Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1521429
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-10-12more like thismore than 2022-10-12
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Tax Avoidance remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, for what reason HMRC pursues employees complicit in the use of loan schemes and not employers. more like this
tabling member constituency Edinburgh South more like this
tabling member printed
Ian Murray more like this
uin 61847 remove filter
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-10-21more like thismore than 2022-10-21
answer text <p>Where an employee has used a disguised remuneration (DR) scheme, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) will go to the employer to settle the tax due in the first instance. Approximately 80 per cent of the £3.4 billion HMRC brought into charge through DR settlements, between March 2016 and the end of March 2022, was from employers.</p><p> </p><p>Liability for the tax is always that of the individual and HMRC will consider other options when collection from the employer is not possible, such as when the employer no longer exists or is based offshore. Parliament has provided a range of statutory powers allowing HMRC, in certain circumstances, to collect the amount due from the employee.</p> more like this
answering member constituency North East Bedfordshire remove filter
answering member printed Richard Fuller more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-10-21T12:22:16.443Zmore like thismore than 2022-10-21T12:22:16.443Z
answering member
3912
label Biography information for Richard Fuller more like this
tabling member
3966
label Biography information for Ian Murray more like this