Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

100827

registered interest
date	23/10/2014
answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
answering dept id	29
answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
hansard heading	Performance Appraisal
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many staff in his Department have more than one member of staff on personal improvement plans.
tabling member constituency	North Durham
tabling member printed	Mr Kevan Jones
uin	211826
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 29/10/2014 answer text <p>The Department does not centrally maintain fully comprehensive records of all employees who have been placed under performance improvement plans as many of these are dealt with informally.</p> answering member constituency Thornbury and Yate answering member printed Steve Webb grouped question UIN 211824 211825 question first answered 29/10/2014 14:54:48 answering member 220 label Biography information for Steve Webb
tabling member	1438 label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones

100829

registered interest
date	23/10/2014
answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
answering dept id	29
answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
hansard heading	Performance Appraisal
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many staff in his Department (a) are on a personal improvement plan, (b) have been on a personal improvement plan for over one year and (c) have been on a personal improvement plan for more than two consecutive years; and what the grades are or were of such staff.
tabling member constituency	North Durham
tabling member printed	Mr Kevan Jones
uin	211824
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 29/10/2014 answer text <p>The Department does not centrally maintain fully comprehensive records of all employees who have been placed under performance improvement plans as many of these are dealt with informally.</p> answering member constituency Thornbury and Yate answering member printed Steve Webb grouped question UIN 211825 211826 question first answered 29/10/2014 14:54:48 answering member 220 label Biography information for Steve Webb
tabling member	1438 label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones

100830

registered interest
date	23/10/2014
answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
answering dept id	29
answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
hansard heading	Performance Appraisal
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many staff in his Department are responsible for mentoring staff on personal improvement plans.
tabling member constituency	North Durham
tabling member printed	Mr Kevan Jones
uin	211825
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 29/10/2014 answer text <p>The Department does not centrally maintain fully comprehensive records of all employees who have been placed under performance improvement plans as many of these are dealt with informally.</p> answering member constituency Thornbury and Yate answering member printed Steve Webb grouped question UIN 211824 211826 question first answered 29/10/2014 14:54:48 answering member 220 label Biography information for Steve Webb
tabling member	1438 label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones

92327

registered interest
date	26/09/2014
answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
answering dept id	29
answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
hansard heading	Performance Appraisal
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many officials in his Department of what (a) gender, (b) ethnicity and (c) age received the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System's (i) exceeded, (ii) met and (iii) must improve performance mark in 2013-14.
tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
tabling member printed	John Healey
uin	209494
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/10/2014 answer text <p /> <p>DWP demonstrates its commitment to diversity and inclusion by, amongst other things, offering a range of flexible employment policies that enable under-represented groups to experience fulfilling public service careers. As a consequence of these policies, DWP has recruited a diverse workforce made up of 69% female, 43% part-time, at least 11% black and minority ethnic, and at least 7% disabled employees.</p><p> </p><p>The requested data is in the tables below. The figures for performance ratings relate to the workforce at 31 March 2014. The figures for performance-related pay relates to the workforce at 31 August 2014. Changes in the workforce in the intervening period largely accounts for differences in the data.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by gender</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Female</p></td><td><p>13,786</p></td><td><p>45,715</p></td><td><p>3,962</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Male</p></td><td><p>5,371</p></td><td><p>20,110</p></td><td><p>3,006</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by declared ethnicity</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>White</p></td><td><p>13,781</p></td><td><p>45,236</p></td><td><p>4,550</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ethnic</p></td><td><p>1,414</p></td><td><p>5,998</p></td><td><p>777</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by age</strong></p><p> </p><table><thead><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><p>16-24</p></td><td><p>192</p></td><td><p>585</p></td><td><p>80</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>25-29</p></td><td><p>1,088</p></td><td><p>2,558</p></td><td><p>239</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>30-34</p></td><td><p>1,855</p></td><td><p>5,015</p></td><td><p>461</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>35-39</p></td><td><p>2,154</p></td><td><p>6,109</p></td><td><p>528</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>40-44</p></td><td><p>3,198</p></td><td><p>8,813</p></td><td><p>715</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>45-49</p></td><td><p>4,302</p></td><td><p>12,692</p></td><td><p>1,113</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>50-54</p></td><td><p>3,682</p></td><td><p>13,557</p></td><td><p>1,339</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>55-59</p></td><td><p>2,116</p></td><td><p>10,565</p></td><td><p>1,315</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>60-64</p></td><td><p>490</p></td><td><p>4,784</p></td><td><p>869</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>65+</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>1,147</p></td><td><p>309</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by declared disability</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Non-disabled</p></td><td><p>15,589</p></td><td><p>52,949</p></td><td><p>5,322</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Disabled</p></td><td><p>801</p></td><td><p>3,965</p></td><td><p>649</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by work pattern</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Full time</p></td><td><p>13,092</p></td><td><p>35,920</p></td><td><p>3,789</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Part time</p></td><td><p>6,065</p></td><td><p>29,905</p></td><td><p>3,179</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>Performance-related pay 2013-14</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Payments made</p></td><td><p>85,900</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Payments not made</p></td><td><p>9,546</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p> answering member constituency Thornbury and Yate answering member printed Steve Webb grouped question UIN 209641 209663 question first answered 14/10/2014 10:58:15 answering member 220 label Biography information for Steve Webb
tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey

92328

registered interest
date	26/09/2014
answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
answering dept id	29
answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
hansard heading	Performance Appraisal
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many officials in his Department completed the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System in 2013-14; how many and what proportion of those officials received the (a) exceeded, (b) met and (c) must improve performance mark; and how many and what proportion (i) did and (ii) did not qualify for a bonus under that process.
tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
tabling member printed	John Healey
uin	209663
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/10/2014 answer text <p>DWP demonstrates its commitment to diversity and inclusion by, amongst other things, offering a range of flexible employment policies that enable under-represented groups to experience fulfilling public service careers. As a consequence of these policies, DWP has recruited a diverse workforce made up of 69% female, 43% part-time, at least 11% black and minority ethnic, and at least 7% disabled employees.</p><p> </p><p>The requested data is in the tables below. The figures for performance ratings relate to the workforce at 31 March 2014. The figures for performance-related pay relates to the workforce at 31 August 2014. Changes in the workforce in the intervening period largely accounts for differences in the data.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by gender</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Female</p></td><td><p>13,786</p></td><td><p>45,715</p></td><td><p>3,962</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Male</p></td><td><p>5,371</p></td><td><p>20,110</p></td><td><p>3,006</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by declared ethnicity</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>White</p></td><td><p>13,781</p></td><td><p>45,236</p></td><td><p>4,550</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ethnic</p></td><td><p>1,414</p></td><td><p>5,998</p></td><td><p>777</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by age</strong></p><p> </p><table><thead><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><p>16-24</p></td><td><p>192</p></td><td><p>585</p></td><td><p>80</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>25-29</p></td><td><p>1,088</p></td><td><p>2,558</p></td><td><p>239</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>30-34</p></td><td><p>1,855</p></td><td><p>5,015</p></td><td><p>461</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>35-39</p></td><td><p>2,154</p></td><td><p>6,109</p></td><td><p>528</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>40-44</p></td><td><p>3,198</p></td><td><p>8,813</p></td><td><p>715</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>45-49</p></td><td><p>4,302</p></td><td><p>12,692</p></td><td><p>1,113</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>50-54</p></td><td><p>3,682</p></td><td><p>13,557</p></td><td><p>1,339</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>55-59</p></td><td><p>2,116</p></td><td><p>10,565</p></td><td><p>1,315</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>60-64</p></td><td><p>490</p></td><td><p>4,784</p></td><td><p>869</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>65+</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>1,147</p></td><td><p>309</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by declared disability</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Non-disabled</p></td><td><p>15,589</p></td><td><p>52,949</p></td><td><p>5,322</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Disabled</p></td><td><p>801</p></td><td><p>3,965</p></td><td><p>649</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by work pattern</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Full time</p></td><td><p>13,092</p></td><td><p>35,920</p></td><td><p>3,789</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Part time</p></td><td><p>6,065</p></td><td><p>29,905</p></td><td><p>3,179</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>Performance-related pay 2013-14</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Payments made</p></td><td><p>85,900</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Payments not made</p></td><td><p>9,546</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p> answering member constituency Thornbury and Yate answering member printed Steve Webb grouped question UIN 209494 209641 question first answered 14/10/2014 10:58:15 answering member 220 label Biography information for Steve Webb
tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey

92329

registered interest
date	26/09/2014
answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
answering dept id	29
answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
hansard heading	Performance Appraisal
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many officials in his Department who received the (a) exceeded, (b) met and (c) must improve performance mark under the Civil Service Employment Policy Performance Management System (i) had a disability, (ii) worked full-time and (iii) worked part-time in 2013-14.
tabling member constituency	Wentworth and Dearne
tabling member printed	John Healey
uin	209641
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/10/2014 answer text <p>DWP demonstrates its commitment to diversity and inclusion by, amongst other things, offering a range of flexible employment policies that enable under-represented groups to experience fulfilling public service careers. As a consequence of these policies, DWP has recruited a diverse workforce made up of 69% female, 43% part-time, at least 11% black and minority ethnic, and at least 7% disabled employees.</p><p> </p><p>The requested data is in the tables below. The figures for performance ratings relate to the workforce at 31 March 2014. The figures for performance-related pay relates to the workforce at 31 August 2014. Changes in the workforce in the intervening period largely accounts for differences in the data.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by gender</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Female</p></td><td><p>13,786</p></td><td><p>45,715</p></td><td><p>3,962</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Male</p></td><td><p>5,371</p></td><td><p>20,110</p></td><td><p>3,006</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong> </strong></p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by declared ethnicity</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>White</p></td><td><p>13,781</p></td><td><p>45,236</p></td><td><p>4,550</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ethnic</p></td><td><p>1,414</p></td><td><p>5,998</p></td><td><p>777</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by age</strong></p><p> </p><table><thead><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td><p>16-24</p></td><td><p>192</p></td><td><p>585</p></td><td><p>80</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>25-29</p></td><td><p>1,088</p></td><td><p>2,558</p></td><td><p>239</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>30-34</p></td><td><p>1,855</p></td><td><p>5,015</p></td><td><p>461</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>35-39</p></td><td><p>2,154</p></td><td><p>6,109</p></td><td><p>528</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>40-44</p></td><td><p>3,198</p></td><td><p>8,813</p></td><td><p>715</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>45-49</p></td><td><p>4,302</p></td><td><p>12,692</p></td><td><p>1,113</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>50-54</p></td><td><p>3,682</p></td><td><p>13,557</p></td><td><p>1,339</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>55-59</p></td><td><p>2,116</p></td><td><p>10,565</p></td><td><p>1,315</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>60-64</p></td><td><p>490</p></td><td><p>4,784</p></td><td><p>869</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>65+</p></td><td><p>80</p></td><td><p>1,147</p></td><td><p>309</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by declared disability</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Non-disabled</p></td><td><p>15,589</p></td><td><p>52,949</p></td><td><p>5,322</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Disabled</p></td><td><p>801</p></td><td><p>3,965</p></td><td><p>649</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong>Performance marks 2013-14 by work pattern</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Exceeded</p></td><td><p>Achieved</p></td><td><p>Must Improve</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Full time</p></td><td><p>13,092</p></td><td><p>35,920</p></td><td><p>3,789</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Part time</p></td><td><p>6,065</p></td><td><p>29,905</p></td><td><p>3,179</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p><strong>Performance-related pay 2013-14</strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Payments made</p></td><td><p>85,900</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Payments not made</p></td><td><p>9,546</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p> answering member constituency Thornbury and Yate answering member printed Steve Webb grouped question UIN 209494 209663 question first answered 14/10/2014 10:58:15 answering member 220 label Biography information for Steve Webb
tabling member	400 label Biography information for John Healey