Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

837513
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-02-05more like thismore than 2018-02-05
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence remove filter
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading USA: Armed Forces more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many (a) officers and (b) other ranks from the (i) Royal Navy, (ii) Royal Marines, (iii) British Army and (iv) RAF are embedded with (A) United States military forces and (B) the US Department of Defense. more like this
tabling member constituency North Durham remove filter
tabling member printed
Mr Kevan Jones more like this
uin 126632 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-02-08more like thismore than 2018-02-08
answer text <p>Given the routine nature of embedding, some of the information requested is not coordinated centrally. We are now in the process of collecting data and I will write to the hon. Member in due course.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
answering member printed Mr Tobias Ellwood remove filter
question first answered
less than 2018-02-08T17:08:00.623Zmore like thismore than 2018-02-08T17:08:00.623Z
answering member
1487
label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
tabling member
1438
label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones more like this
835970
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-02-02more like thismore than 2018-02-02
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence remove filter
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Defence Equipment: Procurement more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, for what reasons exchange rates used by his Department in respect of costs associated with the Equipment Plan do not reflect the market rates at the date of that plan. more like this
tabling member constituency North Durham remove filter
tabling member printed
Mr Kevan Jones more like this
uin 126325 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-02-12more like thismore than 2018-02-12
answer text <p>Ministry of Defence Head Office directs the use of standard exchange rate assumptions for forecasting 10-year costs across the Department. The full cost of required foreign currency at forecast exchange rates is recognised separately in the Department's budgetary planning process with a provision allocated corporately for the difference between costs at forecast rates and planning assumption rates. This mechanism ensures that the total forecast cost of foreign currency is recognised and managed in the context of the overall financial position of the Department, while allowing individual budget holders to focus on managing foreign currency demand rather than reacting to exchange rate changes.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
answering member printed Mr Tobias Ellwood remove filter
question first answered
less than 2018-02-12T15:45:28.453Zmore like thismore than 2018-02-12T15:45:28.453Z
answering member
1487
label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
tabling member
1438
label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones more like this
835971
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-02-02more like thismore than 2018-02-02
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence remove filter
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Defence Equipment: Procurement more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will make an assessment of the effect of changes in exchange rates on the affordability of the Equipment Plan. more like this
tabling member constituency North Durham remove filter
tabling member printed
Mr Kevan Jones more like this
uin 126326 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-02-12more like thismore than 2018-02-12
answer text <p>The Ministry of Defence considers the impact of foreign exchange as part of its routine financial management and builds appropriate levels of contingency into the Defence budget and equipment plan.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
answering member printed Mr Tobias Ellwood remove filter
question first answered
less than 2018-02-12T15:30:54.707Zmore like thismore than 2018-02-12T15:30:54.707Z
answering member
1487
label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
tabling member
1438
label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones more like this
835975
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-02-02more like thismore than 2018-02-02
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence remove filter
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Type 23 Frigates more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how much his Department has spend on the integration of GWS 35 Sea Ceptor local area anti-air missile systems with the Royal Navy's Type 23 frigate fleet. more like this
tabling member constituency North Durham remove filter
tabling member printed
Mr Kevan Jones more like this
uin 126330 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-02-12more like thismore than 2018-02-12
answer text <p>The integration of Sea Ceptor is carried out as part of a wider package of combat system upgrades to the Type 23 Frigates during a scheduled maintenance period. Precise expenditure on the Sea Ceptor integration element is not separately identifiable but is estimated to be in the order of £1 million per ship.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
answering member printed Mr Tobias Ellwood remove filter
question first answered
less than 2018-02-12T15:28:25.73Zmore like thismore than 2018-02-12T15:28:25.73Z
answering member
1487
label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
tabling member
1438
label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones more like this
836012
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-02-02more like thismore than 2018-02-02
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence remove filter
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Merlin Helicopters more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether he plans to re-establish air-to-air refuelling capability for the Agusta Westland Merlin HC4/4A helicopter fleet. more like this
tabling member constituency North Durham remove filter
tabling member printed
Mr Kevan Jones more like this
uin 126367 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-02-12more like thismore than 2018-02-12
answer text <p>The potential to air-to-air refuel Merlin HC4/4A helicopters will continue to be reviewed but I am withholding further detail as disclosure would, or would be likely to, prejudice the capability, effectiveness or security of the Armed Forces.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
answering member printed Mr Tobias Ellwood remove filter
question first answered
less than 2018-02-12T15:44:38.88Zmore like thismore than 2018-02-12T15:44:38.88Z
answering member
1487
label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
tabling member
1438
label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones more like this
833967
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-01-30more like thismore than 2018-01-30
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence remove filter
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Armed Forces: Resignations more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to his Department's Career Transition Partnership Annual statistics: UK Regular Service Personnel Employment 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2017 published on 25 January 2018, how many Service leavers from (a) the Royal Navy (b) the Army (c) the RAF classed as economically inactive six months after leaving their branch of the armed forces were not in (i) in Education, training, volunteering (ii) Travelling or abroad (iii) economically inactive due to medical reasons (iv) looking after family (v) in retirement; in each of the last five years. more like this
tabling member constituency North Durham remove filter
tabling member printed
Mr Kevan Jones more like this
uin 125724 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-02-07more like thismore than 2018-02-07
answer text <p>An estimated 264 Service leavers during Financial Year (FY) 2015-16 used a billable Career Transition Partnership (CTP) service and self-reported as being economically inactive for ‘other’ reasons (i.e. not in education, training or volunteering, travelling or abroad, reporting medical reasons, looking after family or retired) six months after leaving Service. Of these;</p><ul><li>34 were estimated to be Naval Service leavers</li><li>156 were estimated to be Army Service leavers</li><li>74 were estimated to be RAF Service leavers</li></ul><p> </p><p>An estimated 233 Service leavers during FY 2016-17 used a billable CTP service and self-reported as being economically inactive for ‘other’ reasons (i.e. not in education, training or volunteering, travelling or abroad, reporting medical reasons, looking after family or retired) six months after leaving Service. Of these;</p><ul><li>47 were estimated to be Naval Service leavers</li><li>136 were estimated to be Army Service leavers</li><li>50 were estimated to be RAF Service leavers</li></ul><p> </p><p>Data held on reasons for economic inactivity were not processed and compiled prior to FY 2015-16.</p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
answering member printed Mr Tobias Ellwood remove filter
question first answered
less than 2018-02-07T17:03:18.773Zmore like thismore than 2018-02-07T17:03:18.773Z
answering member
1487
label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
tabling member
1438
label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones more like this
833975
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-01-30more like thismore than 2018-01-30
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence remove filter
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Armed Forces: Redundancy more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to his Department's Career Transition Partnership Annual statistics: UK Regular Service Personnel Employment 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2017 published, 25 January 2018, how many Service leavers from (a) the Royal Navy (b) the Army (c) the RAF selected for redundancy between September 2011 and June 2014, who used a billable CTP service and were classed as economically inactive six months after leaving their branch of the armed forces, were not in (i) in Education, training, volunteering (ii) Travelling or abroad (iii) economically inactive due to medical reasons (iv) looking after family (v) in retirement; in each of the last three years. more like this
tabling member constituency North Durham remove filter
tabling member printed
Mr Kevan Jones more like this
uin 125732 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-02-07more like thismore than 2018-02-07
answer text <p>An estimated 415 Service leavers selected for redundancy between September 2011 and June 2014 used a billable Career Transition Partnership (CTP) service and self-reported as being economically inactive for ‘other’ reasons (i.e. not in education, training or volunteering, travelling or abroad, reporting medical reasons, looking after family or retired) six months after leaving Service. Of these;</p><ul><li>58 were estimated to be Naval Service leavers</li><li>247 were estimated to be Army Service leavers</li><li>111 were estimated to be RAF Service leavers</li></ul><p> </p><p>Of these 415;</p><ul><li>196 left during Tranche 1, of which 54 were estimated to be Naval Service leavers, 68 were estimated to be Army Service leavers, and 74 were estimated to be RAF Service leavers.</li><li>106 left during Tranche 2, of which three were estimated to be Naval Service leavers, 67 were estimated to be Army Service leavers, and 36 were estimated to be RAF Service leavers)</li><li>87 left during Tranche 3, all of which were estimated to be Army Service leavers.</li><li>26 left during Tranche 4, nearly all of which were estimated to be Army Service leavers (fewer than three were RAF Service leavers).</li></ul><p> </p><p>Of these 415, an estimated 309 were applicants for redundancy, broken down by Service as follows:</p><ul><li>38 were estimated to be Naval Service leavers</li><li>200 were estimated to be Army Service leavers</li><li>70 were estimated to be RAF Service leavers</li></ul><p> </p><p>An estimated 106 were non-applicants broken down by Service as follows:</p><ul><li>19 were estimated to be Naval Service leavers</li><li>46 were estimated to be Army Service leavers</li><li>41 were estimated to be RAF Service leavers</li></ul><p> </p><p>Estimated numbers have been calculated using sample data, with proportions applied to the overall redundancy population figure. Totals may not equal the sum of their parts. The Ministry of Defence only holds information on Service leavers who were economically inactive six months after leaving Service.</p>
answering member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
answering member printed Mr Tobias Ellwood remove filter
grouped question UIN
125737 more like this
125739 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-02-07T17:01:14.887Zmore like thismore than 2018-02-07T17:01:14.887Z
answering member
1487
label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
tabling member
1438
label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones more like this
833980
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-01-30more like thismore than 2018-01-30
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence remove filter
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Armed Forces: Redundancy more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to his Department's Career Transition Partnership Annual statistics: UK Regular Service Personnel Employment 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2017 published, 25 January 2018, how many Service leavers from (a) the Royal Navy (b) the Army (c) the RAF who (i) chose to be selected for redundancy and (ii) did not choose to be selected for redundancy between September 2011 and June 2014, who used a billable CTP service and were classed as economically inactive six months after leaving their branch of the armed forces, were not in (i) in Education, training, volunteering (ii) Travelling or abroad (iii) economically inactive due to medical reasons (iv) looking after family (v) in retirement; in each of the last three years. more like this
tabling member constituency North Durham remove filter
tabling member printed
Mr Kevan Jones more like this
uin 125737 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-02-07more like thismore than 2018-02-07
answer text <p>An estimated 415 Service leavers selected for redundancy between September 2011 and June 2014 used a billable Career Transition Partnership (CTP) service and self-reported as being economically inactive for ‘other’ reasons (i.e. not in education, training or volunteering, travelling or abroad, reporting medical reasons, looking after family or retired) six months after leaving Service. Of these;</p><ul><li>58 were estimated to be Naval Service leavers</li><li>247 were estimated to be Army Service leavers</li><li>111 were estimated to be RAF Service leavers</li></ul><p> </p><p>Of these 415;</p><ul><li>196 left during Tranche 1, of which 54 were estimated to be Naval Service leavers, 68 were estimated to be Army Service leavers, and 74 were estimated to be RAF Service leavers.</li><li>106 left during Tranche 2, of which three were estimated to be Naval Service leavers, 67 were estimated to be Army Service leavers, and 36 were estimated to be RAF Service leavers)</li><li>87 left during Tranche 3, all of which were estimated to be Army Service leavers.</li><li>26 left during Tranche 4, nearly all of which were estimated to be Army Service leavers (fewer than three were RAF Service leavers).</li></ul><p> </p><p>Of these 415, an estimated 309 were applicants for redundancy, broken down by Service as follows:</p><ul><li>38 were estimated to be Naval Service leavers</li><li>200 were estimated to be Army Service leavers</li><li>70 were estimated to be RAF Service leavers</li></ul><p> </p><p>An estimated 106 were non-applicants broken down by Service as follows:</p><ul><li>19 were estimated to be Naval Service leavers</li><li>46 were estimated to be Army Service leavers</li><li>41 were estimated to be RAF Service leavers</li></ul><p> </p><p>Estimated numbers have been calculated using sample data, with proportions applied to the overall redundancy population figure. Totals may not equal the sum of their parts. The Ministry of Defence only holds information on Service leavers who were economically inactive six months after leaving Service.</p>
answering member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
answering member printed Mr Tobias Ellwood remove filter
grouped question UIN
125732 more like this
125739 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-02-07T17:01:14.95Zmore like thismore than 2018-02-07T17:01:14.95Z
answering member
1487
label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
tabling member
1438
label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones more like this
833982
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-01-30more like thismore than 2018-01-30
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence remove filter
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Armed Forces: Redundancy more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to his Department's Career Transition Partnership Annual statistics: UK Regular Service Personnel Employment 1 April 2012 to 31 March 2017 published, 25 January 2018, how many service leavers from (a) the Royal Navy (b) the Army (c) the RAF selected for redundancy in (i) tranche 1 (ii) tranche 2 (iii) tranche 3 (iv) tranche 4 between September 2011 and June 2014, who used a billable CTP service and were classed as economically inactive six months after leaving their branch of the armed forces were not in (A) in education, training, volunteering, (B) travelling or abroad, (C) economically inactive due to medical reasons, (D) looking after family and (E) in retirement in each of the last three years. more like this
tabling member constituency North Durham remove filter
tabling member printed
Mr Kevan Jones more like this
uin 125739 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-02-07more like thismore than 2018-02-07
answer text <p>An estimated 415 Service leavers selected for redundancy between September 2011 and June 2014 used a billable Career Transition Partnership (CTP) service and self-reported as being economically inactive for ‘other’ reasons (i.e. not in education, training or volunteering, travelling or abroad, reporting medical reasons, looking after family or retired) six months after leaving Service. Of these;</p><ul><li>58 were estimated to be Naval Service leavers</li><li>247 were estimated to be Army Service leavers</li><li>111 were estimated to be RAF Service leavers</li></ul><p> </p><p>Of these 415;</p><ul><li>196 left during Tranche 1, of which 54 were estimated to be Naval Service leavers, 68 were estimated to be Army Service leavers, and 74 were estimated to be RAF Service leavers.</li><li>106 left during Tranche 2, of which three were estimated to be Naval Service leavers, 67 were estimated to be Army Service leavers, and 36 were estimated to be RAF Service leavers)</li><li>87 left during Tranche 3, all of which were estimated to be Army Service leavers.</li><li>26 left during Tranche 4, nearly all of which were estimated to be Army Service leavers (fewer than three were RAF Service leavers).</li></ul><p> </p><p>Of these 415, an estimated 309 were applicants for redundancy, broken down by Service as follows:</p><ul><li>38 were estimated to be Naval Service leavers</li><li>200 were estimated to be Army Service leavers</li><li>70 were estimated to be RAF Service leavers</li></ul><p> </p><p>An estimated 106 were non-applicants broken down by Service as follows:</p><ul><li>19 were estimated to be Naval Service leavers</li><li>46 were estimated to be Army Service leavers</li><li>41 were estimated to be RAF Service leavers</li></ul><p> </p><p>Estimated numbers have been calculated using sample data, with proportions applied to the overall redundancy population figure. Totals may not equal the sum of their parts. The Ministry of Defence only holds information on Service leavers who were economically inactive six months after leaving Service.</p>
answering member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
answering member printed Mr Tobias Ellwood remove filter
grouped question UIN
125732 more like this
125737 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-02-07T17:01:14.997Zmore like thismore than 2018-02-07T17:01:14.997Z
answering member
1487
label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
tabling member
1438
label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones more like this
833995
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2018-01-30more like thismore than 2018-01-30
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 more like this
answering dept short name Defence remove filter
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Navy: Redundancy more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many RN service leavers who (a) chose to be selected for redundancy and (b) did not choose to be selected for redundancy were made redundant from the armed forces between September 2011 and June 2014. more like this
tabling member constituency North Durham remove filter
tabling member printed
Mr Kevan Jones more like this
uin 125752 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2018-02-12more like thismore than 2018-02-12
answer text <p>The requested information is provided in the attached tables.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Bournemouth East more like this
answering member printed Mr Tobias Ellwood remove filter
attachment
1
file name PQ125752-Royal Navy.docx more like this
title Royal Navy Redundancies more like this
2
file name PQ125753-RAF Redundancies.docx more like this
title Royal Air Force Redundancies more like this
grouped question UIN 125753 more like this
question first answered
less than 2018-02-12T16:47:03.33Zmore like thismore than 2018-02-12T16:47:03.33Z
answering member
1487
label Biography information for Mr Tobias Ellwood more like this
tabling member
1438
label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones more like this