Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

707650
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 remove filter
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Armed Forces: Dogs more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many military dogs have been destroyed in each year since 2012; and what the reason for each such destruction was. more like this
tabling member constituency Westmorland and Lonsdale more like this
tabling member printed
Tim Farron more like this
uin 66528 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-03-08more like thismore than 2017-03-08
answer text <p>Decisions to euthanise any animal in military service are only taken by a veterinarian officer after all possible treatment avenues have been exhausted and where it is considered to be the most humane option for the animal. The only other scenario where an animal would be euthanised is where it is considered to pose a risk to public safety.</p><p> </p><p>I refer the hon. Member to the answer given by my hon. Friend the then Minister for Defence Personnel, Welfare and Veterans, (Anna Soubry) on 24 November 2014 to Question 205235 and the answer I gave on 22 June 2015 to Question 2717; both to the hon. Member for North Durham (Kevan Jones). Information relating to dogs euthanised by the Ministry of Defence in each year since 2015 can be found below:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Reason</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2015-16</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2016-17 (to </strong><strong>06/03/17)</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Abdominal Catastrophe</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cardiac Disease</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Unsuitable for re-homing</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>17</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Malignant Neoplasia</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Multiple Chronic Disease Processes</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Neurological Disease</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Osteoarthritis</p></td><td><p>13</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bone Marrow Disorder</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cellulitis of RF necrotic and slough</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Chronic Hygromas</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Cruciate rupture</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Nasal Ulceration</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Pleurisy not responding to treatment</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Right Carpal hyperextension</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ruptured Cranial Cruciate Ligament</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>-</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Chronic Dermatitis</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p><strong>Total </strong></p></td><td><p><strong>79</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>36</strong></p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><sup>1 </sup>The animal is not suitable for re-homing based on behaviour and temperament, with potential consequences for an individual’s welfare.</p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Milton Keynes North more like this
answering member printed Mark Lancaster remove filter
attachment
1
file name 20141124_205235_MOD_Working_Dogs.docx more like this
title 205235 - MOD Working Dogs more like this
2
file name 20150622_2717_Military_Dogs.docx more like this
title 2717 - Military Dogs more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-03-08T17:41:04.717Zmore like thismore than 2017-03-08T17:41:04.717Z
answering member
1544
label Biography information for Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton more like this
tabling member
1591
label Biography information for Tim Farron more like this
707652
registered interest false more like this
date remove filter
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 remove filter
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Ascension Island: Airports more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what recent assessment his Department has made of the quality of the surface of the runway on Ascension Island; and if he will make a statement. more like this
tabling member constituency Ilford North more like this
tabling member printed
Wes Streeting more like this
uin 66515 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2017-03-13
answer text <p>The Ministry of Defence undertakes regular assessments to ensure that the quality of the runway surface at Ascension Island Base continues to meet our operational needs. Where issues are identified we work in conjunction with the US Air Force who own and operate the runway.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Milton Keynes North more like this
answering member printed Mark Lancaster remove filter
question first answered
less than 2017-03-13T17:14:39.967Zmore like thismore than 2017-03-13T17:14:39.967Z
answering member
1544
label Biography information for Lord Lancaster of Kimbolton more like this
tabling member
4504
label Biography information for Wes Streeting more like this