept under review, the Government has no current plans to make changes here.</p> answering member constituency Louth and Horncastle answering member printed Victoria Atkins question first answered 27/02/2023 15:51:42 answering member 4399 label Biography information for Victoria Atkins
tabling member	4770 label Biography information for Amy Callaghan