Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1196447
registered interest true more like this
date less than 2020-05-18more like thismore than 2020-05-18
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Cannabis: Medical Treatments more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, with reference to paragraphs 4 and 5 on page 3 of her Department's Factsheet on Cannabis, CBD and other cannabinoids, what assessment she has made of the limit of detection that is the appropriate level of sensitivity to accurately determine through laboratory analysis that there are no controlled cannabinoids present in a CBD product and that the product contains CBD in its pure form. more like this
tabling member constituency Reigate more like this
tabling member printed
Crispin Blunt more like this
uin 48249 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-06-02more like thismore than 2020-06-02
answer text <p>The Department has made no assessment of limits of detection in relation to testing for the presence of controlled cannabinoids in CBD products. The Home Office approach is one of caution, that is, that a CBD product is likely to be controlled under the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971 and the Misuse of Drugs Regulations 2001 (‘the 2001 Regulations’) if it contains any controlled cannabinoids.</p><p>The term ‘administration’ in the exempt product definition is not defined by the 2001 Regulations. The Human Medicines Regulations 2012 provides the following as part of its definition:</p><p>““administer” means administer to a human being—</p><p> </p><p>(a) orally, by injection, or by introduction into the body in any other way; or</p><p>(b) by external application (whether or not by direct application to the body)”</p><p> </p><p>The interpretation of legislation is ultimately a matter for the courts to decide.</p> more like this
answering member constituency North West Hampshire more like this
answering member printed Kit Malthouse remove filter
grouped question UIN 48250 more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-06-02T07:41:23.137Zmore like thismore than 2020-06-02T07:41:23.137Z
answering member
4495
label Biography information for Kit Malthouse more like this
tabling member
104
label Biography information for Crispin Blunt more like this