Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed question first answered answering member label attachment file name title
tabling member	label

Search

50107

registered interest
date	07/05/2014
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many prison officers left Prison Service employment within (a) six months, (b) one year and (c) two years of becoming an officer in each of the last five years.
tabling member constituency	Cardiff South and Penarth
tabling member printed	Stephen Doughty
uin	198003
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 13/05/2014 answer text <p> </p><p> </p><p>Information on the number of prison officers who left employment within the first two years of joining public sector prisons in England and Wales in 2009 – 2013 is contained in the table below.</p><p> </p><p><strong>Table: Headcount of officers leaving public sector prison service in England and Wales within (a) 6 months, (b) 1 year, (c) 2 years 2009 - 2013 </strong></p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>Year</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Officers leaving Within 6 months</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Officers leaving within 1 year<sup>1</sup></strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Officers leaving within 2 year<sup>1</sup></strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2009</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>100</p></td><td><p>190</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2010</p></td><td><p>30</p></td><td><p>60</p></td><td><p>130</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2011</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>50</p></td><td><p>90</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2012</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>40</p></td><td><p>80</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>2013</p></td><td><p>~</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td><p>50</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p><strong><sup>1</sup></strong><strong> Figures are cumulative i.e. the number leaving within 1 year includes those leaving within 6 months.</strong></p><p>Officer numbers, which are derived from a dynamic administrative system, have been rounded to the nearest 10 to reflect the level of uncertainty in the figures.</p><p> </p><p>It is not possible to provide figures for privately contracted prisons with the time available. This is because information on leavers is held not held centrally and is only available from the individual contractors. This information has been requested and I will write to you again when it is available.</p> answering member constituency Kenilworth and Southam answering member printed Jeremy Wright question first answered 13/05/2014 12:00:00 answering member 1560 label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Wright
tabling member	4264 label Biography information for Stephen Doughty

49753

registered interest
date	06/05/2014
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 10 April 2014, Official Report, column 406W, on remand in custody, what proportion of the total number of defendants charged with the relevant offences the figures represent.
tabling member constituency	Shipley
tabling member printed	Philip Davies
uin	197887
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 13/05/2014 answer text <p> </p><p>The table below shows the total number of defendants proceeded against for the specified offence groups and the number of defendants who were remanded in custody, broken down by sex. It also shows the percentage of defendants remanded in custody out of the total number of defendants proceeded against for the specified offence categories.</p> answering member constituency Kenilworth and Southam answering member printed Jeremy Wright question first answered 13/05/2014 12:00:00 answering member 1560 label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Wright attachment 1 file name 197887.doc title Table 1
tabling member	1565 label Biography information for Sir Philip Davies

49755

registered interest
date	06/05/2014
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 7 April 20104. Official Report, columns 130-1W, on prisons: disciplinary proceedings, what the sex was of each of the 11 employees dismissed for conducting an inappropriate relationship with a prisoner; and how many employees were disciplined but not dismissed for the same misconduct in the same period, broken down by sex.
tabling member constituency	Shipley
tabling member printed	Philip Davies
uin	197872
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 13/05/2014 answer text <p> </p><p> </p><p>The vast majority of Prison Service staff are honest, hard-working professionals. When a member of staff has an inappropriate relationship with a prisoner or ex prisoner, their actions fail to meet the professional standards expected of them in the course of their duty.</p><p> </p><p>Corruption is taken very seriously and there is no place for it within the Prison Service. Anyone who fails to meet these standards will be dealt with swiftly and robustly.&quot;</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Of the 11 employees dismissed for conducting an inappropriate relationship with a prisoner 6 were male and 5 were female.</p><p> </p><p>From 1 January 2013 to 31 December 2013 there were a total of 6 NOMS employees disciplined for having an 'Inappropriate Relationship with a prisoner / ex prisoner'. Of these, were 3 were male and 3 were female.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p> answering member constituency Kenilworth and Southam answering member printed Jeremy Wright question first answered 13/05/2014 12:00:00 answering member 1560 label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Wright
tabling member	1565 label Biography information for Sir Philip Davies

49756

registered interest
date	06/05/2014
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, pursuant to the Answer of 1 May 2014, Official Report, column 763W, on open prisons, what offences were committed by each of the offenders in prison for violence against the person.
tabling member constituency	Shipley
tabling member printed	Philip Davies
uin	197807
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 13/05/2014 answer text <p> </p><p> </p><p>Open prisons have been used since 1936, because they are the most effective means of ensuring that prisoners are suitably risk-assessed before they are released into the community under appropriate licence conditions. These prisons also provide effective supervision for prisoners who do not require the security conditions of the closed estate, because they have been assessed as having a low risk of harm to the public and a low risk of absconding by the independent Parole Board and/or NOMS.</p><p> </p><p>Indeterminate sentence prisoners located in open conditions have been rigorously risk assessed and categorised as being of a low enough risk to the public to warrant their placement in an open prison. They will have previously spent time in prisons with higher levels of security, before being transferred to open conditions if recommended by the Parole Board - or directed through NOMS. Time spent in open prisons affords prisoners the opportunity to find work, re-establish family ties, reintegrate into the community and ensure housing needs are met. For many prisoners, in particular those, such as Indeterminate Sentence Prisoners who have spent a considerable amount of time in custody; these are essential components for successful reintegration in the community and therefore an important factor in protecting the public. To release these prisoners directly from a closed prison without the resettlement benefits of the open estate would undoubtedly lead to higher levels of post-release re-offending.</p><p> </p><p>The requested information is provided in the table below.</p><p> </p><p>These figures have been drawn from administrative IT systems which, as with any large scale recording system, are subject to possible errors with data entry and processing.</p> answering member constituency Kenilworth and Southam answering member printed Jeremy Wright question first answered 13/05/2014 12:00:00 answering member 1560 label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Wright attachment 1 file name Copy of PQ 197807 (Reply data).xls title Table 1
tabling member	1565 label Biography information for Sir Philip Davies

49761

registered interest
date	06/05/2014
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, on how many occasions magistrates in youth courts handed down maximum two-year sentences in each of the last five years.
tabling member constituency	Shipley
tabling member printed	Philip Davies
uin	197812
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 13/05/2014 answer text <p> </p><p> </p><p>There is a separate and distinct youth justice system, including a different sentencing framework. The Detention and Training Order is the main custodial sentence for children and young people and the only custodial sentence available in the Youth Court.</p><p> </p><p>Detention and Training Orders are available for persistent and serious offending committed by children and young people under 18 years old. When determining the length of sentence, courts must have regard to the specific Sentencing Council guideline for young people. This includes factors such as the age, maturity and culpability of the young offender as well as the seriousness of the offence.</p><p> </p><p>Data on the number of Detention and Training Orders given by magistrates alone (not including District Judges) in the Youth Court is not held centrally. However data on the number of children and young people aged 12 to 17 given a Detention and Training Order of 24 months in length in the Youth Court is set out in the table below:</p><p> </p><table><tbody><tr><td colspan="10"><p><strong>Juveniles sentenced to the maximum custodial sentence of two years at magistrates' courts, England and Wales, 2008-2012.</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td> </td><td><p><strong>2 Year sentence</strong></p></td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td><p>2008</p></td><td><p>21</p></td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td><p>2009</p></td><td><p>16</p></td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td><p>2010</p></td><td><p>20</p></td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td><p>2011</p></td><td><p>29</p></td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td><p>2012</p></td><td><p>15</p></td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td><td> </td></tr><tr><td colspan="10"><p>Source: Justice Statistics Analytical Services - Ministry of Justice.</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p> answering member constituency Kenilworth and Southam answering member printed Jeremy Wright question first answered 13/05/2014 12:00:00 answering member 1560 label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Wright
tabling member	1565 label Biography information for Sir Philip Davies

49764

registered interest
date	06/05/2014
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment he has made of magistrates' use of two year sentencing powers; and if he will make a statement.
tabling member constituency	Shipley
tabling member printed	Philip Davies
uin	197786
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 13/05/2014 answer text <p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>A Detention and Training Order, the main custodial sentence for children and young people, can be up to 24 months in length and is available to magistrates sitting in the Youth Court. The Government has not made an assessment of magistrates' use of this order.</p><p> </p><p>There are a range of disposals available to magistrates when dealing with children and young people which are designed to address offending behaviour. Through our reforms this Government has taken steps to improve the youth sentencing framework.</p><p> </p> answering member constituency Kenilworth and Southam answering member printed Jeremy Wright question first answered 13/05/2014 12:00:00 answering member 1560 label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Wright
tabling member	1565 label Biography information for Sir Philip Davies

49766

registered interest
date	06/05/2014
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what proportion of (a) men and (b) women found guilty of benefit fraud in each of the last 10 years received (i) immediate custodial sentences and (b) non-custodial sentences.
tabling member constituency	Shipley
tabling member printed	Philip Davies
uin	197800
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 13/05/2014 answer text <p> </p><p> </p><p>The sentencing framework and sentencing guidelines apply equally to all offenders. Sentencing is entirely a matter for the courts, taking account of all the circumstances of each case. This will include the seriousness of the offence, including all aggravating and mitigating factors, and a guilty plea.</p><p> </p><p>Fraud has a maximum penalty of 10 years' imprisonment and there are various other offences which are specific to benefit fraud, with maximum penalties of up to seven years' imprisonment. The courts must follow the relevant sentencing guideline in their approach to sentencing. Last year, the Sentencing Council conducted a public consultation on a new draft guideline for fraud and a new definitive guideline, informed by the responses received, will apply in due course.</p><p> </p><p>In addition to criminal penalties, those convicted of benefit fraud also face a restriction on their benefits for an extended period.</p><p> </p><p>The number of men and women sentenced at all courts for offences relating to benefit fraud in England and Wales from 2002 to2012 (latest data available) can be viewed in the table.</p><p> </p><p>Please note that court proceedings statistics for the year 2013 are planned to be published by the Ministry of Justice on 15th May 2014.</p> answering member constituency Kenilworth and Southam answering member printed Jeremy Wright question first answered 13/05/2014 12:00:00 answering member 1560 label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Wright attachment 1 file name Copy of PQ 197800 Table.xls title Table 1
tabling member	1565 label Biography information for Sir Philip Davies

49768

registered interest
date	06/05/2014
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what the ratio of prison officers to inmates of each gender was in each (a) prison establishment and (b) category of prison in each of the last five years.
tabling member constituency	Shipley
tabling member printed	Philip Davies
uin	197839
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 13/05/2014 answer text <p> </p><p> </p><p>I refer the hon. Member to the reply given on April 7<sup>th</sup> 2014, Official Report, [261W].</p><p> </p> answering member constituency Kenilworth and Southam answering member printed Jeremy Wright question first answered 13/05/2014 12:00:00 answering member 1560 label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Wright
tabling member	1565 label Biography information for Sir Philip Davies

49968

registered interest
date	06/05/2014
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many prisoners released on temporary licence from Ford Open Prison failed to return in each of the last five years.
tabling member constituency	Bognor Regis and Littlehampton
tabling member printed	Mr Nick Gibb
uin	197782
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 13/05/2014 answer text <p> </p><p> </p><p>The following table shows the number of releases on temporary licence and failures to return recorded at HMP Ford since 2008. Data on failures to return is unavailable before 2009 and centrally held data on temporary releases is unavailable for 2009 and 2010 when a new prison database system was introduced.</p><p> </p><p>Data on temporary release failures for 2013 will be published later this year:</p><p> </p><p><strong>HMP Ford: Release on temporary licence and failures to return </strong></p><table><tbody><tr><td> </td><td><p>2008</p></td><td><p>2009</p></td><td><p>2010</p></td><td><p>2011</p></td><td><p>2012</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Failures to return</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>10</p></td><td><p>12</p></td><td><p>18</p></td><td><p>28</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Temporary releases</p></td><td><p>21,145</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>-</p></td><td><p>24,606</p></td><td><p>33,381</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>Failures on ROTL remain very rare, consistently accounting for less that one tenth of one per cent of all releases, but they are taken seriously. In March, we announced a range of measures to strengthen the existing temporary release provisions to ensure that the right balance is always struck between facilitating resettlement and protecting the public. Under our plans, there will be a more consistent, tougher approach to dealing with ROTL failures and, in the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill, we are seeking to increase the maximum penalty for failing to return from ROTL from six months' to two years' imprisonment.</p> answering member constituency Kenilworth and Southam answering member printed Jeremy Wright question first answered 13/05/2014 12:00:00 answering member 1560 label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Wright
tabling member	111 label Biography information for Nick Gibb

49655

registered interest
date	02/05/2014
answering body	Ministry of Justice
answering dept id	54
answering dept short name	Justice
answering dept sort name	Justice
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many seizures of (a) class A drugs, (b) mobile telephones and (c) knives there were in each high security prison in 2013.
tabling member constituency	Coventry South
tabling member printed	Mr Jim Cunningham
uin	197706
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 13/05/2014 answer text <p> </p><p> </p><p>The National Offender Management Service (NOMS) takes the issue of all contraband in prisons extremely seriously and deploys a comprehensive range of robust searching and security measures to detect items of contraband both at the point of entry to the prison and concealed within the prison. These include targeted searching, random and targeted mandatory drug tests, the use of x-ray machines and CCTV surveillance cameras, Body Orifice Security Scanners to detect contraband secreted internally, and the imposition of closed (non-contact) visits. Prisoners found with prohibited items face swift and robust punishment. This can include having days added to their custody, being transferred to a different prison and losing privileges.</p><p> </p><p>NOMS records seizures of heroin and cocaine in prisons on its Incident Reporting System (IRS). Seizures of any other Class A drug are recorded in a miscellaneous category alongside seizures of other drugs and drug taking paraphernalia. To disaggregate the seizures of other Class A drugs from other seizures recorded in the miscellaneous category would require a manual inspection of each record and would incur disproportionate costs for each area enquired of.</p><p> </p><p>Similarly, seizures of knives and other bladed weapons are also recorded in a miscellaneous category on the IRS, alongside seizures of other contraband, and can only be extracted through a manual inspection of each record. For six of the areas enquired of, such an inspection would incur disproportionate costs.</p><p> </p><p>Data relating to mobile phones seized in prisons in 2013 is being verified and is therefore not available for this response.</p><p> </p><p>The table below gives the number of seizures of heroin, cocaine and knives (including bladed improvised weapons and individual blades) seized in each prison in each area in 2013, where extracting the data would not incur disproportionate cost.</p><p> </p><table><thead><tr><td><p><strong>Establishment Area</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Establishment</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Seizures of Cocaine</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Seizures of Heroin</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>Seizures of knives</strong></p></td></tr></thead><tbody><tr><td rowspan="4"><p>High Security<br>(197706)</p></td><td><p>Belmarsh</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Frankland</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>9</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Manchester</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>19</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Whitemoor</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="6"><p>West Midlands<br>(197707)</p></td><td><p>Birmingham</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td rowspan="6"><p>Disproportionate costs</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dovegate</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Featherstone</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hewell</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Oakwood</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Stafford</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="6"><p>London<br>(197708)</p></td><td><p>Bronzefield</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td rowspan="6"><p>Disproportionate costs</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Feltham</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Pentonville</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Thameside</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wandsworth</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wormwood Scrubs</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="3"><p>Wales<br>(197709)</p></td><td><p>Cardiff</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Parc</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Swansea</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>6</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="7"><p>Kent &amp; Sussex<br>(197710)</p></td><td><p>Elmley</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>9</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ford</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lewes</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Maidstone</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Rochester</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Standford Hill</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Swaleside</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="6"><p>North East<br>(197854)</p></td><td><p>Deerbolt</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Durham</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Holme House</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Kirklevington Grange</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Low Newton</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Northumberland</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="8"><p>Eastern<br>(197855</p></td><td><p>Chelmsford</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td rowspan="8"><p>Disproportionate costs</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Highpoint</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>8</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>The Mount</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Bedford</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Littlehey</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Peterborough Female</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Peterborough Male</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>6</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wayland</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="7"><p>Yorkshire &amp; Humberside<br>(197856)</p></td><td><p>Doncaster</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td rowspan="7"><p>Disproportionate costs</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Everthorpe</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Hull</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Leeds</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lindholme</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wealstun</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Wolds</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="2"><p>South Central<br>(197857)</p></td><td><p>Bullingdon</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>5</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Isle of Wight</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="11"><p>East Midlands<br>(197858)</p></td><td><p>Foston Hall</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td rowspan="11"><p>Disproportionate costs</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Glen parva</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Leicester</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lincoln</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Lowdham Grange</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Morton Hall</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Nottingham</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Ranby</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Rye Hill</p></td><td><p>8</p></td><td><p>9</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Stocken</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Whatton</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="7"><p>South West<br>(197859)</p></td><td><p>Bristol</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dartmoor</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Dorchester</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Eeastwood Park</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Erlestoke</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Exeter</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>7</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Guys Marsh</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td rowspan="10"><p>North West<br>(197860)</p></td><td><p>Altcourse</p></td><td><p>4</p></td><td><p>9</p></td><td rowspan="10"><p>Disproportionate costs</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Buckley Hall</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Forest Bank</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>11</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Garth</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>5</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Haverigg</p></td><td><p>3</p></td><td><p>4</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Kennet</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>0</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Kirkham</p></td><td><p>2</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Preston</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>7</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Risley</p></td><td><p>1</p></td><td><p>1</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Styal</p></td><td><p>0</p></td><td><p>3</p></td></tr></tbody></table><p> </p><p>It is important to note that many drugs are similar in appearance and in many cases drugs seized are not categorically identified by scientific analysis. Some will have been identified using indicative reagent or Marquis tests. Many will have been identified by appearance only.</p><p> </p><p>All figures in this answer have been drawn from live administrative data systems which may be amended at any time. Although care is taken when processing and analysing the returns, the detail collected is subject to the inaccuracies inherent in any large scale recording system. The data are not subject to audit.</p><p> </p> answering member constituency Kenilworth and Southam answering member printed Jeremy Wright question first answered 13/05/2014 12:00:00 answering member 1560 label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Wright
tabling member	308 label Biography information for Mr Jim Cunningham