Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1472798
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-06-23more like thismore than 2022-06-23
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Health Professions: Tax Allowances more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to the Answer of 16 June 2022 to Question 15398 on Tax Allowances: Health Professions, what the Government's policy is on the validity of medics incurring tax charges albeit managed via scheme pays, for inadvertently exceeding annual allowances due to inflation. more like this
tabling member constituency North Down more like this
tabling member printed
Stephen Farry more like this
uin 23816 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The Government is committed to ensuring that hard-working NHS staff do not find themselves reducing their work commitments due to the interaction between their pay, their pension, and the relevant tax regime.</p><p> </p><p>The NHS pension scheme is one of the most generous schemes available, and protects pensions in payment by increasing them by CPI and revalues accrued CARE benefits by CPI+1.5% each year.</p><p> </p><p>Pensions tax relief one of the most expensive reliefs in the personal tax system. In 2019/20 Income Tax relief on total contributions and National Insurance relief on employer contributions for pension savings cost the Exchequer £61 billion, with around 60 per cent of Income Tax relieved at the Higher and Additional rates. The annual allowance helps to ensure that the highest earning pension savers do not receive a disproportionate benefit.</p><p> </p><p>99 per cent of pension savers make annual contributions below £40,000, the level of standard annual allowance which has applied from 2014/15. Individuals who breach the annual allowance on tax-relieved pension savings can also use an option called ‘scheme pays’, under which they can require their pension scheme to pay their annual allowance tax charge now (in return for an actuarially fair reduction in their pension), provided that the annual allowance charge is at least £2,000 and they have exceeded the annual allowance of £40,000. In England and Wales, the NHS Pension Scheme goes further, allowing Scheme Pays to be used on any annual allowance charges relating to accrual in that scheme.</p>
answering member constituency Salisbury remove filter
answering member printed John Glen more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-06-28T13:32:34.007Zmore like thismore than 2022-06-28T13:32:34.007Z
answering member
4051
label Biography information for John Glen more like this
tabling member
4856
label Biography information for Stephen Farry more like this
1472815
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-06-23more like thismore than 2022-06-23
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Mortgages: Interest Rates more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment he has made of the potential effect of trends in the level of interest rates on people who are mortgage prisoners. more like this
tabling member constituency North West Durham more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Richard Holden more like this
uin 23805 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>Ministers and officials meet regularly with industry, trade bodies, and regulators to understand their policies and the impact of the increased cost of living on all mortgage borrowers. I am also in regular contact with mortgage prisoner campaigners about their concerns.</p><p> </p><p>The Treasury continues to work with industry to determine if there are any further solutions which would meaningfully benefit mortgage prisoners and are fair to other borrowers in the wider mortgage market, including those who are also paying variable rates.</p><p> </p><p>The Government continues its efforts to support mortgage borrowers by offering Support for Mortgage Interest (SMI) loans to homeowners in receipt of an income-related benefit to help prevent repossession. Recently, the Prime Minister announced a package of homeownership measures, including changes to SMI Loans. When introduced, these changes will provide support more quickly to homeowners by reducing the qualifying period for SMI loans and remove the ‘zero earnings rule’. There is also protection in place in the courts under the Mortgage Pre-Action Protocol which stipulates that repossession should always be a last resort for lenders.</p><p> </p><p>On the cost of living more broadly, the Government has introduced over £15bn of additional support, targeted particularly at those with the greatest need. This package builds on the over £22bn announced previously, with government support for the cost of living now totalling over £37bn this year. Millions of the most vulnerable households will receive at least £1,200 of one-off support in total this year to help with the cost of living.</p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Salisbury remove filter
answering member printed John Glen more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-06-28T13:17:53.217Zmore like thismore than 2022-06-28T13:17:53.217Z
answering member
4051
label Biography information for John Glen more like this
tabling member
4813
label Biography information for Mr Richard Holden more like this
1472852
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-06-23more like thismore than 2022-06-23
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Cryptocurrencies: Regulation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, pursuant to the Answer of 13 June 2022 to Question 11630 on Cryptocurrencies: Regulation, what assessment he has made of the (a) adequacy of existing skills and qualifications and (b) requirement to acquire further skills of brokers who (i) are already regulated and compliant with Money Laundering Regulations and (ii) do not intend to custody cryptoassets themselves but instead use a registered cryptoasset firm. more like this
tabling member constituency Windsor more like this
tabling member printed
Adam Afriyie more like this
uin 23734 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>It is the responsibility of the FCA to assess whether cryptoasset firms have appropriate anti-money laundering controls.</p><p> </p><p>As part of this assessment, firms must demonstrate they have the necessary skills and qualifications. Firms must also demonstrate they have proper policies and procedures in place to deal with the specific nature of the cryptoasset ecosystem. Where either is assessed to be below the required standard, they may have their application rejected or refused.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>The Money Laundering Regulations established a risk-based approach to the supervision of cryptoasset businesses. The assessment which each firm must undergo is therefore proportionate to the risks generated by the kind of activities firms engage in.</p><p> </p><p>This means that whether the broker holds cryptoassets themselves or uses a registered cryptoasset firm, the skills &amp; procedures required will likely be different from those that a large cryptoasset exchange is expected to demonstrate.</p>
answering member constituency Salisbury remove filter
answering member printed John Glen more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-06-28T13:50:19.997Zmore like thismore than 2022-06-28T13:50:19.997Z
answering member
4051
label Biography information for John Glen more like this
tabling member
1586
label Biography information for Adam Afriyie more like this
1472876
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-06-23more like thismore than 2022-06-23
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury remove filter
hansard heading Safe Hands Plans: Insolvency more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, with reference to funeral plans coming under the the Financial Services Compensation Scheme as of 29 July 2022, whether previous Safe Hands Funeral Plans policy holders will be retrospectively awarded compensation equivalent to what they would be due under the Financial Services Compensation Scheme. more like this
tabling member constituency Midlothian more like this
tabling member printed
Owen Thompson more like this
uin 23776 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>In January 2021, the government legislated to bring all pre-paid funeral plan providers and intermediaries within the regulatory remit of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) from 29 July 2022. This will ensure that, for the first time, consumers are protected by compulsory and robust regulation.</p><p> </p><p>Safe Hands Plans went into administration in March 2022. The government understands that this will be concerning for customers of Safe Hands and continues to monitor the implementation of regulation in this sector closely.</p><p> </p><p>Dignity’s recent commitment to provide ongoing support to Safe Hands’ customers until November 2022 is welcome. This will ensure that any planholders who pass away during this time will receive a funeral without any additional charge.</p><p> </p><p>Prior to the firm going into administration, Safe Hands Plans was not an authorised financial services firm. The Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) is the UK’s compensation scheme of last resort and pays compensation to consumers in respect of claims made in connection with regulated activities when authorised financial services firms fail. Extending the protection of the FSCS – which is funded by a levy on financial services firms – to unregulated firms would send an inappropriate and unhelpful message.</p><p> </p><p>When the pre-paid funeral plan sector comes into regulation on 29 July, FSCS protection will apply for customers of firms that have obtained FCA authorisation, customers whose plans are transferred to such firms, and customers who buy funeral plans from such firms in the future.</p><p> </p>
answering member constituency Salisbury remove filter
answering member printed John Glen more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-06-28T13:22:13.513Zmore like thismore than 2022-06-28T13:22:13.513Z
answering member
4051
label Biography information for John Glen more like this
tabling member
4482
label Biography information for Owen Thompson more like this