Linked Data API

Show Search Form

Search Results

1196582
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-05-18more like thismore than 2020-05-18
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 remove filter
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Ministry of Defence: Chief Scientific Advisers more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many meetings he had with his Department’s Chief Scientific Adviser (a) from 1 September to 30 November 2019 and (b) from 1 December 2019 to 29 February 2020. more like this
tabling member constituency Tunbridge Wells more like this
tabling member printed
Greg Clark more like this
uin 48358 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-05-21more like thismore than 2020-05-21
answer text <p>Between 1 September 2019 and 29 February 2020, one bilateral meeting was held between the Secretary of State for Defence and the Ministry of Defence (MOD) Chief Scientific Adviser. Additionally the Secretary of State for Defence and the MOD Chief Scientific Adviser meet regularly in group briefings.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Horsham remove filter
answering member printed Jeremy Quin more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-05-21T14:47:00.943Zmore like thismore than 2020-05-21T14:47:00.943Z
answering member
4507
label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Quin more like this
tabling member
1578
label Biography information for Greg Clark more like this
1196033
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-05-15more like thismore than 2020-05-15
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 remove filter
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Maritime Patrol Aircraft: Procurement more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to the retirement of the RAF Nimrod fleet, for what reason the UK has not replaced its maritime surveillance capability; and what assessment he has made of (a) the disadvantages of the lack of UK maritime patrol aircraft, (b) when such capability could be restored, and (c) the requirement to restore the capability. more like this
tabling member constituency New Forest East more like this
tabling member printed
Dr Julian Lewis more like this
uin 47165 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-05-20more like thismore than 2020-05-20
answer text <p>In the 2015 Strategic Defence and Security Review, the Government confirmed that it would close the Maritime Patrol Aircraft capability gap with the procurement of nine Boeing P-8A Poseidon aircraft. The UK's first aircraft was delivered to the Royal Air Force in October 2019 and we declared an initial operating capability on 1 April 2020.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Horsham remove filter
answering member printed Jeremy Quin more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-05-20T07:44:21.27Zmore like thismore than 2020-05-20T07:44:21.27Z
answering member
4507
label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Quin more like this
tabling member
54
label Biography information for Sir Julian Lewis more like this
1196204
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-05-15more like thismore than 2020-05-15
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 remove filter
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading F-35 Aircraft more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what assessment he has made of the suitability of the F-35 Lightening II for long periods of supersonic flight. more like this
tabling member constituency Carmarthen East and Dinefwr more like this
tabling member printed
Jonathan Edwards more like this
uin 47244 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-05-20more like thismore than 2020-05-20
answer text <p>When required, the Lightning can cruise at supersonic speed for long periods. However operationally, like most modern combat fast jets, supersonic speeds would only be used in limited tactical situations and would only be required for short bursts; the vast majority of its tactical employment is predicated around subsonic operating speeds. As a result, it is highly unlikely that Lightning would need to be routinely flown at supersonic speed for sustained periods.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Horsham remove filter
answering member printed Jeremy Quin more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-05-20T07:30:53.44Zmore like thismore than 2020-05-20T07:30:53.44Z
answering member
4507
label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Quin more like this
tabling member
3943
label Biography information for Jonathan Edwards more like this
1196264
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-05-15more like thismore than 2020-05-15
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 remove filter
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Sentinel Aircraft more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, in which (a) conventional and (b) counterinsurgency campaigns Sentinel aircraft have seen action since their entry into service; what the original design life of each Sentinel aircraft is, and by how much this can practicably be increased by a life extension project; whether the UK possesses alternative systems that can provide (i) strategic and (ii) tactical surveillance coverage over land equivalent to that currently provided by Sentinel; and how future land campaigns will adequately be conducted if a capability gap is created by the retirement of the Sentinel fleet. more like this
tabling member constituency New Forest East more like this
tabling member printed
Dr Julian Lewis more like this
uin 47167 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-05-21more like thismore than 2020-05-21
answer text <p>The Sentinel R1 has been operationally deployed in support of a number of operations. Some operations are considered to be both conventional and counter-insurgency; for example operations in Afghanistan (Op HERRICK) and Iraq (Op SHADER). It has also been deployed on operations in Libya (Op ELLAMY), Nigeria (Op TURUS) and Mali (Op NEWCOMBE), all considered conventional operations.</p><p> </p><p>Sentinel was introduced in 2008 in the knowledge that a significant equipment upgrade would be required in the mid 2010’s.</p><p> </p><p>The Defence Review in 2010 cancelled this expected upgrade bringing forward the likely out of service date.</p><p> </p><p>The SDSR 2015 determined that Sentinel should be retained for a further period and set a new out of service date of March 2021. While some work was conducted on the on-board equipment this fell well short of a full system upgrade.</p><p> </p><p>The radar and mission system are now increasingly obsolescent and will face increasing reliability issues as time progresses.</p><p> </p><p>Retaining the capability would have required significant upgrade expenditure and the March 2021 out of service date has been retained.</p><p> </p><p>No identical capability is operated by the UK (though similar capabilities exist in the NATO inventory).</p><p> </p><p>The UK does however have a number of other intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities that collect different types of intelligence information, including long-range strategic assets (Sentry, Rivet Joint and Poseidon) and shorter-range more tactically-focused assets (including Shadow, Reaper and Watchkeeper).</p>
answering member constituency Horsham remove filter
answering member printed Jeremy Quin more like this
question first answered
remove maximum value filtermore like thismore than 2020-05-21T17:08:47.523Z
answering member
4507
label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Quin more like this
previous answer version
23097
answering member constituency Horsham more like this
answering member printed Jeremy Quin more like this
answering member
4507
label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Quin more like this
tabling member
54
label Biography information for Sir Julian Lewis more like this
1195550
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-05-13more like thismore than 2020-05-13
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 remove filter
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Royal Fleet Auxiliary: Tankers more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, with reference to the former Secretary of State for Defence's keynote speech at the Sea Power Conference on 15 May 2019, what progress he has made on (a) commissioning and (b) setting a timescale for completion for work examining the lessons from the Mars tanker procurement; and if he will place a report of the findings of that work in the House of Commons Library. more like this
tabling member constituency Wentworth and Dearne more like this
tabling member printed
John Healey more like this
uin 46552 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-05-20more like thismore than 2020-05-20
answer text <p>For details of the schedule for the MARS (Tide Class) Tanker Learning from Experience report, I refer the hon. Member to the answer given by the then Minister for Defence Procurement (Anne-Marie Trevelyan) on 4 September 2019 to Question 286672 to the right Hon. Member for North Durham (Kevan Jones).</p><p> </p><p>I also refer the hon. Member to the answer I gave to the hon. Member for Warley (John Spellar) on 18 May 2020 in response to Question 45955.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Horsham remove filter
answering member printed Jeremy Quin more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-05-20T07:38:27.55Zmore like thismore than 2020-05-20T07:38:27.55Z
answering member
4507
label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Quin more like this
attachment
1
file name Hansard Extracts.docx more like this
title Royal Fleet Auxiliary more like this
tabling member
400
label Biography information for John Healey more like this
1195551
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-05-13more like thismore than 2020-05-13
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 remove filter
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Fleet Solid Support Ships: Procurement more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what progress he has made on the procurement of the Fleet Solid Support ships. more like this
tabling member constituency Wentworth and Dearne more like this
tabling member printed
John Healey more like this
uin 46553 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-05-18more like thismore than 2020-05-18
answer text <p>I refer the hon. Member to the answer given by my noble Friend, the Minister of State at the Ministry of Defence (Baroness Goldie of Bishopton), on 10 March 2020 to Question HL2182 in the House of Lords.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Horsham remove filter
answering member printed Jeremy Quin more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-05-18T16:43:46.717Zmore like thismore than 2020-05-18T16:43:46.717Z
answering member
4507
label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Quin more like this
attachment
1
file name HL2182 - Royal Fleet Auxillary (2).docx more like this
title HL2182 - Royal Fleet Auxilliary more like this
tabling member
400
label Biography information for John Healey more like this
1195693
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-05-13more like thismore than 2020-05-13
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 remove filter
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Dstl: Animal Experiments more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, further to Answer of 13 May 2020 to Question 43761, on Animal Experiments: Porton Down, for what reasons infant marmosets are not reared on site prior to re-homing. more like this
tabling member constituency East Lothian more like this
tabling member printed
Kenny MacAskill more like this
uin 46803 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-05-21more like thismore than 2020-05-21
answer text <p>Infant marmosets are reared on site within their family group where the family are able to do this successfully. In captivity, larger litter sizes (for example triplets) are more frequent and some marmoset families are not able to successfully rear triplets. Optimal family group welfare is maintained, where appropriate, by euthanasia of some infants to reduce litter size down to a number that the family can rear. The decision to reduce litter size is made on a case by case basis, under veterinary supervision. It would not be appropriate to hand rear marmoset infants away from their families (on site or anywhere else) as their physical and psychological welfare needs could not be met in these circumstances.</p><p> </p> more like this
answering member constituency Horsham remove filter
answering member printed Jeremy Quin more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-05-21T13:07:04.107Zmore like thismore than 2020-05-21T13:07:04.107Z
answering member
4507
label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Quin more like this
tabling member
4772
label Biography information for Kenny MacAskill more like this
1195152
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-05-12more like thismore than 2020-05-12
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 remove filter
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Royal Fleet Auxiliary: Tankers more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, if he will place in the Library his Department's report on the Tide-force vessels contract. more like this
tabling member constituency Warley more like this
tabling member printed
John Spellar more like this
uin 45955 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-05-18more like thismore than 2020-05-18
answer text <p>Careful consideration has been given as to whether the MARS (Tide Class) Tanker Lessons Learnt report can be made public at this time. It has been concluded that it cannot as its disclosure would be prejudicial to the formulation of Government policy and commercial interests.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Horsham remove filter
answering member printed Jeremy Quin more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-05-18T16:13:20.48Zmore like thismore than 2020-05-18T16:13:20.48Z
answering member
4507
label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Quin more like this
tabling member
318
label Biography information for John Spellar more like this
1193662
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-05-06more like thismore than 2020-05-06
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 remove filter
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Rifles more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many Lee Enfield No.8 small bore target rifles his Department has destroyed in the last five years; and whether his Department plans to destroy any more of those rifles. more like this
tabling member constituency North Durham more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Kevan Jones more like this
uin 43845 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-05-12more like thismore than 2020-05-12
answer text <p>The Ministry of Defence (MOD) Warehouse Management System records that twelve Lee Enfield No.8 small bore target rifles were destroyed in the last five years. The MOD is examining possible disposal options for the remaining rifles, although no decisions have yet been made.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Horsham remove filter
answering member printed Jeremy Quin more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-05-12T16:23:57.487Zmore like thismore than 2020-05-12T16:23:57.487Z
answering member
4507
label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Quin more like this
tabling member
1438
label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones more like this
1193747
registered interest false more like this
date less than 2020-05-06more like thismore than 2020-05-06
answering body
Ministry of Defence more like this
answering dept id 11 remove filter
answering dept short name Defence more like this
answering dept sort name Defence more like this
hansard heading Type 45 Destroyers: Repairs and Maintenance more like this
house id 1 more like this
legislature
25259
pref label House of Commons more like this
question text To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what the cost of the Type 45 Upkeep 2020 programme was (a) in total and (b) by sub-system (i) Sampson upgrade, (ii) LRR upgrade, and (iii) PIP project. more like this
tabling member constituency North Durham more like this
tabling member printed
Mr Kevan Jones more like this
uin 43846 more like this
answer
answer
is ministerial correction false more like this
date of answer less than 2020-05-12more like thismore than 2020-05-12
answer text <p>The total overall cost of the Type 45 Destroyer Upkeep programme in Financial Year 2019-20 was approximately £38.5 million. There were no upgrades to either the Sampson or Long Range Radar systems. However, the cost of planned routine overhaul of these systems amounted to some £400,000.</p><p> </p><p>The Power Improvement Project is not part of the Upkeep programme, but expenditure on the project during Financial Year 2019-20 amounted to some £11.6 million.</p> more like this
answering member constituency Horsham remove filter
answering member printed Jeremy Quin more like this
question first answered
less than 2020-05-12T14:31:31.207Zmore like thismore than 2020-05-12T14:31:31.207Z
answering member
4507
label Biography information for Sir Jeremy Quin more like this
tabling member
1438
label Biography information for Mr Kevan Jones more like this