Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1136362
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-07-02more like thismore than 2019-07-02
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Science: Research more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if he will bring forward legislative proposals to support human-relevant science. more like this
tabling member constituency Crawley more like this
tabling member printed
Henry Smith remove filter
uin 272219 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-07-10more like thismore than 2019-07-10
answer text <p>This Government promotes advances in biomedical science and technologies that include stem cell research, in vitro systems that mimic the function of human organs, imaging and new computer modelling techniques.</p><p>These advances are providing new opportunities to reduce reliance on the use of animals in research. Animals can only be used where there is no practicable alternatives and where the 3Rs (replacement, reduction and refinement) have been fully implemented. There are no plans to legislate for conducting human-relevant science.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Wyre and Preston North remove filter
answering member printed Mr Ben Wallace more like this
question first answered
less than 2019-07-10T15:51:23.123Zmore like thismore than 2019-07-10T15:51:23.123Z
answering member
1539
label Biography information for Mr Ben Wallace more like this
tabling member
3960
label Biography information for Henry Smith more like this
783221
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-11-03more like thismore than 2017-11-03
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Animal Experiments: Licensing more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, with reference to the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986, how many project licence applications the Home Office rejected in 2016, 2015 and 2014. more like this
tabling member constituency Crawley more like this
tabling member printed
Henry Smith remove filter
uin 111372 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-11-14more like thismore than 2017-11-14
answer text <p>The Home Office does not keep records of project licence applications that have been rejected or withdrawn at either the concept or the drafting stage of the application process. The Secretary of State has not rejected any of the recommendations for granting project licences made by the Animals in Science Regulation Unit inspectors between 2014 and 2016.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Wyre and Preston North remove filter
answering member printed Mr Ben Wallace more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-11-14T14:48:45.92Zmore like thismore than 2017-11-14T14:48:45.92Z
answering member
1539
label Biography information for Mr Ben Wallace more like this
tabling member
3960
label Biography information for Henry Smith more like this
783223
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-11-03more like thismore than 2017-11-03
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Animal Experiments more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what proportion of regulated animal procedures conducted in 2016 were funded, or part-funded, by registered charities. more like this
tabling member constituency Crawley more like this
tabling member printed
Henry Smith remove filter
uin 111373 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-11-14more like thismore than 2017-11-14
answer text <p>The Home Office does not hold information on the proportion of regulated animal procedures which are funded, or part-funded, by registered charities.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Wyre and Preston North remove filter
answering member printed Mr Ben Wallace more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-11-14T15:08:03.767Zmore like thismore than 2017-11-14T15:08:03.767Z
answering member
1539
label Biography information for Mr Ben Wallace more like this
tabling member
3960
label Biography information for Henry Smith more like this
783224
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2017-11-03more like thismore than 2017-11-03
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Animal Experiments more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps she is taking to reduce use of live animals in experiments. more like this
tabling member constituency Crawley more like this
tabling member printed
Henry Smith remove filter
uin 111374 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2017-11-14more like thismore than 2017-11-14
answer text <p>The Home Office ensures that animal research and testing is carried out only where no practicable alternative exists, and under controls which keep suffering to the minimum. This is achieved through robustly applying the principles of the 3Rs which require that, in every research proposal, animals are replaced with non-animal alternatives wherever possible; that the number of animals used is reduced to the minimum needed to achieve the results sought; and that, for those animals which must be used, procedures are refined as much as possible to minimise their suffering.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Wyre and Preston North remove filter
answering member printed Mr Ben Wallace more like this
question first answered
less than 2017-11-14T14:47:44.503Zmore like thismore than 2017-11-14T14:47:44.503Z
answering member
1539
label Biography information for Mr Ben Wallace more like this
tabling member
3960
label Biography information for Henry Smith more like this
634140
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-11-11more like thismore than 2016-11-11
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Primates: Animal Experiments more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what recent representations her Department has received from primate users to reassess its prospective assessment of the term severe for non-human primates subjected to head and/or body restriction and water and/or food restriction on neuroscience research. more like this
tabling member constituency Crawley more like this
tabling member printed
Henry Smith remove filter
uin 52551 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-11-29more like thismore than 2016-11-29
answer text <p>The Home Office regulator maintains engagement with the neuroscience community, as recommended by the Weatherall report 2006. To understand the ongoing relevance of primate research the regulator attended meetings in 2016, arranged by funders and neuroscientists, at which severity assessment was discussed. The regulator also engages regularly and pro-actively with the breadth of stakeholders across the life science community through to animal protection and welfare groups.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Wyre and Preston North remove filter
answering member printed Mr Ben Wallace more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-11-29T17:07:02.68Zmore like thismore than 2016-11-29T17:07:02.68Z
answering member
1539
label Biography information for Mr Ben Wallace more like this
tabling member
3960
label Biography information for Henry Smith more like this
634147
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-11-11more like thismore than 2016-11-11
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Primates: Animal Experiments more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, if she will maintain a severity level of severe for procedures on non-human primates involved in neuroscience research that involves restraining the animals by the head and/or body for several hours every day and the use of fluid and/or food restriction while they are forced to undergo repetitive tests. more like this
tabling member constituency Crawley more like this
tabling member printed
Henry Smith remove filter
uin 52552 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-11-29more like thismore than 2016-11-29
answer text <p>During the harm-benefit analysis the Home Office will assign the severity classification in accordance with European Directive 2010/63/EU which has been transposed into the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 (as amended) and is published at:</p><p>https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/consolidated-version-of-aspa-1986</p><p>All non-human primate project licence applications which are potentially severe severity are also considered by the Government’s independent scientific advisory body, the Animals in Science Committee, for scrutiny and advice before a decision is taken on whether, and on what terms, they may be granted.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Wyre and Preston North remove filter
answering member printed Mr Ben Wallace more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-11-29T17:07:24.803Zmore like thismore than 2016-11-29T17:07:24.803Z
answering member
1539
label Biography information for Mr Ben Wallace more like this
tabling member
3960
label Biography information for Henry Smith more like this
634148
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2016-11-11more like thismore than 2016-11-11
answering body
Home Office more like this
answering dept id 1 more like this
answering dept short name Home Office more like this
answering dept sort name Home Office more like this
hansard heading Primates: Animal Experiments more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what criteria her Department applies when considering applications for licencing neuroscience research on (a) non-human primates in general and (b) on primates which involves head and/or body restraint and/or fluid and/or food restriction in particular. more like this
tabling member constituency Crawley more like this
tabling member printed
Henry Smith remove filter
uin 52553 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2016-11-29more like thismore than 2016-11-29
answer text <p>Animal welfare is at the forefront of any decision to use animals in research, and the Regulator requires robust evidence that the research complies fully with the principles of the 3Rs (replacement, refinement and reduction). In addition, Inspectors require a justification for the use of non-human primates, setting out what results they contribute to the project that no other animal could provide.</p><p>Applications which involve head and/or body restraint and/or fluid and/or food restriction also require particular explanation and justification as to why those techniques are needed and how they can be refined to reduce suffering. The Home Office regulator considers every application, including the associated severity assessment, for a project licence on a case by case basis.</p><p>Home Office Inspectors, all with veterinary or medical qualifications, conduct a harm-benefit analysis to ensure that any harm that may be caused to animals is justified by the potential benefits. The regulator has published operational guidance, detailing how project licence applications are assessed, and further advice on how the harm-benefit analysis process applies to all project licence assessments.</p>
answering member constituency Wyre and Preston North remove filter
answering member printed Mr Ben Wallace more like this
question first answered
less than 2016-11-29T17:06:43.307Zmore like thisremove minimum value filter
answering member
1539
label Biography information for Mr Ben Wallace more like this
tabling member
3960
label Biography information for Henry Smith more like this