Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1254902
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-11-24more like thismore than 2020-11-24
answering body
Attorney General more like this
answering dept id 88 more like this
answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
hansard heading Poaching: Prosecutions more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Attorney General, for what reason a record of the species involved is not collated when recording prosecutions of poaching offences. more like this
tabling member constituency Cambridge remove filter
tabling member printed
Daniel Zeichner more like this
uin 120068 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-12-01more like thismore than 2020-12-01
answer text <p>Offences of poaching are usually charged under one of the following:</p><ul><li>Section 1 of the Night Poaching Act 1828,</li><li>section 30 of the Game Act 1831 or</li><li>section 2 of the Poaching Prevention Act 1862.</li></ul><p> </p><p>There is no requirement to specify in an offence which type of animal the defendant was seeking to take or had taken, and in many cases it is not specified.</p><p> </p><p>Therefore, the CPS is not able to keep any records of which species are involved in its prosecutions for poaching.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Northampton North remove filter
answering member printed Michael Ellis more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-12-01T17:40:28.85Zmore like thismore than 2020-12-01T17:40:28.85Z
answering member
4116
label Biography information for Sir Michael Ellis more like this
tabling member
4382
label Biography information for Daniel Zeichner more like this