Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1504981
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-09-05more like thismore than 2022-09-05
answering body
Attorney General more like this
answering dept id 88 more like this
answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
hansard heading Committee of Privileges more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Attorney General, whether her office was consulted on the decisions by the Cabinet Office to (a) spend public funds on obtaining the legal opinion by Lord Pannick QC and Jason Pobjoy of Blackstone Chambers relating to the proposed conduct of the House of Commons Privileges Committee and (b) place that legal opinion in the public domain. more like this
tabling member constituency Islington South and Finsbury more like this
tabling member printed
Emily Thornberry more like this
uin 47398 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-09-08more like thismore than 2022-09-08
answer text <table><tbody><tr><td><p>The decision in any case as to whether to instruct counsel, who to instruct, and whether to waive privilege in respect of that advice, lies with the instructing Government Department. When a Government Department wishes to instruct a QC, other than First Treasury Counsel or Standing Counsel, it should submit a request for a nomination to the Attorney General’s Office. This process was followed, and the request approved, in relation to the instruction of Lord Pannick QC in this case.</p></td></tr></tbody></table> more like this
answering member constituency Northampton North remove filter
answering member printed Michael Ellis more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-09-08T12:20:20.74Zmore like thismore than 2022-09-08T12:20:20.74Z
answering member
4116
label Biography information for Sir Michael Ellis more like this
tabling member
1536
label Biography information for Emily Thornberry more like this
1503594
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-09-02more like thismore than 2022-09-02
answering body
Attorney General more like this
answering dept id 88 more like this
answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
hansard heading Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Attorney General, how much the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) spent on the (a) prosecution trials brought against ENRC and (b) SFO defence against ENRC counter claims lawsuit. more like this
tabling member constituency Hammersmith more like this
tabling member printed
Andy Slaughter more like this
uin 45309 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-09-08more like thismore than 2022-09-08
answer text <table><tbody><tr><td><p>The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has an ongoing investigation into ENRC. There are no prosecutions, and therefore no associated costs, at this stage. The ENRC have brought two civil actions for alleged misfeasance against the SFO. This matter remains ongoing and as such the final costs are not yet determined.</p></td></tr></tbody></table> more like this
answering member constituency Northampton North remove filter
answering member printed Michael Ellis more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-09-08T11:57:47.123Zmore like thismore than 2022-09-08T11:57:47.123Z
answering member
4116
label Biography information for Sir Michael Ellis more like this
tabling member
1516
label Biography information for Andy Slaughter more like this
1503595
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-09-02more like thismore than 2022-09-02
answering body
Attorney General more like this
answering dept id 88 more like this
answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
hansard heading Serious Fraud Office more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Attorney General, how much her Department spent on the (a) Calvert-Smith review and (b) Altman review of the Serious Fraud Office. more like this
tabling member constituency Hammersmith more like this
tabling member printed
Andy Slaughter more like this
uin 45319 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-09-08more like thismore than 2022-09-08
answer text <p>The costs of Sir David Calvert-Smith’s independent review into the Serious Fraud Office’s (SFO) handling of the Unaoil case (<em>R. v Akle &amp; Anor</em>), which was commissioned by the Attorney General, are still being finalised. The costs to date to the Attorney General’s Office are £84,571.90. There are some costs outstanding, but it is anticipated these will not increase the overall cost of the review significantly. The total costs will be recovered from the SFO.</p><p> </p><p>The cost of Brian Altman QC’s independent review of the collapse of <em>R v. Woods &amp; Marshall</em>, which was commissioned by the Director of the SFO, was £359,442.37. This was paid for by the SFO.</p><p> </p><p>Both reviews presented valuable recommendations and the implementation of these remain a priority for the Law Officers and the Director of the SFO.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Northampton North remove filter
answering member printed Michael Ellis more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-09-08T12:00:36.473Zmore like thismore than 2022-09-08T12:00:36.473Z
answering member
4116
label Biography information for Sir Michael Ellis more like this
tabling member
1516
label Biography information for Andy Slaughter more like this
1503596
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-09-02more like thismore than 2022-09-02
answering body
Attorney General more like this
answering dept id 88 more like this
answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
hansard heading Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Attorney General, how much the Serious Fraud Office spent on the (a) Employment Tribunal and (b) subsequent appeal brought by a former ENRC case-controller who was dismissed. more like this
tabling member constituency Hammersmith more like this
tabling member printed
Andy Slaughter more like this
uin 45321 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-09-08more like thismore than 2022-09-08
answer text <table><tbody><tr><td><p>An Employment Tribunal has not been brought by a former ENRC case-controller against the Serious Fraud Office.</p></td></tr></tbody></table> more like this
answering member constituency Northampton North remove filter
answering member printed Michael Ellis more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-09-08T12:17:17.98Zmore like thismore than 2022-09-08T12:17:17.98Z
answering member
4116
label Biography information for Sir Michael Ellis more like this
tabling member
1516
label Biography information for Andy Slaughter more like this