Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1503484
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-09-02more like thismore than 2022-09-02
answering body
Attorney General more like this
answering dept id 88 more like this
answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
hansard heading Rape: Prosecutions more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Attorney General, how many (a) males and (b) females have been charged with the offence of rape in England in each of the last three years. more like this
tabling member constituency Hendon more like this
tabling member printed
Dr Matthew Offord more like this
uin 45119 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <table><tbody><tr><td><p>The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) does not hold any data which shows the number of suspects charged with the offence of rape. However, management information is held showing the number of suspects charged, by sex, flagged as involving allegations of rape where the CPS authorised a charge and a prosecution has commenced in each of the last three years ending March 2022. The table below shows the number of decisions to charge, in rape flagged cases by the sex of suspects, where this has been identified. <table><tbody><tr><td><p><strong>2019-2020</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2020-2021</strong></p></td><td><p><strong>2021-2022</strong></p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Female</p></td><td><p>22</p></td><td><p>41</p></td><td><p>24</p></td></tr><tr><td><p>Male</p></td><td><p>1,831</p></td><td><p>1,905</p></td><td><p>2,179</p></td></tr><tr><td colspan="3"><p>Data Source: CPS Case Management Information System</p></td></tr></tbody></table>Decisions to charge are where CPS is satisfied that the legal test for prosecution, set out in the Code for Crown Prosecutors is met: there is enough evidence to provide a ‘realistic prospect of conviction’ against each defendant and the prosecution is in the public interest.</p></td></tr></tbody></table>
answering member constituency Northampton North remove filter
answering member printed Michael Ellis more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-09-08T12:03:57.297Zmore like thismore than 2022-09-08T12:03:57.297Z
answering member
4116
label Biography information for Sir Michael Ellis more like this
tabling member
4006
label Biography information for Dr Matthew Offord more like this
1503594
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-09-02more like thismore than 2022-09-02
answering body
Attorney General more like this
answering dept id 88 more like this
answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
hansard heading Eurasian Natural Resources Corporation more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Attorney General, how much the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) spent on the (a) prosecution trials brought against ENRC and (b) SFO defence against ENRC counter claims lawsuit. more like this
tabling member constituency Hammersmith more like this
tabling member printed
Andy Slaughter more like this
uin 45309 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <table><tbody><tr><td><p>The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has an ongoing investigation into ENRC. There are no prosecutions, and therefore no associated costs, at this stage. The ENRC have brought two civil actions for alleged misfeasance against the SFO. This matter remains ongoing and as such the final costs are not yet determined.</p></td></tr></tbody></table> more like this
answering member constituency Northampton North remove filter
answering member printed Michael Ellis more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-09-08T11:57:47.123Zmore like thismore than 2022-09-08T11:57:47.123Z
answering member
4116
label Biography information for Sir Michael Ellis more like this
tabling member
1516
label Biography information for Andy Slaughter more like this
1503595
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-09-02more like thismore than 2022-09-02
answering body
Attorney General more like this
answering dept id 88 more like this
answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
hansard heading Serious Fraud Office more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Attorney General, how much her Department spent on the (a) Calvert-Smith review and (b) Altman review of the Serious Fraud Office. more like this
tabling member constituency Hammersmith more like this
tabling member printed
Andy Slaughter more like this
uin 45319 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <p>The costs of Sir David Calvert-Smith’s independent review into the Serious Fraud Office’s (SFO) handling of the Unaoil case (<em>R. v Akle &amp; Anor</em>), which was commissioned by the Attorney General, are still being finalised. The costs to date to the Attorney General’s Office are £84,571.90. There are some costs outstanding, but it is anticipated these will not increase the overall cost of the review significantly. The total costs will be recovered from the SFO.</p><p> </p><p>The cost of Brian Altman QC’s independent review of the collapse of <em>R v. Woods &amp; Marshall</em>, which was commissioned by the Director of the SFO, was £359,442.37. This was paid for by the SFO.</p><p> </p><p>Both reviews presented valuable recommendations and the implementation of these remain a priority for the Law Officers and the Director of the SFO.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Northampton North remove filter
answering member printed Michael Ellis more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-09-08T12:00:36.473Zmore like thismore than 2022-09-08T12:00:36.473Z
answering member
4116
label Biography information for Sir Michael Ellis more like this
tabling member
1516
label Biography information for Andy Slaughter more like this
1504304
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-09-02more like thismore than 2022-09-02
answering body
Attorney General more like this
answering dept id 88 more like this
answering dept short name Attorney General more like this
answering dept sort name Attorney General more like this
hansard heading Attorney General: Data Protection more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Attorney General, how many data incidents her Department (a) recorded and (b) reported to the Information Commissioner's Office in (i) 2018-19, (ii) 2019-20 and (iii) 2020-21. more like this
tabling member constituency Newport West more like this
tabling member printed
Ruth Jones more like this
uin 46067 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer remove filter
answer text <table><tbody><tr><td><p>The Attorney General’s Office have had no data incidents recorded or reported to the Information Commissioner's Office in (i) 2018-19, (ii) 2019-20 and (iii) 2020-21.</p></td></tr></tbody></table> more like this
answering member constituency Northampton North remove filter
answering member printed Michael Ellis more like this
question first answered
remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2022-09-08T12:06:35.807Z
answering member
4116
label Biography information for Sir Michael Ellis more like this
tabling member
4716
label Biography information for Ruth Jones more like this