Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1126029
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2019-05-13
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury remove filter
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Assistance Animals: Food more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, for what reasons VAT will be charged on food for assistance and therapy dogs. more like this
tabling member constituency Newcastle-under-Lyme more like this
tabling member printed
Paul Farrelly more like this
uin 253520 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-05-16more like thismore than 2019-05-16
answer text <p>The sale of food that is formulated and held out for sale exclusively for working dogs, which includes assistance and therapy dogs, is zero rated. The VAT rules in this area are long-standing and have not changed.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Central Devon more like this
answering member printed Mel Stride remove filter
question first answered
less than 2019-05-16T13:30:33.173Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-16T13:30:33.173Z
answering member
3935
label Biography information for Mel Stride more like this
tabling member
1436
label Biography information for Paul Farrelly more like this
1126056
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2019-05-13
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury remove filter
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading BBC: National Insurance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate he has made of the cost to the BBC of the additional employers' national insurance contributions due as a result of the ruling by HMRC on personal service companies. more like this
tabling member constituency Shipley more like this
tabling member printed
Philip Davies more like this
uin 253536 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-05-21more like thismore than 2019-05-21
answer text <p>I cannot comment on individual tax affairs.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Central Devon more like this
answering member printed Mel Stride remove filter
grouped question UIN 253537 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-05-21T15:36:25.927Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-21T15:36:25.927Z
answering member
3935
label Biography information for Mel Stride more like this
tabling member
1565
label Biography information for Sir Philip Davies more like this
1126057
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2019-05-13
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury remove filter
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading BBC: Off-payroll Working more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what discussions he has had with the BBC on potential tax liabilities arising on the beneficiaries of any settlement reached by the BBC with HMRC over the tax now due by presenters who had previously been paid through personal service companies. more like this
tabling member constituency Shipley more like this
tabling member printed
Philip Davies more like this
uin 253537 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-05-21more like thismore than 2019-05-21
answer text <p>I cannot comment on individual tax affairs.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Central Devon more like this
answering member printed Mel Stride remove filter
grouped question UIN 253536 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-05-21T15:36:25.987Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-21T15:36:25.987Z
answering member
3935
label Biography information for Mel Stride more like this
tabling member
1565
label Biography information for Sir Philip Davies more like this
1126256
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2019-05-13
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury remove filter
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Retail Trade: Urban Areas more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what fiscal steps he is taking to support the economic sustainability of the high street. more like this
tabling member constituency Crawley more like this
tabling member printed
Henry Smith more like this
uin 253560 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-05-21more like thismore than 2019-05-21
answer text <p>At Budget 2018, the Government set out Our Plan for the High Street to help local high streets to evolve and adapt to changing consumer demands. This included a cut for smaller retailers to business rates by a third for two years from 1 April 2019. The Government also announced a new £675m Future High Streets Fund to support local areas to make high streets fit for the future. £55 million of the Fund has also been allocated to support the regeneration of historic high streets and town centres.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Central Devon more like this
answering member printed Mel Stride remove filter
question first answered
less than 2019-05-21T15:40:18.31Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-21T15:40:18.31Z
answering member
3935
label Biography information for Mel Stride more like this
tabling member
3960
label Biography information for Henry Smith more like this
1126269
registered interest false more like this
date remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2019-05-13
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury remove filter
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Musicians: EU Countries more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what steps his Department is taking to ensure that musicians can transport instruments and equipment to EU27 countries after the UK leaves the EU. more like this
tabling member constituency Portsmouth South more like this
tabling member printed
Stephen Morgan more like this
uin 253708 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-05-16more like thismore than 2019-05-16
answer text <p>Delivering a deal negotiated with the EU remains the Government’s top priority. However, if the UK leaves the EU without a deal, the same customs rules will broadly apply to transporting instruments and equipment to the EU as apply to trade between the UK and non-EU countries. This will include the use of temporary admission and applications for Returned Goods Relief.</p><p> </p><p>Alternatively, ATA carnets are available for commercial goods, professional equipment or goods going to trade fair or exhibition in participating countries, which are moved on a temporary basis to a new customs territory (i.e. they will not be sold and will return to the country of origin). This includes musical instruments.</p><p> </p><p>In a no deal scenario, the process of using an ATA Carnet (or a temporary admission declaration) will become an acceptable option for moving goods temporarily between the UK and EU, as the UK will become a single customs territory. The process for obtaining and using a Carnet will remain as it is now.</p>
answering member constituency Central Devon more like this
answering member printed Mel Stride remove filter
question first answered
less than 2019-05-16T13:41:53.537Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-16T13:41:53.537Z
answering member
3935
label Biography information for Mel Stride more like this
tabling member
4653
label Biography information for Stephen Morgan more like this
1125877
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-05-10more like thismore than 2019-05-10
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury remove filter
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Taxation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what the incidence of the taxation of carried interest has been annually since 2005. more like this
tabling member constituency Oxford East more like this
tabling member printed
Anneliese Dodds more like this
uin 252881 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-05-15more like thismore than 2019-05-15
answer text <p>I refer the Honourable Member to the answer that I gave on 23 April 2019 to PQ UIN 243571. In addition, since 6 April 2016 Income Tax has been levied on carried interest that relates to certain short term investments.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Central Devon more like this
answering member printed Mel Stride remove filter
question first answered
less than 2019-05-15T15:43:28.84Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T15:43:28.84Z
answering member
3935
label Biography information for Mel Stride more like this
tabling member
4657
label Biography information for Anneliese Dodds more like this
1125878
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-05-10more like thismore than 2019-05-10
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury remove filter
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Public Sector: Tax Avoidance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many public sector organisations paid workers through disguised remuneration loans. more like this
tabling member constituency Oxford East more like this
tabling member printed
Anneliese Dodds more like this
uin 252882 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-05-15more like thismore than 2019-05-15
answer text <p>Disguised remuneration (DR) loan schemes are contrived arrangements that pay loans in place of ordinary remuneration with the sole purpose of avoiding income tax and National Insurance contributions. The loans are provided on terms that mean they are not repaid in practice, so they are no different to normal income and are, and always have been, taxable.</p><p> </p><p>Individuals, working for public bodies, identified in the course of HMRC’s compliance work as using a tax avoidance scheme would be investigated in the same way as any other scheme user.</p><p> </p><p>The Government estimates that around 50,000 individuals could be affected by the charge on DR loans. The charge applies to all users of DR tax avoidance schemes, it does not single out a specific group or industry. It is possible for individuals to use DR tax avoidance schemes without the participation or knowledge of the entity that engages them.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Central Devon more like this
answering member printed Mel Stride remove filter
question first answered
less than 2019-05-15T15:41:27.187Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-15T15:41:27.187Z
answering member
3935
label Biography information for Mel Stride more like this
tabling member
4657
label Biography information for Anneliese Dodds more like this
1125242
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury remove filter
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Sanitary Products: VAT more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what representations he has made to the Romanian Presidency on progressing its negotiations on abolishing VAT on sanitary products. more like this
tabling member constituency Glasgow Central more like this
tabling member printed
Alison Thewliss more like this
uin 252004 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-05-16more like thismore than 2019-05-16
answer text <p>To date, the Romanian Presidency has held one official level discussion on the European Commission’s legislative proposal on VAT Rates. As drafted, this proposal would give the UK the flexibility to apply a zero rate of VAT to women’s sanitary products.</p><p> </p><p>During this discussion, the UK delegation made clear that the Government strongly supports the flexibility that the draft legislation would offer. Member States and the Commission are well aware of the Government’s firm commitment to zero rate women’s sanitary products as soon as it is legal to do so.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Central Devon more like this
answering member printed Mel Stride remove filter
question first answered
less than 2019-05-16T15:07:29.68Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-16T15:07:29.68Z
answering member
3935
label Biography information for Mel Stride more like this
tabling member
4430
label Biography information for Alison Thewliss more like this
1125369
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury remove filter
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Employment Agencies: Tax Avoidance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment his Department has made of the level of involvement of recruitment agencies in disguised remuneration loans. more like this
tabling member constituency Oxford East more like this
tabling member printed
Anneliese Dodds more like this
uin 252056 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-05-13more like thismore than 2019-05-13
answer text <p>DR schemes are contrived arrangements that pay loans in place of ordinary remuneration, usually through an offshore trust, with the sole purpose of avoiding income tax and National Insurance contributions. The loans are provided on terms that mean they are not repaid in practice, so they are no different to normal income and are, and always have been, taxable.</p><p> </p><p>HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) will always seek payment of the loan charge from employers in the first instance. It is only where HMRC cannot reasonably collect from the employer, for example where the employer is no longer in existence or is based offshore, that the individual will be liable to pay the tax due. Around 75% of overall yield from the measure is expected to come from employers.</p><p> </p><p>Only an employer, or umbrella company established for the purpose, can originate a DR scheme. Recruitment agencies match individuals with engagers who require their labour. In most cases recruitment agencies do not employ the individual in question. Where a recruitment agency used a DR scheme to reward their employees they will be liable to pay the loan charge in the first instance.</p>
answering member constituency Central Devon more like this
answering member printed Mel Stride remove filter
grouped question UIN 252057 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-05-13T15:46:10.287Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-13T15:46:10.287Z
answering member
3935
label Biography information for Mel Stride more like this
tabling member
4657
label Biography information for Anneliese Dodds more like this
1125370
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-05-08more like thismore than 2019-05-08
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury remove filter
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Employment Agencies: Tax Avoidance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many recruitment agencies have been implicated in loan charge cases. more like this
tabling member constituency Oxford East more like this
tabling member printed
Anneliese Dodds more like this
uin 252057 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-05-13more like thismore than 2019-05-13
answer text <p>DR schemes are contrived arrangements that pay loans in place of ordinary remuneration, usually through an offshore trust, with the sole purpose of avoiding income tax and National Insurance contributions. The loans are provided on terms that mean they are not repaid in practice, so they are no different to normal income and are, and always have been, taxable.</p><p> </p><p>HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) will always seek payment of the loan charge from employers in the first instance. It is only where HMRC cannot reasonably collect from the employer, for example where the employer is no longer in existence or is based offshore, that the individual will be liable to pay the tax due. Around 75% of overall yield from the measure is expected to come from employers.</p><p> </p><p>Only an employer, or umbrella company established for the purpose, can originate a DR scheme. Recruitment agencies match individuals with engagers who require their labour. In most cases recruitment agencies do not employ the individual in question. Where a recruitment agency used a DR scheme to reward their employees they will be liable to pay the loan charge in the first instance.</p>
answering member constituency Central Devon more like this
answering member printed Mel Stride remove filter
grouped question UIN 252056 more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-05-13T15:46:10.337Zmore like thismore than 2019-05-13T15:46:10.337Z
answering member
3935
label Biography information for Mel Stride more like this
tabling member
4657
label Biography information for Anneliese Dodds more like this