Show Search Form

Search Results

registered interest	true false
date	exactly: or between: and
answering body
answering dept id
answering dept short name
answering dept sort name
hansard heading
house id
legislature	pref label
question text
tabling member constituency
tabling member printed
uin
answer	is ministerial correction true false date of answer exactly: or between: and answer text answering member constituency answering member printed grouped question UIN question first answered answering member label
tabling member	label

Search

1354285

registered interest
date	09/09/2021
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme: Aviation
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment he has made of the potential effect of the end of the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme on employment in the airline sector.
tabling member constituency	Ellesmere Port and Neston
tabling member printed	Justin Madders
uin	45862
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 14/09/2021 answer text <p>The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme was designed as a temporary, economy-wide measure to support businesses while widespread restrictions were in place. Closing the scheme at the end of September is designed to strike the right balance between supporting the economy as it opens up, continuing to provide support and protect incomes, and ensuring that incentives are in place to get people back to work as demand returns.  This approach has worked; the OBR have estimated that without the short-term fiscal easing announced in the Budget, and in particular the CJRS extension, unemployment would have been about 300,000 higher in the fourth quarter of this year than the 2.2 million in the central forecast.</p><p> </p><p>The Government recognises the particular challenges that the travel industry has faced as a result of COVID-19. In England travel agents have recently benefited from Restart Grants worth up to £6,000, and can continue to benefit from the £2 billion of discretionary grant funding that has been made available to local authorities in England through the Additional Restrictions Grant (ARG). Furthermore, the travel sector is being supported with over £12 billion that has been made available through loan guarantees and support for exporters. In addition, airports continue to benefit from the renewed Airport and Ground Operations Support Scheme announced at Budget.</p><p> </p><p>The Global Travel Taskforce (GTT) report sets out a clear framework for the Government’s objective of establishing a safe and sustainable return to international travel, which is key to enabling the sector’s recovery. It has been created following extensive engagement with the international travel and tourism industries, and changes following the recent checkpoint review of the GTT are a vital step in enabling the recovery of travel operators and those whose jobs rely on the travel industry.</p><p> </p><p>The Government has shown throughout the pandemic that it is prepared to adapt support if the path of the virus changes. It continues to engage closely with sectors across the economy, including the travel industry, in order to understand their recovery horizons as the vaccine is rolled out and restrictions ease.</p> answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire answering member printed Jesse Norman grouped question UIN 45955 question first answered 14/09/2021 15:02:37 answering member 3991 label Biography information for Jesse Norman
tabling member	4418 label Biography information for Justin Madders

1316388

registered interest
date	19/05/2021
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Taxation: Rebates
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many overpaid tax refunds have been refunded within three weeks in the most recent period for which figures are available; and what the average refund time is.
tabling member constituency	Ellesmere Port and Neston
tabling member printed	Justin Madders
uin	3930
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 27/05/2021 answer text <p>Information in the form requested is not readily available and could only be obtained at disproportionate cost.</p> answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire answering member printed Jesse Norman question first answered 27/05/2021 14:25:50 answering member 3991 label Biography information for Jesse Norman
tabling member	4418 label Biography information for Justin Madders

1311606

registered interest
date	22/04/2021
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Tax Avoidance
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what discussions his Department has held with relevant stakeholders on the Upper Tribunal decision of 12 April 2021 in the context of the Government's policy on people subject to the Loan Charge.
tabling member constituency	Ellesmere Port and Neston
tabling member printed	Justin Madders
uin	185954
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 29/04/2021 answer text <p>HMRC are carefully considering the Upper Tribunal decision of 12 April.</p><p> </p><p>The decision does not affect the Loan Charge legislation which was subject to an independent review in 2019. The Independent Loan Charge Review assessed the impact of the Loan Charge policy on affected taxpayers. Its careful and considered report found that it was right to tackle disguised remuneration tax avoidance schemes and that everyone should pay their fair share of tax.</p><p> </p><p>The report also examined the question of from when the Loan Charge should apply and concluded that the law about the tax treatment of DR loan schemes was clear from 9 December 2010. This was when draft legislation was published setting out that income provided through schemes using third parties, such as loan schemes, would be subject to Income Tax and NICs.</p> answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire answering member printed Jesse Norman question first answered 29/04/2021 09:34:36 answering member 3991 label Biography information for Jesse Norman
tabling member	4418 label Biography information for Justin Madders

1301969

registered interest
date	11/03/2021
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, how many employers who have accessed the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme have made staff redundant in each month since April 2020.
tabling member constituency	Ellesmere Port and Neston
tabling member printed	Justin Madders
uin	167241
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 19/03/2021 answer text <p>HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) do not hold information on which employees have been made redundant.</p><p> </p><p>HMRC publish statistics on the Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) for each month of the scheme. Alongside this, HMRC have published secondary analysis of furloughs that have ended. This shows that 90% of employees who stopped being furloughed between April 2020 and July 2020 were still on their original payroll in August 2020. However, this analysis does not distinguish between employees who chose to leave their jobs and those that were made redundant. The publication can be found on GOV.UK:</p><p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/coronavirus-job-retention-scheme-statistics-secondary-analysis" target="_blank">https://www.gov.uk/government/statistics/coronavirus-job-retention-scheme-statistics-secondary-analysis</a>.</p> answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire answering member printed Jesse Norman question first answered 19/03/2021 11:50:02 answering member 3991 label Biography information for Jesse Norman
tabling member	4418 label Biography information for Justin Madders

1299178

registered interest
date	03/03/2021
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what discussions he has had with relevant stakeholders in affected sectors on the effect of the 31 October 2020 cut-off date for the Coronavirus Job Retention scheme on (a) employee retention and (b) business costs.
tabling member constituency	Ellesmere Port and Neston
tabling member printed	Justin Madders
uin	162631
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 12/03/2021 answer text <p>The Government has worked extensively with a wide variety of organisations, across sectors and all over the country. This includes businesses, representative and trade bodies, and the unions.</p><p> </p><p>At the recent Budget, in response to calls from businesses, the Chancellor announced an extension to the CJRS until the end of September. The OBR expects 1.8 million fewer people to be unemployed than they forecast in July last year because of the CJRS and other Government interventions.</p><p> </p><p>The use of Real Time Information (RTI) allows HMRC to verify claims in the most efficient and timely way, ensuring payments can be made quickly while reducing the risk of fraud. The Government has extended the RTI cut-off date to ensure as many businesses as possible are brought into scope, balancing the risk of fraud that existed as soon as the scheme became public. From 1 May, an employer can claim for any employee for whom they have made an RTI submission to HMRC between 20 March 2020 and 2 March 2021, notifying a payment of earnings for that employee.</p> answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire answering member printed Jesse Norman question first answered 12/03/2021 11:56:44 answering member 3991 label Biography information for Jesse Norman
tabling member	4418 label Biography information for Justin Madders

1299334

registered interest
date	03/03/2021
answering body	Treasury
answering dept id	14
answering dept short name	Treasury
answering dept sort name	Treasury
hansard heading	Secondhand Goods: VAT
house id	1
legislature	25259 pref label House of Commons
question text	To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer, what assessment he has made of the potential merits of reducing import VAT on second hand goods.
tabling member constituency	Ellesmere Port and Neston
tabling member printed	Justin Madders
uin	162637
answer	answer is ministerial correction date of answer 12/03/2021 answer text <p>The Government is committed to protecting UK high street businesses from VAT-free imports and as such, it is important that it maintains a robust system of VAT collection at the border. Furthermore, VAT makes a significant contribution towards the public finances, and any reduction to import VAT on second-hand goods would have to be balanced by increases in taxes elsewhere, or reductions in Government spending.</p><p> </p><p>Therefore, while the Government keeps all taxes under review, there are currently no plans to alter the VAT treatment of imports of second-hand goods.</p> answering member constituency Hereford and South Herefordshire answering member printed Jesse Norman question first answered 12/03/2021 12:01:36 answering member 3991 label Biography information for Jesse Norman
tabling member	4418 label Biography information for Justin Madders