Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1104763
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-03-25more like thismore than 2019-03-25
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Reoffenders more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many Serious Further Offence reviews have been reopened in each year since 2010. more like this
tabling member constituency Leeds East remove filter
tabling member printed
Richard Burgon more like this
uin 236511 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-03-29more like thismore than 2019-03-29
answer text <p>Under the Probation Serious Further Offence (SFO) Review Procedures, the National Probation Service (NPS) or Community Rehabilitation Company (CRC) must undertake a review where an offender under statutory supervision in the community is charged with a qualifying offence – a “notification”. Not every notification results in a conviction for an SFO. The NPS or CRC has three months to complete a review and will complete each review unless charges are dropped beforehand.</p><p>SFOs are rare. Fewer than 0.5% of offenders under statutory supervision are convicted of a serious further offence.</p><p>No SFO reviews have been reopened since 2010.</p><p>Data regarding the number of SFO reviews that cited excessive workload as a contributory factor to that offence are not collated as part of the SFO review process and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.</p><p>Data regarding the number of SFO reviews that cited inadequate management supervision as a contributory factor to that offence are not collated as part of the SFO review process and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.</p>
answering member constituency Penrith and The Border remove filter
answering member printed Rory Stewart more like this
grouped question UIN
236512 more like this
236514 remove filter
question first answered
less than 2019-03-29T14:58:25.317Zmore like thismore than 2019-03-29T14:58:25.317Z
answering member
4137
label Biography information for Rory Stewart more like this
tabling member
4493
label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this
1104764
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2019-03-25more like thismore than 2019-03-25
answering body
Ministry of Justice more like this
answering dept id 54 more like this
answering dept short name Justice more like this
answering dept sort name Justice more like this
hansard heading Reoffenders more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, in how many cases Serious Further Offence reviews have cited excessive workload as a contributory factor to that offence. more like this
tabling member constituency Leeds East remove filter
tabling member printed
Richard Burgon more like this
uin 236512 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2019-03-29more like thismore than 2019-03-29
answer text <p>Under the Probation Serious Further Offence (SFO) Review Procedures, the National Probation Service (NPS) or Community Rehabilitation Company (CRC) must undertake a review where an offender under statutory supervision in the community is charged with a qualifying offence – a “notification”. Not every notification results in a conviction for an SFO. The NPS or CRC has three months to complete a review and will complete each review unless charges are dropped beforehand.</p><p>SFOs are rare. Fewer than 0.5% of offenders under statutory supervision are convicted of a serious further offence.</p><p>No SFO reviews have been reopened since 2010.</p><p>Data regarding the number of SFO reviews that cited excessive workload as a contributory factor to that offence are not collated as part of the SFO review process and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.</p><p>Data regarding the number of SFO reviews that cited inadequate management supervision as a contributory factor to that offence are not collated as part of the SFO review process and could be obtained only at disproportionate cost.</p>
answering member constituency Penrith and The Border remove filter
answering member printed Rory Stewart more like this
grouped question UIN
236511 more like this
236514 remove filter
question first answered
less than 2019-03-29T14:58:25.367Zmore like thismore than 2019-03-29T14:58:25.367Z
answering member
4137
label Biography information for Rory Stewart more like this
tabling member
4493
label Biography information for Richard Burgon more like this