Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label previous answer version answering member constituency answering member printed answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

1003604

registered interest
date	09/11/2018
answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
answering dept id	29
answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
hansard heading	Dichloromethane: Industrial Health and Safety
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what assessment her Department has made of the potential dangers associated with the use of the chemical Dichloromethane in the workplace.
tabling member constituency	East Ham
tabling member printed	Stephen Timms
uin	189520
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/11/2018 answer text <p>The risks associated with the use of Dichloromethane (DCM) are well documented. Breathing in vapour can produce narcotic effects including drowsiness, headache, unconsciousness and death. DCM has also been classified by the <em>International Agency for Research on Cancer</em> as a category 2a carcinogen.</p><p> </p><p>As the health effects can be fatal, the use of DCM as a paint-stripper is restricted under the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals Regulation (REACH) and professional users must be trained and competent in its safe use. For all workplace uses of DCM, employers must also adhere to the requirements of the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations (COSHH) to prevent or adequately control employee exposure.</p><p> </p> answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth answering member printed Sarah Newton question first answered 14/11/2018 10:35:25 answering member 4071 label Biography information for Sarah Newton
tabling member	163 label Biography information for Sir Stephen Timms

988891

registered interest
date	16/10/2018
answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
answering dept id	29
answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
hansard heading	Personal Independence Payment: Multiple Sclerosis
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people with multiple sclerosis who were previously in receipt of disability living allowance and have undergone a reassessment for personal independence payment applied for mandatory reconsideration of the decision in each year since 2013.
tabling member constituency	East Ham
tabling member printed	Stephen Timms
uin	180081
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 22/10/2018 answer text <p>Table 1 below shows the number of Personal Independence Payment (PIP) reassessment decisions, mandatory reconsideration (MR) registrations, appeals cleared and decisions overturned at appeal for people with a primary disabling condition of multiple sclerosis.</p><p> </p><p><em>Table 1: Number of PIP reassessment decisions, mandatory reconsideration (MR) registrations, appeals cleared and decisions overturned at appeal for people with a primary disabling condition of multiple sclerosis by year of initial decision</em></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of MRs registered</p></td><td><p>Number of appeals cleared</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>480</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>1,950</p></td><td><p>470</p></td><td><p>220</p></td><td><p>180</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>9,840</p></td><td><p>1,960</p></td><td><p>780</p></td><td><p>640</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>10,540</p></td><td><p>1,990</p></td><td><p>660</p></td><td><p>560</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018 (January to June)</p></td><td><p>3,980</p></td><td><p>580</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>Table 2 below shows the number of PIP new claims for people with a primary disabling condition of multiple sclerosis who did not receive an award at the initial decision post assessment and where the decision was changed at MR or appeal.</p><p> </p><p><em>Table 2: Number of PIP new claims decisions for people who did not receive an award at the initial decision post assessment where the award was changed at mandatory reconsideration (MR) and where decisions were overturned at appeal for people with a primary disabling condition of multiple sclerosis by year of initial decision</em></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions where the award was changed at MR</p></td><td><p>Number of appeals cleared</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>850</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>70</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>1,550</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>210</p></td><td><p>150</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>1,290</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>210</p></td><td><p>140</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>1,350</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>160</p></td><td><p>110</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018 (January to June)</p></td><td><p>810</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>Since PIP was introduced 3.5m decisions have been made until June 2018, of these 9% have been appealed and 4% have been overturned.</p><p> </p><p>Data on the number of people who had the mobility award increased from none or standard rate to the enhanced rate is available from internal analytical datasets, but to assess the completeness of recording and quality assure the figures to answer this PQ would incur disproportionate cost.</p><p>Data has been rounded to the nearest 10. Components may not sum to totals due to rounding.</p><p>'#' fewer than 5 decisions in this category.</p><p>The data relates to MRs and appeals recorded up to June 2018 (the latest published data on appeals). Claimants who have received benefit decisions more recently may not yet have had time to complete the claimant journey and progress to appeal.</p><p>PIP data includes normal rules and special rules for the terminally ill claimants, and is for both new claims and DLA reassessment claims.</p><p>Data is based on primary disabling condition as recorded on the PIP computer system. Claimants may often have multiple disabling conditions upon which the decision is based but only the primary condition is shown in these statistics.</p><p>Appeals data shown in the tables is taken from the DWP PIP computer system’s management information. Therefore this appeals data may differ from that held by Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service for various reasons such as delays in data recording and other methodological differences in collating and preparing statistics.</p><p>Some decisions which are changed at mandatory reconsideration, and where the claimant continues to appeal for a higher PIP award, are then changed again at tribunal appeal. Therefore the number of people who had a decision changed at mandatory reconsideration and the number of people who had a decision changed at tribunal appeal cannot be added together.</p><p>Decisions overturned at appeal may include a number of appeals that have been lapsed (which is where DWP changed the decision after an appeal was lodged but before it was heard at Tribunal).</p> answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth answering member printed Sarah Newton grouped question UIN 180082 180083 question first answered 22/10/2018 17:12:58 answering member 4071 label Biography information for Sarah Newton
tabling member	163 label Biography information for Sir Stephen Timms

988892

registered interest
date	16/10/2018
answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
answering dept id	29
answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
hansard heading	Personal Independence Payment: Multiple Sclerosis
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many people with multiple sclerosis who were in receipt of disability living allowance and have undergone a reassessment for personal independence payments appealed the decision at tribunal and (a) had their decision overturned and (b) had their mobility award increased from none or standard rate to the higher rate.
tabling member constituency	East Ham
tabling member printed	Stephen Timms
uin	180082
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 22/10/2018 answer text <p>Table 1 below shows the number of Personal Independence Payment (PIP) reassessment decisions, mandatory reconsideration (MR) registrations, appeals cleared and decisions overturned at appeal for people with a primary disabling condition of multiple sclerosis.</p><p> </p><p><em>Table 1: Number of PIP reassessment decisions, mandatory reconsideration (MR) registrations, appeals cleared and decisions overturned at appeal for people with a primary disabling condition of multiple sclerosis by year of initial decision</em></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of MRs registered</p></td><td><p>Number of appeals cleared</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>480</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>1,950</p></td><td><p>470</p></td><td><p>220</p></td><td><p>180</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>9,840</p></td><td><p>1,960</p></td><td><p>780</p></td><td><p>640</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>10,540</p></td><td><p>1,990</p></td><td><p>660</p></td><td><p>560</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018 (January to June)</p></td><td><p>3,980</p></td><td><p>580</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>Table 2 below shows the number of PIP new claims for people with a primary disabling condition of multiple sclerosis who did not receive an award at the initial decision post assessment and where the decision was changed at MR or appeal.</p><p> </p><p><em>Table 2: Number of PIP new claims decisions for people who did not receive an award at the initial decision post assessment where the award was changed at mandatory reconsideration (MR) and where decisions were overturned at appeal for people with a primary disabling condition of multiple sclerosis by year of initial decision</em></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions where the award was changed at MR</p></td><td><p>Number of appeals cleared</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>850</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>70</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>1,550</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>210</p></td><td><p>150</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>1,290</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>210</p></td><td><p>140</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>1,350</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>160</p></td><td><p>110</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018 (January to June)</p></td><td><p>810</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>Since PIP was introduced 3.5m decisions have been made until June 2018, of these 9% have been appealed and 4% have been overturned.</p><p> </p><p>Data on the number of people who had the mobility award increased from none or standard rate to the enhanced rate is available from internal analytical datasets, but to assess the completeness of recording and quality assure the figures to answer this PQ would incur disproportionate cost.</p><p>Data has been rounded to the nearest 10. Components may not sum to totals due to rounding.</p><p>'#' fewer than 5 decisions in this category.</p><p>The data relates to MRs and appeals recorded up to June 2018 (the latest published data on appeals). Claimants who have received benefit decisions more recently may not yet have had time to complete the claimant journey and progress to appeal.</p><p>PIP data includes normal rules and special rules for the terminally ill claimants, and is for both new claims and DLA reassessment claims.</p><p>Data is based on primary disabling condition as recorded on the PIP computer system. Claimants may often have multiple disabling conditions upon which the decision is based but only the primary condition is shown in these statistics.</p><p>Appeals data shown in the tables is taken from the DWP PIP computer system’s management information. Therefore this appeals data may differ from that held by Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service for various reasons such as delays in data recording and other methodological differences in collating and preparing statistics.</p><p>Some decisions which are changed at mandatory reconsideration, and where the claimant continues to appeal for a higher PIP award, are then changed again at tribunal appeal. Therefore the number of people who had a decision changed at mandatory reconsideration and the number of people who had a decision changed at tribunal appeal cannot be added together.</p><p>Decisions overturned at appeal may include a number of appeals that have been lapsed (which is where DWP changed the decision after an appeal was lodged but before it was heard at Tribunal).</p> answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth answering member printed Sarah Newton grouped question UIN 180081 180083 question first answered 22/10/2018 17:12:58 answering member 4071 label Biography information for Sarah Newton
tabling member	163 label Biography information for Sir Stephen Timms

988893

registered interest
date	16/10/2018
answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
answering dept id	29
answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
hansard heading	Personal Independence Payment: Multiple Sclerosis
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how many new personal independence payment claimants with multiple sclerosis did not receive an award during their initial personal independence payment assessment and subsequently received an award at (a) mandatory reconsideration and (b) tribunal for each year since 2013.
tabling member constituency	East Ham
tabling member printed	Stephen Timms
uin	180083
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 22/10/2018 answer text <p>Table 1 below shows the number of Personal Independence Payment (PIP) reassessment decisions, mandatory reconsideration (MR) registrations, appeals cleared and decisions overturned at appeal for people with a primary disabling condition of multiple sclerosis.</p><p> </p><p><em>Table 1: Number of PIP reassessment decisions, mandatory reconsideration (MR) registrations, appeals cleared and decisions overturned at appeal for people with a primary disabling condition of multiple sclerosis by year of initial decision</em></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of MRs registered</p></td><td><p>Number of appeals cleared</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>480</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>20</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>1,950</p></td><td><p>470</p></td><td><p>220</p></td><td><p>180</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>9,840</p></td><td><p>1,960</p></td><td><p>780</p></td><td><p>640</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>10,540</p></td><td><p>1,990</p></td><td><p>660</p></td><td><p>560</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018 (January to June)</p></td><td><p>3,980</p></td><td><p>580</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>Table 2 below shows the number of PIP new claims for people with a primary disabling condition of multiple sclerosis who did not receive an award at the initial decision post assessment and where the decision was changed at MR or appeal.</p><p> </p><p><em>Table 2: Number of PIP new claims decisions for people who did not receive an award at the initial decision post assessment where the award was changed at mandatory reconsideration (MR) and where decisions were overturned at appeal for people with a primary disabling condition of multiple sclerosis by year of initial decision</em></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p>Number of decisions</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions where the award was changed at MR</p></td><td><p>Number of appeals cleared</p></td><td><p>Number of decisions overturned at appeal</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>70</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>10</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2014</p></td><td><p>850</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>70</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2015</p></td><td><p>1,550</p></td><td><p>90</p></td><td><p>210</p></td><td><p>150</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2016</p></td><td><p>1,290</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>210</p></td><td><p>140</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2017</p></td><td><p>1,350</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>160</p></td><td><p>110</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2018 (January to June)</p></td><td><p>810</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>#</p></td><td><p>#</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p>Since PIP was introduced 3.5m decisions have been made until June 2018, of these 9% have been appealed and 4% have been overturned.</p><p> </p><p>Data on the number of people who had the mobility award increased from none or standard rate to the enhanced rate is available from internal analytical datasets, but to assess the completeness of recording and quality assure the figures to answer this PQ would incur disproportionate cost.</p><p>Data has been rounded to the nearest 10. Components may not sum to totals due to rounding.</p><p>'#' fewer than 5 decisions in this category.</p><p>The data relates to MRs and appeals recorded up to June 2018 (the latest published data on appeals). Claimants who have received benefit decisions more recently may not yet have had time to complete the claimant journey and progress to appeal.</p><p>PIP data includes normal rules and special rules for the terminally ill claimants, and is for both new claims and DLA reassessment claims.</p><p>Data is based on primary disabling condition as recorded on the PIP computer system. Claimants may often have multiple disabling conditions upon which the decision is based but only the primary condition is shown in these statistics.</p><p>Appeals data shown in the tables is taken from the DWP PIP computer system’s management information. Therefore this appeals data may differ from that held by Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service for various reasons such as delays in data recording and other methodological differences in collating and preparing statistics.</p><p>Some decisions which are changed at mandatory reconsideration, and where the claimant continues to appeal for a higher PIP award, are then changed again at tribunal appeal. Therefore the number of people who had a decision changed at mandatory reconsideration and the number of people who had a decision changed at tribunal appeal cannot be added together.</p><p>Decisions overturned at appeal may include a number of appeals that have been lapsed (which is where DWP changed the decision after an appeal was lodged but before it was heard at Tribunal).</p> answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth answering member printed Sarah Newton grouped question UIN 180081 180082 question first answered 22/10/2018 17:12:58 answering member 4071 label Biography information for Sarah Newton
tabling member	163 label Biography information for Sir Stephen Timms

946957

registered interest
date	23/07/2018
answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
answering dept id	29
answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
hansard heading	Employment and Support Allowance
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, by what date she plans for claimants of employment and support allowance who have been underpaid to have received all the back-payments due to them.
tabling member constituency	East Ham
tabling member printed	Stephen Timms
uin	167107
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 04/09/2018 answer text <p>Further to the latest Written Statement on Employment and Support Allowance – HCWS877 – made on 18 July, we are currently assessing timescales for completion of this exercise. Our aim is for all claimants to receive the benefit they are due as quickly as practicable.</p> answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth answering member printed Sarah Newton question first answered 04/09/2018 11:03:06 answering member 4071 label Biography information for Sarah Newton
tabling member	163 label Biography information for Sir Stephen Timms

946961

registered interest
date	23/07/2018
answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
answering dept id	29
answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
hansard heading	Employment and Support Allowance
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what plans she has to pay compensation to people who are in debt as a result of employment support allowance underpayments.
tabling member constituency	East Ham
tabling member printed	Stephen Timms
uin	167108
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 04/09/2018 answer text <p>We will be reviewing all those cases potentially affected and paying any arrears of past payments that are due. Our focus is on paying arrears to claimants in line with the primary legislation.</p> answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth answering member printed Sarah Newton question first answered 04/09/2018 11:07:28 answering member 4071 label Biography information for Sarah Newton
tabling member	163 label Biography information for Sir Stephen Timms

917322

registered interest
date	05/06/2018
answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
answering dept id	29
answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
hansard heading	Health and Safety Executive: Income
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how much commercial income was accrued to the Health and Safety Executive in each of the last five years.
tabling member constituency	East Ham
tabling member printed	Stephen Timms
uin	149894
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 11/06/2018 answer text <p>The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has earned the following commercial income in each of the last five years:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p> </p></td><td><p><strong>2013/14</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2014/15</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2015/16</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2016/17</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2017/18</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Commercial Income (£M)</p></td><td><p>10.2</p></td><td><p>12.9</p></td><td><p>14.6</p></td><td><p>15.5</p></td><td><p>16.2</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p>Note – the figures are as per HSE’s Annual Report and Accounts and represent income from the Health and Safety Laboratory (HSL) external customers for 13/14 and 14/15, and commercial income from 15/16 onwards as defined in note 4 to the 16/17 ARA (15/16 restated). HSL operated as an in-house agency of HSE until it was integrated as a major part of HSE’s Science Division in April 2015.</p> answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth answering member printed Sarah Newton question first answered 11/06/2018 13:57:49 answering member 4071 label Biography information for Sarah Newton
tabling member	163 label Biography information for Sir Stephen Timms

909534

registered interest
date	22/05/2018
answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
answering dept id	29
answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
hansard heading	Industrial Health and Safety: Private Sector
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, what recent assessment she has made of the (a) effectiveness and (b) value for money of the private sector health and safety accreditation market.
tabling member constituency	East Ham
tabling member printed	Stephen Timms
uin	146692
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 05/06/2018 answer text <p>The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) has not undertaken any specific recent assessment of the effectiveness and value for money of the private sector health and safety accreditation market.</p><p>Professor Ragnar Löfstedt’s 2011 independent review of health and safety legislation for the Department noted concerns about the proliferation of accreditation schemes in the construction sector. Those at the top of the supply chain may impose accreditation requirements as a way of protecting themselves from reputational or commercial damage if a supplier subsequently breaches health and safety legislation. Findings from recent HSE research, including on supply chain assurance of which accreditation is a part, show that the resulting documentary obligations can become a workstream in their own right for suppliers. Reliance on such schemes can give false reassurance if not supported by credible assessment and audit. HSE will be publishing its findings this year.</p><p> </p><p>HSE is committed to working with the industry to simplify arrangements for pre-qualification in health and safety. HSE helped to establish the Safety Schemes in Procurement (SSIP) Forum, which launched in May 2009, to establish mutual recognition of accreditation between different pre-qualification schemes. Mutual recognition can deliver savings to both procurers and contractors; figures compiled by SSIP highlight more than £50 million of savings to clients, other buyers and suppliers in 2016.</p> answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth answering member printed Sarah Newton question first answered 05/06/2018 13:29:53 answering member 4071 label Biography information for Sarah Newton previous answer version 61302 answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth answering member printed Sarah Newton answering member 4071 label Biography information for Sarah Newton
tabling member	163 label Biography information for Sir Stephen Timms

909575

registered interest
date	22/05/2018
answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
answering dept id	29
answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
hansard heading	Health and Safety Executive: Finance
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how much commercial income the Health and Safety Executive budgeted for in each of the last five years.
tabling member constituency	East Ham
tabling member printed	Stephen Timms
uin	146693
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 04/06/2018 answer text <p>HSE budgeted for the following commercial income figures in each of the last five years.</p><p><strong> </strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong> </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2013/14</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2014/15</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2015/16</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2016/17</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2017/18</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Commercial Budget (£M)</p></td><td><p>10.4</p></td><td><p>14.2</p></td><td><p>16.8</p></td><td><p>16.3</p></td><td><p>18.0</p></td></tr></tbody></table> answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth answering member printed Sarah Newton question first answered 04/06/2018 16:38:42 answering member 4071 label Biography information for Sarah Newton
tabling member	163 label Biography information for Sir Stephen Timms

904869

registered interest
date	15/05/2018
answering body	Department for Work and Pensions
answering dept id	29
answering dept short name	Work and Pensions
answering dept sort name	Work and Pensions
hansard heading	Health and Safety Executive: Income
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, how much the Health and Safety Executive earned through selling consultancy services in each of the last five years.
tabling member constituency	East Ham
tabling member printed	Stephen Timms
uin	144150
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 21/05/2018 answer text <p>The information requested is not readily available and to provide it would incur disproportionate cost.</p> answering member constituency Truro and Falmouth answering member printed Sarah Newton question first answered 21/05/2018 10:32:34 answering member 4071 label Biography information for Sarah Newton
tabling member	163 label Biography information for Sir Stephen Timms