Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1519380
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2022-10-10more like thismore than 2022-10-10
answering body
Treasury more like this
answering dept id 14 more like this
answering dept short name Treasury more like this
answering dept sort name Treasury more like this
hansard heading Tax Avoidance remove filter
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what estimate HM Revenue and Customs has made of the proportion of tax evaded through disguised remuneration schemes that will be paid by entities that recommended, promoted and operated those schemes. more like this
tabling member constituency Richmond Park more like this
tabling member printed
Sarah Olney more like this
uin 59955 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2022-10-18more like thismore than 2022-10-18
answer text <p>Disguised remuneration (DR) avoidance schemes seek to avoid tax that is due from those that use them, so action to counteract this involves a tax charge on the scheme user, rather than the promoter or enablers of such schemes.</p><p> </p><p>Where the user was employed, HMRC will go to the employer to settle the tax due or collect the Loan Charge in the first instance. Where collection from an employer is not possible, such as when the employer no longer exists or is based offshore, HMRC considers other options to collect the tax due. Approximately 80 per cent of the £3.4 billion HMRC brought into charge through DR settlements between Budget 2016 and the end of March 2022 was from employers.</p><p> </p><p>The Government and HMRC are committed to tackling promoters and enablers of tax avoidance schemes. HMRC can charge enablers of defeated tax avoidance schemes penalties of up to 100 per cent of the fees earned, and legislation included in Finance Acts 2021 and 2022 strengthens and accelerates this power and other measures to tackle promoters and enablers. The First-Tier Tribunal has recently imposed a penalty on a promoter for failing to disclose a scheme under the Disclosure of Tax Avoidance Schemes (DOTAS) regime in excess of £1 million.</p>
answering member constituency North East Bedfordshire remove filter
answering member printed Richard Fuller more like this
grouped question UIN 59971 more like this
question first answered
less than 2022-10-18T12:44:37.323Zmore like thismore than 2022-10-18T12:44:37.323Z
answering member
3912
label Biography information for Richard Fuller more like this
tabling member
4591
label Biography information for Sarah Olney remove filter